Bitcoin Forum
May 13, 2024, 06:36:27 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 »
41  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: cryptohub.online - multipool + market + cooperative masternodes [VERSION 2.3] on: June 12, 2018, 11:36:01 AM
Hi all I’m new using crypto hub.

Yesterday made a transaction from the exchange to my wallet, took 12 confirmations and it went green saying transactions was in the blockchain.

After 24 hrs my transaction hasn’t arrived to my wallet. I don’t know what’s going on but shouldn’t take that long.

Any ideas?

What coin did you withdraw?

RVN, same one I transferred to the exchange


I checked CryptoHub is at right chain on RVN.
Check your local wallet, current block height is 250689

I have checked the blockchain and it says that the address in CryptoHub still has the RVN and no transaction has been made from it. There is only one transaction on that address and it was the RVN I sent from cryptobridge.

Total received on the address 1739,xxx RVN and total sent 0....

So what’s the solution to this??
42  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: HSRMINER Neoscrypt Fork by Justaminer - High Hashrate, API, all GPUs supported! on: June 12, 2018, 10:57:32 AM
Hi there!

I have problems with the miner. Every time I run it, it closes after 5 minutes working... I get this error


any ideas?

Hi man, please check that your gpus are not overclocked too much. You can try to reduce OC and/or use normal process priority version of the miner ( or specify -c 3 or -c 2 option with hp version).

Ok

Anyone knows stable OC for GTX 1070 Ti? I was using 70% TDP, +200 clock and +700 mem and seems to be crashing after 5 minutos.

Already used the -c 2 and still crashing after 5 min.

Are you sure is OC issue? Never had this problem before with these settings
43  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: HSRMINER Neoscrypt Fork by Justaminer - High Hashrate, API, all GPUs supported! on: June 11, 2018, 04:51:20 PM
Hi there!

I have problems with the miner. Every time I run it, it closes after 5 minutes working... I get this error


any ideas?
44  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: cryptohub.online - multipool + market + cooperative masternodes [VERSION 2.3] on: June 11, 2018, 01:05:15 PM
Hi all I’m new using crypto hub.

Yesterday made a transaction from the exchange to my wallet, took 12 confirmations and it went green saying transactions was in the blockchain.

After 24 hrs my transaction hasn’t arrived to my wallet. I don’t know what’s going on but shouldn’t take that long.

Any ideas?

What coin did you withdraw?

RVN, same one I transferred to the exchange

I checked CryptoHub is at right chain on RVN.
Check your local wallet, current block height is 250689

It might be but the transaction hasn’t been received yet. I have check again the wallet address just in case I made I mistake but the address is the same.

I actually sent the RVN to a different exchange and it hasn’t been received.
45  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: cryptohub.online - multipool + market + cooperative masternodes [VERSION 2.3] on: June 10, 2018, 02:59:16 PM
Hi all I’m new using crypto hub.

Yesterday made a transaction from the exchange to my wallet, took 12 confirmations and it went green saying transactions was in the blockchain.

After 24 hrs my transaction hasn’t arrived to my wallet. I don’t know what’s going on but shouldn’t take that long.

Any ideas?

What coin did you withdraw?

RVN, same one I transferred to the exchange
46  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: cryptohub.online - multipool + market + cooperative masternodes [VERSION 2.3] on: June 10, 2018, 11:34:26 AM
Hi all I’m new using crypto hub.

Yesterday made a transaction from the exchange to my wallet, took 12 confirmations and it went green saying transactions was in the blockchain.

After 24 hrs my transaction hasn’t arrived to my wallet. I don’t know what’s going on but shouldn’t take that long.

Any ideas?
47  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Zealot/Enemy (z-enemy) NVIDIA GPU miner. on: June 09, 2018, 01:45:12 PM
Z-ENEMY VER 1.11 (PUBLIC v4)

For Windows (Cuda 9.1)
zealot/enemy-1.11 (z-enemy)  From: Dk & Enemy

- Performance improvements: x17 (+4-8%), x16r&s (+1-3%) and other ...

- Fast start on multi gpu-rigs

- GPUs limit increased to 24

- AeriumX(AEX) - the miner supports Aerium new swap algo (-a aeriumx), starting 4th June.

- Added: C11(-a c11) basic  , Skunk(-a skunk) basic , improved TimeTravel8(-a timetravel) and Polytimos (-a poly)


P.S. Please  do not post  here download links from our discord. Build was not tested and ready.   Due to technical issues, c11 hashing function was disabled in the first release ...
launched for tests, great  job as usual!
keep doing what you are doing man!
update: after 24hr pool shows 8% of rejects
sonds not so good, but i will keep looking at this

After changing pool to a EU pool the rejected shares has improved a lot going down from 0.55% to 0.13% so I’d say the miner version 1.11 is good and stable.



