|
I imagine blockchain in the form of bee cells. Each cell contains information in electronic form, owned by any of us, and we can dispose of it personally, for which we are given a personal key. And God forbid you lose it, all that you have time to put in your cell will not be available, you will lose it forever.
All cells are linked together, forming a chain of blocks (cells) that are not connected to the common server. This is a kind of database that can be used equally by all Internet users. Only the owner of a cell can change the information in a particular cell. The right to do so and gives him a personal key.
By the way, the technology of blogging was first used as a component of bitcoin as a digital currency in 2009. It was based on the idea of using block chains, put forward a year before Satoshi Nakamoto.
The blockchain system assumes the highest degree of security of the data entered in the storage of your cells.
Is that so?
Not so long ago bought a smartphone. When trying to enter manually the key to enter the Voice, failed: it was extremely inconvenient to enter its data on this small device. Already having given up on this business a hand, decided that I will only read a news Tape, and to make all other operations on the laptop.
However, a few minutes later I found that I was still in the Voice network... How it happened, I can not even imagine.
In addition, one golasinski craftsman not long ago suggested how to recover a forgotten password using your own computer. I. e., if desired, any attacker will be able to find your secret valuable key.
It is unlikely that this system will protect your property or intellectual property rights, because to copy the text or photos posted by you, and give them for their own, can any dishonorable citizen, as I wrote about it not so long ago under one of the posts one of the voters. Yes, and added that I should be happy that someone on my text makes money, "content with the glory."
What else did I find out?
The fact that the blockchain itself is considered a decentralized system is beyond doubt. But I do not agree with the statements of some voters that the Voice is also decentralized, there is in itself and is not obliged to obey any rules, referring to the various mathematical and other codes, through which Bare works.
One thing is that it has a team of founders who have invested in the development of this platform, a group of programmers and developers, lawyers and other professionals who unobtrusively monitor the order on the site.
Another thing is that users have been given much more freedom of action than on other, more or less similar projects, nevertheless organizing such a structure as the Delegation, designed to also keep order on the site. The fact that some delegates often shirk from their duties, wrote a lot, but that's another question.
As much as some users would like to present a Voice free from any conventions and obligations, but it has a set of rules that we try to adhere to. Let everything go on its own, using the slogan " Anarchy is the mother of order!"the project as a whole will not do any good to any of us individually. What is happening now on the Voice shows the harmfulness of this policy.
The amount of content and interesting, and useful is almost reduced to a minimum for one simple reason: rollback systems and boosters pulled over the main part of the pool, which stood out for the whole project. As a result, 5-7 people receive super profits, the rest - get a penny. When I tried to resent the rest of the Board, were issued: "in the blockchain, baby! Here you can do everything, and casino games too!"
Just something I never found information that the blockchain system is allowed to open prohibited by law casinos.
Somehow it happened that I started with the concept of blockchain, and then moved to the Voice. But they are interconnected, no matter how cool, although the difference between them still exists.
|
Show Posts
