 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 »
|
Credits's technical white paper is poorly written. The technical white paper lists a lot of explanations of conventional terms, such as what is TCP/IP, what is Haffman Tree and so on, giving people a sense of "Outdoors". On how to achieve the speed of millions of seconds per second, Credits's white paper is not very detailed, very vague.
Agree with this. But if CREDITS has developed outstanding know-how on how to achieve 1 M TPS it'd be weird for them to disclose it in WP. Such know-how may be considered to constitute the assets of a company. As I have said before let's give them a time. I disagree. Do you think BTC would hold a couple hundred billion dollars market cap if the source code was closed? Of course not, it is all about the source code for a globally distributed decentralized payment network. Agree with you. Sure they will release it in due time. |
|
|
|
There is red flag here, Credits says Nitin Gaur (Director at IBM Blockchain Labs) is advisor, but when I check his linkedin, nothing about Credits. I even send message to him at Linkedin, asking his confirmation as advisor at Credits, he do not answer.
Since a couple of days Nitin Gaur added his position as an advisor to CREDITS on linkedin. https://www.linkedin.com/in/nitin-gaur-75571a9/"As an advisor my focus and Interest in on scalability and economic viability of blockchain networks. I also assist with business models and structure." True, there are some mistakes in this sentence (English) but still, having an IBM-director as your advisor should mean something, no? Yes, they do have an impact, some people are now questioning people who are into Credits are we all shills or paid supporters of Credits? I don't think so it's my money I have the rights to invest where I want to, those who shame those investors almost $2,072,830 USD in volumes should check the stat daily. The banks/centralized institutions are scared of Crypto and will do anything in their power to suppress it. This fud is not coming out of nowhere. |
|
|
|
For me is credits a long term investment. I have a lot of faith in this team.
Agreed, HODLING my Credits like there is no tomorrow and adding as much as possible. They have an army of Russian developers working and refining the code. This team is going from strength to strength. |
|
|
|
I heard a source that the CS might be listed on binance in April and this could happen because I believe this project has a very good development strategy and they have the support from all over the community Cryptocurrency. I am considering investing more CS because the price of CS is very cheap
Binance does not list scams. Credits will never moon because people who buy this coin does not have the money to buy it up. If they had the money, they would not buy this coin. HAHA, that's an overstatement  Or a lie, whatever suits you. With pre-Beta Credits have shown that they're not a scam, there is a product behind it, which is functional, though they logically still have a few bugs. But they should eliminate most of them for Beta and certainly until the main-net in June. The question is how many transactions per second can they achieve, but we need to wait for a proper test with enough transactions. Right now there's not enought transactions to view that. It doesn't matter how much Sebastian and therat can FUD the project, they at least have something to show unlike most of other ICO projects. I am still waiting for the code to see if they are really legit or just another project, who claim to be ETH killer without a substance. In the beginning the paid shillers and most of the pathetic investors here were saying that they have the code but they wait to "patent" it. Now they all wait to build that code. Here you can check their claims that they work on the project from 2016. But somehow they have nothing ready and they build it now.  Is this FUD too? Sebastian my friend, we really need to send you on a reading course. Maybe afterwards you can watch some youtube videos on sofware development in whatever language you speak to understand how it works. Google concept development and you will see it is not coding. Please if you are going to Fud something, know what your talking about. Whoever is paying you to fud on here is overpaying. You have no idea what you are talking about. Credits is perfectly on track. |
|
|
|
Your right, I should stop, its a guilty pleasure.
These guys don't have a clue.
Wonder how long this fud will last, 10$, 50$,300$?
Impossible to Fud if the price goes over 500$
We are wondering too for how long you are gonna act like paid shillers and pathetic investors. "We are wondering too for how long you are gonna act like paid shillers and pathetic investors." WE!!!So there is a group of you that are creating fake fud. I knew it. You are very smart. Credits should hire you on their project. And you are very dumb for slandering Credits and insulting anyone who speaks positively of Credits. Fair enough bringing up red flags but continuing to create meaningless fud just shows everyone that you/your group have an agenda to suppress the price which is foolish. |
|
|
|
Your right, I should stop, its a guilty pleasure.
These guys don't have a clue.
