|
21
|
Economy / Lending / Re: .1 loan request
|
on: February 27, 2015, 11:42:03 PM
|
|
Still waiting, I will urge others (and myself) to remove all negative feedback when repaid.
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
Economy / Lending / Re: .1 loan request
|
on: February 22, 2015, 10:38:51 PM
|
|
Don't gamble, you will only lose. If you pay me back I will remove negative feedback and recommend that others do as well. 20$ for an account with avatar is really not worth it, get a job at mcdonalds and work for 2 hours and you will have enough to pay me back.
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
Economy / Lending / Re: .1 loan request
|
on: February 17, 2015, 04:26:58 PM
|
OP is still late on that payment. Will accuse of a scam if he does not pay back soon. This is what he said in a PM a while ago Hey man sorry for the delay, i want to pay you back but i dont have the funds at the moment, if theres anything we can work out or make a deal, ive been trying hard to get your .13 back to you its just i might need some more time but i will pay you back forsure.
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
Economy / Lending / Re: .1 loan request
|
on: February 02, 2015, 06:16:27 PM
|
thanks for doing this loan without collateral william. you rock  No problem, no reason to ask for collateral and go through all this problem for 0.1 btc on a full member account. Waiting for payment on the 4th of 0.13 btc |
|
|
|
|
30
|
Economy / Services / Re: ➫ ➬ Lucky Bit Signature Campaign ★ Earn up to 0.125BTC every month ★ Open Now!
|
on: January 27, 2015, 08:02:16 PM
|
Yes, you did. Registered. Just in case madmat doesn't qualify for some reason: Sorry about that, the forum crash deleted 4 of my posts and I needed to write extra posts. Reenrolling for another month. Post count: 1896 Well, it's not hard to gauge where the interest is. I'll take this in mind. Sorry, madmat was quickest and qualified! Stingle, Am I still qualify for the campaign ? My records show you were disqualified months ago. I didn't run a full background check but a preliminary look indicates you might be eligible to re-enter if you apply. If you can get an application into an open slot, you'll know for sure. Can someone with red feedback enroll to campaign   Red trust does not automatically disqualify someone from participating. A red DefaultTrust doesn't always indicate an ineligible participant, but the trust ratings are taken into consideration when evaluating someone. I do try to take a balanced approach to how seriously trust feedback should be taken and in general feedback alone is not enough to disqualify someone. Right here are the people before |
|
|
|
|
31
|
Economy / Lending / Re: need 0.05
|
on: January 27, 2015, 07:40:30 PM
|
Loan: 0.05btc
Amount to repay: 0.055btc
No Collateral
Duration of Loan: 2 days or less
my addy: 1FUH8tzZTEnhakdZxuh1esx28D3J271PNv
Hit me up fam |
|
|
|
|
34
|
Economy / Investor-based games / Re: Input Requested from Ponzi Users
|
on: January 27, 2015, 03:15:28 AM
|
In case you did not know, http://flukybet.com/ just started a lotto based game and I am the escrow for the funds. See sig for the discussion thread. Obviously if all things are working well, you would maintain the escrow, but let's say I am a scumbag and want to run off with the funds. How does you acting as an escrow benefit the people I have defrauded? (Please understand I am not questioning you, I am truly interested in your response) With an escrow managing the funds and payouts, 1. OP has zero access to the funds 2. payout process has no gaps Basically what your saying is a trusted user runs the escrow. Any escrow wouldn't manually run a ponzi for free, and if he was taking a fee, why not him run his own. A solution to this thought would be to provide your script and he would put the blockchain API on it so that the payouts would still come out automatically but on the start of the round, the large amount of payments would be in the hands of the escrow. You have no rights to give your opinions scammer. At least this OP had the courtesy to use a reputable member to hold the funds unlike you stating that you needed 3 confirmations and then poof . Like david copperfield. Wasn't me who did that... Please look at the proof before falsely accusing me. What? Dude stop rolling the ball to others. It was you. Coming clean wont get you a noble prize. Voice your opinions else where .. perhaps the scam accusation section or something. No. It was not me. Look at the IP logs of all moreias alts The IP logs accessing the blockchain wallet Moreias alt actually ADMITTED that it was him and not me (thegambler) That's what scammers do dont they, deny.. We all know who it is. So enough is enough. Refund then start talking, else just get back to your corner I am denying because I have proof that supports my deny of this. All you have is your opinion, and no proof that I did it. What ever you say sherlock, your trust rating says it all. Here's a opinion for you, get a real job instead of doing all this bullshit and wasting your time here on this forum and on PD. Start working and raise the funds to re-pay back what you took , oh not forgetting funds from btc-stocks too. Obviously your other alt is Plutonium. I had no involvment with btc-stocks, that was moreia... Plutonium is one of many of moreias alts. You have made found zero connection with me and btc-stocks, don't know why your falsly accusing |
|
|
|
|
35
|
Economy / Investor-based games / Re: Input Requested from Ponzi Users
|
on: January 27, 2015, 03:11:19 AM
|
