Will try ist by myself now und donate 850 GI to BigDeal. I have already donated to foundation 6%, I guess BigDeal is at the very end also important. Well done IOTATEAM Richi  It's better to donate to foundation until the min goal is reached. Otherwise we'll end up with two failed goals instead of just one. |
|
|
|
What is Big Deal? Is it donation like Foundation? It's about selling a part of your coins with a discount to a select few strategic key partners that wish to attain a sizable position enough worth their while. |
|
|
|
Will leave negative feedback shortly to warm others, hopefully preventing others getting ripped off by you!!!
Funny to hear this from a guy who scams the others. I see you are upset, go and call your mom, I'll tell her that she should have done abortion. His/her mom is so fat that she thought it was just a bad case of constipation when being pregnant and one does not simply treat constipation with abortion. Well arent you the card, I bet you attract all the ladies at the parties you attend with your witty japes and tales of altcoins. Just look at all the shit illodin has grabbed through his super awesome altcoin skills. I'm straight but find you so hot right now  Fake pic. To prove you wrong I will post a pic of me and my current girlfriend cuddling on a bed on a lazy sunday:  |
|
|
|
Will leave negative feedback shortly to warm others, hopefully preventing others getting ripped off by you!!!
Funny to hear this from a guy who scams the others. I see you are upset, go and call your mom, I'll tell her that she should have done abortion. His/her mom is so fat that she thought it was just a bad case of constipation when being pregnant and one does not simply treat constipation with abortion. |
|
|
|
No need for so much animosity. A simple short reply like "Actually, we really need 100%." would be much more productive.
To be fair, iotatoken posted at least five times that the foundation goal at http://foundation.iotatoken.com/ is the absolute minimum. A day left to deadline and only 84% of the minimum amount donated, apparently IOTA community doesn't want a foundation? |
|
|
|
Are you sure the privkey is the private key of the address, and not the result of the command "masternode genkey"? |
|
|
|
I still have my ICO seed and FIM-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx account name from 2014 from which I haven't done any transfers, how can I log in to that account now? I can't find that option in Lompsa.
http://lompsa.com -> top right Sign in -> enter secret phrase. You need your account private key = secret phrase. Oh yea how did I miss that. Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
I still have my ICO seed and FIM-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx account name from 2014 from which I haven't done any transfers, how can I log in to that account now? I can't find that option in Lompsa.
|
|
|
|
I can't create Lompsa account with the downloaded client because the Create new account dialog's captcha has an error "ERROR for site owner: Invalid domain for site key" and it can't be clicked, so the Continue button is disabled. In the server+html version the captcha works, but when I click the Continue button the console displays an error and nothing happens: 2016-07-15 03:58:28 FINE: Invalid parameters
nxt.http.ParameterException
at nxt.http.ParameterParser.getAccount(ParameterParser.java:419)
at nxt.http.ParameterParser.getAccount(ParameterParser.java:409)
at nxt.http.ParameterParser.getAccount(ParameterParser.java:425)
at nxt.http.GetAccount.processRequest(GetAccount.java:41)
at nxt.http.MofoCallAPIFunction.processRequest(MofoCallAPIFunction.java:50)
at nxt.http.rpc.CallAPIFunction.call(CallAPIFunction.java:46)
at nxt.http.websocket.MofoSocketServer$3.run(MofoSocketServer.java:383)
at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) |
|
|
|
Last time I saw such bullishness on Monero thread, I almost bought at the ATH ...  Uhoh, that must mean this is the top! Everybody panic and sell your Moneroj! to meQuite accurate observations. |
|
|
|
In Linux is compiled normally (last git clone).
Try refreshing boost
Yes QT compiles without the fix, but the issue is with the daemon. At least for me. |
|
|
|
I had to change this line const CScriptID& hash = boost::get<CScriptID&>(address); in rpcrawtransaction.cpp to const CScriptID& hash = boost::get<CScriptID>(address); to get it to compile on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS. Otherwise I was getting an error /usr/include/boost/variant/get.hpp:178:5: error: invalid application of ‘sizeof’ to incomplete type ‘boost::STATIC_ASSERTION_FAILURE<false>’ Can you please confirm this change doesn't break anything? |
|
|
|
Admiral_BitPlease stop your spam on my topic. All your shit piss me of. If you want to accuse someone of scamming you have to go here : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0You don't speculate on the price and you don't sell / buy IOTA. You just keep repeating that sellers are scammers over and over. So you are off-topic. So stop and gtfo. I generally don't agree with censorship, but at this point I think everyone has seen Admirals shitpost and herpes like post history. He's a scammer that just posts a bunch of nonsense. He's taking up space and being a general cunt. I would be fine with you just removing all his posts and banning him. Just let him dig his own grave as he continues to spread his libel and defamation claiming people with publicly known identities or established forum personas are scammers without proof. These sellers will try to scam you out of your BTC.
|
|
|
|
I've asked you before, and I will ask you again, do you or do you not condone the actions of the Monero trolls? Do you think that trolling other coins is a good way to gain publicity? Are you happy that people think of this when they think about Monero?
I'm still waiting for an answer, Riccardo.
Of course he does condone, but won't say anything on record. Only this time there was a backlash and butts are hurt when the premier troll hero icebreaker is humiliated for his premature ejaculation. iCEBREAKER did nothing wrong.
Except probably donate 240xmr to the dash guy rofl rofl Supporting the coin you are supposed to be trolling. Fail much???    |
|
|
|
I look forward to Dash's peer-reviewed white papers that contain no mathematics. And I look forward to Monero's leaders standing up and publicly denouncing the wretched behaviour of their band of trolls that serve to make all of crypto look bad, not to mention hold Monero back. Alas, that will never happen either. We need to end this. I'm definitely not the only one who feels this way. I hope you are in agreement on that point. I will absolutely not denounce anyone. They are intelligent individuals who are welcome to say whatever they want. If I am to denounce them because they are critical of some other project, where does that end? What if some community members decide they don't like sushi, which I love - should I denounce them too? What if they have different moral beliefs, or religious beliefs, or they don't love dogs as much as I do? Your call for "Monero's leaders" (such as they exist) to denounce members of the community for this is a disgusting attack on free speech. Them disliking sushi doesn't harm your project. |
|
|
|
@ICO investors got approx 0.004btc/100gIOTA.
I believe you're off by order of magnitude. |
|
|
|
No I don't get it. Perhaps you could word it differently and I can try again?
Sorry moving on, it requires some selfstudy now. Sure thing, please go ahead. Perhaps start a blog and paste the link here when/if you have it sorted. |
|
|
|
It is not about CH taking the btc, it's about the solution.
I think Davids solution is certainly a way to correct this. But I don't agree.
Why: because it is impossible for a third party to be 100% sure it is CH's account.
Without the solution it's 100% sure many people will get scammed. With the solution there's 0.1%* chance someone will get scammed. __________ * If we estimate the chance CH didn't sell the seed is 99.9% Two wrongs don't make a right. It's impossible for you to be 100% sure there are two wrongs unless you are CH or bought his seed. Your logic is flawed. Are you implying giving the stolen tokens to those who paid for them but were scammed is wrong? No, let me break it down in little pieces for you: Two wrongs: 1. it is impossible for a third party to be 100% sure it is CH's account. 2. 0.1% chance someone ELSE will get scammed (which is a random number you made up, but let's keep this in for the sake of argument) Hence the saying: Two wrongs don't make a right. Get it? No I don't get it. Perhaps you could word it differently and I can try again? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
