|
Hello. I was wondering if posts in Off-topic sub-forum are not counted in to total posts? If they are not - I'm wondering why? Because I think you still get the signature shown there to the same BitcoinTalk.org members that use Bitcoin in general..
|
|
|
|
Honestly I never knew that signatures pays that well. If I would make 20 quality posts per day, I would earn almost the same amount as I earn in my daily job.  Great way to save some money, thanks for the opportunity Yobit! |
|
|
|
|
There is no scientific proof that God exists, however there are many NDE cases. I would say first what is needed to be researched are NDE's (near death experiences, where people often claim that they have met deceased loved one's & a bright light that they usually describe as God). Google Sam Parnia and read some articles. There is a big research going on and results should be shared publicly in a month or two.
|
|
|
|
|
Personally I do not believe that ghosts exist. I think if you are "seeing" something, you are experiencing some form of brain hallucination.
|
|
|
|
|
There are already some types of cancer that got treated in rats & mice. However, those are only lab tests now, but I think in the long term the future is bright. I think there should be a cure for most of the cancer types within next 50-100 years.
|
|
|
|
|
All seems to be really nicely done, however, maybe it's only me, but I would include the price in USD next to Bitcoin price. Let's be realistic - that way it would be easier to see the "real" price of the product.
|
|
|
|
|
This might sound a bit off-topic, but don't you guys think that some of the other online business escrow services could start including Bitcoin? Such as for example Escrow.com. They have a good reputation and a service like theirs could add up some more income from Bitcoin escrow deals.
|
|
|
|
|
Jail, scam? Wtf, wake the fuck up Tim Thompson. First you go shitting on me on Telegram and block me after I reply to you and now you come here and talk shit? People sell their companies and turn them into other hands, somehow that doesn't make them scammers and when I turn the project into other hands so it would just be up with help of other people, I get blamed to be a scammer? I did what was the best at that time. I get all the blame, fuck that there was a whole team that was supposed to do stuff which we planned together & they leave, but it's okay with them, right? Some of you are just disgusting hypocrites.
And also, I didn't scam a single person and you blame me for scamming. Cold mailing & scamming are two very different things, but seems like you're just not educated enough to do some research and act as wise guy, while you understand absolutely nothing.
I've sold all my Unify? Wake up again. To make this immediately? Wake up again. You really need to wake up. You just came here to shit on me after all the effort & money I put in to Unify and after I gave it to 13 people who I THOUGHT will handle it all better than I did alone.
Why did I start this? Because the goals of Unify weren't set by me. My goals were to have a marketplace, while all teams goals were to have a crowdfunding site, ICO and so on. Why should I alone do all this, when people who were in charge of making those goals run away? I tried to manage the best that I could, but thanks - this is what you get for trying your best in community that is being ran by greed. Now I get blamed because the new team couldn't communicate to each other and I get blamed that I didn't deliver them such stuff as domains, social media logins and marketplace backup, when they've had almost all of that, just couldn't communicate to each other. I didn't turn Facebook and Android store login to them. They've had everything else. It's not my problem. And if you think that I should have dumped all my coins on market crash and run away leaving the project "noone's", then you need to think about yourself a bit. I did what was the best.
This is why I've created this crypto and not letting in anyone else into the team - to not make bullshit like that again, letting other's set goals by your name and later dissappearing. Also, the premine here is high, so I wouldn't be doing it all again only from my own funds and end up some day spending 100K EUR and getting blamed for fucking everything again. Also, don't forget that Unify premine was 1%. All other coins I've got were received as any other person could - from mining and exchanges, nothing more. I don't know why I'm even explaining you any of this, because I know that your view to all of this is childish. I've talked to couple other Unify long time members in Telegram like grownups, but you just come to my social media channels do shit and then block me. I didn't expect that from you, but now I see your real face.
