I guess you use content-compression? If not, it wouldn't take nuhc code, I'm sure which ever web server you use can allow you to enable it in its configuration!  |
|
|
|
The fact that it uses MD5 is an issue. It should definitely have been set up using SHA256/SHA512, and at least a per user salt(You haven't clarified as to whether it's the same for all, unless I've misread something). Or even double SHA512 two-unique-salts halved.  |
|
|
|
|
Seeing the database doesn't mean having write access.
|
|
|
|
No, I was meaning I'd wait for yout to have it possible to make an entry with it, and I'd have a script running to make entries if certrain conditions were met Don't know about your idea  |
|
|
|
Copy in case that disappears: Mt. Gox Db Purportedly for Sale... Posted to the 'Bin: "I Got mtgox database,1 day old.Got also bitcoins7;it not as big but still lots hehe!no secure LOL..... would send user&pass in here but,I want to sell to big buyer Email: auto36299386@hushmail.comMake big offer!!! ~cRazIeStinGeR~" http://pastebin.com/xhnNdvte |
|
|
|
Nice! (/me waits for it to be done enough so he can get to work at automatically entering if it picks up speed ) |
|
|
|
I've had quite a success too. |
|
|
|
And another entry I do like an automated one, as it leaves no room for someone accidentally forgetting to add soemthing to a spreadsheet. (Although bugs could be disastrous). edit: And more!  |
|
|
|
I'm about to start manually pushing out payments. Sorry about that automation. [Edit]: Looks like the code is fixed up, and people are getting paid out! If anyone would like to confirm their payment, that would be good. Just interested, how any lines of code are there? |
|
|
|
edit: I failed |
|
|
|
06/18/11 10:52:31 buy 0.06500000 81.42000000 5.29230000
Someone bought stuff form me which I didn't have, my order was shown as selling for 81, which I thouhgt was a reporting glithc, yet, someone bought 81. I only bot the 64 I sold worth, however, the other person spent 5.29BTC and got 81.
So, do bitparking, in total, have less NMC than shown in people's balances?
Nah, you're mistaking something completely boring for something interesting. Someone put in a buy for 81.42NMC, You had a sell of 64. All of yours, plus 17.42 of someone elses order were sold in order to satisfy the buyer. This is how a normal market works. If you buy X at Y price they it will buy all available up to amount X and price Y starting at the cheapest available. My sell order was shown as having 81NMC in the sell order list. |
|
|
|
|
Just spiked to 16.7 from 13.8... 0.o
|
|
|
|
I recently sold 64.87 NMC on bitparking namecoin exchange, and received 4.24 BTC. However, someone else, bought from me: 06/18/11 10:52:31 buy 0.06500000 81.42000000 5.29230000 Bitparking is selling that which it does not have, it appears...? That, or a reporting gitch, but I don't know... Be careful! I'm confused as to what you're actually saying. Can you explain for those of us that have never used the service? Someone bought stuff form me which I didn't have, my order was shown as selling for 81, which I thouhgt was a reporting glithc, yet, someone bought 81. I only bot the 64 I sold worth, however, the other person spent 5.29BTC and got 81. So, do bitparking, in total, have less NMC than shown in people's balances? |
|
|
|
|
I added maybe, since I did not know, although maybe the caps are over the top...?
|
|
|
|
I've entered two of these, hopefully at least one of them actually pays out, then I break even |
|
|
|
I recently sold 64.87 NMC on bitparking namecoin exchange, and received 4.24 BTC. However, someone else, bought from me: 06/18/11 10:52:31 buy 0.06500000 81.42000000 5.29230000 Bitparking is selling that which it does not have, it appears...? That, or a reporting gitch, but I don't know... Be careful! |
|
|
|
Seems to have slowed down a bit.. reinvested my winnings from earlier, lets keep it going guys eek... read the end of thread first? |
|
|
|
|
Actually, $300 per 80MH/s, plus a slmalla mount of stuff for the interface to the computer.
|
|
|
|
Namecoin mining is no longer more profitable than mining for BTCs. The "gold rush" is over! |
|
|
|
|
People moved to namecoin - its instantaneous difficulty is now 100,000... 0.o, and it's already at 55000.
It was 3k less than a week ago.
D:
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
