|
Bump... bounty raised to 1 BTC!
|
|
|
|
sp! come, sell me your improvements, I have $$$ waiting for you...  |
|
|
|
|
Need an information that enables me to unlock setting memory timings on Turing and Ampere. It works for Pascal no problem, but for Turing/Ampere, the action is "successful" but there is no result and timings are not saved. So there must be some switch somewhere which would unlock this potential. I only need information, don't even need the code. This information would probably be located in the private (NDA) part of NVAPI.
Whoever has this info and is willing to sell, PM me.
|
|
|
|
I hope this post does not get deleted, because my posts were getting deleted. I am making this post on my behalf, has nothing to do with NiceHash and NiceHash is not aware of it. This is my personal view and NOT a statement from NiceHash. Let's start with timeline several months ago, before the big BTC hype, when BTC was still just around 10k. Who was mining back then? Old school miners. People that know how to mine, people that use dedicated rigs, are well aware NOT to store any personal data on these PCs. Keep private keys away. Minerstat for example, is actually well aware of this, and they made a suggestion Don't mine on personal computer. We do know what minerstat application includes, but we can never know what is in the mining clients as they are closed source. source: https://minerstat.com/help/how-to-secure-your-mining-environmentSo, generally, it is well known that it is simply too risky to just mine on your own PC. You need to have a dedicated rig for that, if you wish to mine. What happened then? BTC started rising and with it all other altcoins and ethereum. NiceHash made some campaigns and there will be more - to get general population (especially gamers into mining). Let's put out this fact: these people DO NOT have dedicated rigs for mining, they DO MINE on their personal computers. The thing that everyone here knows is very risky to do. But everything is fine, when each person decides for himself. If you are prepared to take the risks and you do install close source miners from anonymous developers, that is on you and nobody else. Nobody can be blamed for your choice, right? Now, this things becomes way more complicated, if there is someone else who installs this on your PC - like NiceHash. And if you didn't notice the total ignorance by the majority of people towards this problem, to the point of even making jokes of "stealing my porn collection". These things are not something you make fun of. These things can destroy a company and put people behind bars. Yes, NiceHash is aware of this problem, was aware of this BEFORE phoenix saga happened, that is why there were certain threads opened and posts made. There were plans to inform public better about this issue. NiceHash started solving this issue from two perspectives: first was to inform the public and second was to create alternative that would at least come close to the closed source solutions made by anonymous developers. Until last weekend, everything was calm. Then NiceHash started getting reports about PhoenixMiner Mega.nz download issue. Okay, it can happen, developer would surely fix the issue and upload new bins, inform us about new link. But nothing. We decided to write to developer - no response. After no response, we started getting worried. Is that an exit scam? Did we just distribute malicious software from anonymous developer and will be held responsible for installing malware on 300k computers worldwide? This was the main question in the company. How would ANY reasonable person react to this speculation? Keep it quiet and hope that this is not true? Well... hope is not enough, hope doesn't absolve you from responsibility. Yes, NiceHash do have 3rd party EULA that every user has to confirm, but like I mentioned before, nobody was reading that. People gave jack shit about it and really didn't care. They were under complete illusion that "NiceHash is a big company, they surely must have taken care of what I am installing, no?". Perhaps if this happened and there was a court case, NiceHash could win, but that doesn't mean NiceHash would survive. And when we took a deeper look - developer gone for 1.5 months, constant attempts to push 5.5d bins, someone was doing hash checks and said these don't match (not sure why that was but as later found out - probably because of different zip files), it was just a big panic and a race with a time - if there is a malicious attempt, we need to inform users ASAP and reduce possible damage. Considering how long developer did not react (it must have been like 3 days), we were sure he/she/they are not coming back and the only question remaining was: is there