Wonder how long this fud will last, 10$, 50$,300$?
Impossible to Fud if the price goes over 500$
We are wondering too for how long you are gonna act like paid shillers and pathetic investors. "We are wondering too for how long you are gonna act like paid shillers and pathetic investors." WE!!!So there is a group of you that are creating fake fud. I knew it. |
|
|
|
All we seem to here is credits bad code this and credits scam this when the facts are:
- Live test shown ( Most other coins have not done this)
- Good code/Bad Code ( That is the dumbest thing I have ever heard, your code can have the best flow structure, recursive code, dynamic code generation
methods and let me tell you that is all bullshit. What counts is fast code especially at Alpha/beta level, make your code fast, as long as the final result is fast then
the rest is bullshit which will be improved upon just like the bullshit wallet problem that everyone seems to focus on)
- Code reviews ( Bullshit again at this point, its so easy to look at written code and rip it apart, show that O, yes I could of written this method better or
structured that class better.
Writing code from scratch in a completely new field like Blockchain which is still in its infancy is super hard. So before these
so called super coders rip the Credits code apart, stop and realize that Credits have written their own code from the bottom up. Should they follow best
practice, of course. Is there a best practice in Blockchain programming, I don't think so. Continuously pointing out negatives and not positives is a bullshit
review. So many stupid pompous reviewers who should be taken with a grain of salt.
- Working product ( Continuous and prompt delivery. Working, working, working. These guys are hustling every day to bring out something revolutionary that works.
Careful when investing in crypto, its a risky market. But more importantly watch out for all of these paid fudders spreading negativity. Crypto/Blockchain is big business and there are many people trying to suppress it.
Again some positive preachers trying to sound smart. No one is paid to explain why this is a shitcoin. However, people are paid to shill this all over the place if you haven't noticed already. They said they are developing this garbage for 3 years. That should be enough to realize how bad it is. Looking at your last bunch of posts. All fud aimed at credits just like Sebastian. I am not trying to sound clever, Credits is showing promise. I can see by the way you write you are biased based on nothing more than your own agenda. Your opinion means nothing without facts. The fact is there is working code and tests to prove it. Here is a fun fact for you: even the "visibility of working live testnet" doesn't work. It just doesn't. They spent a lot of time already to make it look like it is working, but it still shows some mocked stuff. Untill today there was no proof whatsoever, that they actually have somewhat working blockchain behind all this. And by blockchain I mean some verifiable by consensus data structure. Also there was no description, even vague, about how exactly their "algorithm" works. They just keep pouring out a set of modern terms and abbreviations with the explanation what they actually mean, just like wikipedia Omg, so now when companies release code its automatically assumed to be fake. So when crypto companies release a alpha/beta/testnet, then you say fake. When crypto companies release software you say fake. When crypto companies establish partnerships you say fake. In summary no matter what crypto companies do they are fake. Are you reading your own sentences. Your logic is completely upside down. And if this is you Sebastian under a different name, you tricks will still not work. Their code is shit, their product is absolute shit. Their approach is beyond cheap. Their marketing is everything they got. Their partnerships are laughable, non existing or scams. That is the exact logic behind it, let's act like we are doing everything a successful blockchain would. This must be legit then. You don't even need to look for other people's opinions when you see some blatant and obvious shit they have come up with. It's just insane how they do their business "Their code is shit" Again with the shit code...Come up with something better. Shit compared to what? Maybe not constructed according to best practice but if it works and its fast SFW. "their product is absolute shit" So trying to create a blockchain solution is shit. Why are you even here? "Their approach is beyond cheap" The Ceo attends talks and gives interviews. They release code according to a timeline that actually works. Cheap according to what? " let's act like we are doing everything a successful blockchain would" What is a successful blockchain? what makes a successful blockchain? Have you a written a rule book? "You don't even need to look for other people's opinions when you see some blatant and obvious shit they have come up with" That says it all. Your arguments like the other fudders are just nonesense and baseless. There is great promise in Credits. Price is stable, they are sticking to their deadlines and producing a product which is more than I can say about other Cryptos. Don't underestimate Russian programmers. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACM_International_Collegiate_Programming_Contest#2018_World_FinalsSebastian if you have difficulty reading and understanding, Russia is number 1. I know the temptation is to reply to these clowns but I think we are wasting our time. The project is legit and has been fudded to shit but still moved up in a severe bear market where everything has been dropping. Remember something when people fud like this its nearly always bullish. Dont waste your time. Your right, I should stop, its a guilty pleasure. These guys don't have a clue. Wonder how long this fud will last, 10$, 50$,300$? Impossible to Fud if the price goes over 500$ |
|
|
|
All we seem to here is credits bad code this and credits scam this when the facts are:
- Live test shown ( Most other coins have not done this)
- Good code/Bad Code ( That is the dumbest thing I have ever heard, your code can have the best flow structure, recursive code, dynamic code generation
methods and let me tell you that is all bullshit. What counts is fast code especially at Alpha/beta level, make your code fast, as long as the final result is fast then
the rest is bullshit which will be improved upon just like the bullshit wallet problem that everyone seems to focus on)
- Code reviews ( Bullshit again at this point, its so easy to look at written code and rip it apart, show that O, yes I could of written this method better or
structured that class better.
