Bitcoin Forum
January 18, 2019, 01:06:45 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.17.1 [Torrent]
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 [45] 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 »
881  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: [Motivational post] Don't be disappointed, still you can upgrade your rank. on: September 13, 2018, 07:05:35 AM
Up for new comers
882  Economy / Scam Accusations / Scam - Acommax ICO - Fake team & ponzi scheme on: September 13, 2018, 06:48:47 AM
ICO Name: acommax
Website :
Archived ( Archived by someones on 09 sep 2018.)
ANN thread:
ICO status: Up comming.
Valid reason if accusation: Fake team & High ROI.

They used team from stock image. Their high return plan is a ponzi scheme.


They edit picture on victor file.

Photo source from : Shutterstock

Domain information
Domain Age: 49 Days
Last Refreshed: Just now
Website Speed: Very Fast
Website Value: $242.05
Owner: WhoisGuard Protected

Tagged scammer. Waiting for DT reply.
883  Economy / Scam Accusations / Scam - GENKI Token- fake team - Plagiarized whitepaper. on: September 13, 2018, 05:28:02 AM
Website :
Airdrop thread :
ICO live on:

Reason of Accusation: Fake team & whitepaper plagiarism.

They used cartoon for picture with fake LinkedIn profile those are only 5 connection . That means just newly create LinkedIn profile.

Plagiarized whitepaper: They direct copy whitpaper content from well known website quora.  


Copy paste from:

Only 7 page whitpaper with no details information. I believe there is more plagiarism content. Right now I am on mobile just found it now. Whatever copy paste it's consider plagiarism. They steal others content without permission.

Although I am not experience coding but look like to me there is something wrong. They just copy paste others coding and never change details except Name , symbol and supply. I know open source code can copy anuyone but nothing change means developer of smart contract not professional.
Let's check  smart contract code

pragma solidity ^0.4.23;

 * @title SafeMath
 * @dev Math operations with safety checks that throw on error
 * Project : Genki (GENKI)
 * Decimals : 8
 * TotalSupply : 100000000000
library SafeMath {

    * @dev Multiplies two numbers, throws on overflow.
    function mul(uint256 a, uint256 b) internal pure returns (uint256 c) {
        if (a == 0) {
            return 0;
        c = a * b;
        assert(c / a == b);
        return c;

    * @dev Integer division of two numbers, truncating the quotient.
    function div(uint256 a, uint256 b) internal pure returns (uint256) {
        // assert(b > 0); // Solidity automatically throws when dividing by 0
        // uint256 c = a / b;
        // assert(a == b * c + a % b); // There is no case in which this doesn't hold
        return a / b;

    * @dev Subtracts two numbers, throws on overflow (i.e. if subtrahend is greater than minuend).
    function sub(uint256 a, uint256 b) internal pure returns (uint256) {
        assert(b <= a);
        return a - b;

    * @dev Adds two numbers, throws on overflow.
    function add(uint256 a, uint256 b) internal pure returns (uint256 c) {
        c = a + b;
        assert(c >= a);
        return c;

contract ForeignToken {
    function balanceOf(address _owner) constant public returns (uint256);
    function transfer(address _to, uint256 _value) public returns (bool);

contract ERC20Basic {
    uint256 public totalSupply;
    function balanceOf(address who) public constant returns (uint256);
    function transfer(address to, uint256 value) public returns (bool);
    event Transfer(address indexed from, address indexed to, uint256 value);

contract ERC20 is ERC20Basic {
    function allowance(address owner, address spender) public constant returns (uint256);
    function transferFrom(address from, address to, uint256 value) public returns (bool);
    function approve(address spender, uint256 value) public returns (bool);
    event Approval(address indexed owner, address indexed spender, uint256 value);

contract GenkiProjectToken is ERC20 {
    using SafeMath for uint256;
    address owner = msg.sender;

    mapping (address => uint256) balances;
    mapping (address => mapping (address => uint256)) allowed;    

    string public constant name = "Genki";
    string public constant symbol = "GENKI";
    uint public constant decimals = 8;
    uint256 public totalSupply = 100000000000e8;
    uint256 public totalDistributed =  10000000000e8;    
    uint256 public constant MIN_CONTRIBUTION = 1 ether / 1000;
    uint256 public tokensPerEth = 20000000e8;