an exit scam or not? Why did we think so? The reasons cannot be simply explained with one sentence, but I have made explanation available here: https://www.reddit.com/r/NiceHash/comments/lzsheq/phoenixminer_howwhywhat_statement_from_it_expert/ But on Monday morning, look, developer is back! I was sure, we need to make an apology now. Even though, we never said that there is malware, we only warned users there COULD be, people panicked and simply overlooked our "COULD" word. So, my belief was to make a sorry statement at least for this indirect damage. And if you ask me, I am still sorry for this. I know what it means, if developer intentions are not harmful, and until there is name to be kept, I am sure, intentions are not harmful. I know how much damage from reduced income this must have caused. But I cannot decide for the company what statements to give out. This is not in my power and voting was against doing this. If it helps you PhoenixMiner, personally, I am sorry for this, truly I am. Now, let's also debate the other very suspicious events that were going on before developer reappeared and which do not make much sense and were completely unnecessary and must have been related to something else, which made the whole disappearance even more suspicious. I believe, if there were none of these activities, things would probably go into different direction, perhaps even towards official sorry statement. So, after the announcement was made, there was immediate FUD by Josip Juhas, that NiceHash has pushed malicious 5.5d binaries to all NiceHash users and that this is just a campaign to fix own mistake. I have asked Josip to take this statement down, because it was not true. It was not true according to the source code, which is publicly available and everyone can analyze and confirm that this could not have happened unless the real developer pushed these bins on Mega.nz. Also, not a single user reported getting 5.5d bins and nobody reported anything about being infected. But Josip Juhas continued pushing this FUD to the point so others have copied his statement, including Alchemy from RedPandaMining and this statement was then spread by RedPandaMining all around the community through his YouTube channel. Besides that, someone (definitely not developer) also started massive shill campaign on all social media posting either this exact same FUD about 5.5d binaries being pushed or diversion - some events from NiceHash's history to discredit NiceHash warning as false and as something you really don't have to worry about. I cannot prove who was behind this campaign, but if developer wasn't available, then I would guess it was definitely NOT the developer. And the developer would be the only one having interest doing that. So who else would be doing that? I still don't know, but if I'd have to point my finger I'd say Josip Juhas. It fits his profile. Why? Let me tell you something about Josip Juhas, aka minerstat owner. Josip Juhas was convicted two times in Slovenia and spend some time in prison. First time, he was convicted for planned murder. With some other people, they had a plan to hire a young woman, insure her for large sum of money (2.5mil EUR) and then murder her to get this money. So, basically, to make insurance fraud. He got 1 year of prison for this (because it was never executed and was only planned). Second time, he was convicted for extorting women. There were 3 guys, one had sex with women and they taped acts. After the act, there was extortion for money so they would keep quiet and not tell their husbands. At least 3 women were the victims. Not much was revealed publicly, because identity of victims was hidden. He got around 3 years of prison for this crime. Sources (unfortunately in Slovenian, but you can use google translate): https://www.vecer.com/kronika/do-grla-vpleten-v-dogovor-o-umoru-bo-terjal-odskodnino-zaradi-pripora-10075458https://old.slovenskenovice.si/crni-scenarij/doma/za-nacrtovani-umor-sta-dobila-po-10-lethttps://old.delo.si/novice/kronika/kljucno-prico-cakajo-na-sodiscu-in-v-zaporu.htmlThere are a lot more sources available, I just listed few. How do I know this? Josip Juhas once worked for NiceHash. He resigned somewhere in the middle of 2017. He wasn't fired, he resigned, let me make this very clear. Also, he is well aware of dangers of mining on personal computer - he has this text I quoted before on minerstat webpage. So, why would he do what he did then you may ask yourself? Deep inside, he must know the dangers, deep inside he knew that NiceHash distributed PhoenixMiner on many PCs around and deep inside he knew that this could be the end of NiceHash if it turns out to be true - that there is an exit scam. But if NiceHash makes a big