67
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Catcoin - NEW THREAD - FORK INCOMING AT BLOCK 21346 - Scrypt MEOW!
|
on: January 31, 2014, 09:31:58 PM
|
Add "Kimoto Gravity Well algorythm" for recalculate diff after each block and blocktime will adjust automatically to the designed blocktargetime and everything will be good.
We tortured this code on the testnet and it works well. So far, it's performing in the real world. If you don't mind, we'll let this new code work for at least 24 hours... I noted yesterday that the 36SMA12LMT would drop diff below 1 on the first cycle. It's clearly underdamped, but as long as we don't see any 100x step inputs it should stabilize eventually. At least we will be getting 240 blocks per day instead of varying from 5 to 500 per day, so that part is much improved.
|
|
|
72
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Catcoin - Scrypt meow!
|
on: January 30, 2014, 10:29:52 PM
|
Just curious, has the new diff smoothing algo been tested against a step function decrease of over 100x? Because that's what it's going to see after the fork, and I don't like my first impressions on considering what the function response is going to be. I'm thinking diffs will drop below 1; please tell me I'm wrong.
you are wrong. dif will be 108 at the fork and adjust at 12% per block according to network hashrate... it will gradually step down... Exactly, it will adjust 12% down... for 35 blocks, bc the last block time will be over 6 hours. That brings it down to 1 (since 108 x .88^36 is about 1)
|
|
|
73
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Catcoin - Scrypt meow!
|
on: January 30, 2014, 09:32:54 PM
|
Just curious, has the new diff smoothing algo been tested against a step function decrease of over 100x? Because that's what it's going to see after the fork, and I don't like my first impressions on considering what the function response is going to be. I'm thinking diffs will drop below 1; please tell me I'm wrong.
|
|
|
74
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Catcoin - Scrypt meow!
|
on: January 30, 2014, 07:09:45 PM
|
My wallet doesn't complete to sync, it always says "2 hours behind". I'm running the 0.8.7.0-beta qt client. What I have to do? Thanks
That's because no block has been found for several hours, due to high difficulty. A fix is coming after 8 more blocks (probably a couple days yet). You should update to the new wallet.
|
|
|
77
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] profit switching auto-exchanging pool - middlecoin.com
|
on: January 28, 2014, 07:53:20 PM
|
you sheeple are easy to herd, try to explain to me what happened on those screenshots smart ass then?! since you know it alll Someone DID explain it to you but you aren't listening: How did you get 1.5 milliion shares accepted and 45000 shared rejected in 15 hours at 1024 diff with 2 MH/s? Looks like your miners switched to other pool(s) while you weren't watching.
no my miners did not switch to other pools because the cgwatcher logs say so and plus i dont have any other pool in my config or bat file. Post your config and .bat here. Also, list your GPUs, OS, and cgminer, driver, and SDK versions. Something is causing cgminer to report too many accepted shares.
|
|
|
78
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] profit switching auto-exchanging pool - middlecoin.com
|
on: January 28, 2014, 07:44:04 PM
|
All I see is a lot of downtime recently. Try letting it run uninterrupted for 12 hours? You hashrate isn't high enough to have great consistency at 1024 diff, but over a full day it will even out.
But the accepted rate should still reflect what its actually hashing at, irrelevant of the 3 hour average, Or leaving it for 12 hours. With the high (1024) difficulty, there is a LOT of variability in the hashrate shown by the table. Throw in the fact that coinGeeks graphs subsample that data and 3 hours is not anywhere close enough to resolve what the true mean accepted hashrate is. Especially at 2 lower hashrates. Run 12 hours at least, then compare your accepted, rejected, and average hashrates from cgminer to coinGeek's graphs.
|
|
|
79
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] profit switching auto-exchanging pool - middlecoin.com
|
on: January 28, 2014, 07:38:52 PM
|
but u have payout since 3 Days i dont have payouts there is somthing wrong @ middlecoin Did you doublecheck your payout address against all of the miners? You can also try a different payout address and see if that helps. The address is 100% correct. And yes, it works correctly with the other address. But that does not help me to get the money from this address DON'T USE THAT ADDRESS! It has typo'ed duplicates on the allusers table, which means it's messing up the middlecoin database: 17iwDLvDwqBjMnGBAqPPpvij6Fmt6NFUCu 17iwDLvDwqBjMnGBAqPPpvij6Fmt6nFUCu 17iwDLvDwqBjMnGBAqPPpvij6Fmt6FUCu Get a new address in your wallet and mine to that. h2o will correct that and get you your BTC eventually, but every share you submit to either of those usernames is BTC you aren't going to see for a while. He's been told that already. Apparently he'd rather whine and accuse than do what others have suggested. nonsense There the two typos addresses are no longer used the Hashrate only goes to the correct address. There is no reason why this should not work. And I want to see how you react if someone takes away your money. You are not concerned with why are you talking as if you were affected? I'm affected by your cluttering this thread with that image when you know what the problem is and how to resolve it. The hashrate does NOT go to the right username, because the middlecoin DB waffles on whether to assign it to the typo'ed address or the correct address (I'm guessing it's internal search function is not case sensitive). Use a different address (one that does not have 95% character match to any on the allusers table. PM h2o to resolve the multiple addresses. Issue solved.
|
|
|
80
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] profit switching auto-exchanging pool - middlecoin.com
|
on: January 28, 2014, 07:34:47 PM
|
I was saying something is wrong with the pool but nobody cared, now i see people are reporting the same problem i was reporting on Sunday . let me guess your cgminer stats doesn't add up with the MC pool?! I gave up trying to figure it out, i even messaged h20 but he didn't give a fuck about it since there are lot of other pigs around to rob from. It feels like your cgminer submits the shares to h20's personal address I even tried to mine for 24hours with a new address, guess what the new address never showed in the database , all in all h2o is robbing you without knowing it here is my earlier post on Sunday, then any cares to explain this to me??? what's happening here because i can't make a sense of it and this .. How did you get 1.5 milliion shares accepted and 45000 shared rejected in 15 hours at 1024 diff with 2 MH/s? Looks like your miners switched to other pool(s) while you weren't watching.
|
|
|
|