    event Transfer(address indexed _from, address indexed _to, uint256 _value);
    event Approval(address indexed _owner, address indexed _spender, uint256 _value);
    event Distr(address indexed to, uint256 amount);
    event DistrFinished();

    event Airdrop(address indexed _owner, uint _amount, uint _balance);

    event TokensPerEthUpdated(uint _tokensPerEth);
    event Burn(address indexed burner, uint256 value);

    bool public distributionFinished = false;
    modifier canDistr() {
    modifier onlyOwner() {
        require(msg.sender == owner);
    function GenkiProjectToken () public {
        owner = msg.sender;    
        distr(owner, totalDistributed);
    function transferOwnership(address newOwner) onlyOwner public {
        if (newOwner != address(0)) {
            owner = newOwner;

    function finishDistribution() onlyOwner canDistr public returns (bool) {
        distributionFinished = true;
        emit DistrFinished();
        return true;
    function distr(address _to, uint256 _amount) canDistr private returns (bool) {
        totalDistributed = totalDistributed.add(_amount);        
        balances[_to] = balances[_to].add(_amount);
        emit Distr(_to, _amount);
        emit Transfer(address(0), _to, _amount);

        return true;

    function doAirdrop(address _participant, uint _amount) internal {

        require( _amount > 0 );      

        require( totalDistributed < totalSupply );
        balances[_participant] = balances[_participant].add(_amount);
        totalDistributed = totalDistributed.add(_amount);

        if (totalDistributed >= totalSupply) {
            distributionFinished = true;

        // log
        emit Airdrop(_participant, _amount, balances[_participant]);
        emit Transfer(address(0), _participant, _amount);

    function adminClaimAirdrop(address _participant, uint _amount) public onlyOwner {        
        doAirdrop(_participant, _amount);

    function adminClaimAirdropMultiple(address[] _addresses, uint _amount) public onlyOwner {        
        for (uint i = 0; i < _addresses.length; i++) doAirdrop(_addresses[i], _amount);

    function updateTokensPerEth(uint _tokensPerEth) public onlyOwner {        
        tokensPerEth = _tokensPerEth;
        emit TokensPerEthUpdated(_tokensPerEth);
    function () external payable {
    function getTokens() payable canDistr  public {
        uint256 tokens = 0;

        // minimum contribution
        require( msg.value >= MIN_CONTRIBUTION );

        require( msg.value > 0 );

        // get baseline number of tokens
        tokens = tokensPerEth.mul(msg.value) / 1 ether;        
        address investor = msg.sender;
        if (tokens > 0) {
            distr(investor, tokens);

        if (totalDistributed >= totalSupply) {
            distributionFinished = true;

    function balanceOf(address _owner) constant public returns (uint256) {
        return balances[_owner];

    // mitigates the ERC20 short address attack
    modifier onlyPayloadSize(uint size) {
        assert( >= size + 4);
    function transfer(address _to, uint256 _amount) onlyPayloadSize(2 * 32) public returns (bool success) {

        require(_to != address(0));
        require(_amount <= balances[msg.sender]);
        balances[msg.sender] = balances[msg.sender].sub(_amount);
        balances[_to] = balances[_to].add(_amount);
        emit Transfer(msg.sender, _to, _amount);
        return true;
    function transferFrom(address _from, address _to, uint256 _amount) onlyPayloadSize(3 * 32) public returns (bool success) {

        require(_to != address(0));
        require(_amount <= balances[_from]);
        require(_amount <= allowed[_from][msg.sender]);
        balances[_from] = balances[_from].sub(_amount);
        allowed[_from][msg.sender] = allowed[_from][msg.sender].sub(_amount);
        balances[_to] = balances[_to].add(_amount);
        emit Transfer(_from, _to, _amount);
        return true;
    function approve(address _spender, uint256 _value) public returns (bool success) {
        // mitigates the ERC20 spend/approval race condition
        if (_value != 0 && allowed[msg.sender][_spender] != 0) { return false; }
        allowed[msg.sender][_spender] = _value;
        emit Approval(msg.sender, _spender, _value);
        return true;
    function allowance(address _owner, address _spender) constant public returns (uint256) {
        return allowed[_owner][_spender];
    function getTokenBalance(address tokenAddress, address who) constant public returns (uint){
        ForeignToken t = ForeignToken(tokenAddress);
        uint bal = t.balanceOf(who);
        return bal;
    function withdraw() onlyOwner public {
        address myAddress = this;
        uint256 etherBalance = myAddress.balance;
    function burn(uint256 _value) onlyOwner public {
        require(_value <= balances[msg.sender]);
        // no need to require value <= totalSupply, since that would imply the
        // sender's balance is greater than the totalSupply, which *should* be an assertion failure

