 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »
|
|
Die Frage ist halt, Reicht es aus zu sagen, Dass ich die Coins von Privat ohne Beleg gekauft habe?
Er möchte sich eine Immobilie kaufen und daher würde er gerne den Gesamtbetrag einzahlen.
Die Bank sagt dazu "Das wird vom System ausgelöst und hängt je nach Konto Aktivität ab, daher hätten Sie keinen Einfluss darauf. (Das System meldet ungewöhnliche Aktivitäten)."
|
|
|
|
|
Mich würde Eure Meinung zu folgenden Thema mal interessieren...
Peter hat vor ein Paar Jahren von seinem "ersparten" Bargeld, BTC für 9500€ von einer anonymen Person gekauft.
Nun möchte er diese Bitcoins verkaufen und den Erlös von, sagen wir mal 60.000€ auf sein Bankkonto bekommen.
Option 1:
Er verkauft diese wieder an einen beliebige Person und zahlt das Bargeld auf sein Bankkonto ein.
Wie sieht es da mit dem Herkunftsnachweis aus?
Option 2: ?
Option 3: ?...
|
|
|
|
Hallo @Moeter81, viel Erfolg bei deinem Angebot. Zur Sicherheit aller Beteiligten aber von mir einmal der Hinweis, dass der Nutzer im OP kürzlich nach langer Inaktivität aufgewacht ist und davor überwiegend im englischsprachigen Bereich aktiv war.  Quelle: Bitcointalk Und weil wir ja alle möchten, dass diese Deals hier für alle Parteien reibungslos ablaufen, erinnere ich daran, dass man bei neuen oder lange inaktiven Accounts immer besondere Vorsicht walten lassen und am besten nur mit einem Escrow handeln sollte. Sicher ist sicher.  Danke für diese wichtige Info, das man vorsichtig sein sollte bei solchen Geschäften. Ich denke, das kann sich jeder selber denken. Ich habe jedenfalls schon einige erfolgreiche Deals mit Usern gehabt. Das Angebot steht jedenfalls noch. |
|
|
|
|
Ich biete Euch hier ein paar BTC an, bis max. 10K€.
Ich komme aus der Nähe von Oberhausen und bin mobil.
Ich nehme eine Gebühr von Aktuell 3%.
Bei ernsthaften Interesse, meldet Euch kurz bei mir.
|
|
|
|
So basically you have to enable developer mode to show & install the app? Or are there additional steps that you need to do before installing the app? Kinda weird they don't explain this in the official guide. Since migration is necessary for NEO holders I don't know why it needs to be gated behind a developer mode either, CMIIW. Glad to see you work it out OP. Yes, exactly. After a long wait, Ledger Support informed me of this. As soon as you switch on developer mode, the neo app will be visible in the catalogue. |
|
|
|
-snip-
Does the language setting have no effect? Given that the Deutsch has several enriched fonts, it is possible that it was automatically integrated into the keyboard and affects the input word. Try to use the default language whenever possible. Good luck. good idea but unfortunately that didn't work either. |
|
|
|
So you can't find Neo N3 and NEO app? Or is it the latter? If I understood the explanation correctly, the old app is no longer supported and you need to use the N3 one. If you still can't find it, probably contact their support for further help. I've never seen anything like this assuming everything is updated etc. I don't think it is an internet problem either, I could be wrong though. CMIIW.
This is what I see when I search:  or:  |
|
|
|
Yes, I already mentioned the article above. I can also clearly remember that the Neo app was in the app catalog at the time. |
|
|
|
Does anyone know this problem and has a solution to it?
According to you other thread, your Ledger Nano X is new. So, have you updated its firmware yet? Because the device that you've received might have an outdated firmware. Yes, everything is up to date with the latest firm and software. |
|
|
|
|
I have now backed up everything from the ledger except NEO, I can't find the NEO app in the app catalog anymore. Anyone know what's going on here?
|
|
|
|
No, I work with Electrum. Ledger live is overwhelmed and crashes. |
|
|
|
|
The day before yesterday I started to get my amounts on the new device.
I let Electrum work 13 hours yesterday for 206 inputs. When Electrum has finished signing, it is important that I unlock the ledger quickly beforehand, otherwise the error message I posted above will appear, so you always have to make sure that you are on the computer at the end of the procedure .
I now only have coins from 40 entries (previously around 500) on my ledger.
I'm just sending 20 more to my new device but it's still taking a very, very long time.
The inputs are now greatly reduced, but ledger has saved all transactions and the list has not gotten any smaller.
