just checking in, still getting the update failed msg when I hit the refresh button.

no worries, at least it's on your radar which is all I wanted :-)

just checking in :-)

Finally figured out how to access the clipboard without the long press.

That being said, I'm getting request failed. Please try again in a few seconds. But same thing even after say 5 minutes.

Tried two different api's

Long press for the clipboard works from the address page. But not when trying to add the API key.

No rush, it's a start :-)

Looks good so far. Would have to test for a month or two to really get a feel for it with diff addresses,  some mine, some not. But looks like it's just missing LTC for now.

That one image that looks like a 1x3 "widget" within the app. Anyway to make that an actual widget that can be placed on the home screen where it can be single tapped for a refresh like what the Digital Currency Widget app does if you're familiar with it.

Displays a coins current price. I know setting auto updates might be a pain. But the named app can also have refreshes initiated with just a single tap to the widget.

But also, and this would be a nice feature for the widgets on this, if you can implement them. But, say centered at the bottom. Show the time it was last updated.

See linked img.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_mKjVBoeEk_JC6tYsrZogBTRl_cbbPqq/view?usp=drivesdk

Edit: Already got my blockonomics api though

Not sure, if any API's and from what site would be needed for LTC.

Also love the dark mode idea if having the app opened !

Edit 2: I actually just opened Nova Settings to make my home screens 7x6, still have excellent icon size, to add two 1x3 widgets for a BTC & LTC address lol

Ducks up my discover widget a bit, but I can fix that by removing the padding it has. The data on the right will remain a little jacked, but it'll be more legible to fully understand what the figures are.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1a1sFPekq-G45hLgN8J25nS7p-EfHqYzB/view?usp=drivesdk

Android and cool. Never heard of blockonomics


As for features, I'd have to read back and see all of what I said. But I believe I did originally cover it all.

lol np. Was just curious.

Just checking in :-)

Problem solved, it's an old VPS IP of mine. Not that you would care OG because you automatically seem to assume someones up to some foul shit given the wording you chose and the way you chose to phrase your sentence...

Or maybe it would help if my main Legendary account I got back not long ago posted it, instead of this newb one.

JFC, I'm asking for a range of when it would have been used on this account. Not info if it wasn't bec, DUH, I'd have no relevancy to it then...

So it becomes yes it was used o nthis account betwen a and b.

OR>>>

Sorry, was never used on this account. TTYL.

I was wondering if there might be a global mod or an admin here that can check an IP I have.

I believe it's one of my old ones that I still have in use on 3 web files I no longer need (the IP) for RPC stuff. This is easily confirmed if a global mod or admin can tell me a date range of when this account would have posted from it.

I think it's an old one from when I lived in Va, and if so. I obviously no longer need or have use for it. Or it may belong to something else I just forgot. But seeing if I have any historical attachments to it here would be a big help. Especially since, at least last I knew, the SMF DB log's account IP's used when they're posted from.

Ty.

I can PM the IP to said global mod or admin.

Think that's what I signed up for during the initial Waller setup, but Ty.

Will do it again for good measure using thst link.

lol... I didn't even thing of added info. That said, if the electrum QR's include a note field. I may incorporate it's QR codea into my sm peoject instead of those provided by trezor. I'll have to scan each with the coinbase app later to see what's what.

Cost will be approx $13, but a dual sided ID card. One with BTC logo, address typed and address QR. With the reverse being LTC . Size of a credit card, kept in the wallet. If needed to receive coin to the trezor addresses. Just gotta pull it out.

One final thing I want to keep separate from the above reply, not that I guess I really need to... and this is purely out of curiosity. But how / or why is it that the trezor site and the Electrum clients generate diff QR codes for the same address ? Even though off the top of my head I would fathom a guess that's just because they used some sort of varying coding methods even though QR readers can read both.

Not sure how I get send-able merit, otherwise I would give this a +1. But that did the trick for both LTC & BTC. I can now see both addresses in their respective Electrum clients that were originally given to me on the Trezor website using the nTH seed word / passphrase..

Ty !

Also, CMIW ?

Correct me if I'm wrong ?

Lastly, if someone can send me any current publication links on the "beta" stuff for Trezor previously mentioned, that would be awesome... Ty.

From Electrum Load, but first...