        address burner = msg.sender;
        balances[burner] = balances[burner].sub(_value);
        totalSupply = totalSupply.sub(_value);
        totalDistributed = totalDistributed.sub(_value);
        emit Burn(burner, _value);
    function withdrawForeignTokens(address _tokenContract) onlyOwner public returns (bool) {
        ForeignToken token = ForeignToken(_tokenContract);
        uint256 amount = token.balanceOf(address(this));
        return token.transfer(owner, amount);

Perhaps they copied from ForeignTokens but they never change it. I am not sure about coding case. Developers can confirm it.

Domain information
Title: Genki Project
Domain Age: 45 Days
Last Refreshed: Just now
Website Speed: Slow
Website Value: $141.58
Organisation: Statutory Masking Enabled
Owner: Statutory Masking Enabled
Owner Address: Statutory Masking Enabled
Owner City: Statutory Masking Enabled
Owner Postcode: Statutory Masking Enabled
Phone Number: Statutory Masking Enabled
884  Economy / Reputation / Re: Boldman Capital badly bumping Airdrop thread by newbie account. on: September 12, 2018, 07:17:55 PM
Thread already moved on trash by the way  Grin
885  Other / Meta / Re: how to open an account that was banned 7 days on: September 12, 2018, 07:08:08 PM
My account was banned 7 days, now it's more than 7 days but my account is still banned, what should I do? Can anyone help? Huh

You should add your banned profile link on original post. If I am not wrong this is your profile link:;u=1037938 . By the way , if got banned for 7 days, should be remove ban since over 7 days. Only moderators can answer you. Just wait..
886  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: - SCAM - Fake Team on: September 12, 2018, 06:55:45 PM
After some discussions with Lucas from, I decided to stop the campaign:

They will apparently continue here:

Thanks for your initial reaction. As well they are running bounty by themselves , we should tagged them by the way. Tagged by me , need DT action. Stealing other people's identity isn't good practise.
887  Economy / Reputation / Boldman Capital badly bumping Airdrop thread by newbie account. on: September 12, 2018, 05:22:01 PM
[BOUNTY] Boldman Capital - Airdrop to everyone!
Airdrop thread bumping badly by newbie account. Perhaps they are using paid service.

Also I was opened thread on scam accusation about their team long time ago. Although I report so many reply include thread but there is too much spam. I think thread should moved on trash.
888  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: [SCAM ALERT] Boldman Capital anonymous team. Be careful !!!!! on: September 12, 2018, 05:13:08 PM
Be careful from their Airdrop 
They are using bumping service.
889  Other / Meta / Re: In which forum can one post a competition thread? on: September 12, 2018, 04:52:27 PM
I think, the Bounties (Altcoins) would be more appropriate for that.

Yes, since OP mention Token that means  competition thread should post on Bounties (Altcoins) board. Because contest if for Alts coin.
890  Other / Meta / Re: Some topic should sticked. Moderators please check & consider if possible. on: September 12, 2018, 01:42:41 PM
rules should either be displayed or linked to upon sign up and they should be forced to read them in any which way we can.

Strongly agree with you. There should force to read the rules. Just not like we skip terms & conditions when register others site. Should add tick box for each rule. Means a new user have to read and mark one by one. And shouldn't allow for skip.

Regarding sticked post, I noticed in few board had sticked multiple thread from single user. It can combine on one topic. And some useful and informative post can be combined and sticked instead of sticked individually.
891  Other / Archival / Re: Alternative solutions by community instead of pushing theymos. on: September 12, 2018, 01:21:57 PM
Anyway, I'm sure you've seen this, but for anyone that hasn't take a look at theymos' response.

