|
502
|
Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [0PH] ckpool.org ZERO FEE SPLNS no registration mining pool US/DE/CN
|
on: January 10, 2019, 02:30:01 AM
|
No GPU mining for me, but thanks for clarifying the key part of needing to get over the dust threshold first--0.001BTC reward, I presume--and *then* you're qualified to get in line... I see now.
No, the dust reward here is the lowest of any pool at 5640 satoshi (strictly speaking you can theoretically get even less than that as a reward if you get above the 5640, but by the time you get a payout, your share of the block is smaller rather than larger due to pool size fluctuations.) |
|
|
|
|
503
|
Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [0PH] ckpool.org ZERO FEE SPLNS no registration mining pool US/DE/CN
|
on: January 10, 2019, 02:16:02 AM
|
I thought if you minded here long enough with any applicable miner that you'd eventually get join the round-robin of The Lucky 50 that get bumped from the Postponed to Payment group...
You will, eventually. CPU's and GPU's will take much longer. S9's are cheap, gekko science has their newpac usb stick. So there are cost friendly options for hobbyists. I still mine with my gpu but won't go into much more detail on ck's thread as they mine altcoins to trade for BTC.
No, I'm quite sure you will never get enough hashes to ever get a payout even here. It's not a lucky 50, you still have to get above the dust threshold and then get in line. There's no luck involved at all. To get above dust threshold with a GPU miner here, you will have to mine for probably a decade with everything else being equal. That's not going to happen. Ergo don't. |
|
|
|
|
509
|
Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [30PH] ckpool.org ZERO FEE SPLNS no registration mining pool US/DE/CN
|
on: December 11, 2018, 11:51:29 PM
|
Looks like it's now survival of the fittest pools out there...smaller pools are going to become closer to obsolete...
The good news is that I was making zero from running the pool with a higher hashrate so I'm not losing anything by it falling, which means the pool won't be going anywhere. If enough people wise up and realise they'd be better off here, things might change in the future, but this is pretty much how I expect things will continue to pan out as sheep keep mining for ants. |
|
|
|
|
510
|
Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [30PH] ckpool.org ZERO FEE SPLNS no registration mining pool US/DE/CN
|
on: December 11, 2018, 09:02:28 PM
|
BLOCK!
"height": 553396,
"reward": 12.69451886,
"solvedby": "1JPo4Na3LVTKSU311ny1k4pYGa9LSNTnR",
"date": "[2018-12-11 12:00:33.419]",
"hash": "0000000000000000001b45e78ed4508e0ef7da41900622d1e372450157c89c5e",
"shares": 9142502238383,
"diff": 161.9
Gotta love Block Tuesdays! They're good on any of the days that end in `y'...  [2018-12-11 12:00:33.209] Possible block solve diff 10320464034899.158203 !
[2018-12-11 12:00:33.400] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2018-12-11 12:00:33.575] Solved block 553396 by 1JPo4Na3LVTKSU311ny1k4pYGa9LSNTnR.1JPo4Na3LVTKSU311ny1k4pYGa9LSNTnR.vHA17E-B-S6
[2018-12-11 12:00:33.575] User 1JPo4Na3LVTKSU311ny1k4pYGa9LSNTnR:{"hashrate1m": "13.9P", "hashrate5m": "13.7P", "hashrate1hr": "13.6P", "hashrate1d": "13.6P", "hashrate7d": "13.3P"}
[2018-12-11 12:00:33.575] Worker 1JPo4Na3LVTKSU311ny1k4pYGa9LSNTnR.1JPo4Na3LVTKSU311ny1k4pYGa9LSNTnR.vHA17E-B-S6:{"hashrate1m": "182T", "hashrate5m": "185T", "hashrate1hr": "183T", "hashrate1d": "181T", "hashrate7d": "168T"}
[2018-12-11 12:01:58.851] Hash for block height 553396 confirms block was CONFIRMED
And that block seemed to be an excuse for some more miners to drop off... |
|
|
|
|
512
|
Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [55PH] ckpool.org ZERO FEE SPLNS no registration mining pool US/DE/CN
|
on: December 06, 2018, 06:02:31 AM
|
Not sure about your formula but best answer is: variables will change so any math will as well. I'd use CG's tool to help but with that kind of hashing you'll know after a few days where your derp will lay for this coming block.
