A project for social media to include messaging and advertising with content creation for publishers. This looks like a combo of fb, blogger, topbuzz and the likes. The insights could help in helping advertisers to target their end users. I see this as a copy off the platforms mentioned above. With the difference in paying them in cryptocurrency. Facebook shop already sells for sellers. Too many projects for same thing. I can’t see any existing application or social media site for the developers.
The combination of the various aspects you mentioned get incorporated also by several other projects these days. It's a very interesting business area and attracts developers a lot. |
|
|
|
|
I like the idea of a tiered masternode concept as it opens the door for many people to invest money they have a available and still be able to run a MN. If you consider DASH or others, literally nobody is able to run a MN.
|
|
|
|
RAISED FUNDS
46,944 C2C RAISED SO FAR FOR STUDENTS
Is there an address where we can see whether it is true that so much has been sent to you by now? Also, can you give us the proof later on that you will be sending that to deserving students. And how can we know that you are giving that to real students? And your criteria of giving such funds? These are all very good questions and if they don't get answered in a satisfying manner I think it is safe to say that this isn't serious. guys guys guys i know how you all feel because i feel the same this is another sad story! This coin project ended before it even started .these group of guys are using good things to promote their "schemes" if this was serious it would have never been launched the way it did even with a pre-ann it would have been more professional and classy let us not keep hoping because then they will pop back up, make up some bs story and actually suceed in scamming more people. I spent some time the last weeks to identify threads where I think it is not serious and then I jumped in and helped the doubters. Most of the threads become quiet very shortly after they have been detected to be scammers. That is a very good development. |
|
|
|
What's vesting? I dont get it  Vesting applies to team tokens, ensuring that the team’s priorities properly align with the community’s. The team will successfully deliver the project as it’s stated in the project roadmap. Founder and Core Team Tokens vest for one year from the date they are allocated. They are also unlocked by 1/12 each month. 1/12 each month is quite a lot and doesn't look like a proper vesting schedule. Anyhow, who has control over those funds? What happens if you fail to deliver? |
|
|
|
May the loser talk to you one more time: how is your project going? Seems quite a lot of people from your thread lost interest? How did that happen? ;P |
|
|
|
I can watch snapshot was taken using data of blocks on 11th December 2017 is that mean everyone having Bitcoins on that specific time automatically becomes eligible for forked coins ? Why for snapshot data of three months was used without prior announcement or there was some pre-announement before and I don't know.
No, there was no pre-announcement, we wanted to make a surprise. And we waited for a long time with the announcement, waited for market to stabilize. But did not wait  This is quite weird. People know what they have in their wallet NOW, because they can check. But how would someone know which of their BTC addresses were containing BTC three months earlier? This difficulty will surely not help adoption. However, I must say that the idea of removing Satoshi's coins in quite funny, I'va too always thought at that Sword of Damocles as a major problem nobody want to see. It's debatable of course that Satoshi owns so many Bitcoins, but are you sure that no large organization owns close to as many Bitcoins as Satoshi? We can't know and I think there is a possibility that concentration of ownership in Bitcoin is already high regardless of Satoshi's coins. But everyone knows about Satoshi and monitoring the movements of his funds. Sure, you can monitor the funds and see when they move. What do you think will happen when he moves 500,000 Bitcoin? What if Bitcoin is worth 10 trillion dollars in the future and Satoshi moves 500,000 Bitcoin?  There are definitely some problems with that because literally anyone could be Satoshi and we don't know whether it might be very bad that one person or organization owns so much of a potential global currency. I think that there will be an unprecedented collapse of Bitcoin prices, this is a psychological problem, but as the price increases Satoshi's personality will become more and more important, maybe he will be the first trillionaire (even potential or virtual). So there will be a big difference between whether someone will move their 500k or whether Satoshi himself will do it. I know this is an old story but I want to bring it up again. It is not only that someone moves 500,000 Bitcoin, it is also important who the person is that moves 500,000 Bitcoin. If it is Bill Gates, people might calm down. What if it's some crazy politician like the boss from Korea? That would be Bitcoin's death. |
|
|
|
Vivid logo design is very cute, very affinity, the website's design style is very fresh and easy to browse. The development of the project is very successful, and you have done very well in all aspects.