Got it. Thanks for remind. Theymos already answered about it. So thread should be locked anyway.
892  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Scam ICO- Socialmediapay - Fake team on: September 12, 2018, 08:43:36 AM

Edited OP with your additional info.
893  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Scam ! Nettek Coin - cartoon team picture - Plagiarized whitepaper on: September 12, 2018, 08:11:59 AM
Lol . They had changed picture from website. Removed cartoon picture. Just create new LinkedIn profile. I already tagged them, need tagged someone from DT.
894  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Steincoin - SCAM - Fake Team on: September 12, 2018, 07:41:06 AM
Good catch. Look like they are not yet enter bitcointalk. Their pre sale not yet start. We need keep in eye on their project. Need to exposed as much as possible. This post also will visible on Google search anyway. If someone search before investing abviously they will find it.

Also website is very new
Domain Age: 6 Days
Last Refreshed: Just now
Website Speed: Slow
Website Location  : Spain

Only 6 days before register the doamin.
895  Other / Archival / Alternative solutions by community instead of pushing theymos. on: September 12, 2018, 07:14:58 AM
Alternate solution by community instead of pushing  theymos. We can see lot of suggestion in last few months. Unfortunately we can't see any reaction from admin. Due to lot of suggestion I don't think it's possible implement all. Obviously there is few suggestion theymos should consider.

However there is no alternatives way to solution or reduce problems? I think we can, although not possible completely but community can reduce problems instead of just pushing admin. We can share possible solution and step up for action.

I will collect all the suggestion from hilariousetc post Community generated suggestions to improve the forum instead of search all meta post. I will picked few suggestion that possible solution or can be reduce. There is many similar suggestion, I will pick one of them.

A newbie welcome message or link to a welcome thread upon sign-up explaining the basic rules and links to everything they need to know including the full forum rules, helpful guides and FAQs etc. No excuses for not knowing the rules then.

Obviously this is a good suggestion for newbie. Since there is no respons from theymos I would like to suggest sticked a post on every board like index. Subject could be Index, must read before posing or something similar. That thread should include all the information & useful thread link created by community that need to know for newbie. Like LoyceV created this thread. On the other hand I noticed there is multiple sticked post by same user few most of boards. It could be combinde in same post. On the other hand few useful topic can be sticked together. And index topic should not lock for question from newbie, so someone from community can answer them. Of course we need help from moderators for that.

Require at least one merit to become a Junior Member

There is multiple suggestion almost same about Jr. Members and remove signature. This is the most important suggestion by community & theymos should consider this suggestion. To be honest problem isn't Jr. Members , problem is signature campaign. Obviously it can be reduce by community. To avoid spamming Jr. should not allow by managers. Already some managers never accept Jr. Members. Sticked a post dedicated for managers and participant about signature campaign unofficial rules. There should be involved trust system. Should tagged managers who will allow Jr. Members, although there is so many red tagged managers. However if managers not follow than tagged Jr. Members. Tagged should be temporary until they remove signature , Of course tagged member will request to removed tag. I know it's little bit complicated, but not impossible. I believe we have not to continue it more than a month. Because between one month every one will know that he will get tagged if not follow it. As far as I know people's always try to avoid red paint. I can't see others solution except it if admin not disable sign or require small merit for become Jr. Members. If you have any other solution than share it here.

Posts from lower ranked accounts don't bump ICO threads to the top (which would then render paid bump spam useless).

Need encourage more people's for report using patrol page. There is active moderators on ICO ANN board. Sometimes take action within 10 minutes. I am not sure how to encourage people for reporting. Perhaps it would be small merit giveaway. Like 1 merit for each 500 good report. On the other hand a spam reporter couldn't spammer himself.


A 'bump button' for the marketplace that only allows you to bump your thread once every 24 hours. Manually bumping by posting will then be disallowed. As mentioned above, posts by lower ranked accounts could not be able to bump threads thus curbing potential abuse.

I don't think so it's necesarry to implement on current situation, there is more important suggestion for implementation. Same comment as above I discussed, need more patroller post report.

A sub board for highly merited users to encourage constructive topics only by users who have proven their worth here over time (or make the Ivory Tower merit requirement much higher [OMG ITS LIKE SOVIET RUSSIA GULAG]).
Not agree with that, if implement that community will missed lot of quality and useful post. Useful post could be post on meta or help & beginner board, so it will visible for all.