warning, and it turns out to be true, then NiceHash would survive, because people were warned and they could have reacted fast enough to prevent damage. Do you see reasoning now? Josip Juhas wish that NiceHash would die since 2017 when he resigned. He created kinda competitive service - minerstat, so of course, he wants NiceHash gone, obliterated. And by spreading malware, that would be the perfect way. So, making any warnings, that is actually bad - he doesn't want NiceHash to make warnings, he wants NiceHash to make mistakes, so he could take over with minerstat. You can go search his history of comments here and you will notice that he was constantly bad mouthing NiceHash for no apparent reason. I have contacted Josip Juhas at the end of 2020, was expecting to get bad mouthed but was surprised that he was being very polite. Now I see, it was all only the act. His plan was to sell minerstat to NiceHash for 5 million EUR. Of course NiceHash turned that down. There was no reason for him to talk to NiceHash anymore after that. He was so convinced that he was building "something" for NiceHash for the past 3 years, but when we told him that we don't need his service, he was very disappointed. And this is what you get if you don't pay... Basically, if he had a sex tape, it wouldn't be a question "can you please buy this for 5mil?" but rather statement "give me 5mil or I release this sex tape to the public!". So, be very careful when you deal with him. Never make any business with him. Better not even talk to him. And I am sure he will come up with some bullshit about me being the owner and that nobody likes me and that I am alone and that people are leaving NiceHash. NiceHash has about 50 people and is growing, getting more people every month. What he talks "supposedly about me" is actually his own personality. Josip Juhas has only his girlfriend and one guy from 2017. That is whole minerstat. Only brainwashed people can work with/for him. Sooner or later, anyone realizes that it is impossible to do business with him or impossible to work with/for him. So, what will happen now in the future? NiceHash Miner will introduce some way of putting PhoenixMiner back in, it just isn't going to be automatic download by NiceHash. That is just way too risky. When people manually insert miners in, then NiceHash cannot be responsible for anything malicious if it ever happened. Similar destiny awaits all other anonymous miners. We don't hate PhoenixMiner and we did not want to destroy PhoenixMiner. This is just malicious talk. There was a risky situation and we had to take extraordinary action to protect NiceHash. And regarding Josip Juhas. Well, we can just hope that he doesn't murder us all... because after all... he could be capable doing that. I know he will be fighting hard and try to delete this post I made. He was able to reach with mods somehow to delete my other posts. Let's see if he get's so lucky this time too. If he does, then mod, whoever is deleting this post, perhaps you should think twice - isn't this bitcointalk, a forum where free speech is guaranteed? |
|
|
|
|
Can you provide some proof that you are actually the real PhoenixMiner and not a hacker controlling PhoenixMiner account on bitcointalk?
|
|
|
|
Sure .)
You still run suprnova pools?
We wanted to warn people from not just blindly running miner files on their PCs with sensitive data and look what kind of shill war we get back. Started by minerstat...Makes me wonder what benefits they have behind the scene... Just look at all these new accounts, all 1 star, newly bought up for this purpose, makes me sick. Not one old account says anything, because everyone oldsql knows that you just dont want to execute PhoenixMiner on your main dev PC for example, shit even your sources could be stolen then.
My account is from 2017, and I've asked the same questions (also with no response) on Reddit with my account from 2015 with 9k karma. Funnily enough most people don't actually post on here all that often, personally I only usually visit to check for new builds. How about instead of raving about "hired shills" you calm down and answer the damn question that everybody is asking you? I will reiterate them for ease of reference: The last update to your github seems to link directly to a Mega link, this clearly isn't the build currently being distributed since you have removed PhoenixMiner in the latest update. So are you updating your miner and then updating github? In which case what prevents you from having updated that hardcoded URL to something else in the interim? Your original posts also reference a mismatched hash: Control shasum from new download locations does not match the value published by the developer on his channel!
