No, we are not. My point was, if Bitcoin is a scam and early adopters are those who got into it in the past two years before you did, what then is the US FRN when the early adopters got into it before you were born? Injustice! We need to gather the troops and have a flash mob protest! Were you not alive for the past two years? Did you not have Internet access? Not know how to use Google? So a few hundred people make a mint because they new about something before you did are scammers, even though you had as much chance as anyone to do the same; while the legacy currency system that you were born into is the metric by which you judge fairness? Are you for real?
So because the US FRN did it, it's ok that BitCoin does it. Yet BitCoin is somehow far superior and above reproach. I suppose only because you have a vested interest, because I can't fathom any other reason why you would so defend BitCoin in one sentence, yet accuse me of having an issue with fairness when the issue exists with both. From one form of control to another, you just happen to have more power in this version so it is more appealing to you. This isn't forum.usfrn.org, it's forum.bitcoin.org, btw.
If you know a better way of introducing a new currency with all the advantages of Bitcoin without what you consider the faults of Bitcoin, please do it so the world can have access to such a fantastic creation. Trust me, if it's so much better, people will drop Bitcoin like a bad habit. Hell, it shoudn't be that hard, just build off of the back of Bitcoin.
Working on it, although only on paper at this point.
If you suggest there are no advantages to Bitcoin, then wtf are you doing posting on a Bitcoin forum? Trying to save us? With friends like that, who needs enemies?
Keeping myself apprised, of course. You know, so I can report to my bosses at the CIA. Plus I just enjoy debating on the internets.