Charging ICOs a fee to make their ANN here. You could even get rid of the ANN board completely and give them their own sub once they've paid the fee.

Who will be responsible for scam ? Currently no one blaming forum for scam due to not moderated by forum. But when forum will get paid than question will go to admin why you allow this ICO for sub board?

Additional perks for Legendary accounts or a higher rank if added

What is next ? If added one more rank than people might ask for another rank. It's look fine current rank system.

Add badges as a reward for high reporters and/or merited users
Admin already seeking for that. About merit I already discussed above.

If I am wrong , I will not argue since its my own opinion. You can share your thoughts. Also about others suggestion. Lot of more suggestion here. We can't reduce pressure from admin? I think possible reduce if we share each other what would best action by forum. No need all forum members for revolutions. Did you saw whole country people perticipate if happened any revolutions ? I don't think so. It might be hard but I don't think impossible few thing.

Please share your thought if there is alternative solutions by community about any suggested post. We can't try our best instead of blaming theymos ?
896  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / All alt coin become shit coins. on: September 12, 2018, 02:55:03 AM
Since Bitcoin holding in good position but alt coins are bleeding everyday. It's look all alt coins become shit coins. I will not surprised if alt coin price become below ICO price. Lol. I was wrong that alt coins holding more profits from Bitcoin. I have more than 50% loss on alt coins. Although I am not going to sale in loss even I have to hold more than years. But I don't think so market will recover soon. There is too much negetive news about crypto currency. And it's already effects on alt coins.

However current situation but I think this is good time to invest on crypto currency. But invest only whatever you can afford loss.
897  Other / Meta / Re: [GUIDES] on Bitcointalk. Index thread (until there is a dedicated subforum?) on: September 12, 2018, 02:33:38 AM
You can add this thread on your index.
Guidelines, how to spot a scam ICO & report effectively.
Bounty Hunters ! Must read before join any bounty campaign

This thread should sticked on Help & beginner board.
898  Other / Meta / Re: My account was banned. I do not agree with this. on: September 11, 2018, 02:23:38 PM
But I did not do any plagiarism.

How you know you got ban for plagiarism ?  Grin . This is not include in your massege that you received from forum. Anyway SFR10 already explained you in details. Hope you got your answer.

For your info, it's look you are trading merit on your current account. You might get red on this account also. At least save this account, don't lose it again.

Just 2 minute gap send and received. Also post has deleted.

899  Other / Meta / Re: Some topic should sticked. Moderators please check & consider if possible. on: September 11, 2018, 12:16:25 PM
I'm wondering why you didn't include Merit & new rank requirements
There is already a sticked post by hilariousandco with details explanation. Also there quote of original post.

we should probably consolidate some of them, but the info you proposed can certainly be added to existing stickies. Things like what you suggested could be included in the the Newbie/Welcome message which I suggested here as well.
Not bad idea. If can added existing also not bad or can be combined 3 in 1. If welcome message implement it's also good. But I wondering people's will read or they will just skip like when we register a website and just mark on terms & conditions, never read what is there( most of us did it ) . Anyway your proposal is good. If theymos not agree than some of post can be sticked or combined by moderators.
900  Other / Meta / Some topic should sticked. Moderators please check & consider if possible. on: September 11, 2018, 09:26:08 AM
Really I don't know the process and requirement  of sticked a topic. Just I feel that few topic should sticked for forum those are useful especially new comers. I just choose 3 topic include one of my post that I think helpful for forum & new comers.  Topics are discribe itself, I don't think to need details explanation.

1. [Guide] Reporting effectively - Meta.
2. How to sign a message?! - Beginners & Help
3. Guidelines, how to spot a scam ICO & report effectively.. - Beginners & Help
4. [GUIDES] on Bitcointalk. Index thread - Beginners & Help
5. Report plagiarism (copy/pasting) here. Calling for Mod action: please permban - Meta

I am not sure others but [Guide] Reporting effectively[ is really need sticked on meta. Never mind I am still begginer but I learn & inspire reporting effectively from this post although I am reporting little bit from began. So this post can encourage others also.

I don't know about others board if any post deserve for sticked. Perhaps you can reply here if you found.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 [45] 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 » is not available or authorized for sale. Do not believe any fake listings.
Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!