Personally I think the syncing feature of the client urgently needs to be fixed before developments in other departments should be taken too far. I opened my client overnight and the last 10 days of activity still haven't synced up.
I'm running the client since a few hours ago and the syncing is slowly going... 22% It took me dayyyyyyys to download the full chain.. maybe over a week. That's pretty bad for a "torrent" coin who's blockchain size is in the range of 250mb. It is still a young ambitious coin. Anyone know what the v is for? |
|
|
|
|
Personally I think the syncing feature of the client urgently needs to be fixed before developments in other departments should be taken too far. I opened my client overnight and the last 10 days of activity still haven't synced up.
|
|
|
|
lots of eyes here  |
|
|
|
*We will need some kind of rating system for the community to filter out bad torrents.
*SEEDERS WILL NEED GOOD INCENTIVES TO KEEP TORRENTS HEALTHY
* We will need a way to moderate the torrents somehow so it doesn't get filled up with viruses and spam. I think the only way to do this would be a rating system? Also I am a member of some very large private torrent groups that have been around for years. IPTORRENTS.COM ... etc I can put word out there and get these guys over here. They will have many great ideas and a lot of good content to bring on board. Iptorrents.com is an amazing site btw. All about speed and rewarding its seeders to encourage a healthy community.
Regarding incentivized seeding, I completely agree, this would create a very healthy community and prevent wasted space from spammy torrents or dead links with no host. One option I have frequently thought about: Many private trackers utilize seed/leech ratios. A project like vTorrent could easily incorporate something similar using a platform token (VTR) to maintain ratios. For instance, seeders get rewarded VTR from purse of individual leeching/receiving the file. Upon connecting to a peer, a smart contract is initialized that binds the downloader/recipient of the file to reimburse the seeder proportional to their contributions. Once the file is complete, contract is fulfilled and all seeders are sent tokens proportional to the MB they successfully seeded to the client which downloaded the file. I haven't yet figured out how decide on an agreeable rate of MB/VTR ...possibly incorporating the current exchange rate? Only other option I see working to maintain equilibrium is by implementing a nuBits type of systems...as you wouldn't want to create a barrier to entry for individuals who cant afford to buy tokens and can't earn any by uploading new content.
Just a thought experiment, but I do see an awfully large potential. |
|
|
|
|
speaking of torrents... any reason we shouldn't be able to download the blockchain (using the VTR client) in the same manor we would any other file using bitTorrent protocol? To allow super fast syncing? This seems to be a prevalent issue in the cryptosphere. Is the real problem here just not enough nodes? Or is it the manor in which the blockchain is transmitted and pieced back together?
|
|
|
|
|
Srysly, after seeing relentless attacks on trackers last year I instantly thought, why not distribute it? ? Truly excited for the potential here. (Whoah bittrex!)
|
|
|
|
|
Oh I care, lack of surprise I'm sure. After all the last crap with the first AutoDiv this was bound to happen.
I think it's interesting to see that this and GlideSec have appeared bot not pay dividends the same weekend... and by my calculation they are both the two top div paying assets. Fingers crossed on the GlideSec. AutoDiv, well, based on the OP's behavior over the last few months, I honestly have lost hope. Being proved wrong would be a pleasant surprise.
|
|
|
|
nice new image on the OP I can't login to nodesupport - Says to contact the owner - I think I failed entering my password too many time. I was going to post: I think it would be appropriate to be able to see all Nodecoin earned through running a node. I can see coins earned from fees on the blocks page but not in the transactions page. It would make sense to show this on the transaction page as well.
Add a Contacts feature. It would be great to be able to save addresses for use in the future.
Thanks |
|
|
|
i want to buy more, but I'm worried autodiv will start a new asset and not pay autodiv3  thanks for the payout  |
|
|
|
didnt realize this is basically like shapeshift  ...and im a stakeholder |
|
|
|
What different roles do BTCD and BBR play in SuperNet and InstantDex?