Writing code from scratch in a completely new field like Blockchain which is still in its infancy is super hard. So before these
so called super coders rip the Credits code apart, stop and realize that Credits have written their own code from the bottom up. Should they follow best
practice, of course. Is there a best practice in Blockchain programming, I don't think so. Continuously pointing out negatives and not positives is a bullshit
review. So many stupid pompous reviewers who should be taken with a grain of salt.
- Working product ( Continuous and prompt delivery. Working, working, working. These guys are hustling every day to bring out something revolutionary that works.
Careful when investing in crypto, its a risky market. But more importantly watch out for all of these paid fudders spreading negativity. Crypto/Blockchain is big business and there are many people trying to suppress it.
Again some positive preachers trying to sound smart. No one is paid to explain why this is a shitcoin. However, people are paid to shill this all over the place if you haven't noticed already. They said they are developing this garbage for 3 years. That should be enough to realize how bad it is. Looking at your last bunch of posts. All fud aimed at credits just like Sebastian. I am not trying to sound clever, Credits is showing promise. I can see by the way you write you are biased based on nothing more than your own agenda. Your opinion means nothing without facts. The fact is there is working code and tests to prove it. Here is a fun fact for you: even the "visibility of working live testnet" doesn't work. It just doesn't. They spent a lot of time already to make it look like it is working, but it still shows some mocked stuff. Untill today there was no proof whatsoever, that they actually have somewhat working blockchain behind all this. And by blockchain I mean some verifiable by consensus data structure. Also there was no description, even vague, about how exactly their "algorithm" works. They just keep pouring out a set of modern terms and abbreviations with the explanation what they actually mean, just like wikipedia Omg, so now when companies release code its automatically assumed to be fake. So when crypto companies release a alpha/beta/testnet, then you say fake. When crypto companies release software you say fake. When crypto companies establish partnerships you say fake. In summary no matter what crypto companies do they are fake. Are you reading your own sentences. Your logic is completely upside down. And if this is you Sebastian under a different name, you tricks will still not work. Their code is shit, their product is absolute shit. Their approach is beyond cheap. Their marketing is everything they got. Their partnerships are laughable, non existing or scams. That is the exact logic behind it, let's act like we are doing everything a successful blockchain would. This must be legit then. You don't even need to look for other people's opinions when you see some blatant and obvious shit they have come up with. It's just insane how they do their business "Their code is shit" Again with the shit code...Come up with something better. Shit compared to what? Maybe not constructed according to best practice but if it works and its fast SFW. "their product is absolute shit" So trying to create a blockchain solution is shit. Why are you even here? "Their approach is beyond cheap" The Ceo attends talks and gives interviews. They release code according to a timeline that actually works. Cheap according to what? " let's act like we are doing everything a successful blockchain would" What is a successful blockchain? what makes a successful blockchain? Have you a written a rule book? "You don't even need to look for other people's opinions when you see some blatant and obvious shit they have come up with" That says it all. Your arguments like the other fudders are just nonesense and baseless. There is great promise in Credits. Price is stable, they are sticking to their deadlines and producing a product which is more than I can say about other Cryptos. Don't underestimate Russian programmers. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACM_International_Collegiate_Programming_Contest#2018_World_FinalsSebastian if you have difficulty reading and understanding, Russia is number 1. |
|
|
|
All we seem to here is credits bad code this and credits scam this when the facts are:
- Live test shown ( Most other coins have not done this)
- Good code/Bad Code ( That is the dumbest thing I have ever heard, your code can have the best flow structure, recursive code, dynamic code generation
methods and let me tell you that is all bullshit. What counts is fast code especially at Alpha/beta level, make your code fast, as long as the final result is fast then
the rest is bullshit which will be improved upon just like the bullshit wallet problem that everyone seems to focus on)
- Code reviews ( Bullshit again at this point, its so easy to look at written code and rip it apart, show that O, yes I could of written this method better or
structured that class better.
