 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
Dynamic added to the pool!!: Spanish Crypto Pool Ivema Dynamic MiningDiff: 0.125
URL: pool.ivema.es:4236
Worker: <WALLET_ADDRESS>
Password: c=DYN
|
|
|
|
Yes, you were right. Now it is working fine. I used an old config file there. No it is the correct one. Spanish Crypto Pool Ivema New Coin Added
criptonight-heavy: SOLACE
Fee 1%
Payouts every hour SOLACE Miningpool.ivema.es Ports: 4444 -> Diff 2000 -> Low end hardware URL: pool.ivema.es:4444
Worker: <WALLET_ADDRESS>
Password: x 4446 -> Diff 10000 ->Mid range hardware URL: pool.ivema.es:4446
Worker: <WALLET_ADDRESS>
Password: x 4448 -> Diff 20000 -> High end hardware URL: pool.ivema.es:4448
Worker: <WALLET_ADDRESS>
Password: x |
|
|
|
Spanish Crypto Pool Ivema New Coin Added
criptonight-heavy: SOLACE
Fee 1%
Payouts every hour SOLACE Miningpool.ivema.es Ports: 4444 -> Diff 2000 -> Low end hardware URL: pool.ivema.es:4444
Worker: <WALLET_ADDRESS>
Password: x 4446 -> Diff 10000 ->Mid range hardware URL: pool.ivema.es:4446
Worker: <WALLET_ADDRESS>
Password: x 4448 -> Diff 20000 -> High end hardware URL: pool.ivema.es:4448
Worker: <WALLET_ADDRESS>
Password: x |
|
|
|
Yes, like all the pools. Everything is correctly configured, and it is only happening in Cryply... As you can read some post before, it's a problem of one pool having more than 50% of the blocks... My pool is working fine now. Dev, can you add it to the first post? Spanish Crypto Pool Ivema So many orphans pool.ivema.es/site/mining |
|
|
|
I added 0.001 diff to my pool: Spanish Crypto Pool Ivema Elicoin MiningDiff: 1
URL: pool.ivema.es:3333
Worker: <WALLET_ADDRESS>
Password: c=ELI
Diff: 0.001
URL: pool.ivema.es:3433
Worker: <WALLET_ADDRESS>
Password: c=ELI
|
|
|
|
My pool is working fine now. Dev, can you add it to the first post? Spanish Crypto Pool Ivema CryplyMiningDiff: 1
URL: pool.ivema.es:3333
Worker: <WALLET_ADDRESS>
Password: c=CRP
Diff: 0.001
URL: pool.ivema.es:3433
Worker: <WALLET_ADDRESS>
Password: c=CRP
|
|
|
|
I agree mostly, but creating a gui miner using only one pool for it, does not help the network at all. About orphan blocks They appear due to the fact that the network hashrate is calculated incorrectly and difficulty does not increase In order for hashrate correct calculation, it is necessary that none of the pools has 50% of blocks You are not forced to mine on the pools with the highest hashrate There are pools with the low hashrate Start mining on them, smear the hashrate of the network more evenly and everyone will be happy There is pools: https://p2pool.work/http://yenten-pool.ml/http://doufen.com/http://bhpool.ru/Raise their hashrate If you don't want to mine on this pools, don't cry that there is so much orphans There is the case that the 30 seconds per block increases the amount of orphans, but not significantly About the estimated profit, it is also calculated based on the hashrate of the network Network hashrate is calculated incorrectly, the estimated profit is also calculated incorrectly There is wrote above, that the pools were not working. Stratum worked. Web interface and cron was glitched This did not affect the payments of the mined coins. Everything was paid in full, however with the delay. |
|
|
|
|
A lot of Orphans in the cryply network. In most of the pools I know. I think there is a problem there, and no cryply developer is looking at it...
|
|
|
|
pool.ivema.es Once a day or each 2 days I got the same message than Cryply block explorer you have... Safe mode: Warning: The network does not appear to fully agree! Some miners appear to be experiencing issues.Again the same problem, not only on the block explorer, also in my pool..... something is happening on the cryply network. Cryply Developer, could you please check why we are getting this error?? Thanks, Witxo Any problem in the Cryply network??? You can see this in the official block explorer:
Safe mode: Warning: The network does not appear to fully agree! Some miners appear to be experiencing issues.