What were these "new download locations," as the dev hasn't posted any? What was the hash, and how did the hash mismatch if you were purportedly linking to 5.5c which we have all downloaded and can see matches the hash posted by PhoenixMiner? This sounds remarkably like you guys messed up, panicked, made a report to Mega (probably why the Github got taken down) and made a bunch of increasingly rabid posts about it. Probably due the hurry our NiceHash Miner dev didn't update GitHub repo, it was very important to make new plugin ver which killed PhoenixMiner. It is Sunday... people usually don't work on sunday. Anyway, it is just C#, easily decompilable, you can check whats inside even if you don't have the source. Are you happy with the answer? Why do you think NiceHash is here just to f*ck everyone? Please, imagine that there is really malware in PhoenixMiner, proved, what do you think would happen with NiceHash? Everyone would be blaming us saying "You distributed PhoenixMiner!" These EULAs that people have to agree to mean jack shit when it explodes, people don't care what is written on paper, people become like animals, only actions count. We had to make this announcement to protect NiceHash. |
|
|
|
Wow so many old name suddenly popping up djezo.. you're still here ?   Sure .) You still run suprnova pools? We wanted to warn people from not just blindly running miner files on their PCs with sensitive data and look what kind of shill war we get back. Started by minerstat...Makes me wonder what benefits they have behind the scene... Just look at all these new accounts, all 1 star, newly bought up for this purpose, makes me sick. Not one old account says anything, because everyone oldsql knows that you just dont want to execute PhoenixMiner on your main dev PC for example, shit even your sources could be stolen then. |
|
|
|
That crook made sure that NiceHash didn't just vanish after hack in 2017 when CEO and chief of security Marko Kobal was hacked and consequently wallets drained for 4700. If this crook wasn't there and if he didn't insist that NiceHash must continue to operate, then users would never get back 4700 bitcoins and there would be no NiceHash today.
And watch how this verdict is overturned by constitutional court in the following months because of planted evidence and violation of human rights such as the right to defense - particularly to view evidence. Of course reporters didn't write that. It wouldn't be so shocking then eh? Would like to see you defend yourself when evidence is planted and then they don't allow you view that evidence. Everyone gets convicted that way.
I must say your posts, both here and on Reddit, are extremely unprofessional. Not to mention questionable in their content and intent. It might be an idea for NiceHash to hire an actual PR firm if they lack anybody competent in communicating with the general public rather than let people like you speak on their behalf. Ignoring the nonsensical suggestion that Škorjanc is innocent, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, you are spreading FUD to try and push users to a competing miner. PhoenixMiner is not anonymous, he hasn't posted and his Mega got taken offline. This was likely due to a licensing complaint, which is the only part of your Reddit post that isn't rabid nonsense, but we do not know and there is zero reason to suspect malfeasance. That PhoenixMiner is some backdoored monstrosity and Mega, of all companies, not only somehow got wind of it but kept this to themselves is about as ridiculous a proposition as I have heard in some time. My posts are not official statements of the company. I am making posts on my own. Freedom of speech. If you blame anyone, blame me, not the company. When it comes to reporters like Krebs, these would not publish evidence of planted evidence, because in such case, they would be ripped apart by the governments. They are not allowed to post anything shady about governments of western countries. You think the poor guy didn't try to reach media ? Of course he did... but when you start talking about "planted evidence", suddenly, room is empty and everyone runs away. I have seen it on my own eyes! I bet if I post that page from one file where it is clearly visible,that evidence was planted, my post would get deleted, even from this forum Now back to PhoenixMiner. If he is not anonymous, who is he then? What is his name? And don't give me this link: https://phoenixminer.ru/blog/ because it is obviously that this page was quickly created for shilling, just check the github address... it points to https://github.com/fireice-uk/ Shills are in such a hurry now that they just reuse GitHubs of other users... |
|
|
|
Only today did I actually look into the company NiceHash that I had been using. They were founded by a crook. Found guilty, served time for creating the largest botnet ever revealed designed to steal banking info. I will NEVER be using NiceHash again. They caused a TON of people to panic today all to get traffic to their new open source miner. This is disgraceful. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NiceHash#ControversiesThe SHA-1 of the .ZIP file is:
9a3efe6130ba21ab2ade9df38ff9d52a539d9693
I dont have the zip file because I deleted it once I extracted it
The SHA-1 of of my .EXE file is:
11428c3bdf728860fd057c411a95b14e13f05dbc
Are the ZIP and EXE checksum suppose to be different? is mine safe?