Ive been mining on this pool for if I had to guess around 2 weeks, and have renting a lot of hashing power so I get to full 5nd as fast as possible. Thats why im trying to figure out what my full payout will be to see if I have reached 5nd. Not sure how to calculate when you throw rentals into the equation. Just a heads up. The numbers don't add up for renting hashpower just to make up the 5ND so I recommend against it unless you're getting it for very cheap (which you're usually not.) |
|
|
|
|
515
|
Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [55PH] ckpool.org ZERO FEE SPLNS no registration mining pool US/DE/CN
|
on: December 02, 2018, 03:11:44 AM
|
I recommend using Bitcoin Core as your hot wallet and your Ledger Nano S as your cold wallet. Here are five reasons why. Most importantly, using a full node as your hot wallet contributes to Bitcoin's economic strength. If you are unable or unwilling to store the entire Bitcoin blockchain, you may run Bitcoin Core with pruning enabled, using the -prune=<n> command-line argument. (The Ledger Live app may also not work properly with payments from coinbase transactions, which is how this pool pays its miners. There is currently no documentation from Ledger regarding this.) It's worth noting you can substantially decrease your bandwidth requirements with bitcoin core by enabling the blocksonly mode. You will have the same level of security, can still send transactions, the only difference to you is that transactions will need one confirm before they even show up in your wallet. This is actually more secure anyway, but a little disconcerting if someone has just sent you some coin as you can't see it till the next block passes. You are not supporting the network as much as a full node, but you are still helping slightly. Note that no light wallet will ever be as secure as a full blockchain based one, but another alternative for a secure low bandwidth light wallet is still greenbits on android or greenaddress on iphone - they have a web interface you can use on PC as well if need be ( http://greenaddress.it ). These are not as flash as some of the newer wallets but get the job done and have all their code open and auditable. |
|
|
|
|
517
|
Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [30PH] ckpool.org ZERO FEE SPLNS no registration mining pool US/DE/CN
|
on: November 28, 2018, 01:52:23 AM
|
[2018-11-28 01:46:29.271] Possible block solve diff 106058768599316.140625 !
[2018-11-28 01:46:29.421] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2018-11-28 01:46:29.564] Solved block 551773 by 32LA7cmsj35LH7cK1MjvwyoLEmYpuWAD9k.worker
[2018-11-28 01:46:29.564] User 32LA7cmsj35LH7cK1MjvwyoLEmYpuWAD9k:{"hashrate1m": "32.4P", "hashrate5m": "32.2P", "hashrate1hr": "32.2P", "hashrate1d": "26.1P", "hashrate7d": "13.3P"}
[2018-11-28 01:46:29.564] Worker 32LA7cmsj35LH7cK1MjvwyoLEmYpuWAD9k.worker:{"hashrate1m": "32P", "hashrate5m": "31.7P", "hashrate1hr": "31.8P", "hashrate1d": "25.2P", "hashrate7d": "11P"}
Still waiting on confirm  |
|
|
|
|
520
|
Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 1% fee solo mining USA/DE 251 blocks solved!
|
on: November 17, 2018, 09:04:23 PM
|
My SSD space near depleted, blockchain 238GB  . If I use Exodus wallet address, will it work? I just worried if I block the newly generated block will not be recognize as spendable. It will but I recommend staying with your own node instead. Simply change to a pruned node to save space. There is no need to keep the full blockchain if you have limited space. Add something like this to our bitcoin.conf: prune=10000 And that will limit it to using only 10GB of space. The lowest you can set it to is 550 which means only 550MB. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
coming soon?
