Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 »
|
Ethereum trading is open for a few days now. Why did you buy or sell? It will be interesting to see what motivations people have for trading.
Please only comment if you actually made a trade and put money where your mouth is. We don't need further loose predictions from non-stakeholders here.
Did you buy the account, or is it hacked? What are you talking about? Do you suspect that this thread is a scam? Very active until April 22, 2014, 08:53:47 PM then nothing until this post. Why would anyone obtain this account? Is it of value?
|
|
|
|
Ethereum trading is open for a few days now. Why did you buy or sell? It will be interesting to see what motivations people have for trading.
Please only comment if you actually made a trade and put money where your mouth is. We don't need further loose predictions from non-stakeholders here.
Did you buy the account, or is it hacked? What are you talking about? Do you suspect that this thread is a scam?
|
|
|
|
|
Ethereum trading is open for a few days now. Why did you buy or sell? It will be interesting to see what motivations people have for trading.
Please only comment if you actually made a trade and put money where your mouth is. We don't need further loose predictions from non-stakeholders here.
|
|
|
|
|
Would a moderator please close this endless stream of scam messages? This thread helps no one.
|
|
|
|
|
Great job.
What is "Early adopter cold storage"?
|
|
|
|
|
Talk to bitcoinbuilder.com. They represent tons of MtGox customers.
|
|
|
|
|
Doing further research it seems that 0.9 seems to have coin control. That's great news!
|
|
|
|
As a feature request, it would be useful to have the ability to lock all outputs except for a given list of outputs. That would make it easy to send from a specific output bypassing the usual coin selection logic.
If you need to send from a specific output, easiest to use coin control or raw transaction API. Googling for "coin control" it seems that this is a non-standard feature not available in the official Bitcoin-qt. I do not like to trust other clients or branches. I'd like to have that feature available, though. Better than locking outputs. Raw transactions seem error-prone to me. One mistake and the coins are gone.
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like I passed in true instead of false. With your example I tested it to work. Thanks!
As a feature request, it would be useful to have the ability to lock all outputs except for a given list of outputs. That would make it easy to send from a specific output bypassing the usual coin selection logic.
|
|
|
|
|
So why did you stop buying?
|
|
|
|
currently we have the following: - Mandatory 2FA
Why would anybody want mandatory 2FA? That is an anti-feature.
|
|
|
|
|
According to the history of those addresses at most two victims have been scammed. Are there other scam addresses?
|
|
|
|
|
Well, it looks totally legit to me. I think you should open the attachment!
|
|
|
|
|
I would very happily buy from that person at a near-zero price. I don't see a problem with that situation.
Furthermore, why would he sell off at low prices? He will not do that.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I did this. When I initially left it out I received an error. After filling it in the error went away.
|
|
|
|
1. There was a HUGE btc debt erasing for a low $ value in the last weeks of trade on MTGox. (about 350k-400k coins have been erased as debt for a sum of around $63,000,000 - $72,000,000 ($180 per coin).
Source? Proof?
|
|
|
|
In Bitcoin Qt, I tried to lock unspent outputs. My intention was to lock all but one to force a particular output to be selected for a transaction. I understand it should work like this: - call lockunspent with a list of outputs
- call listlockunspent and observe that all specified outputs are actually locked
Unfortunately, none are locked in my testing. What am I doing wrong? There was no error message. I entered the command in the debug window. Edit: I reviewed the source code and I did not find any obvious usage errors on my part. Debugging the client is beyond my abilities, though.
|
|
|
|
|
Could a mod please rename the thread? The title is misleading and it catches more attention than it should. Wouldn't "Has MtGox shut down?" have been enough?
|
|
|
|
Why is it so big(!)
I get that question a lot.
|
|
|
|
I'd say they accidentally deployed a new website feature which is to lock all bitcoins for 6 month. They'll probably announce it soon enough. According to the date from the screenshot, they'll lock them in tomorrow. Looks like they've finally decided not to pay. Reminds me of the Greece/Cyprus haircuts. "Just give us a little more time and extend our credit lines. We promise we'll pay!". And it's gone!
|
|
|
|
|