yes, .exe file looks original because I downloaded it from the first post of this thread a couple of weeks ago. That crook made sure that NiceHash didn't just vanish after hack in 2017 when CEO and chief of security Marko Kobal was hacked and consequently wallets drained for 4700. If this crook wasn't there and if he didn't insist that NiceHash must continue to operate, then users would never get back 4700 bitcoins and there would be no NiceHash today. And watch how this verdict is overturned by constitutional court in the following months because of planted evidence and violation of human rights such as the right to defense - particularly to view evidence. Of course reporters didn't write that. It wouldn't be so shocking then eh? Would like to see you defend yourself when evidence is planted and then they don't allow you view that evidence. Everyone gets convicted that way. |
|
|
|
Yo sp_ my nigga! You came back? You have any private optimzation for any algorithm used in ethash? I am buying. Interested for cards pascal, turing and ampere only (no maxwell shit anymore). Also if you have any private memory timings modification code I would buy. Just send me PM if you have anything like that for sale. Oh and Octopus algo, you have clean CUDA C++ code for it? Cos I was looking, there is only some weird unknown language stuff that I've never seen before in public miners. Also interested in speed opts regarding this algo for pascal, turing, ampere. Basically, anyone who can handle CUDA and want to earn big bucks and not only pocket change, PM me and show me your skills  |
|
|
|
I think NiceHash either messed up or just a way to scare people into using their miner. What would be the devs reasoning or motive to do anything malicious? Devs are making millions right now, they have been MIA lately probably traveling the globe on a yacht. Probably spending the missive surge of income they are getting from all the new miners. I have never trusted NiceHash, I just don't see a motive for dev to do anything.
1st message nice... I Yes, don't you finally get it? Now shills are coming out to try to convince you that phoenix is fine, just keep using it... Guys, don't be ridiculous and stop using it + reinstall Windows and change passwords if you used it on your PC. |
|
|
|
I think NiceHash either messed up or just a way to scare people into using their miner. What would be the devs reasoning or motive to do anything malicious? Devs are making millions right now, they have been MIA lately probably traveling the globe on a yacht. Probably spending the missive surge of income they are getting from all the new miners. I have never trusted NiceHash, I just don't see a motive for dev to do anything.
You know, if I was PhoenixMiner I would made a company, sign software, pay taxes and have people working and taking care of binaries being constantly available to customers. Then I could actually legally spend those millions of income and buy a yacht legally and wouldn't have any issues representing source of my income, I wouldn't break any laws. So, now explain me, why would someone hide his ass for so many years, keep identity in such a secrecy? And when getting these millions you would need to launder money first because this is just too much to spend as a pocket money. There are just too many shady things going around to be so trusty regarding it. Also read this: https://www.reddit.com/r/NiceHash/comments/lzsheq/phoenixminer_howwhywhat_statement_from_it_expert/ |
|
|
|
|
Recently, we have banned several market manipulators that were responsible for cheating out NiceHash Miners by first placing very high paying orders and then when NHMs started filling in, cancelling them. At the same time, these persons had very low paying orders ready to accumulate the remaining NHMs that were stuck for some time with very low paying orders. We did not steal any coins, we just terminated access to these accounts. If you would like to get your coins back, you will have to contact support.
Normally, we do not interfere with our markets, but this time, we had to, to protect our miners from getting ripped off by some buyers.
