701
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][RELAUNCH] SUN COIN - NEW QTs, NEW CODE, WORKING POOLS - MINE NOW!
|
on: February 14, 2014, 06:13:48 PM
|
there is no activation link in my mail it just say : You must wait for the activation email before logging in for the first time. You should have an email within a few moments of signing up that contains a link to activate your account.
Check your email again, account is unlocked. **EDIT** PityThePool's block confirmation time is after 120 confirms, which is a bit long and will take awhile before coins move into your balance. If the dev chimes in with the proper block confirmation time, I can lower this.
|
|
|
702
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Service Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: CoinMarketCap.com - Market Cap Rankings of All Cryptocurrencies!
|
on: February 14, 2014, 05:57:52 PM
|
Can someone explain this to me.
I like that the prices/volumes/market cap can be shown in both BTC and $USD. However, when I change from USD to BTC the percentages and market cap % change column is always the same for both.
Shouldn't this be different? If the $USD price of BTC is up by 5%, then I would expect any coins whose exchange price against BTC is unchanged to also be up by 5%. But if I switch to BTC, I would expect the %change to be 0%.
Instead, I see 5% regardless of whether I'm using BTC or USD to show prices. This seems wrong to me. If a coin's price is up by 5% I don't know whether that's because BTC is up 5%, or whether the actual exchange price of the coin is up by 5%.
|
|
|
705
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][RELAUNCH] SUN COIN - NEW QTs, NEW CODE, WORKING POOLS - MINE NOW!
|
on: February 14, 2014, 05:08:00 PM
|
ON CORRECT CHAINPity the Pool! SunCoin (SUN) Pool- Solid servers, UPS/generator backups - Redundant internet - 1.5% fee
http://sun.pitythepool.com cool.. but fee is too much for now! Sorry but unfortunately fees are necessary to cover costs. We are a SOLID and RELIABLE pool with GREAT uptime and fast response to support requests. Our servers are not rentals at some VPS provider - we own the physical servers, the rack, and the data center. We are here to stay. As an added bonus - I will donate all pool fees and donations to the SunCoin development team for the first 48 hours, to help increase the coin's chance of successGO SUNCOIN
|
|
|
707
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] RigHound - remotely manage all your mining rigs
|
on: February 14, 2014, 04:10:40 PM
|
Yay, the pool switching issue is no longer! Just to make sure, you can't delete pools yet can you?
I also noticed that the last rig on the list is not showing GPU data (just the rig name and runtime), but everything else works.
**Also, I noticed a rig showing -1.00MH/s. It turns out that this card was in DEAD state.
Nope, sorry on deleting pools, I will add a delete button soon
|
|
|
711
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] RigHound - remotely manage all your mining rigs
|
on: February 13, 2014, 08:22:53 PM
|
Update
35 users have signed up so far, and only about 30 rigs are being monitored. It seems the majority of users appear to be signing up just to "snag" one of the limited quantity of alpha accounts and have no mining rigs configured. I'm opening up the alpha period to 60 years - we need more!
Would love to hear some more feedback from those of you who are using the system.
|
|
|
714
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] RigHound - remotely manage all your mining rigs
|
on: February 12, 2014, 03:55:19 PM
|
The issue is not whether you use TCP/IP or HTTP.
But it is a known issue with cgminer - sometimes it sends truncated data; closes socket before everything is sent. I don't know how often that appears for JSON format, I use non-JSON custom format, it is shorter and easier to parse (when not using 3rd party JSON libs), but it happens here and there anyway.
I was afraid of that - good to know, thanks. It is definitely happening far less often receiving in 8k chunks rather than the 2k chunks I was using previously, and it was only happening when the data returned was greater than the receive buffer size. As I said, time will tell on whether this is stable.
|
|
|
716
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] RigHound - remotely manage all your mining rigs
|
on: February 12, 2014, 02:04:16 PM
|
Awesome, looking forward to new features!!
I am having an issue when I change pools 4x. The 4th time I get errors like: RigCommander.SwitchPool: Unable to execute command. RigCommander.FindPool: Unable to execute command. Unterminated string. Expected delimiter: ". Path 'POOLS[4].Last Share Difficulty', line 1, position 2920. RigCommander.SwitchPool: Unable to execute command. RigCommander.FindPool: Unable to execute command. Unexpected end when deserializing object. Path 'POOLS[4].Last Share Difficulty', line 1, position 2920.
The rig will say HasError on the website, is hashing fine, but needs cgminer restarted to monitor/control again.
Thanks again for the input. I've run into this as well. Short version: Every time you change pools, RigHound first checks to see if your instance of cgminer has that pool in it's "pools" list, and if it doesn't, adds it. Then, it commands cgminer to switch to that pool. The problem occurs when cgminer's "pools" list gets larger than maybe 3-4 pools in it. I haven't figured out why yet, but for some reason sometimes I get back truncated JSON results (like, I get back 3 pools and only half the 4th's pools info). Part of the problem may be that I'm using a raw TCPIP socket connection rather than an HTTP request (I'm convinced raw TCP/IP is faster), this means I have to build my own buffering/receive mechanism rather than the built-in HTTP ones, and I'll be the first to admit there may be some bugs there. It doesn't happen all the time, and not with every rig, so it's tough to troubleshoot. I'm working on this along with a better, faster & automatic way to refresh your rig's status (so you don't have to click the "Refresh" button and wait FOREVER). Stay tuned, I'm making changes & improving this every day! **EDIT** Just implemented a possible fix for this, time will tell if it works consistently - as an added bonus, the "Refresh Status" button is about 2x faster as well
|
|
|
717
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] RigHound - remotely manage all your mining rigs
|
on: February 12, 2014, 10:09:32 AM
|
Looking great! I have a suggestion, could you add an option to change ALL of your rigs' pools at the same time?!
ABSOLUTELY! Bulk rig management is definitely coming in the near future, including scheduling (mine at pool A for X hours then switch to pool B). *Maybe* even some auto-profitability switching stuff (not sure I want to head down that path). Right now I'm mostly concentrating on connectivity & reliability in reaching out to your rigs & controlling them.
|
|
|
720
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] RigHound - remotely manage all your mining rigs
|
on: February 12, 2014, 05:54:22 AM
|
Thanks both of you for reporting this. I found the issue, you should be able to add new pool workers now. Hint: RigHound configuration is easier when you use the same worker name for your rig at all your pools. You can set the "Default Worker name" from the Edit Miner window. If you do this, when you add new pool workers, they will be associated with the correct mining rig automatically.
|
|
|
|