Writing code from scratch in a completely new field like Blockchain which is still in its infancy is super hard. So before these
so called super coders rip the Credits code apart, stop and realize that Credits have written their own code from the bottom up. Should they follow best
practice, of course. Is there a best practice in Blockchain programming, I don't think so. Continuously pointing out negatives and not positives is a bullshit
review. So many stupid pompous reviewers who should be taken with a grain of salt.
- Working product ( Continuous and prompt delivery. Working, working, working. These guys are hustling every day to bring out something revolutionary that works.
Careful when investing in crypto, its a risky market. But more importantly watch out for all of these paid fudders spreading negativity. Crypto/Blockchain is big business and there are many people trying to suppress it.
Again some positive preachers trying to sound smart. No one is paid to explain why this is a shitcoin. However, people are paid to shill this all over the place if you haven't noticed already. They said they are developing this garbage for 3 years. That should be enough to realize how bad it is. Looking at your last bunch of posts. All fud aimed at credits just like Sebastian. I am not trying to sound clever, Credits is showing promise. I can see by the way you write you are biased based on nothing more than your own agenda. Your opinion means nothing without facts. The fact is there is working code and tests to prove it. Here is a fun fact for you: even the "visibility of working live testnet" doesn't work. It just doesn't. They spent a lot of time already to make it look like it is working, but it still shows some mocked stuff. Untill today there was no proof whatsoever, that they actually have somewhat working blockchain behind all this. And by blockchain I mean some verifiable by consensus data structure. Also there was no description, even vague, about how exactly their "algorithm" works. They just keep pouring out a set of modern terms and abbreviations with the explanation what they actually mean, just like wikipedia Omg, so now when companies release code its automatically assumed to be fake. So when crypto companies release a alpha/beta/testnet, then you say fake. When crypto companies release software you say fake. When crypto companies establish partnerships you say fake. In summary no matter what crypto companies do they are fake. Are you reading your own sentences. Your logic is completely upside down. And if this is you Sebastian under a different name, you tricks will still not work. |
|
|
|
All we seem to here is credits bad code this and credits scam this when the facts are:
- Live test shown ( Most other coins have not done this)
- Good code/Bad Code ( That is the dumbest thing I have ever heard, your code can have the best flow structure, recursive code, dynamic code generation
methods and let me tell you that is all bullshit. What counts is fast code especially at Alpha/beta level, make your code fast, as long as the final result is fast then
the rest is bullshit which will be improved upon just like the bullshit wallet problem that everyone seems to focus on)
- Code reviews ( Bullshit again at this point, its so easy to look at written code and rip it apart, show that O, yes I could of written this method better or
structured that class better.
Writing code from scratch in a completely new field like Blockchain which is still in its infancy is super hard. So before these
so called super coders rip the Credits code apart, stop and realize that Credits have written their own code from the bottom up. Should they follow best
practice, of course. Is there a best practice in Blockchain programming, I don't think so. Continuously pointing out negatives and not positives is a bullshit
review. So many stupid pompous reviewers who should be taken with a grain of salt.
- Working product ( Continuous and prompt delivery. Working, working, working. These guys are hustling every day to bring out something revolutionary that works.
Careful when investing in crypto, its a risky market. But more importantly watch out for all of these paid fudders spreading negativity. Crypto/Blockchain is big business and there are many people trying to suppress it.