As a measure, we did not only ban market manipulators, but we also improved algorithm switching and we will worker harder on this issue in the future.
Temporary, we have disabled placing Blake2s orders and we may reinitiate placing them when we have stronger anti-market manipulation tactics in place.
|
|
|
|
https://github.com/nicehash/NiceHashMinerLegacy/issues/555Very interesting discovery OK - I was surprised to see that NiceHashMiner queiries the registry about 60 THOUSAND times a minute! Some of the query types might be worrying - e.g. it has a mailto check, and it searches all the private certificate locations e.g. Root and CA. Considering there is full NHM Legacy source available on GitHub, just point out which part of the code is malicious. Until then, I suggest you to study more about computer tech so you will be able to better understand what, when and why is needed for software to properly work. |
|
|
|
So I tried finding some other pools than Nanopool for Ethereum and tried ethermine.org but it was the same problem here. Can you tell me what pool support this kind of protocol? --ypsi NiceHash supports it fully. |
|
|
|
Hey zawawa. Since you're around I was wondering if I could ask you why your gatelessgate or sgminer 5.5.5-8 nicehash are getting "Stratum connection interrupted" when mining xmr on nicehash on a regular basis?
Perhaps there is something that I can add to the config to stop this from happening?
Thanks for your time. Cheers!
That happens with excavator, too. I will find out what is going on. That is normal if you do not submit any share in 10min window. |
|
|
|
Version 1.3.1 alpha NVIDIA report
GTX 1080Ti
Version 1.2.11 alpha - 685 H/s
Version 1.3.1 alpha NVIDIA - 698 H/s :-)
5 X GTX 1070
Version 1.2.11 alpha - 2120 H/s
Version 1.3.1 alpha NVIDIA - 1968 H/s :-(
Try with 1 worker per card only. 5 X GTX 1070 with config (with 1 worker per card)[
{"time":1,"commands":[
{"id":1,"method":"algorithm.add","params":["equihash","zec-eu1.nanopool.org:6666","**********************************************"]}
]},
{"time":2,"commands":[
{"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","0"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","1"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","2"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","3"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","4"]}
]},
{"time":5,"commands":[
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.tdp","params": ["0","80"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.core_delta","params": ["0","80"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.memory_delta","params":["0","680"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.tdp","params": ["1","80"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.core_delta","params": ["1","100"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.memory_delta","params":["1","680"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.tdp","params": ["2","80"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.core_delta","params": ["2","100"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.memory_delta","params":["2","680"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.tdp","params": ["3","80"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.core_delta","params": ["3","100"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.memory_delta","params":["3","680"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.tdp","params": ["4","80"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.core_delta","params": ["4","100"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.memory_delta","params":["4","680"]}
]},
{"time":10,"commands":[
{"id":1,"method":"worker.reset","params":["0"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.reset","params":["1"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.reset","params":["2"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.reset","params":["3"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.reset","params":["4"]}
]},
{"time":15,"loop":20,"commands":[
{"id":1,"method":"worker.print.speed","params":["0"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.print.speed","params":["1"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.print.speed","params":["2"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.print.speed","params":["3"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.print.speed","params":["4"]},
{"id":1,"method":"algorithm.print.speeds","params":["0"]}
]},
{"event":"on_quit","commands":[
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.tdp","params": ["0","100"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.core_delta","params": ["0","0"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.memory_delta","params":["0","0"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.tdp","params": ["1","100"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.core_delta","params": ["1","0"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.memory_delta","params":["1","0"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.tdp","params": ["2","100"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.core_delta","params": ["2","0"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.memory_delta","params":["2","0"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.tdp","params": ["3","100"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.core_delta","params": ["3","0"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.memory_delta","params":["3","0"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.tdp","params": ["4","100"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.core_delta","params": ["4","0"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.memory_delta","params":["4","0"]}
]}
]
Version 1.2.11 alpha - 2120 H/s Version 1.3.1 alpha NVIDIA with 1 worker per card - 2068 H/s :-( Load per card 97% - afterburner screenshot:  OS? Version of OS? Driver version? |
|
|
|
Version 1.3.1 alpha NVIDIA report GTX 1080Ti with config [
{"time":1,"commands":[
{"id":1,"method":"algorithm.add","params":["equihash","zec-eu1.nanopool.org:6666","************************************"]}
]},
{"time":2,"commands":[
