Bitcoin Forum
May 10, 2024, 07:43:27 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 »
1  Other / Meta / Re: To all higher ranked members here on: September 18, 2018, 03:21:49 PM

Quote

if your post had not started out like a bleeding vagina I would of given you the merit.. so yes, saying anything is unfair isnt the way to deal with it - fuck anyone else, worry about yourself and if needed improve yourself to get to your goal.

If you find any harsh comments or whenever someone uses vulgar language you can click on "Report to moderator"  Smiley
2  Other / Meta / Re: To all higher ranked members here on: September 18, 2018, 03:18:20 PM
Quote

The Merit system is in place now & there’s nothing you can do about it. If you’re a newbie you’ll need to work harder to gain Merit, that’s just the way it is. Try & be different, stand out.

It’s like when you leave school & you’re the new kid at work. You get the shit jobs in the office, you have to make the coffee & the tea but as time passes & you get more experience you become useful at work. You’re not the new kid all of a sudden & then a new, new kid joins Cheesy

If you get me Smiley

yeah i got that but thing is higher ranked members may or may not be highly qualified and newbies might or might not be noobs when it comes to technology.i agree with that example what you have mentioned.But problem here is you never know who is useful at work now because some people who are having higher rank now didn't worked hard as much as newbies are working hard right now.
3  Other / Meta / Re: To all higher ranked members here on: September 18, 2018, 02:55:12 PM
—So before merit system people who are legendary right now, got into that position by their quality of post ? No right? They might have spammed too to get into member,Hero member and legendary.So why no action on them —

WRONG!
If somebody who is a Legendary Member was a regular shitposter & or spammer it’s likely that somebody would have reported their posts & they’d have been banned before reaching Full Member status.


Most Legendary Members post at least mediocre quality posts.


Ok in this discussion thread you must have observed that whatever the post done by a higher ranked member gets merit no matter what they post and lower ranked member never gets it.Just to demonstrate it live i have created this thread.I hope administrators and moderators look into this issue.
4  Other / Meta / Re: To all higher ranked members here on: September 18, 2018, 02:50:28 PM
Sorry, but how a post from 2015 where I join a signature campaign has anything to do with this? You WHOLE post history is shit.

You literally went stalking for a post from 3 years ago to post here. Can you try with any of my last ~3000 posts? Wink

So you agree that you are one of the spammer from 2015 to 2017.And you got enlightened in 2018 by then you were a Hero member.Nice move.
5  Other / Meta / Re: To all higher ranked members here on: September 18, 2018, 02:48:18 PM
Newbies and juniors suffer because they keep starting duplicate threads like this one.
How can i get merit points if with the sharing system 5>2.5>1.25>0.625> we are heading to zero?  Huh Huh
Have you not read anything about how the merit system works?  It's not exactly new at this point.
*Never mind, you're newer than I thought.*

The reason we don't run out of merits is because the merit source members keep getting their sMerits replenished.  So there's not a fixed amount at any given time.  It keeps increasing.  And I would add that Theymos just added 36 more merit sources AND advised them to be somewhat liberal when handing out merits to Newbies.  I've been trying to be liberal so far, but right now there's a hell of a lot of spam threads and merit-grabbing attempts.  

I'm going to hold off until this all settles.  Some noobs, no doubt, are trying to make their best posts ever in order to get out of newbie hell, and then they'll likely go right back to shitposting.

The word airdrop is too much expensive word in this scenario as it's purely a luck so let's call, merits are "donated" to higher ranked members as they didn't had one.
You're free to call it whatever you want, but you're obviously not grasping the "life isn't fair" concept.  I'd also point out that you're just now complaining about something that happened back in January and that it's useless to complain about it.
Doesn't matter when it happened.Because mistakes need to be pointed out from past to correct it in future.
6  Other / Meta / Re: To all higher ranked members here on: September 18, 2018, 02:45:15 PM
Correct me if i am wrong then instead of claiming it as thrash.
There is nothing to correct. It's pure trash.

1. It adds nothing to the discussion.
2. It adds nothing to anyone's life.
3. It's just an effortless oner liner made while you were shitpost bursting for the sake of filling a quota or increasing your post count. You literally go from post to post writing the first thing that comes to your mind.

It's simply just a waste of bandwidth and space on the server's database.

I'm sorry if you are so delusional that you can't see how bad your post is and how wrong is your mentality on this forum.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=840124.msg12594038#msg12594038

Exactly this is why i claim most of people of higher ranked members here are purely based on luck.You can check where you stand.  Wink

1. It adds nothing to the discussion.
2. It adds nothing to anyone's life.
3. It's just an effortless oner liner made while you were shitpost bursting for the sake of filling a quota or increasing your post count. You literally go from post to post writing the first thing that comes to your mind.

It's simply just a waste of bandwidth and space on the server's database.

I'm sorry if you are so delusional that you can't see how bad your post is and how wrong is your mentality on this forum.
7  Other / Meta / Re: To all higher ranked members here on: September 18, 2018, 02:38:42 PM
Quote
Timing was important, yes.  Deal with it.  But you're wrong about this being luck.  Legendaries put in a lot of time here posting and many have still earned lots of merits on top of what they were airdropped.  Again, you're going to have to deal with it.  Nobody cares about claims of "this isn't fair, wahhhh".

The word airdrop is too much expensive word in this scenario as it's purely a luck so let's call, merits are "donated" to higher ranked members as they didn't had one.
8  Other / Meta / Re: To all higher ranked members here on: September 18, 2018, 02:33:20 PM
Nope ,they suffer because they don't have Legendary membership here and they don't get merit for whatever they post


You don't get merit because you post trash like this:

No as bitcoin is completely decentralized and permission less ,tamper proof cryptocurrency which uses technology of blockchain for the transaction.

