Bitcoin Forum
September 24, 2024, 03:29:18 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.1 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »
1  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The state of bitcoin in ireland. on: July 12, 2011, 10:30:39 PM
People in the Ireland are only going to flock to Bitcoin if the whole Euro appears unstable, not just the Irish economy, which it's not at this point.
You guys must be reading different news than I because my sources say the Euro is undoubtedly in trouble.
2  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Bitcoin7.com - Brand new exchange market! on: July 09, 2011, 12:16:38 AM
BitCoin7 has worked great for me . . . aside from the recent Dwolla issues. And I continue to use MtGox and TradeHill. All three serve a purpose.

That said, a word to the TradeHill guys - lose the sanctimonious act. I wouldn't mind . . . but for the fact that your site design is a direct rip off of the MtGox site. And you guys have the gall to lecture BitCoin7? Please.
3  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Pools With a Significant Hashrate: A Realistic Double Spend Attack Taking 2 Hr on: July 07, 2011, 03:19:47 PM
Who, exactly, is working on this?
4  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin 3D Model - First Attempt on: July 06, 2011, 10:43:47 PM
i love the latin flare.
The Latin needs some work. It's headed in the right direction . . . but it comes off as a little busy to me. Let me mull it over and I'll see if I can provide some concrete suggestions.
5  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin BANKS on: June 27, 2011, 11:04:26 PM
According to this thread:

http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=21615.0

They are planning on mining to create bitcoins that will be distributed as "interest"

What I don't understand is what is in it for them. I don't get their business model. How will they make money?
The guy claims not to be in it for the money but to support the growth of BitCoin.
6  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: America is about to hit the toilet and probably with most of the world. on: June 27, 2011, 10:25:57 PM
Heres a view into the depression world.  Read the posts, alot of desperation from young and old people alike.

http://www.homelessforums.org/forumdisplay.php?s=9a692229f4edde18d920b2d2b05042f6&f=3
Some sad stuff to read.
7  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Market is saying Tradehill is new leader? on: June 27, 2011, 10:08:40 PM
Forget the bid/ask spread for a moment. What about volume? Isn't that the final arbiter?
MTGox is running at roughly 5 times the volume of TradeHill. That's way, way down from what it used to be . . . but, still, they remain the largest by quite a bit.
8  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Market is saying Tradehill is new leader on: June 27, 2011, 10:00:27 PM
All this means is that buyers have more of a preference for TradeHill and sellers prefer Mtgox.
Might want to rethink that theory.
9  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: "How I Bought Lunch in Manhattan with Bitcoins" on: June 27, 2011, 09:37:27 PM
I own a pizza shop and I want to accept bitcoins but I'm still majorly concerned about how to keep my coins secure on windows.
Just keep them in your MtGox account . . .
10  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Goxed - 15:30 open on: June 26, 2011, 06:27:40 PM
Any other competent technical folks want to get together and discuss putting an exchange together? Not too impressed with the options we have right now.
I have been thinking about it. But there's more to a successful company than just setting up a couple of web services.
We most certainly agree.

But BitCoin needs a truly professional exchange. We do not have that now and I do not see one coming down the pike. There are a lot of posers out there whose product falls far far short of the talk and promise.

It's not a question of whether a far better product can be produced, it's a matter of who is going to do it.
11  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Goxed - 15:30 open on: June 26, 2011, 06:20:35 PM
Any other competent technical folks want to get together and discuss putting an exchange together? Not too impressed with the options we have right now.

Serious?
Yes.
12  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Goxed - 15:30 open on: June 26, 2011, 04:49:12 PM
Quote
You can only really use several servers for the website itself. The actual order matching need to be done on a single processor detached from the front end.
They could at least detach the entering of orders into the database and the actual order processing. Also load balancing for the frontend (which is terribly slow) and for MySQL (which seems to crash frequently) should be a must-have. I doubt they have any of this...
MySQL. Jeez, isn't that really the end of the discussion? What else did they use, FrontPage?

Any other competent technical folks want to get together and discuss putting an exchange together? Not too impressed with the options we have right now.
13  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Goxed - 15:30 open on: June 26, 2011, 04:31:42 PM
It's 1:30 am in Japan right now - are these guys even up right now working on this?

Can anyone confirm?
14  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Goxed - 15:30 open on: June 26, 2011, 04:21:02 PM
How long does it take you to test software?
I've been programming for close to two decades. The issue here isn't the amount of time it takes to test . . . it's the piss poor planning and communication.

Why are we all here 80 minutes after the first communicated launch time and 50 minutes after the revised launch time STILL WONDERING WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON?
15  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Goxed - 15:30 open on: June 26, 2011, 04:11:33 PM
I've been defending Gox pretty much the whole time, but this is starting to drive me crazy.  MagicalTux hasn't posted anything on the forum since the 21st.  It should have been obvious to me when they admitted their deadlines were just there to get people off their back, that they didn't take the notion of a timely and orderly restoration of service very seriously.  :-/

When you have to wait for IRC groupies to get a message about the site's status.  They don't take their business seriously.  Otherwise updates would be made ahead of time on their support website.
They are sitting on a freaking goldmine . . . and they appear to have nothing but contempt for their users.

Mind-blowing.
16  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Goxed - 15:30 open on: June 26, 2011, 03:55:16 PM
This is incredibly painful for me to watch . . . this is a no brainer, a quality problem.

If i knew that on date x, time y, that i was going to have n users hitting my server all at once, this would be an easy task.

It would be fun, it would go smoothly, I would have a plan.

I can only think the guys at MtGox are either grossly incompetent or incredibly greedy (they still have all this stuffed on to some box under their desk).

Torturous...
Sing it, brother.
17  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Goxed - 15:30 open on: June 26, 2011, 03:40:02 PM
What is the story MtGox? Are you going live or what? Take a sh*t or get off the sh*tter.
18  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Gox wouldn't be getting hammered right now, if they had allowed open orders on: June 26, 2011, 03:36:10 PM
Yeah apparently their SQL server is having a hard time dealing with all the attention and needed to spend some time in it's room by itself.
The entire platform has been in its room for a week.
19  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Gox wouldn't be getting hammered right now, if they had allowed open orders on: June 26, 2011, 03:24:08 PM
This is the thing that troubles me about MtGox - the seeming inability to learn from mistakes or listen to advice. Is it stubborness? Arrogance? Do they live in a bubble and make no effort to find out what their customers are saying?

I dunno . . . so many of the issues they have been having are completely avoidable . . . and yet invariably they choose the path of maximum clusterflock. I find it utterly baffling.
20  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Camp BX Hacker / Compliance Security Audit on: June 25, 2011, 07:33:58 PM
Gotta say, I wasn't that impressed with their site. I signed up and found that their code transformed my username to all lowercase characters. Why would anyone do such a thing? 
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!