It is very creative with good motive oriented and easily understandable about the purpose of the project emerged to the designs as it easily grabs the attention of the investors. This is a lot about functionality. If the application really adds value to how people can manage their portfolio this can become a very expensive token. |
|
|
|
There is only 5 days left for this ICO. The team really should be in this thread promoting and answering questions. But maybe it will be better for us investors if they dont. Less money in should mean more will be burnt, so out portions will be a larger chunk right?
less money in, means less fund for development and marketing, gone are the days where you make your token scars to increase value now we need a lot of investors to hold and trade a token to create volume in an exchange. Less money in, more pressure on the team to make more out of less. If you are overfunded you can also become lazy and negligent. It's not a question that you can easily answer in terms of right or wrong. There is certainly something like a minimum amount to make this happen, but many projects collect too much these days. Would you disagree? |
|
|
|
If you know that it is over, then it is probably over and there is no need to "think" that it is too late to register   I should say "I think airdrop is over" as at that moment I was not sure Now I know for sure it's over and all participants should complete the KYC process " As we have more than 40 thousand participants we will only allow you to complete one KYC attempt. Please insure you provide accurate information to insure you are not rejected. " 40 000 participants - that's impressive number! And I don't think airdrop will affect much the price of token, especially on the long-term As it was really not easy to get to high rank, I did my best and got only "RANK 3" Over 40,000 thousand participants is huge of course, but it also means that there won't be many token on average? How many is it per participant? |
|
|
|
I guess I can participate at concerts from my home via VR glasses? Or is there also a VR concert where people meet somewhere? How does that work by standard?
Yes you can participate anywhere at anytime. You can catch concerts live or on demand in the presence of your own home. On the application you can chat with friends in realtime so that's the closest thing to watching a real concert with friends! Even though it will take a while until people become familiar with such a new technology, I can see the whole business growing very soon. Tickets can also be much cheaper and it might be an option even for those who don't have that much money. But they need the technology of course, which is quite expensive I guess? |
|
|
|
Trading with bitmex is very dangerous, especially when the margin is up to 100 times, the chances of us losing very high. But with the spicacoin project, I'm sure it will help us reduce the risk of losing 90%.
If you seriously believe in such claims, it is you who is to blame if you lose big. There is no way to win with 100x leverage trades guaranteed. You know why? Because there is also no way to win with 1x leverage trades. Here I'm not saying that it will win absolutely when the margin x100, but with the signal that we have, we just win 5 loses 4 still win. You know what I mean? And based on the trading signals, we can avoid the phase liquidate (liquidate) You are talking crap. There is nothing more to say about you. There is no such thing as a free lunch, ever heard about that? And when it comes to leveraged trading, the "guaranteed" success for free money - which is already zero - will be even lower... |
|
|
|
Although Mercatox is not that very popular exchange, I only trade on this exchange thrice, I still consider this exchange good for Credits, the more exchange the better for the project, who knows one day all exchange will have Credits in their platform
Mercato literally has zero impact on almost any coin. I tried to trade there some time ago but the liquidity sucked and it didn't make any sense. |
|
|
|
RAISED FUNDS
46,944 C2C RAISED SO FAR FOR STUDENTS
Is there an address where we can see whether it is true that so much has been sent to you by now? Also, can you give us the proof later on that you will be sending that to deserving students. And how can we know that you are giving that to real students? And your criteria of giving such funds? These are all very good questions and if they don't get answered in a satisfying manner I think it is safe to say that this isn't serious. |
|
|
|
What is a lockup period for? Just want to understand The lockup period ensures that tokenholders don’t sell until 14 days after the last round of token sales is complete. After that, the tokens will be listed on a number of well-known, trustworthy exchanges. This allows those who missed the opportunity to buy tokens during the pre-sale and ICO sale to still get tokens for use on the platform. Have the contracts with those well-known and trustworthy exchanges already been signed or do you only for it right now? Hi! Hitbtc is the first confirmed one but there will be others of course. Will be announced. Thank you for your interest. It is mostly the first step to go to Hitbtc. Will be interesting to see what other exchanges might express their interest. |
|
|
|
No you are an idiot with a lot of time on your hands.