Correct me if i am wrong then instead of claiming it as thrash.
9  Other / Meta / Re: To all higher ranked members here on: September 18, 2018, 02:27:23 PM
Last thing let's start with a polling mechanism here before you guys take any random decisions like this and ask participants to adhere on it,if bitcoin is decentralized why not Bitcointalk ?
Again, you're another noob who was nowhere to be found when this was actually being discussed, which it has been for months now. 

If anyone had started a poll, guaranteed you would have missed it, just like you missed the dozens of other threads asking the same question you just asked.  Most noobs are pure spammers and don't deserve to be able to wear advertising in their signature.  That's obvious to most senior members AND Theymos himself. 

Also, life isn't fair.  Suck it up and deal with it, because that fact likely isn't going to change in your lifetime.  However, this change is completely fair given how badly the spammers have diluted all the good posts with their nonsense.

Noob is just a relative experience .Before saying someone as noob remember Satoshi would think you as noob too.So let's be professional on that.Most noobs aren't pure spammers by the way.

Yeah i agree life isn't fair because i have to deal with the higher ranked members here who got into higher rank purely based on luck.Yes they suck up the fact too.  Wink
10  Other / Meta / Re: To all higher ranked members here on: September 18, 2018, 02:22:27 PM
Newbies and juniors suffer because they keep starting duplicate threads like this one.

Nope ,they suffer because they don't have Legendary membership here and they don't get merit for whatever they post (if you know what i mean  Wink ) .Moreover the truth is most legendary members here are legendary because of their luck nothing more.
11  Other / Meta / To all higher ranked members here on: September 18, 2018, 02:12:02 PM
The new rule introduced is really not cool.Why only newbies and Jr Members has to suffer each and every time? So before merit system people who are legendary right now, got into that position by their quality of post ? No right? They might have spammed too to get into member,Hero member and legendary.So why no action on them ?

Moreover being a newbie or Jr Member if someone post a constructively no one bats an eye here to give merit.But being a hero member or legendary member when someone posts everyone loses their mind and someone gonna merit it.Sad truth.I am just saying the reality of Bitcointalk right now,just posting on behalf of all my fellow Newbies and Jr Members.Hope the justice is served.

Last thing let's start with a polling mechanism here before you guys take any random decisions like this and ask participants to adhere on it,if bitcoin is decentralized why not Bitcointalk ?

Any thoughts on this?



12  Other / Meta / Re: Enhanced newbie restrictions & requirements on: September 18, 2018, 01:41:16 PM
I think you should consider the ability to buy merit for yourself. You can already effectively do this by way of purchasing a copper membership. Based upon the fact that well under 1% of active users have received a single merit, there need to be additional ways for people who do not post garbage to rank up.

Buying merit or normal ranks is like buying yourself a bunch of trophies to put on your shelf. It's stupid, and it's an insult to everyone who achieved it legitimately. I can't see ever doing that. I don't particularly mind letting people pay for some of the privileges of these things, such as with copper membership, but it should be a parallel system.

Copper membership is good. Now, if you want to participate in signature campaigns, you can either pay the $10-$20 for copper membership or accomplish the herculean task of making one good post. I don't think that it's unreasonable in either case.

If people are making good posts but are still struggling to get merit, then that's a problem with the merit system and should be fixed on my end. Demanding money in order to bypass a broken system would be really bad. But AFAICT the merit system actually is reasonably effective at identifying good posters.

This is really not cool.Why only newbies and Jr Members has to suffer each and every time? So before merit system people who are legendary right now, got into that position by their quality of post ? No right? They might have spammed too to get into member,Hero member and legendary.So why no action on them ?

Moreover being a newbie or Jr Member if someone post a constructively no one bats an eye here to give merit.But being a hero member or legendary member when someone posts everyone loses their mind and someone gonna merit it.Sad truth.I am just saying the reality of Bitcointalk right now,just posting on behalf of all my fellow Newbies and Jr Members.Hope the justice is served.

Last thing let's start with a polling mechanism here before you guys take any random decisions like this and ask participants to adhere on it,if bitcoin is decentralized why not Bitcointalk ?
13  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Developer Interview Questions on: September 08, 2018, 06:46:47 AM
I'm learning programming .But after seeing these questions i am quite confident as i can able to answer most of them  Grin Wink
14  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: i'd like to start educating others about blockchain: main points? on: September 08, 2018, 06:34:14 AM
Explain them why blockchain and why centralization is the problem and how blockchain works.
Introduce them to bitcoin ,and it's purpose.They will eventually learn about altcoins too later
15  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: Bitcoin Prediction : Dream or real ? on: August 12, 2018, 10:19:07 AM
No one can predict ,the only realistic way to find a value in something is Supply vs Demand,If Bitcoin is going to exhaust in few years due to mining then their is a high value for it,but in terms of price ,no one knows.
16  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: [WARNING] Potential SCAM ICO emerging soon, if not already out - CashTelex on: August 12, 2018, 10:02:23 AM
Great work by finding scams and keeping the community and bounties clean.Trusted bounty manager for a reason.
17  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Want to learn blockchain ✎ on: August 12, 2018, 09:59:14 AM
If you are good at connecting dots by gaining chunks of knowledge then "medium" is a great source to learn about blockchain.
18  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: How anonymous and secure is the blockchain technology? on: August 12, 2018, 09:53:00 AM
It depends on the algorithm and consensus mechanism you use to make it psuedo anonymous or completely anonymous.If consensus mechanism is perfect then it will be tamper proof.
19  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Explain SHA 256 Algorithm on: August 12, 2018, 09:31:10 AM
Thank you so much it worked.
20  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Consensus Mechanism on: August 07, 2018, 10:39:27 AM
How does a mix between Proof Of Work and Proof Of Stake work?
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!