{"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","0"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","0"]}
]},
{"time":5,"commands":[
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.tdp","params": ["0","100"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.core_delta","params": ["0","130"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.memory_delta","params":["0","800"]}
]},
{"time":10,"commands":[
{"id":1,"method":"worker.reset","params":["0"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.reset","params":["1"]}
]},
{"time":15,"loop":20,"commands":[
{"id":1,"method":"worker.print.speed","params":["0"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.print.speed","params":["1"]},
{"id":1,"method":"algorithm.print.speeds","params":["0"]}
]},
{"event":"on_quit","commands":[
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.tdp","params": ["0","100"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.core_delta","params": ["0","0"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.memory_delta","params":["0","0"]}
]}
]
Version 1.2.11 alpha - 685 H/s Version 1.3.1 alpha NVIDIA - 698 H/s :-) 5 X GTX 1070 with config [
{"time":1,"commands":[
{"id":1,"method":"algorithm.add","params":["equihash","zec-eu1.nanopool.org:6666","***************************************"]}
]},
{"time":2,"commands":[
{"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","0"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","0"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","1"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","1"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","2"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","2"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","3"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","3"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","4"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","4"]}
]},
{"time":5,"commands":[
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.tdp","params": ["0","80"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.core_delta","params": ["0","80"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.memory_delta","params":["0","680"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.tdp","params": ["1","80"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.core_delta","params": ["1","100"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.memory_delta","params":["1","680"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.tdp","params": ["2","80"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.core_delta","params": ["2","100"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.memory_delta","params":["2","680"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.tdp","params": ["3","80"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.core_delta","params": ["3","100"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.memory_delta","params":["3","680"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.tdp","params": ["4","80"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.core_delta","params": ["4","100"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.memory_delta","params":["4","680"]}
]},
{"time":10,"commands":[
{"id":1,"method":"worker.reset","params":["0"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.reset","params":["1"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.reset","params":["2"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.reset","params":["3"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.reset","params":["4"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.reset","params":["5"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.reset","params":["6"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.reset","params":["7"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.reset","params":["8"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.reset","params":["9"]}
]},
{"time":15,"loop":20,"commands":[
{"id":1,"method":"worker.print.speed","params":["0"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.print.speed","params":["1"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.print.speed","params":["2"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.print.speed","params":["3"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.print.speed","params":["4"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.print.speed","params":["5"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.print.speed","params":["6"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.print.speed","params":["7"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.print.speed","params":["8"]},
{"id":1,"method":"worker.print.speed","params":["9"]},
{"id":1,"method":"algorithm.print.speeds","params":["0"]}
]},
{"event":"on_quit","commands":[
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.tdp","params": ["0","100"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.core_delta","params": ["0","0"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.memory_delta","params":["0","0"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.tdp","params": ["1","100"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.core_delta","params": ["1","0"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.memory_delta","params":["1","0"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.tdp","params": ["2","100"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.core_delta","params": ["2","0"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.memory_delta","params":["2","0"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.tdp","params": ["3","100"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.core_delta","params": ["3","0"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.memory_delta","params":["3","0"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.tdp","params": ["4","100"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.core_delta","params": ["4","0"]},
{"id":1,"method":"device.set.memory_delta","params":["4","0"]}
]}
]
Version 1.2.11 alpha - 2120 H/s Version 1.3.1 alpha NVIDIA - 1968 H/s :-( Try with 1 worker per card only. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