No I didn't not confuse wallet lock and passphrasing lol. I get the phrase is like an extra word to the seed.

But from Electrum Load...

default_wallet > Standard Wallet > Used a Hardware Device > Prompts for PassPhrase > Screenshot you shared (native segwit m/84'/2'/0'") > Deny file lock bec it's public and that I don't care about.

But the BTC address that shows is a bc1 address when I would like to see the one I initially got from Trezor / that Trezor shows if I log online using the same pass which is a 36x address.

Same for Electrum-LTC which shows me a ltc1 address but on the trezor site, using the same passphrase. Shows me a MEQ address.

Everything else I previously wrote I'm comfortable with and have learned some. So really it's this one minor inconvenience that has me slightly confused. Since between the Electrum wallets and the trezor site using the same passphrase. I am given two very diff addfresses when going to the respective "receive" tabs online and in the desktop wallets.

I'm sure I just overlooked something simple, I would hope, in Electrum. But given what I am currently seeing, even if I wanted to use addresses initially given to me by Electrum. The reverse would hold true that I wouldn't see them online via the trezor site.

So the easiest solution it seems would be to get the trezor addresses to show on Electrum by way of adjusting a particular setting or adding something. Which I sort of mentioned before in by maybe adding the addresses given to me by trezor, when using my passphrase, manually which would make it like a watch wallet on Trezor but still needing the device attached to be able to send from it ?!?

Edit: Reading back, I guess I could try it without waiting for a reply, but I'm guessing wipe the wallet file and redoing it all with the legacy option ticked ?

It seems with a passphrase set, legacy or not. The address are all the same secured in a WELL protected manor. I just want to / would prefer to see the same addresses between the two so I have the option to use the Electrum clients at home when needed but the trezor site when required. If I am away from home.

At least until the Trezor suite I'm now learning about thx to you is done. So I would have their client to show addresses in the way I am seeking and then their site when needed.

So it showed up yesterday, didn't know until today. Got into a weird loop on the setup when naming the Trezor. But I figured that out. That said, it asked me if I wanted to set a pin, which I did, options seemed to be 1 to 9 numbers. Anyway, maybe this is what you meant by pass phrase, I don't know. But if not, what am I missing here ?

Edit: NM, figured it out. Just did a wipe of the device, then going to restore seed to double check if the pass wallet address is the same as well as the normal one. Pass phrase isn't even secure, but its for a test so... not like I can't do a new one that from what little I know is always attached to the seed.

Edit: The trick is just remembering if I ever send coins to the "normal" address, to send them to the pass address.

But, seed restore confirmed...

I did also notice Electrum generates new address. Will probably just stick with the trezor site. Electrum seems like it might confuse things in some respect, Especially since it seems set passphrases would be typed via keyboard on a computer, which I have very few problems with if any, but still. But it definitely seems like a use one or the other but not both type of situation.

Edit: although now that I'm thinking about the passphrase thing while I'm working on dinner.

I guess it doesn't matter whether it's typed in to the computer or on the device itself. For the simple fact that it's probably one of the most unlikeliest of scenarios that somebody would get a hold of the physical device knowing that I've typed the passphrase onto the computer unless it was a close relative and or friend.

So I guess that much is technically a null point. But the inconsistencies with electrum using different addresses than what's on the trezor website is a little weird.

To rectify that I guess we should say, is that just entering the addresses given to me by trezor manually into electrum as a watch wallet? But then if you go to send from that, the secret key, is still stored on the device and never transferred to electrum?

But then what if it's a wallet with a passphrase I set on electrum but want to see that address on the trezor site. Same thing by just entering the pass. I guess think of it as a backwards compatibility type question.

Although I dont recall seeing an option to add an address into trezor except for legacy addresses, guessing that's what electrum generates ?

But ya. Def seems like trezor site or electrum but cant be both even though any address generated falls back to the seed so to speak.

I like the idea of using the Standalone software versus the trezor website. I just still have some concerns I guess you could say.

lmao. So I basically described what you wanted anyway thus proving a demand. But ya... with crypto being what it is. I'm honestly surprised there is no such wallet app.

Not even sure it could be called a wallet the way it's described and would function. But the appeal is def there, for me anyway.

I look forward to testing it out. But I hope with the features I mentioned I more or less kept it pretty simplistic.