About the 1-2% improvement it’s really difficult to tell due to the fluctuations on the hashrate for different algos.

Keep up the good work!!!
48  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Zealot/Enemy (z-enemy) NVIDIA GPU miner. on: June 08, 2018, 03:01:49 AM
Could you guys actually post your hashrates instead of "wow this is the best I've ever seen" ?

My hashrate with 6 GTX 1070 Ti is around 80 MH/S average pool side. Have a look



On the console it changes from 60 MH/S all the way up To 123 MH/S depending on the algo, slow, medium or fast
49  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Zealot/Enemy (z-enemy) NVIDIA GPU miner. on: June 07, 2018, 04:12:36 PM
Z-ENEMY VER 1.11 (PUBLIC v4)

For Windows (Cuda 9.1)
zealot/enemy-1.11 (z-enemy)  From: Dk & Enemy

- Performance improvements: x17 (+4-8%), x16r&s (+1-3%) and other ...

- Fast start on multi gpu-rigs

- GPUs limit increased to 24

- AeriumX(AEX) - the miner supports Aerium new swap algo (-a aeriumx), starting 4th June.

- Added: C11(-a c11) basic  , Skunk(-a skunk) basic , improved TimeTravel8(-a timetravel) and Polytimos (-a poly)


P.S. Please  do not post  here download links from our discord. Build was not tested and ready.   Due to technical issues, c11 hashing function was disabled in the first release ...
launched for tests, great  job as usual!
keep doing what you are doing man!
update: after 24hr pool shows 8% of rejects
sonds not so good, but i will keep looking at this

I am back on 1.11 and only got 0,55% rejected so far. Seems to be working fine
50  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] ccminer 2.2.5 - opensource - GPL (tpruvot) on: June 07, 2018, 02:46:06 PM
Hi guys!

Maybe this is the wrong place to ask but have a question about CREA mining.

I have started mining the coin like 10 hrs ago using yiimp.eu pool. My rig is 6 GTX 1070 Ti giving 5.1 GH/S and I am using ccminer 2.2.5 which is supposed to be without dev fee.

According to whattomine and crypt0zone I should be getting around 5 coins per hour (later it changed to 4.81) so in 10 hours it should be somewhere near 48-50 but I would happily accept somewhere between 43 and 45 due to pool hashrate fluctuations, rejected shares and console hashrate inaccuracies plus 2% fee from yiimp.eu


1. 10 hours is not enough to calculate average earnings.
2. Whattomine is not accurate.
3. To receive pool payment, pool should solve block. But there are other pools also, so they are solving blocks too. Therefore, irregular payment gaps exists.

Yeah I understand all that but it seems to be too many coins missing. I mean it’s half of it. I would never expect to get exactly what whattomine says neither crypt0zone but somewhere near. Also my miner was doing 5.1 GH/S steady at the console, 5.0 GH/S steady in the pool and I run the calculations with 4.8 GH/S to give it some margin but it’s extremely off the figures.

The pool solved 134 block in the past 24 hrs so that’s 5,5 block average per hour.

I have switched back to RVN coin anyway, and funnily enough just been mining for 5 hours and numbers are spot on.

Not blaming anyone, don’t take me wrong but trying to understand such a big gap on payouts and such a big difference in rewards cos at the end of the day it means I have wasted 10 hours to get 30 coins instead of 50 so pretty much to break even

Thanks for replying and taking the time
51  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] ccminer 2.2.5 - opensource - GPL (tpruvot) on: June 07, 2018, 09:02:47 AM
Hi guys!

Maybe this is the wrong place to ask but have a question about CREA mining.

I have started mining the coin like 10 hrs ago using yiimp.eu pool. My rig is 6 GTX 1070 Ti giving 5.1 GH/S and I am using ccminer 2.2.5 which is supposed to be without dev fee.

According to whattomine and crypt0zone I should be getting around 5 coins per hour (later it changed to 4.81) so in 10 hours it should be somewhere near 48-50 but I would happily accept somewhere between 43 and 45 due to pool hashrate fluctuations, rejected shares and console hashrate inaccuracies plus 2% fee from yiimp.eu

So far after 10 hours I have only mined 27.79. So what the hell is going on? Is yiimp taking 50% fees or what am I missing?

Miner is been running stable with no issues.



Also how is it possible that the miner is constantly submitting shares but the are gaps of 25 minutes, 40 minutes even 65 minutes without a single payment to my wallet?



I’m switching coin for the time being and not using yiimp again until this is clarified cos it does seem very doggy.

If anyone can help I would really appreaciate it.
52  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][CREA] CREATIVECHAIN A multimedia marketplace for intellectual property on: June 07, 2018, 08:45:43 AM
Hi guys!

