|
I'm wondering why block time was increased, where can I read about it?
|
|
|
|
Nice collection u got there.  This is mine number currently: `- Total banned: 452
|
|
|
|
Glad to help. BTW one of my nodes shows atm: `- Total banned: 278 
|
|
|
|
can any one post an fail2ban jail for that?
Good idea. Instructions how to make one: First make sure that you have logips=1 in your bitcoin.conf, otherwise it won't work. Need to restart bitcoind after this change. In /etc/fail2ban/jail.local add following at the end of file: [bitcoin]
enabled = true port = 8333 filter = bitcoin logpath = /home/bitcoin/.bitcoin/debug.log maxretry = 0 bantime = 2592000 findtime = 2592000
Make sure logpath is pointing to the right place. I set bantime for 1 month, adjust to your liking. Create file /etc/fail2ban/filter.d/bitcoin.conf and put following inside: # Fail2Ban configuration file for bitcoin # [Definition] failregex = .*receive version message: Why\? Because fuck u.*peeraddr=<HOST>:.* ignoreregex =
fail2ban-client reload should add new jail, check /var/log/fail2ban.log for errors. fail2ban-client status should show bitcoin jail: Status |- Number of jail: 2 `- Jail list: ssh, bitcoin
And fail2ban-client status bitcoin should show something like this: Status for the jail: bitcoin |- filter | |- File list: /home/bitcoin/.bitcoin/debug.log | |- Currently failed: 0 | `- Total failed: 16 `- action |- Currently banned: 16 | `- IP list: 77.34.27.96 95.53.51.198 176.50.123.107 178.64.113.245 93.120.208.183 77.82.86.29 5.199.198.144 77.40.25.121 178.35.111.80 37.23.153.174 178.67.71.3 95.129.179.54 92.37.141.207 176.50.198.19 37.78.17.90 95.70.82.79 `- Total banned: 16
Enjoy! 
|
|
|
|
If you're running 0.12 you can ban a node by its ip address with rpc call
setban <ip> add <optional bantime>
Problem is there are hundreds of them. Pretty tedious doing it by hand. Edit: After some hours my patch banned 83 of them: bitcoin@bananapi:~/bin$ ./bitcoin-cli listbanned|grep addr "address": "2.60.204.57/32", "address": "5.136.220.110/32", "address": "5.137.251.169/32", "address": "5.138.15.217/32", "address": "5.139.87.106/32", "address": "5.142.27.229/32", "address": "5.143.55.24/32", "address": "5.143.115.180/32", "address": "31.23.195.149/32", "address": "31.23.231.195/32", "address": "31.163.105.183/32", "address": "31.180.152.1/32", "address": "31.181.162.179/32", "address": "37.23.253.228/32", "address": "46.41.92.99/32", "address": "46.41.97.157/32", "address": "46.41.115.251/32", "address": "46.48.167.72/32", "address": "46.48.179.188/32", "address": "46.159.121.207/32", "address": "46.191.253.244/32", "address": "77.34.87.50/32", "address": "77.34.108.82/32", "address": "77.41.95.148/32", "address": "78.37.227.67/32", "address": "79.105.223.109/32", "address": "81.30.123.42/32", "address": "81.163.37.42/32", "address": "85.173.74.60/32", "address": "85.173.190.40/32", "address": "86.102.32.234/32", "address": "87.225.42.163/32", "address": "87.225.89.116/32", "address": "88.200.246.39/32", "address": "90.150.248.22/32", "address": "91.147.24.172/32", "address": "92.37.155.47/32", "address": "92.37.182.182/32", "address": "92.37.223.99/32", "address": "92.101.41.148/32", "address": "92.101.106.113/32", "address": "93.178.114.164/32", "address": "94.233.7.122/32", "address": "94.233.69.6/32", "address": "94.233.211.110/32", "address": "94.245.139.200/32", "address": "94.245.183.30/32", "address": "95.37.173.26/32", "address": "95.53.187.129/32", "address": "95.55.215.16/32", "address": "95.70.2.205/32", "address": "95.70.48.54/32", "address": "95.70.48.232/32", "address": "95.70.70.7/32", "address": "95.72.181.180/32", "address": "95.72.236.7/32", "address": "95.110.12.169/32", "address": "95.159.159.94/32", "address": "95.159.179.222/32", "address": "95.165.154.153/32", "address": "95.189.49.30/32", "address": "95.190.31.191/32", "address": "109.165.117.185/32", "address": "109.184.70.22/32", "address": "109.184.176.205/32", "address": "109.229.105.198/32", "address": "176.49.173.143/32", "address": "176.50.215.156/32", "address": "176.120.199.230/32", "address": "176.209.67.249/32", "address": "178.35.46.76/32", "address": "178.35.130.106/32", "address": "178.64.0.241/32", "address": "178.64.65.227/32", "address": "178.64.151.255/32", "address": "178.65.205.3/32", "address": "178.67.164.232/32", "address": "178.68.4.64/32", "address": "178.68.36.162/32", "address": "178.69.85.123/32", "address": "178.184.58.144/32", "address": "185.11.149.125/32", "address": "188.19.140.210/32",
|
|
|
|
I patched my client like this: diff --git a/src/main.cpp b/src/main.cpp index 0eb5b58..b870dd5 100644 --- a/src/main.cpp +++ b/src/main.cpp @@ -4388,6 +4388,16 @@ bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, string strCommand, CDataStream& vRecv, else pfrom->fRelayTxes = true;
+ // ban dumbass + if (pfrom->cleanSubVer.find("Why?") != std::string::npos) + { + pfrom->PushMessage(NetMsgType::REJECT, strCommand, REJECT_OBSOLETE, string("Banned. Why? Because fuck u, thats why")); + LogPrintf("Banning dumbass %d\n", pfrom->id); + Misbehaving(pfrom->GetId(), 100); + pfrom->fDisconnect = true; + return false; + } + // Disconnect if we connected to ourself if (nNonce == nLocalHostNonce && nNonce > 1) {
|
|
|
|
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOPE, satoshies that is what we will use.
1 bitcent is 1 satoshi. Good enough for me.
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed. Bits looks good and doesn't need another change down the way (like from mili to micro).
|
|
|
|
While that site is cool, it's far from convenient to have food shipped. I'm not going to order my groceries and wait 3-5 business days to be able to eat.
You can't order it with gold either, so gold is failure too, right?
|
|
|
|
Because history repeating. The history of fiat money, to put it kindly, has been one of failure. In fact, EVERY fiat currency since the Romans first began the practice in the first century has ended in devaluation and eventual collapse, of not only the currency, but of the economy that housed the fiat currency as well. http://dailyreckoning.com/fiat-currency/
|
|
|
|
we're still technically in a bear market. i'd advice against throwing caution to the wind for at least a few more days  Exactly. We din't even had single (closed) green candle yet.
|
|
|
|
Pretty sure iReport is user-submitted articles.
It sure is. Damn, thought it's too good to be true.
|
|
|
|
Paul Krugman: The growth of the Internet will slow drastically, as the flaw in "Metcalfe's law"--which states that the number of potential connections in a network is proportional to the square of the number of participants--becomes apparent: most people have nothing to say to each other! By 2005 or so, it will become clear that the Internet's impact on the economy has been no greater than the fax machine's. http://web.archive.org/web/19980610100009/www.redherring.com/mag/issue55/economics.htmlnice! when did he write that? i don't see a date. June 1998 I think.
|
|
|
|
Paul Krugman: The growth of the Internet will slow drastically, as the flaw in "Metcalfe's law"--which states that the number of potential connections in a network is proportional to the square of the number of participants--becomes apparent: most people have nothing to say to each other! By 2005 or so, it will become clear that the Internet's impact on the economy has been no greater than the fax machine's. http://web.archive.org/web/19980610100009/www.redherring.com/mag/issue55/economics.html
|
|
|
|
Just saying.
So you saying that bubble will burst at $1024 in two years?
|
|
|
|
|