It’s just a mini, but Maybe it’s because I’m using nano pool, they just added support for the Z9 so maybe there’s less people over there. Not sure, but you may want to try them out. I have use them for ETH and XMR for quite a while and been very happy with them.

Running at 650 MHz, over the past 23 hours, 46,505 accepted shares, 54 rejected (0.116%) over on Nanopool.

Rejects can have lots of variables, I used to get lots of rejects on my Vegas when I ran XMR-Stak, but after switching to SRBMiner I get almost none.  Same thing goes for pools.  When I mine ETH on my 1070 rig at nicehash I get lots of rejects, none at Nanopool.

these look pretty cool, but too much $$$ for me:

https://minermaster.com/product-category/product/

So I tried adding a 2nd fan to my Mini (Delta QFR1212GHE) yesterday, but man it was way to loud.  I found that moving the fan about 1 inch away from the backplate reduced the noise a lot, which I think means most of the noise is turbulence.  Even with that, the point of creating a push/pull fan setup is to either cool better at the same noise level or cool the same with reduced noise level.  I'm not really seeing that with these industrial fans.  Removing the backplate completely should help but not sure I want to void my warranty yet.  Also need a way to mount it if the backplate is removed.  Anyone else try this?

Interesting, on the Ant Miner web console, it says all 3 are online, just hashing at 1.5k each...  Most folks were reporting they would see HW errors or the 3rd card going to 0 when their overclock was too high, so I was assuming this was slightly different.

Just got my batch 2 Mini yesterday.  Ran it at 650 Mhz all night and had no HW errors and minimal pool rejects (using nanopool).  Getting around 14.8Ksol/s.  What's odd is I changed the cgminer.conf to set the speed to something higher but anything higher than 650 just gives me a really low hash rate, around 4.5Ksol/s, even 655 Mhz.  No HW errors, just slow hashing.  Anyone else experience this?

wondering the same thing...

Kind of disappointing actually.  I get 1450 h/s on my 1950x, and Ryzen 2nd gen has a better caching scheme (about 10% faster) than first gen Ryzen.

Cooler Master A12038-60BB-4RP-F1
Delta Electronics QFR1212GHE
Delta Electronics QFR1212GHEXUM
Nidec V12E12BS1B5-07
Sanyo Denki 9GV1212P1J01
Shengjiu SG121238BS
Sunon PSD1212PMBXA-F-PWM

No, mining via Nicehash vs and XML pool shouldn't affect the hashrate.  In Nicehash what miner software is it using for mining XMR. XMR-stak or XMRig?

I have a few Ryzen rigs mining with XMR-stak/Nicehash and they are around 600 h/s with 8 threads.

Just $0.02 here... 

Avoid the Gigabyte X399 boards, I have one and hate it.  It has tons of issues, and Gigabyte support for this platform is horrible.  Shop around on the 1950x, you can find some good deals on them now that Threadripper 2 has been announced, or go with a Ryzen2 platform.  Ryzen2 can mine monero well and is a fraction of the cost of Threadripper (I have a Ryzen 2600 that mines 600+ h/s with no overclock).

The hot fix is working great, thank you so much!!!!

Hmm, My 4770k gives me 290-310 h/s with XMR-stak.  Running a mild OC (3.9Ghz) with stock voltage.  How many threads are you using?  4 is optimal due to the 8 MB L3 cache.

I recently switch from XMR-stak to SRBminer for my GPUs because I was getting a lot of rejected shares on Nicehash. Rejected shares dropped from 5-6% to 0.1%, and I got a nice bump in hashrate. My Vega56 went from 1980 to 2050 h/s and 1/2 my RX570s went from 900 to 950 (the othe half are a different brand/memory and stayed at 900). 

What GPU are you using for your Primary Display?  A couple months back I was using my CPU's iGPU for the primary display and everything worked great.  Recently, I can't get any mining software to load any AMD OpenCL devices unless I use one of them as my primary display.  It's almost like Windows is not loading the AMD drivers properly unless an AMD card is the primary display.  I had the same behavior from at least 4 different miners, so my issue had nothing to do with Claymore.

submitted a Github issue, thank you!

Still on 2.3.0, running on MacOS X 10.9.

Been getting this error the last 2 days, causes GRM to crash

INFO: 2018/06/20 04:54:07 nanopool.go:170: networkBlocks query succeeded!
INFO: 2018/06/20 04:54:07 nanopool.go:175: Querying NANOPOOL minerPayments.
INFO: 2018/06/20 04:54:07 nanopool.go:183: minerPayments query succeeded!
ERROR: 2018/06/20 04:54:07 influxdb.go:60: DBDaemon could not write record batch to influxDB...
panic: runtime error: index out of range

goroutine 51 [running]:
go-rig-monitor/pool.(*PoolConfig).LoadNanopoolData(0xc420120cc0, 0x1559640, 0xc42024a180, 0xc420073da0)
   /Users/ramf/go/src/go-rig-monitor/pool/nanopool.go:339 +0x3794
go-rig-monitor/pool.Monitor(0xc4200224e0, 0x15, 0xc420024eb0, 0x7, 0xc420024f50, 0x7, 0xc420024ff0, 0x7, 0x1e, 0x3e8, ...)
   /Users/ramf/go/src/go-rig-monitor/pool/pool-monitor.go:61 +0x1a5
created by main.main
   /Users/ramf/go/src/go-rig-monitor/main.go:143 +0xb50
 

Look cool, already downloaded it.  Do I need to do anything to migrate from 2.3?  Should I delete my existing Dashboards?

thanks for all your hard work!

I have 2 ETH rigs, one with 6x1070s, one with 6xRx570s.  All my 1070s are Nvidia branded FE and set to power target = 65% with NvidiaInspector. All hash at 32.5-33 Mh/s and consume 99-100 watts.  My Rx570s are a mix of Asus and MSI cards, all are bios modded.  The Asus cards consume 92-94 watts, MSI cards range from 95-105 watts and all 6 hash at 29.0 Mh/s.  So for me Nvidia cards are more efficient hash/watt, but cost a lot more (now) than AMD cards.  Nvidia cards are very easy to tune, AMD cards CAN be easy (find a good bios online and flash it) or a pain (roll your own bios mod and spend hours tweaking).  For my ASUS cards, I found a great BIOS on Anorak, flashed it and I was off and running.  My MSI cards didn't like any of the straps I tried, so spent a lot of time trying to find an optimal setting.  Also have 3 of the exact same MSI cards with the exact same bios, same memory, etc, and they use 95w, 99w, 105w.

i have 3 RX570s with Hynix memory and have to use slower straps to get the best hash rate out of them.  Thinking they have 1750 straps or maybe even higher...  They hash about 900 H/s with intensity 58.  My 3 Elpida memory 570s run more aggressive straps (1500 i think) and hash about 950 h/s with intensity 58.  All 6 run memory at 2020 Mhz.  On XMR-stak all 6 hash around 880-890, but they react the same way to strap timings.