In case you did not know, http://flukybet.com/ just started a lotto based game and I am the escrow for the funds. See sig for the discussion thread. Obviously if all things are working well, you would maintain the escrow, but let's say I am a scumbag and want to run off with the funds. How does you acting as an escrow benefit the people I have defrauded? (Please understand I am not questioning you, I am truly interested in your response) With an escrow managing the funds and payouts, 1. OP has zero access to the funds 2. payout process has no gaps Basically what your saying is a trusted user runs the escrow. Any escrow wouldn't manually run a ponzi for free, and if he was taking a fee, why not him run his own. A solution to this thought would be to provide your script and he would put the blockchain API on it so that the payouts would still come out automatically but on the start of the round, the large amount of payments would be in the hands of the escrow. You have no rights to give your opinions scammer. At least this OP had the courtesy to use a reputable member to hold the funds unlike you stating that you needed 3 confirmations and then poof . Like david copperfield. Wasn't me who did that... Please look at the proof before falsely accusing me. What? Dude stop rolling the ball to others. It was you. Coming clean wont get you a noble prize. Voice your opinions else where .. perhaps the scam accusation section or something. No. It was not me. Look at the IP logs of all moreias alts The IP logs accessing the blockchain wallet Moreias alt actually ADMITTED that it was him and not me (thegambler) That's what scammers do dont they, deny.. We all know who it is. So enough is enough. Refund then start talking, else just get back to your corner I am denying because I have proof that supports my deny of this. All you have is your opinion, and no proof that I did it. |
|
|
|
|
36
|
Economy / Investor-based games / Re: Input Requested from Ponzi Users
|
on: January 27, 2015, 03:08:19 AM
|
In case you did not know, http://flukybet.com/ just started a lotto based game and I am the escrow for the funds. See sig for the discussion thread. Obviously if all things are working well, you would maintain the escrow, but let's say I am a scumbag and want to run off with the funds. How does you acting as an escrow benefit the people I have defrauded? (Please understand I am not questioning you, I am truly interested in your response) With an escrow managing the funds and payouts, 1. OP has zero access to the funds 2. payout process has no gaps Basically what your saying is a trusted user runs the escrow. Any escrow wouldn't manually run a ponzi for free, and if he was taking a fee, why not him run his own. A solution to this thought would be to provide your script and he would put the blockchain API on it so that the payouts would still come out automatically but on the start of the round, the large amount of payments would be in the hands of the escrow. You have no rights to give your opinions scammer. At least this OP had the courtesy to use a reputable member to hold the funds unlike you stating that you needed 3 confirmations and then poof . Like david copperfield. Wasn't me who did that... Please look at the proof before falsely accusing me. What? Dude stop rolling the ball to others. It was you. Coming clean wont get you a noble prize. Voice your opinions else where .. perhaps the scam accusation section or something. No. It was not me. Look at the IP logs of all moreias alts The IP logs accessing the blockchain wallet Moreias alt actually ADMITTED that it was him and not me (thegambler) |
|
|
|
|
37
|
Economy / Investor-based games / Re: Input Requested from Ponzi Users
|
on: January 27, 2015, 03:05:23 AM
|
In case you did not know, http://flukybet.com/ just started a lotto based game and I am the escrow for the funds. See sig for the discussion thread. Obviously if all things are working well, you would maintain the escrow, but let's say I am a scumbag and want to run off with the funds. How does you acting as an escrow benefit the people I have defrauded? (Please understand I am not questioning you, I am truly interested in your response) With an escrow managing the funds and payouts, 1. OP has zero access to the funds 2. payout process has no gaps Basically what your saying is a trusted user runs the escrow. Any escrow wouldn't manually run a ponzi for free, and if he was taking a fee, why not him run his own. A solution to this thought would be to provide your script and he would put the blockchain API on it so that the payouts would still come out automatically but on the start of the round, the large amount of payments would be in the hands of the escrow. You have no rights to give your opinions scammer. At least this OP had the courtesy to use a reputable member to hold the funds unlike you stating that you needed 3 confirmations and then poof . Like david copperfield. Wasn't me who did that... Please look at the proof before falsely accusing me. |
|
|
|
|
38
|
Economy / Investor-based games / Re: Input Requested from Ponzi Users
|
on: January 27, 2015, 03:02:08 AM
|
In case you did not know, http://flukybet.com/ just started a lotto based game and I am the escrow for the funds. See sig for the discussion thread. Obviously if all things are working well, you would maintain the escrow, but let's say I am a scumbag and want to run off with the funds. How does you acting as an escrow benefit the people I have defrauded? (Please understand I am not questioning you, I am truly interested in your response) With an escrow managing the funds and payouts, 1. OP has zero access to the funds 2. payout process has no gaps Basically what your saying is a trusted user runs the escrow. Any escrow wouldn't manually run a ponzi for free, and if he was taking a fee, why not him run his own. A solution to this thought would be to provide your script and he would put the blockchain API on it so that the payouts would still come out automatically but on the start of the round, the large amount of payments would be in the hands of the escrow. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