BTCD is the reference currency by which all InstantDEX currency trades will be paired. (For example, BTC-->Doge will really be BTC-->BTCD-->DOGE behind the scenes) BTCD stakers will receive 5% of all revenues generated by InstantDEX and SuperNET.http://104.131.45.236/instantdexMatthew are dividends just paid to BTCD stakers in the form a BTCD? |
|
|
|
|
As far as I know is there is no way to just delete asset that you own (or even to close it if you are the creator). My question is then, is there an address we can send all our useless audodiv assets to so I don;t have to look at it anymore?
|
|
|
|
|
thank you autodiv for your consideration with regards to my recent investments. I appreciate you're understanding of my circumstance and appreciate your compensation. Thanks!
Apologies everyone for any inappropriate or misdirected behavior.
|
|
|
|
The least that could be done is a swap-out for recent buyers before the announcement. Nothing about this was 'obvious'
Really ? It was waiting to happen . .  yes. really. the OP looks exactly as it did weeks ago. all it speaks of is autoDiv3. the lack of conversation about autoDiv make's it obvious? what it does say about autoDiv3 is that it is designed to be a longterm/lifetime investment. so why would anyone just assume that autoDiv is any different? The difference is that AutoDiv was an IPO with a short sales period. I told initial investors it was an experimental fund. I do not feel at all bad about shutting it down because all initial ICO investors received at least a 200% ROI in just over two months. I have not marketed for the asset in quite some time and I have told anyone who asked that I felt it was not as good of an investment as AutoDiv3 when the price soared about 5 all the way to 7 or beyond. Why? Because the dividends were calculated on the basis of 4 NXT only, lowering the effective yield below the amount paid by ICO investors. In other words people were paying more to get less. On the other hand AutoDiv3 has been selling for below the .1 rate which the dividend calculation is made at. That means the effective yield is higher than what is offered. Since both assets were used primarily for dividend appreciation it seems people would choose that one. However numerous people have been 'day trading' both assets. That is particularly a problem for AutoDiv because the dividends are supplementing the trades and most people are not holding - which was the main and only point of the asset. Had you asked me any of these questions I would have been happy to answer. It is not as if I am out of touch since I update and respond every day. I am only alleging that any details/advice from the asset issuer, such as the fact that you are/were planning to close an asset that is/was currently gaining in value, should be made clear in the OP (from a professional standpoint - especially if you would like to build up a positive reputation as an asset manager/issuer). I should have reached out to you, you are correct. As I had mentioned earlier, I only purchased a small amount with the intent of comparing ROI and dividends. Sorry if you feel I'm being overly dramatic - just feel like I kinda got sucker-punched from behind.  |
|
|
|
The least that could be done is a swap-out for recent buyers before the announcement. Nothing about this was 'obvious'
Really ? It was waiting to happen . . yes. really. the OP looks exactly as it did weeks ago. all it speaks of is autoDiv3. the lack of conversation about autoDiv make's it obvious? what it does say about autoDiv3 is that it is designed to be a longterm/lifetime investment. so why would anyone just assume that autoDiv is any different? If you would have followed his AutoDiv/AutoDiv3 thread on the NXT-forum, you would have seen, that he guaranteed a minimum of 1% daily (max. 2.5%) for Autodiv (He changed the OP there already, but it is talked about in the thread). I would have liked this to be a longterm/lifetime investment too, but it should be clear to anyone, that 1% DAILY (guaranteed) won´t last . . He was paying well over 1% daily, but as soon, as he started to pay exactly 1.01% every day, for weeks, i knew, that it is coming to the end, and i sold off my AutoDiv gradually. so people like you are, in-part, at fault for noobs, like me, accumulating autoDiv just before the asset is closed. Thanks for your a-hole-y-er than thou intelligence. |
|
|
|
NXT-RD3G-MNDR-BH5S-8UJVT is dumping more than 20,000 CELL at 1.19 NXT each right now! He is losing his mind! But never mind it is a good opportunity to buy more!  yah... looks a little desperate for some greenbacks. Hoping I won't have to let go of any cell in the near future. |
|
|
|
The least that could be done is a swap-out for recent buyers before the announcement. Nothing about this was 'obvious'
Really ? It was waiting to happen . . yes. really. the OP looks exactly as it did weeks ago. all it speaks of is autoDiv3. the lack of conversation about autoDiv make's it obvious? what it does say about autoDiv3 is that it is designed to be a longterm/lifetime investment. so why would anyone just assume that autoDiv is any different? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
