 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »
|
After first start i get this error.
"Cryptonight hash self-test failed. This might be caused by bad compiler optimizations."
whats wrong?
5vega rig, working fine with 2.5 until now, do i need to change smth?
could be an issue with a system overclock; those test functions do work and haven't changed since day one.... They pass on my machines. could be you need to get your amd.txt from v 2.7.x/2.8.x, and copy the optimizations to the new amd.txt generated by 2.9.0; so be sure you didnt copy your old .txt files; you need to edit the new ones. I had to let mine redo the nvidia and amd txt more than once for some reason. My test rig: B250D8P I3-6100 8Gb GTX 1070, GTX 650Ti, RX560 I did update my video drivers to the current version for Nvidia because of the security bug that was found; and I left my AMD blockchain drivers alone as its been since I installed the RX560. Ill zip up and upload the whole folder including my configurations directly from that miner; and post a link in a minute. You can see if its any different for you. I do suggest updating the nvidia drivers though; the security bug is a real threat; as well as I think needing the updated driver is a reality (I did compile under CUDA 10) I installed new cuda and affined the threads to one cpu-core, working now. Thx for the tip and your work  |
|
|
|
|
After first start i get this error.
"Cryptonight hash self-test failed. This might be caused by bad compiler optimizations."
whats wrong?
5vega rig, working fine with 2.5 until now, do i need to change smth?
|
|
|
|
|
hey
im thinking to switch from cryptonight to ETH and was wondering whats the Hashrate + Power Usage for vegas 56/64 at the moment with this miner?
thx for an answer in advance
|
|
|
|
same problem with 5x vega 64 runing hiveos and teamredminer v3.8 with 2% rejected shares in nicehash,nanopool, and all of grft mining pools.how can I set diff manually in hiveos?
dont you add difficulty behind the wallet adress with a .(dot) ? like walletadressxyz1234.40000 for a 40000 difficulty? |
|
|
|
i would love to try this miner checked windows download file and found something suspicious Arcabit Trojan.BZC.ONG.Pantera.13.0DC71EE4 20181129
BitDefender Gen:Heur.BZC.ONG.Pantera.13.0DC71EE4 20181129
Comodo Application.Script.Miner.A@7wv4f2 20181129
Cylance Unsafe 20181129
Emsisoft Gen:Heur.BZC.ONG.Pantera.13.0DC71EE4 (B) 20181129
GData Gen:Heur.BZC.ONG.Pantera.13.1162CBC9 20181129
Kaspersky not-a-virus:HEUR:RiskTool.Script.BitMiner.gen 20181129
MAX malware (ai score=82) 20181129
Microsoft PUA:Win32/CoinMiner 20181129
eScan Gen:Heur.BZC.ONG.Pantera.13.0DC71EE4 20181129
Qihoo-360 Win32/Virus.Script.4bc 20181129
ZoneAlarm by Check Point not-a-virus:HEUR:RiskTool.Script.BitMiner.gen 20181129 I know some of these are shown at all mining programs but the pantera thing is new to me. Can anyone confirm this readout? |
|
|
|
|
unfortunately
it looks like scam yes :/
Last Active: July 25, 2018, 05:56:03 AM
|
|
|
|
Hey guys whats your intensity setting with stak2.5.+ in amd.txt for cn_heavy on 64/56? im only getting ~1300h/s per card with intensity at 896 { "index" : 0,
"intensity" : 896, "worksize" : 8,
"affine_to_cpu" : 0, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 2,
"unroll" : 8, "comp_mode" : true
},
Im reading that people do nearly 1500h/s per card  on v8 i use 1984 intensity and do you use something else for cn_fast/lite? Thx in advance for any answers. |
|
|
|
walpool.com - scam, dont mine here !!!
my wallet: hvxyLjX1cWpBPNYLsCbLM3LDNUeuixaWEEv61dMboWiNMqrECSX9c3a4ZejeTspDcJ3fvUzExUTBvNB K1JKgcrkY58dGuGNkSe
not PAY!
although the difficulty has gone crazy with the pumped price - if you still want to mine HAVEN I recommend haven.miner.rocks - I mined there for 12 hours and got paid, but since everyone else seems to be mining it too I went back to mining Loki. I like the idea behind Haven Protocol, but there are too many big questions so far unanswered about the workability of it's economics. If you are just mining to dump for BTC then sure, but I mine to HODL. Please do not go mine on haven.miner.rocks. It's got 85% of total network hashpower! It's just awful in terms of decentralisation. Please choose another. I'm personally on cryptoknight.cc. Never had problems with them. Works perfectly well. Please spread the hash. Spreading the Hash is a good thing but my miners never get the estimated coins shown on Cryptoknight and there are often issues with delayed payments etc. Even when the majority of the Hashrate from a coin is at cryptoknight the calculations fail. Their biggest advantage is to have "all" the crap coins united under a 0% fee   Miner.rocks you get what you shown or even better and yes im aware that a smaller pool is more effected by pool luck. |
|
|
|
wow, who made a good shot here at tradeogre??  24h High $ 901.80 i came to late, damn wallet actualization took ages  |
|
|
|
|
on cryptonight:
56īs 1800-2000h/s
64īs 1900-2100h/s
64īs draw a bit more power(+5%), most important thing is to get cards with good cooling(more then one fan).
ofc u want samsung memory.