Goodbye madam actually his questions are valid and he just wants straightforward answers. care to address that first? maybe he will stop nagging you as scammers because we had seen such projects before. these charity-related projects that wanted to help - very rare are genuine. ended up as scammers. im nice about it but sometimes im an asshole too. His questions are invalid. He wants to know who we are? We have clearly explained that. He won't tell us who he is so why should we tell him who we are? It makes zero sense. This is just an ERC20 token used for remittance payments to charities and disaster relief services. We aim to make it global and a phenomenon. If you want to know if we are developers...no. We hired developers to do the work. We are just philanthropists. We told him we would email him our info if he disclosed himself, but he did not. So we do not feel that our personal lives should be attacked by crazy people over the internet. It is up to YOU if you decide to participate or not. We preach due diligence. Thank you for being civil. You are funny dude. Go away with your project. You want our money and we don't want yours. You either show your face or we won't support you. Claiming you are going to support charity is a damn joke. Get down to earth. If you want to make this a global phenomenon, why don't you attend conferences and hold presentations? Or visit real charity events? What is this? Do you think you can fool us? |
|
|
|
What is a lockup period for? Just want to understand The lockup period ensures that tokenholders don’t sell until 14 days after the last round of token sales is complete. After that, the tokens will be listed on a number of well-known, trustworthy exchanges. This allows those who missed the opportunity to buy tokens during the pre-sale and ICO sale to still get tokens for use on the platform. Have the contracts with those well-known and trustworthy exchanges already been signed or do you only for it right now? |
|
|
|
I can watch snapshot was taken using data of blocks on 11th December 2017 is that mean everyone having Bitcoins on that specific time automatically becomes eligible for forked coins ? Why for snapshot data of three months was used without prior announcement or there was some pre-announement before and I don't know.
No, there was no pre-announcement, we wanted to make a surprise. And we waited for a long time with the announcement, waited for market to stabilize. But did not wait This is quite weird. People know what they have in their wallet NOW, because they can check. But how would someone know which of their BTC addresses were containing BTC three months earlier? This difficulty will surely not help adoption. However, I must say that the idea of removing Satoshi's coins in quite funny, I'va too always thought at that Sword of Damocles as a major problem nobody want to see. It's debatable of course that Satoshi owns so many Bitcoins, but are you sure that no large organization owns close to as many Bitcoins as Satoshi? We can't know and I think there is a possibility that concentration of ownership in Bitcoin is already high regardless of Satoshi's coins. But everyone knows about Satoshi and monitoring the movements of his funds. Sure, you can monitor the funds and see when they move. What do you think will happen when he moves 500,000 Bitcoin? What if Bitcoin is worth 10 trillion dollars in the future and Satoshi moves 500,000 Bitcoin? There are definitely some problems with that because literally anyone could be Satoshi and we don't know whether it might be very bad that one person or organization owns so much of a potential global currency. |
|
|
|
thoughtful and promising project. I will participate in twitter campaign. Good luck everyone.
Best of luck to your participation bud on this project. Lets hope that twitter will not ban account owners advertising ICO on thier personal pages. Twitter will perhaps not ban account but can't say as google, facebook, twitter have some ongoing issues with the ICO sales. But other mediums will too be good for the future of vvid to gorw more wide. As far as I am ware Twitter definitely plans to shut down most accounts that promote ICOs unless they are verified to not promote scams. |
|
|
|
RAISED FUNDS
46,944 C2C RAISED SO FAR FOR STUDENTS
Is there an address where we can see whether it is true that so much has been sent to you by now? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
