3
|
Bitcoin / Mining / Re: First power bill inclusive of 24/7 mining rigs...
|
on: October 09, 2011, 01:21:03 AM
|
Nice work wrapping the power meter  I'd imagine the pacific northwest has the lowest retail power rates in the US. Break-even in socal is around $4/BTC, not counting cooling. -rph I've seen some places ~$0.06/kWh in the U.S., inclusive of all delivery charges. But PNW isn't too bad. It use to be a lot lower ~$0.04/kWh a little over a decade ago. Cheers, Kermee
|
|
|
12
|
Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Need help with sobtc.digbtc.net
|
on: September 08, 2011, 05:34:09 AM
|
http://solidcoin.whmcr.co.uk is broken. It's only updated to 28480. I'm running my own SC Bitcoin-Abe instance and this is what I found for you:   You received a payout of 0.77 SC. 0.77 SC is still in the wallet at sb6MefCdrbpXVJmaBZU5gKG22R5nQ5PPUd and not spent. The TX was 'committed' to Block #31133 which was solved on @ 2011-09-07 19:53:17 UTC. Make sure your client is caught up to at least block 31133. Cheers, Kermee
|
|
|
13
|
Economy / Marketplace / Re: Fake MtGox site
|
on: September 08, 2011, 01:55:41 AM
|
Should I try to log in my account from here to see if it is linked to MtGox database?
No offense to you or trying to be a douche, but this is the reason why phishing attacks are still a valid attack vector even up to this day even though it would seem most people are aware of this method... Cheers, Kermee
|
|
|
15
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Difficulty from 1777774.48200146 to 1779163.943662?
|
on: September 07, 2011, 01:52:04 AM
|
There was a bug in the difficulty display in some previous versions. The actual difficulty was always right, but it was reported incorrectly. This has been fixed in recent versions. Update your nodes, and if you mine for a pool showing 1779163, pester the pool operator to update his.
simple explanation:
0.3.20.2 calculates less accurately => 1779163.94366 0.3.24 calculates more accurately => 1777774.482
they must have been grabbing the difficulty factor from an older install temporarily.
edit: sorry i just noticed kjj said basically the same thing above.
Awesome. Thanks you two for the explanation! Cheers, Kermee
|
|
|
18
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Difficulty from 1777774.48200146 to 1779163.943662?
|
on: September 06, 2011, 11:25:15 AM
|
Granted, I'll be the first to admit that I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed, but could someone explain to me why within our 2016 block range between difficulty retargets, we have some blocks at 1777774 and some at 1779164? This is the first time I've seen a difficulty change/difference during a 2016 block range. Did I miss something? Cheers, Kermee EDIT: bitcoind still shows 1777774.48200146, and all the latest blocks solved still shows 1777774.48200146... But http://blockexplorer.com/q/getdifficulty ... 
|
|
|
19
|
Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [~5000 Gh/s] DeepBit.net PPS+Prop,instant payouts, we pay for INVALID BLOCKS too
|
on: September 06, 2011, 04:28:29 AM
|
It's definitely the largest however I'm wondering what the reason why is?
In a nutshell, it has had the least issues dealing with DDoS'es in the past because [Tycho] is generally on top of things and it's an extremely stable pool at all other times. Plus the fact that for 'Proportional' users have generally very steady payouts. Cheers, Kermee
|
|
|
20
|
Economy / Goods / Re: Modded PS3 Slim > $500 BTC
|
on: September 05, 2011, 11:11:23 PM
|
Will also show my buyer how to download games.
Would you entertain a trade with the iMac I'm selling in my signature? Cheers, Kermee
|
|
|
|