You could biosflash your 56 to a 64 if u want.
For a faster Roi i would suggest 56 and for long term max profit the 64s.
For cryptonight heavy coins FE is bestbuy atm
|
|
|
|
i guess someone lost some serious money |
|
|
|
i finally had a chance to buy 5 vega 64 im some how a new miner (6month) but its my first vega build (i have some experience with 580,570,1070,1070ti) my vegas hbm2 runs hot (around 75) but core temp is ok(around 62) question is is there any way to undervolt hbm2? does soft power play table help for uv hbm2? Maybe you should check this guide http://vega.miningguides.com/75 for hbm is to hot imo |
|
|
|
This allready looks good. Keep up the good work and the good communication. Looking forward to get more and MOAR out of my vegas Thx for implementing differenet pp tables on each card individually that fast. |
|
|
|
i like this one  Our investigation into the mining equipment strongly suggests to us that the total manufacturing cost of the equipment is less than $1,000, meaning that anyone who paid $10,000 for it was paying a massive profit premium to the manufacturer, giving them the ability to make 9 more units for themselves.
You could say Asics buyer are the Fanboys of this companies |
|
|
|
What makes you think I have crossfire enabled? the driver tries to activate Crossfire automatically after installation, therefore you should deactivate it after driver installation. from vegaminingguides TURN OFF AMD CROSSFIRE DETECTION
Whenever Windows starts the AMD driver tries to detect other Vega cards to establish "crossfire". We don't want crossfire and even searching for it is not good for driver stability. We also don't want it polling to see about power states when your mining. Here are manual steps to disable "EnableUlps" and "EnableCrossFireAutoLink" (take note of the Vega registry ID numbers as we will need them again later)
Windows Start key --> "regedit"
Be careful to only change entries that this guide says to change, you can mess up your computer with this program.
Navigate to the proper directory by either drilling down per the photo below (easier) or you can search and let Windows find it via:
Select Edit --> Find (Ctrl-F)
Type "EnableUlps" and select the 'Find Next' button (case sensitive)
It may take a long time to search... let it work
The search windows will eventually go away having driven down into your registry and selected a field "EnableUlps" with a value of 1 (true) - click to expand pic if needed. |
|
|
|
*edit: Needed to load Blockchain from scratch and all missing payments did show* hey there I was mining on https://trtl.mine2gether.com/# Last transaction on my windows wallet (v.1.0.6625.36022) is from 05.04.2018 Its is fully synced atm but there are missing severeal payments which were sent from the pool. 18.4.2018, 01:43:57 ...8b16a1441639dd92efe3 1482.00 3
18.4.2018, 01:33:56 ...5c409d54fc506ca99b2f 1156.00 3
18.4.2018, 01:23:53 ...bba806b3a2bc5d4b768 1684.00 3
18.4.2018, 01:03:53 .....0b19613a864140fc 1624.00 3
18.4.2018, 00:53:51 ........5c89f02ba832f0 1404.00 3
18.4.2018, 00:43:50 .......dd5e60d14b21934f 1461.00 3
18.4.2018, 00:33:49 ....b0bb350c9ec33c66796 1295.00 3
18.4.2018, 00:23:48 ...91be5aac7411e060c1a7 2360.00 3
18.4.2018, 00:03:46 ..0a6afd34a9016787818da 1297.00 3
17.4.2018, 23:53:44 ...f5534282904845f155a6 1708.00 3
16.4.2018, 02:08:43 .5c410b13e7fcc0ad98ff8a1 652.00 3
16.4.2018, 01:58:42 ...176ea6eac1041b0250fd 618.00 3
16.4.2018, 01:48:42 ....485edb5d7080b92b9e 1867.00 3
16.4.2018, 01:38:41 .97eab9d8b3c803874e7f7a 1280.00 3
16.4.2018, 01:18:42 ...95f4033fb6af7a90fd84 1764.00 3
16.4.2018, 01:08:39 ...de64f83da312fc0b55a 1947.00 3
16.4.2018, 00:58:41 ...01260b5da4d4463eb70 3483.00 3
16.4.2018, 00:48:39 ...cbc1321c84f6227aabc 2652.00 3
16.4.2018, 00:38:40 ...a27d5ee671b300ea5ad 2320.00 3
16.4.2018, 00:28:39 .......b6cf02dd655c4f5 4886.00 3
16.4.2018, 00:18:37 .0e8690531137ef2def500 1717.00 3
16.4.2018, 00:08:36 ....c7b2418809ebc4cb07 743.00 3
5.4.2018, 02:23:46 ....1471dc8cdea0f28159 946.00 0
*edit: Needed to load Blockchain from scratch and all missing payments did show* |
|
|
|
|
It is possible of course.
You can always check google for benchmarks to calculate the outcome.
like "monero benchmark" "anycoin benchmark" "gtx 260 monero benchmark"
Keep in mind that as soon as an "Altcoin" gets attention that more people will mine it and difficulty will rise and your profitabilty will lower!
for example watch the difficulty graph for the last 6-12months of your favoured coins
|
|
|
|
|