Also I have some problem sin the daemon of my pool with similar issues. Also got a lot of orphan blocks...since having these errors...
Any idea what happened?
server with block explorer starting after reboot not correctly all is ok now which pool? |
|
|
|
Again the same problem, not only on the block explorer, also in my pool..... something is happening on the cryply network. Cryply Developer, could you please check why we are getting this error?? Thanks, Witxo Any problem in the Cryply network??? You can see this in the official block explorer:
Safe mode: Warning: The network does not appear to fully agree! Some miners appear to be experiencing issues.
Also I have some problem sin the daemon of my pool with similar issues. Also got a lot of orphan blocks...since having these errors...
Any idea what happened?
server with block explorer starting after reboot not correctly all is ok now |
|
|
|
|
Any problem in the Cryply network??? You can see this in the official block explorer:
Safe mode: Warning: The network does not appear to fully agree! Some miners appear to be experiencing issues.
Also I have some problem sin the daemon of my pool with similar issues. Also got a lot of orphan blocks...since having these errors...
Any idea what happened?
|
|
|
|
|
Miner is using luckypool, if you have the address already there, you cannot use it.
Very bad for the rest of the pools....
|
|
|
|
We have been under DDOS attack today. Now everything is working fine again.Spanish Crypto Pool Ivema Elicoin MiningURL: pool.ivema.es:3333
Worker: <WALLET_ADDRESS>
Password: c=ELI HAPPY MINING
|
|
|
|
I think it's most important the transparency and the open source... But yes, let's wait this pro-version. In the meantime I continue using cpuminer-opt... Very bad. No Open Source miner. No pool can be selected.... No transparency... Don't like at all. I think you don't see video 1:38 pro version |
|
|
|
Very bad. No Open Source miner. No pool can be selected.... No transparency... Don't like at all. |
|
|
|
My pool is working fine. Spanish Crypto Pool Ivema Elicoin MiningURL: pool.ivema.es:3333
Worker: <WALLET_ADDRESS>
Password: c=ELI i tried now a few pools, but on all i have massive "Stratrum connection failed ..... Connection refused".
are all pool under attack ??
until yesterday it was working.
best regards
Schwan
|
|
|
|
|
I have configured a yiimp pool for some yescryptR16(Yenten, Cryply, Elicoin) and yescryptR32(Wavi) coins.
The problem is that if I configure stratum difficulty to be under 1 I got 100% rejected shares, some of them invalid shares, some of them Low difficulty shares.
I I use 1 or more, it works fine, but most cpus take a lot of time to accept a share.
I have seen some yiimp pools with difficulty to 0.001 or 0.1.... any idea on what i have to do?
Thanks,
Witxo
|
|
|
|
I think this is a problem of the stratum of yiimp. I have a yiimp pool (pool.ivema.es) and get the problem that when I put the priority of the stratum less that 1, I get a lot of rejected shares, most of them invalid and low difficulty shares. I investigated and could not find anything, but is something related to yiimp stratum for sure. I tried a mpos/nomp pool and it worked fine with 0.1 diff. But i like yiimp because you can add more than 1 coin... Perhaps owner of the official pool can gave us how did they get to use 0.1 diff on the yiimp stratum.... Thanks, Witxo HASHVALUE MINING POOLhttp://hash4value.pw
Based on Yiimp pool (No Registration Needed)
Fee : 0.5% Only (Lowest Fee)
-a yescryptr16 -o stratum+tcp://hash4value.pw:6333 -u <WALLET_ADDRESS> -p c=ELI Hi! Can you make diff less than 1? Somebody knows a pool which has a diff less than 1, except the basic? |
|
|
|
Eso solo funciona si estas conectado por wifi. si usas ethernet no va... Otra forma es marcar la conexion como Metered, de esta forma no usara el windows update  |
|
|
|
|
