|
861
|
Other / Meta / Re: Dear Bitcointalk...
|
on: January 02, 2014, 11:41:37 AM
|
You should go to the litecoin forums and act all indignant about them moving bitcoin posts to off topic too. Such bias and arrogance, ugh.
Do this |
|
|
|
|
863
|
Economy / Services / Re: Earn upto 0.6 BTC per month for your signature!
|
on: January 01, 2014, 11:32:48 PM
|
A fraudulent business scheme
When you're considering goals for yourself, don't forget to examine your work life. What changes could you make to become a more productive and pleasant but OP you are fucked up. and Guys you also be sure for not being scammed next time.
Sorry for all who was been scammed and fuck this OP and hit negative Trust.
Good Luck
Why bother? Now he doesn't give a fuck, it was at beginning that it was useful |
|
|
|
|
866
|
Other / Meta / Re: Activity Post stuck at 14?
|
on: January 01, 2014, 07:57:25 PM
|
It increases by 14 every two weeks if you posted 14 times in those two weeks.
It's crazy how people misunderstand this rule 1 (ONE) post in a fortnight brings 14 points of activity |
|
|
|
|
868
|
Other / Meta / Re: BitcoinTalk++ script - v0.2.82
|
on: January 01, 2014, 07:44:09 PM
|
Great, thanks I have a problem, the + and the - are not working. I cannot see them, but everything else works fine though.
OS? Browser? BT++ version? |
|
|
|
|
869
|
Other / Meta / Re: Why no trust in meta?
|
on: January 01, 2014, 07:21:22 PM
|
|
I never noticed that kind of behaviour. If that happens then yeah it's better not to show it.
I think it could be good to show it in Meta though. (No hot debates here)
|
|
|
|
|
870
|
Other / Meta / Re: BitcoinTalk++ script - v0.2.82
|
on: January 01, 2014, 07:12:24 PM
|
|
Anyone else noticing this? (I don't have access to a computer before a few hours)
Good password? (Are you able to talk in the chat?)
|
|
|
|
|
871
|
Other / Meta / Re: Why no trust in meta?
|
on: January 01, 2014, 05:28:07 PM
|
I agree but showing trade trustworthiness doesn't prevent them from giving useful ideas so I don't see how your post justifies not to show it
It's just additional info
I think people would be quick to judge and not trust or listen to their involvement in the discussion because they have a bad trust rating. Do you think so? Why? Do people think scammer never say anything right or worth something? I personally always check why someone is negatively rated so after that it's easy to know whether you should listen to the guy depending on the context |
|
|
|
|
873
|
Other / Meta / Re: Why no trust in meta?
|
on: January 01, 2014, 05:12:55 PM
|
Is there any reason why it isn't shown everywhere?
Trade trustworthiness is irrelevant to discussion. Scammers can still contribute useful ideas to a discussion. I agree but showing trade trustworthiness doesn't prevent them from giving useful ideas so I don't see how your post justifies not to show it It's just additional info |
|
|
|
|
874
|
Other / Meta / Re: BitcoinTalk++ script - v0.2.82
|
on: December 30, 2013, 02:43:03 PM
|
|
I think the problem is your server. I just add a url CSS node so I can't do much about that.
What I could do instead is downloading the CSS, saving it in the in-browser BT++ saved data, then using this data as CSS.
So even if it downloading the CSS lags (whatever the reason is), the CSS import will be instant.
Now that I'm writing it I think it's a good idea so yeah I'll code that. I'll have to check what max size I can save though.
|
|
|
|
|
878
|
Local / Actualité et News / Re: Revue de presse bitcoin en français
|
on: December 30, 2013, 01:08:24 PM
|
L’autre problème, c’est qu’elle n’est pas si sécurisée que ça. Des hackers sont entrés dans le système. C’est un système qui va être victime de son succès, mais aussi de ses faiblesses. Ah bon ? Secp256k1 a été cassé ? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