Maybe this is the wrong place to ask but have a question about CREA mining.

I have started mining the coin like 10 hrs ago using yiimp.eu pool. My rig is 6 GTX 1070 Ti giving 5.1 GH/S and I am using ccminer 2.2.5 which is supposed to be without dev fee.

According to whattomine and crypt0zone I should be getting around 5 coins per hour (later it changed to 4.81) so in 10 hours it should be somewhere near 48-50 but I would happily accept somewhere between 43 and 45 due to pool hashrate fluctuations, rejected shares and console hashrate inaccuracies plus 2% fee from yiimp.eu

So far after 10 hours I have only mined 27.79. So what the hell is going on? Is yiimp taking 50% fees or what am I missing?

Miner is been running stable with no issues.



Also how is it possible that the miner is constantly submitting shares but the are gaps of 25 minutes, 40 minutes even 65 minutes without a single payment to my wallet?



I’m switching coin for the time being and not using yiimp again until this is clarified cos it does seem very doggy.

If anyone can help I would really appreaciate it.
53  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Zealot/Enemy (z-enemy) NVIDIA GPU miner. on: June 06, 2018, 06:48:14 PM
In your description you write Z-ENEMY VER 1.11 (PUBLIC v4) and in the filename is ***puplic-final_v3
Is it the correct file?


Same problem here.

Also, I have tried your version 1.11 and there’s something weird about it so I have switched back to 1.10

Have a look at this pic and you’ll see 3 different connectiosn to the pool when I have only one miner running. I do not really understand what’s going on so hope you can explain it.



And as I said before, how is it possible that the miner is submitting shares constantly but there is no payout for more than 25 min?

Please do not take it as a complain. I am just trying to understand what’s happening
54  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][POW/MN][BOUNTY] ◭ Airin — The new masternode experience ◮ on: June 06, 2018, 04:31:12 PM
Hi guys!

I am new with Airin and I would like to mine this coin.

What pool and miner do you recommend for best results with NVIDIA GPU? I have GTX 1070 Ti.

Tried to mine in phi phi pool.com but doesn’t seem to be working. Started mining and automatically exchanged all the coins to ARG-script (Argentum) so is either a scam or I do not know what happened.

All other pools I looked at (bsod, archpool, fairmine, etc) no longer have AIRIN for mining.

Thanks for help

Hi bro.
As at now, AIRIN already become POS Coins.
POW ended at June, 4th.
Join our discord for more info : https://discord.gg/YZvZvAB


Thanks for the info!! I new there was something wrong just didn’t know what hehe
55  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][POW/MN][BOUNTY] ◭ Airin — The new masternode experience ◮ on: June 06, 2018, 03:53:00 PM
Hi guys!

I am new with Airin and I would like to mine this coin.

What pool and miner do you recommend for best results with NVIDIA GPU? I have GTX 1070 Ti.

Tried to mine in phi phi pool.com but doesn’t seem to be working. Started mining and automatically exchanged all the coins to ARG-script (Argentum) so is either a scam or I do not know what happened.

All other pools I looked at (bsod, archpool, fairmine, etc) no longer have AIRIN for mining.

Thanks for help
56  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Zealot/Enemy (z-enemy) NVIDIA GPU miner. on: June 02, 2018, 07:51:20 PM
what's the logic behind lowering the cards power limit, guys?
it's obvious that the card will force to downclock itself when hitting the limit and lose performance because of it Roll Eyes

I've personally never touched the power limit, but I've always lowered the core voltage, with proper overclock it won't restrict your hashrate at all.

I do not totally agree with your description. In my case I have GTX 1070 Ti and been mining ZEC for 2 months.

In my little experience if I keep the power limit to 100% with +200 clock and + 700 men I get pretty much 40-50 sols/s extra mining ZEC but power draw from the wall it’s really high like 180W each card plus the CPU, motherboard, SSD, PSU and RAM so about 1180W. That in money for me means 849,6 KW per month and I pay 0.0840389 €/kw so around  72 euros in electricity per month.

By lowering the PL or TDP I try to find the sweet spot for the card to run full power with the overclocking settings without any downclock because it has reached the limits. For my cards (and my make MSI and EVGA) 70% TDP with +200 clock and +700 mem seems to be it so basically I only lose those 40-50 sols/s extra on ZEC but the power draw from the wall goes down to 870W which means 626,4 KW per month so 52,65 euros.

That all means I lose 4/5 euros per month with the lower hashrate but save 20 on electricity so overall I win 15 euros. To that you can add lower card temperatures lower fan settings and more life expectancy I would say.

Maybe you do exactly the same with the voltage but that’s unknown to me, never played with it and would need some mentoring to learn how to use it properly.