Again some positive preachers trying to sound smart. No one is paid to explain why this is a shitcoin. However, people are paid to shill this all over the place if you haven't noticed already. They said they are developing this garbage for 3 years. That should be enough to realize how bad it is. Looking at your last bunch of posts. All fud aimed at credits just like Sebastian. I am not trying to sound clever, Credits is showing promise. I can see by the way you write you are biased based on nothing more than your own agenda. Your opinion means nothing without facts. The fact is there is working code and tests to prove it. |
|
|
|
|
All we seem to here is credits bad code this and credits scam this when the facts are:
- Live test shown ( Most other coins have not done this)
- Good code/Bad Code ( That is the dumbest thing I have ever heard, your code can have the best flow structure, recursive code, dynamic code generation
methods and let me tell you that is all bullshit. What counts is fast code especially at Alpha/beta level, make your code fast, as long as the final result is fast then
the rest is bullshit which will be improved upon just like the bullshit wallet problem that everyone seems to focus on)
- Code reviews ( Bullshit again at this point, its so easy to look at written code and rip it apart, show that O, yes I could of written this method better or
structured that class better.
Writing code from scratch in a completely new field like Blockchain which is still in its infancy is super hard. So before these
so called super coders rip the Credits code apart, stop and realize that Credits have written their own code from the bottom up. Should they follow best
practice, of course. Is there a best practice in Blockchain programming, I don't think so. Continuously pointing out negatives and not positives is a bullshit
review. So many stupid pompous reviewers who should be taken with a grain of salt.
- Working product ( Continuous and prompt delivery. Working, working, working. These guys are hustling every day to bring out something revolutionary that works.
Careful when investing in crypto, its a risky market. But more importantly watch out for all of these paid fudders spreading negativity. Crypto/Blockchain is big business and there are many people trying to suppress it.
|
|
|
|
As they disabled comments, they are automatically labeled a scam in your messed up world. Just shows you the amount of nonsense you come up with. If you want to talk conspiracy theories. Are you and your scam group employed by the Syndicate that tries to keep market prices down? As i'm reading through other crypto threads I see the same behavior you are showing here. Very interesting stuff. You and your people cannot keep cryptos down forever. |
|
|
|
Hello there is a lot of drama going on because of the number of transactions you claim to be able to facilitate. When will the first public demonstration with a real world setup take place where you show us the real power of your system?
They worked 3 years already as they stated but somehow its very hard to release the code because they have to "patent" it first. But they released something they called it alpha version from 3 years of "hard" work. With MD5 and programming for childs. Everyone is laughing with these scammers. 3 years of hard work and somehow they decided to release something like code after they get panicked because everybody was talking about it. Its so obvious what they are doing but i have to admit that they have a lot of scam supporters. Your fud is strong, but the Credits force is stronger FYI, if you continue to formulate your sentences like this no one will ever take you seriously. Credits to the moon. |
|
|
|
@sebastian787 Looks like you'll not stop this childish behaviour anyway so I'll not waste my time with you and we'll see in the next few months who talk bullshit.
The dogs bark, but the caravan goes on.
I just ignore him, he is probably part of some scam syndicate sitting in a call center somewhere. Bet you these guys target different companies hoping for some sort of payoff. In other news, Credits release pre Beta. Go Credits!!!! |
|
|
|
WTF!!! What other project is attacked and moaned at like this? Since when has anyone done code review on ETH or EOS and their only thing they can grab hold of is why no Telegram? All I see is echo chambers in Crypto. Inability to think for themselves and follow the crypto herd in one big its going to the moon clusterfuck. Jesus think for yourselves people. Credits has completely been overlooked due these scam allegations which had no basis in fact. They are a young smallish team doing something special, why can't people see that? NONE of the shitcoin ICO projects got attacked like this. My only thought is lots of EOS and ETH fanboys have to attack what threatens their investments. The FUD is now moving from oh its a lie and a scam to oh its amateurish lol. The project has show it does 500k tps. This should be the biggest news of 2018!!! EOS couldn't manage it with an army of coders. No pun intended but credit where credit is due.  Stop crying like a little girl and present facts. Your comments have no value. You talk sh*ts every time about moon, EOS, and a useless achievement of 500k tps on virtual machines on same LAN, same machine and with zero network latency. Thats how scams work and no how legit companies work. I have reported you to the moderator now, you are borderline harassing people and slandering Credits. |
|
|
|
When scammers dont know what to say, they will start talking about english letters missing from comments, if parents know you're online, loosing work, bla bla bla and moon!