|
|
|
|
https://testmine.ru/ added PRONTO -a x11 -o stratum+tcp://testmine.ru:3533 -u wallet_address -p c=PRONTO I previously had a bad experience with your pool - all of my earnings went to some other account  There was an error in the code. I did not put it from the official repository. Fixed. Okay, good to hear that you've fixed it. |
|
|
|
https://testmine.ru/ added PRONTO -a x11 -o stratum+tcp://testmine.ru:3533 -u wallet_address -p c=PRONTO I previously had a bad experience with your pool - all of my earnings went to some other account |
|
|
|
EXCHANGE UPDATE!Good news! We should be listed today on https://bitexlive.com exchange! Please register there in order to be first one's to buy or sell PRONTO on the exchange! As for the website, I'm still experiencing some problems with exchange script. Deposits / withdrawals do work, but the sell / buy orders do not update. Will continue to work on the website itself, without the exchange for now since we'll get a Bitexlive listing. We can get our own exchange later maybe PS, I believe that bitexlive has even higher volume than graviex |
|
|
|
Listing on Graviex exchange would be good starting point.
I am thinking that maybe launching our own exchange for PRONTO would be more rational at this time. Maybe Graviex would be a good start, but paying 0.4 BTC for an exchange that let's be fair - has almost no volume doesn't sound well to me. I would better choose a way to get an own exchange going first until we can afford something more significant like CryptoBridge at least. |
|
|
|
Where can I get the PRONTO wallet? Do I need to install it?
Hello, you can find download links of the PRONTO wallet at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5097220 - installation of the wallet is regular, as of many other cryptocurrencies. |
|
|
|
|
28 nodes already! If you don't have enough resources to mine it - you can always buy a masternode from me. Only 0.025 BTC for a masternode!
|
|
|
|
|
Just a quick update. Still working on the website, developing in under a VPS now, so we would have an opportunity to have our own exchange on the website. Doing it all alone, so it's taking some time. Thank you for your patience guys.
|
|
|
|
I also have tried modifying light.css file (theme css file) with the following: QToolBar > QToolButton:checked {
border-image: url(':/icons/light/overview') 0 0 0 0 stretch stretch;
background-color:opacity:0.52;
border:20px solid #282828;
color:#fff;
font-weight:bold;
}It did not change anything at all too. |
|
|
|
I'm now trying to make QT wallet client change icon into another one, when the icon is clicked (checked). I've added the following line: new QAction(QIcon(":/icons/" "/overview2"), tr("&"), (this));to Bitcoingui.cpp file, it did compile, but it did not change anything. When I click on an icon it stays the same. void BitcoinGUI::gotoOverviewPage()
{
overviewAction->setChecked(true);
if (walletFrame) walletFrame->gotoOverviewPage();
-> new QAction(QIcon(":/icons/" "/overview2"), tr("&"), (this));
} Any ideas how to do it? |
|
|
|
qt/bitcoingui.cpp:563:9: note: suggested alternative: ‘toolbar’
toolBar->setIconSize(QSize(128, 128));
^~~~~~~
toolbar
As the compiler suggestion suggests, names are case sensitive. Yeah, I also tried doing that, then it gives the following: qt/bitcoingui.cpp: In member function ‘void BitcoinGUI::createToolBars()’:
qt/bitcoingui.cpp:563:37: error: no matching function for call to ‘QToolBar::setIconSize(int, int)’
toolbar->setIconSize(100,100);
^
In file included from /root/source_code/depends/i686-w64-mingw32/share/../include/QtWidgets/QToolBar:1:0,
from qt/bitcoingui.cpp:61:
/root/source_code/depends/i686-w64-mingw32/share/../include/QtWidgets/qtoolbar.h:170:10: note: candidate: void QToolBar::setIconSize(const QSize&)
void setIconSize(const QSize &iconSize);
^~~~~~~~~~~
/root/source_code/depends/i686-w64-mingw32/share/../include/QtWidgets/qtoolbar.h:170:10: note: candidate expects 1 argument, 2 provided
Makefile:7546: recipe for target 'qt/qt_libprontoqt_a-bitcoingui.o' failed
make[2]: *** [qt/qt_libprontoqt_a-bitcoingui.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory '/root/source_code/src'
Makefile:10568: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/root/source_code/src'
Makefile:688: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
Tried doing "setIconSize(100);" instead of "setIconSize(100,100);" and it gives the same result. My bad! Actually it did work! Thanks for the help guys, I really appreciate it. I'm trying to learn some QT myself, so I really appreciate the help you've given! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
