|
22
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Tokens (Altcoins) / Re: ✅🚀[ANN] [ICO] KEPLER - Next Generation Blockchain Platform For AI & Robotics🚀
|
on: January 30, 2018, 09:57:00 AM
|
I checked out Kepler media page on the website, with 22 logos of media pages. I checked 3 popular ones (like Cointelegraph) and there are no articles. Only link to the website. Why?
We just prepared the links of most media outfits out there but we will soon edit them with real articles pertaining to Kepler when those media outlets start to write about us. This behind ridicoulness, you are deliberately misleading people. We will have active media campaign from 15 th Feb. therefore we will only be adding there more media banners. Any info on the team? Some of this just sounds very sketchy (mega factory?), but I'll keep an open mind for the time being.
The Kepler Technologies team is actually great, they have been working on High tech for a very long time. Most of their TOP management are Early BTC investors and have huge amount of funds not saying anithing about the knowledge. AND as I know they already have big whales, so I think it can all end up with huge success! I am one of their active supporter First you referr to the team as "they", now you are referring as "we". Who are you actually, are you part of the team? |
|
|
|
|
29
|
Other / Meta / Re: Solutions for the spam problem?
|
on: January 24, 2018, 09:38:55 PM
|
I would love to see shitposters becoming more careful and creating better posts when they fear for red trust, but I don't have much hope of that happening.
Actually it worked to me. I noticed that my latest posts have been somehow useless, now I am paying more attention to what I am writing. But it would have been if the user get warned before receiving the red trust. Although I still do not consider my red trust label to be fair. I do like Ecuamobi's proposal. |
|
|
|
|
31
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] (QTUM) - A Scalable PoS Smart Contract Platform - MainNet Complete!
|
on: January 23, 2018, 03:19:20 PM
|
How i can get Qtum-electrum for windows xp?
You should move away from windows xp (and from windows as well, get linux instead https://distrowatch.com) asap. There are well-known vulnerabilities that expose your device to malicious access. Windows XP is no longer supported since 2014. OK. But i need Qtum-electrum for windows xp. How can I get this? From their github: Microsoft ended support for Windows XP on April 8th, 2014, No attempt is made to prevent installing or running the software on Windows XP, you can still do so at your own risk but be aware that there are known instabilities and issues. Please do not report issues about Windows XP to the issue tracker. Aren't you able to install the wallet? |
|
|
|
|
32
|
Other / Meta / Re: A request to Blazed (and others who are in plan to recruit more DT members)
|
on: January 23, 2018, 02:11:41 PM
|
Problem here is, the people they tag for being shitposters are not competition for the high paying hero slots that the new dt member's are after. They usually tag senior and below members and users that have spammy posts which would have never made it in the campaigns anyways.
Actually I have been given red trust (I never join signatures campaign tho, this was an exception). |
|
|
|
|
34
|
Local / Accuse scam/truffe / Trust negativo - come comportarsi?
|
on: January 22, 2018, 10:05:38 PM
|
Salve, posto in questa sezione perchè non so bene dove postarla. Vi spiego brevemente , mi è stata dato un feedback negativo da The Pharmachist con questa motivazione "Garbage one-line shitposter." Come potete vedere dal suo account ha lasciato centinaia e centinaia di feedback negativi per spamming. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=487418Nella sezione meta potete vedere diversi complaints https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=24.0Ultimamente (e comunque overall) potrei aver fatto spesso post di una sola riga, ma è questa una motivazione sufficiente per essere additati con trust negativo? Non sono uno spammer, questa è la mia seconda campagna in 4 anni, non spammo per guadagnare. Cosa fare in questi casi? |
|
|
|
|
35
|
Other / Meta / Re: TRUST ABUSE BY NEW DT MEMBERS.. Theymos should review the trust system.
|
on: January 22, 2018, 09:43:45 PM
|
In addition, I should have been given a warning at least.
Your *warning* was received on 2018-01-10. The *warning* as you intend it, it was not supposed to be used the way The Pharmacist used it. It now makes my account less if not completely eligible with future trades. Which is completely unfair, as I already performed smooth trades in the past. My "one-line shitposting" is not intended as what you guys are fighting against because I never join signature campaigns nor I need to rank up. |
|
|
|
|
37
|
Other / Meta / Re: TRUST ABUSE BY NEW DT MEMBERS.. Theymos should review the trust system.
|
on: January 22, 2018, 08:42:44 PM
|
Your posts are horrible. You should never be allowed in a campaign of any kind again.
So what? That's your personal opinion, I ask questions mostly (that can be useful to other persons if replied). As I stated before, I am here since 2013 and this has been my second signature campaign in 4 years. I joined it because I am supporting the project (I invested in it as well). I do not join campaigns on a mothly basis nor I will. I don't understand why my account should be labeled as negative trusted. I will try to improve my forum cointribution tho. |
|
|
|
|
40
|
Other / Meta / Re: TRUST ABUSE BY NEW DT MEMBERS.. Theymos should review the trust system.
|
on: January 22, 2018, 03:12:58 PM
|
- Do not rate people based on the quality of their posts. How is this not to be considered an abuse of the trust system? I have been given a negative trust cause my latest posts were only one-like questions and following ann threads posts, but I have a bit more quality overall post history. What's wrong with it? This was my very first signature campaign, and I do not intend to join another one, I was just supporting the project. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