If I said something wrong please anyone feel free to correct me. I have used ZEC as an example because that is what I have been mining so far so can’t say anything about RVN and zealot enemy miner.

I have seen videos on YouTube, rigs with same cards as mine and everyone seems to be getting around 77mh/s using similar settings so I am not really that far off. My average now in ravenminer.com is 80 MH/S so can’t complain.

I think the lower performance is due to the fact that I am in Europe and connected to US server so more ping, and sometimes more rejected shares, the difficulty on RVN has gone up since yesterday and the pool hashrate fluctuates from 270 to 420 GH/s plus as someelse mentioned, X16R has different algos so my cards go from 10.5 MH/S with slow all the way to 24 MH/S with fast.

Anyway I have only been mining RVN for 24hrs so have to wait a bit more to see real numbers. The only thing I do not fully understand is why whilst the miner is submitting shares constantly (like 6-18 per minute) sometimes I can mine for 25 minutes without a single payment on the pool.

Any hints are appreciated
57  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Zealot/Enemy (z-enemy) NVIDIA GPU miner. on: June 02, 2018, 07:24:23 PM
Keeping the powerlimit at 90% or above is essential for high performance for z-enemy.

In addition, try comparing -i 20 with -i 21. For some cards -i 20 is the threshold above which performance actuall degrades.

Thanks for the info

I understand regarding intensity that 20 could be good but 21 will degrade the performance so means lower hash? I have tried before with 22 and 23 and both crashed so only 20 and 21 good for me and seems to be ok wit 21 (it has never crashed)

Power limit to 90% sounds to much unless you do not have to pay for electricity. And the description says it will be more stable between 90-110% PL but that doesn’t mean more efficient or higher performance. For me stability is about crashing and rejected shares but I could be wrong so please correct me by all means
58  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Zealot/Enemy (z-enemy) NVIDIA GPU miner. on: June 02, 2018, 10:26:13 AM
After running the miner for like 6 hours + I do not seem to be getting the performance whattomine and crypt0zone say I should. It is supposed to be 380 coins in 24 hrs so about 15.7 coins per hour with 77 MH/S and It doesn´t seem to be getting there.

Anything I am doing worng? This is my bat file:

z-enemy -a x16r -o stratum+tcp://us.ravenminer.com:5678 -u address -p worker1,d=24 -i 21

As I mention before I run 6 GTX 1070 Ti with V1.10 on windows 10 64bit Nvidia drivers 391.35
per my own experience this is not the most accurate calculator and actuals earnings are less.
also you allways need to consider that network hashrate is allways fluctuating so you will never ever get accurate result as any calculation, the calculations itself are only presumptions

Yeah your are right about that and the difficulty has gone up as well so the earnings go down a bit. I still think is too much because by now I should have 30 coins more than what I have so that is 10% less pretty much.

How you guys doing with the rejected shares? I have 0.65% rejected which I belive it is really low.
59  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Zealot/Enemy (z-enemy) NVIDIA GPU miner. on: June 01, 2018, 09:55:28 PM
After running the miner for like 6 hours + I do not seem to be getting the performance whattomine and crypt0zone say I should. It is supposed to be 380 coins in 24 hrs so about 15.7 coins per hour with 77 MH/S and It doesn´t seem to be getting there.

Anything I am doing wrong? This is my bat file:

z-enemy -a x16r -o stratum+tcp://us.ravenminer.com:5678 -u address -p worker1,d=24 -i 21

As I mention before I run 6 GTX 1070 Ti with V1.10 on windows 10 64bit Nvidia drivers 391.35
60  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Zealot/Enemy (z-enemy) NVIDIA GPU miner. on: June 01, 2018, 06:49:17 PM
Hi everyone!!

I am new using this miner. Have started using it today mining RVN coin. My rig is a 6 GTX 1070 Ti and my config is 70% TDP, +200 clock and +700 mem.

It is running stable, really stable the only thing I notice which I do not know if it is normal or not is that the MH/S output of each card changes a lot. I never go lower than 77 Mh/s but it can go higher up to 120 Mh/s so I wonder why is it not stable at the higher end?? Right now it is sitting at 95 Mh/S
At first, it is recommended to never set powerlimit below 90% for stable and efficient work of Zealot.
If you start having stability issues at 90% PL, drop your core and mem to +0 and then gradually increase to stable values.

For the x16r and x16s algo the hashrate shown in the miner can be very different through time, because there are a lot of "basic" algos inside x16r/s, "fast" and "slow".
Better to watch your average hashrate on the pool.

Thank you for the info!! I thought it was the switching between the algos but wasn´t sure. The miner runs really stable at 70% it hasn´t crashed since started and only 2 rejected shares so far so I think this setting is good.

Pool side reports around 76 MH/S but I assume that to be normal as has to be reduce by 1% from the miner console due to dev fee
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!