|
4563
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][SHA-256D] PETRODOLLAR (P$): BIG OIL COMES TO CRYPTO
|
on: October 29, 2014, 11:47:53 PM
|
what does your getinfo say now?
"blocks" : 58661,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"connections" : 2,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 28032.59400435,
but my wallet now shows differnt
this is what my wallet has: "blocks" : 58667, "timeoffset" : 0, "connections" : 10, "proxy" : "", "difficulty" : 10765.67578407, |
|
|
|
|
4565
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][SHA-256D] PETRODOLLAR (P$): BIG OIL COMES TO CRYPTO
|
on: October 29, 2014, 11:29:07 PM
|
i have it running now but it doesn't seem to be paying out. could be the confirmations have not caught up to be distributed.
With the network being so weak the pool forked earlier and the blocks were orphans. It's back on track again now but anyone who has a wallet make sure your keeping it open. It will help the network. I started hashing again last night on Hasher.ca with wallet 9.10.0-beta. am i forked? My wallet shows 6 active connections to the network. I don't think the version matter so much. The DEV never really did anything with the wallets since release. Just make sure you're this block at least... "blocks" : 58660, "timeoffset" : 0, "connections" : 8, "proxy" : "", "difficulty" : 28032.59400435, My console says Block 58660 and Diff 28032. I just haven't seen any payouts from Hasher and all the blocks have been confirmed. I even found a block for the pool last night that was all me. Have not seen it yet in my wallet. that's what the pool is on now, it wasn't earlier today and not sure how long it was off. It previously on had 1 connection, and now it has 2 and is on the proper chain. |
|
|
|
|
4566
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][SHA-256D] PETRODOLLAR (P$): BIG OIL COMES TO CRYPTO
|
on: October 29, 2014, 11:12:08 PM
|
i have it running now but it doesn't seem to be paying out. could be the confirmations have not caught up to be distributed.
With the network being so weak the pool forked earlier and the blocks were orphans. It's back on track again now but anyone who has a wallet make sure your keeping it open. It will help the network. I started hashing again last night on Hasher.ca with wallet 9.10.0-beta. am i forked? My wallet shows 6 active connections to the network. I don't think the version matter so much. The DEV never really did anything with the wallets since release. Just make sure you're this block at least... "blocks" : 58660, "timeoffset" : 0, "connections" : 8, "proxy" : "", "difficulty" : 28032.59400435, |
|
|
|
|
4570
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] SuperNET asset 12071612744977229797, trading symbol UNITY
|
on: October 29, 2014, 06:32:09 PM
|
Looks like someone sold in to the wall.  That's actually kind of funny.  I wonder what their motivations are... On the plus side that means that SuperNET itself now has a nice check of UNITY shares now. Those might come in handy at some point in the future. Possibly selling their SuperNET for buy blocknet. they will regret very soon , but regret is useless. That's very likely. I don't think it's just a coincidence that the dump happened right as blocknet is doing their ITO. Whoever it is is probably hoping for a quick profit that they didn't see with SuperNET They'll be sad in the end. No safety net like the wall they sold into with UNITY. |
|
|
|
|
4571
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][Blocknet] The internet of blockchains / XBridge / true cross-chain P2P
|
on: October 29, 2014, 05:15:22 PM
|
The term "you" here refers to a third party (CoinGateway) with no vested interest in shafting anyone.
In fact, their prime interest is to attract customers, so I very much doubt there'd be any "shafting" going on.
Their algorithm was not disclosed to prevent gaming coins' prices prior to the ITO.
If you're unhappy with the price of SWIFT, please take it up with them. I'm interested to hear their response actually, so by all means post it here.
Are you saying that you let CoinGateway come up with the averaging function for your ITO? That makes very little sense. It would be impossible to game an averaging function significantly if it weighted historical prices more than recent prices. That's not a new concept. I thought you guys were computer scientists and knew about mathy things like that. Yes, it is their responsibility for the pricing of coins, in the same way that it could not be our responsibility to price coins on an exchange where one is listed. that's just wrong. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