As usual no value. Just talking sh*t about 1000x prices.
Look can you like FUCK OFF now you have been proved wrong. You fucking retard. Why continue now? Indeed, away with this fucking queer. Please get this guy banned. |
|
|
|
Maybe you created these accounts?
You are already a very suspicious character.
These accounts are still working on the forum making useless posts every day. Thats how credits creates hype. By fake accounts and bots. You are one shady guy. You mention shillers and fake accounts all sorts of crazy stuff. Do your parents know your online, is there a grown up at home to supervise you? |
|
|
|
Here you can check an example of how they create the fake accounts with many posts and activity. Plus the bots that they are working all day long around the forum for creating posts and activity so newcomers will think that these accounts are legit and unique. Because of this activity newcomers will think that their comments are standing and are from experienced members. So watch out this kind of accounts as are all artificial created for commenting all over the forum creating a hype every day with stupid updates and creating "experienced" accounts. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2273672.440     We need to mention here that in this thread the representative is ICOCloud. Watch out the rest accounts and their activity. JennyH Mike Sh Falleot cprman So now you can imagine what happens on the rest of the forum on thousand of topics on different sections.
Any account praising these scammers can be or a fake account created by them or just greedy investors that are afraid about their investment and they keep supporting these scammers no matter what so newcomers can invest more money and increase the price. Maybe you created these accounts? You are already a very suspicious character. |
|
|
|
Sebastion, I've found you a new job. Hi Everyone, CREDITS is opening up a Blockchain Lab in New York and looking for a community manager. - You'll be the face of the fastest Blockchain Platform in the World in NYC! If you think you are the right person e-mail us at ld@credits.com for more details now. Thanks. Gravey. I prefer working on legit companies and no scammers. This is my favorite Sebastian quote He prefers working on the companies then for them. If your investment skills are half as bad as your English you should stay far away from anything to do with money. lol |
|
|
|
Very impressive about what the project is achieving. They have now been listed on the Lbank exchange and this will undoubtedly be their new development this year. Personally I still hold CS because I am confident that when the Cryptocurrency market recovers, the price of CS will definitely increase very high and may become the first altcoin in 2018 to reach the price of $100
If they do what they've promised even $500 is possible. Haha nice name Think 10 to 50 with the mainnet and indeed lot more if they deliver what they are claiming! Guys i think you are wrong here. Credits its not for 100$ or 500$. Its for 1000$ per coin. They will even surpass ethereum and every blockchain available that have hundreds of developers working every day for their projects and for many years. They will achieve this with no devs nowhere, no progress and with their pdf and fake TPS achievements. With their blockchain you will be able to make a coffee by thinking of it. You will be able to find a girlfriend with a blink of your eyes. You will be able to upload your conscience on their blockchain so you can achieve immortality. Russia wont have rubbles anymore but all Russians will use Credits every day. Credits will be used for blockchain 10.0 on Web 5.0 by everyone and even Aliens will use Credits to visit our Earth. Star Trek and Star Wars will help on that. Plus their offices will be on the moon. Bitcoin is an old granny, it needs to get replaced with a better coin like Credits. $1000 per coin at 2019 is possible. Why only 1000$? 5000$ for sure. Yes in the upcoming years maybe 2020, 2021 we will see $5000 USD. For once Bizzarosuppoman said something that could actually be true. Positive it will do $1000, who knows later down the line. I did some math based on Bitcoins ATH and Credits supply. We could reach $2400 per Credit in another bullrun. Pls do not some math before you don't know what the meaning of market capitalisation is! 2400$ per credit = 240 Billion market cap, The actual mc of all coins and tokens together is 280 billion. Seriously, all you noobs need much more knowledge before starting buying into crypto or you will all get rekt fucking hard! The marketcap reached a total of $840 Billion in early Januari. 240 Billion wouldn't be that crazy  . If crypto has mass adoption the market could go trillions especially when the 3rd world countries catchup. |
|
|
|
|