Is it because of that?
I'm curious how it behaves when getting the other coins over, I hope it works better/faster.
Then I will reset the old ledger and set it up again and see if everything works normally again.
|
|
|
|
I've never seen a reason why mining rewards should stay on the pools longer than necessary, so I've always set it to the minimum payout amount.
I have of course changed this now.
But I had never heard of it before, which could cause problems at some point.
Normally it's not much of an issue in most wallets, unless we're taking about thousands of small payouts. Yours is a unique case. That setting will also save you some satoshi later when you need to spend your mining rewards. Because it could cause you to pay more fee if you end up creating transactions with high number of inputs ( higher transaction size). Yes, that's right. I hadn't thought about that either, but I think it won't be a big difference, but it would be avoidable. |
|
|
|
Should I rather get another hardware wallet and try to get my inventory over there?
What is your exact model of ledger hardware wallet? Old and retired model S is slower than newer models, but I don't think this change would speed anything in your case, and your computer hardware and processor is more than enough. Maybe hardware wallet devices with faster processors will have less issues with many transactions, but this is just my speculation. it's not faster yet. I'll get a new hardware wallet on Tuesday, then I'll try to get everything over and will then reset the ledger. Did you choose any other manufacturer for hardware wallet? I would suggest getting something that is open source, and if you are only dealing with Bitcoin than Passport by Foundation could be good option. As for other hardware wallets, I never heard someone had problems with mining rewards, but you can check the list I made for open source wallets available today: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5288971.0EDIT: I did some research about Trezor hardware wallets, and they are saying that Trezor is not designed as a mining rewards wallet because of high number of transactions, so they are suggesting costumers to compile more transactions to one and then deposit to Trezor wallet. Yes, My Nano S is an old model, it is several years old. But I have the feeling that the problem with the speed is not due to the hardware. For example, if I open Ledger live without connecting the Ledger to my computer, my computer works very hard to synchronize my transactions until the program crashes. I ordered a Ledger Nano X because I don't just manage BTC. I will empty my old Ledger Nanos and then set it up completely again and then use it as a second storage memory. I've never seen a reason why mining rewards should stay on the pools longer than necessary, so I've always set it to the minimum payout amount. I have of course changed this now. But I had never heard of it before, which could cause problems at some point. |
|
|
|
i managed to do another transaction on an external wallet today i combined 42 and it took 3 hours. Does it get faster once you have less remaining funded inputs in your wallet? I also wonder if your Ledger with the current wallet will work okay again once all your inputs are consolidated, or that somehow the existence of those used addresses will still slow it down. it's not faster yet. I'll get a new hardware wallet on Tuesday, then I'll try to get everything over and will then reset the ledger. I will report Tuesday if I was successful. And I got a response from Ledger today: "It looks like your problem is that you are sending a high number of transactions to a hardware wallet. If you are sending many small payments or so-called "dust payments" to an address controlled by your hardware wallet can cause your blockchain transactions to become out of sync, which can significantly increase the time it takes to construct or validate transactions. You can either create an account on Ledger and make the transfer little by little, or try Electrum." |
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the tip!
i managed to do another transaction on an external wallet today i combined 42 and it took 3 hours.
Apparently I was lucky again and am now gradually getting my credit back.
Thank you for your help!
|
|
|
|
I think the reason why it slowdown even on 5 inputs may be because of the connection problem you might be using a broken USB cable My assumption was this problem occurs while creating the transaction, but if you're right, it's while signing it. Is that correct, OP? try to replace it with a known working one or try to clean the USB plug and terminals with a brush and thinner/alcohol. I would not use paint thinner, that dissolves all kinds of plastic. When I bought the Ledger back then, I thought I had made a good choice.
But now I don't have a good feeling about it anymore.
Unfortunately, what is on the ledger is not exactly small. Still, 400 inputs isn't that much, and if that would be a problem, I would have expected much more complaints about it. Should I rather get another hardware wallet and try to get my inventory over there? That should work, as far as I know Trezor uses the same seed format. Whatever you do, don't enter your seed words in any website! You probably know this, but people still do it once in a while.
Alternative: use IanColeman's software to recover private keys, but this requires an offline setup and you should know what you're doing including offline signing. Another hardware wallet is easier and probably the safest choice. yes, it occurs when signing. |
|
|
|
What are the system specs? RAM? CPU? and so on. Are you running anything else that could be grabbing system resources?
Probably not the problem but any 1 thing that is limiting can bring some other things to a crawl.
Figure it's worth verifying that before we all go down the rabbit hole of figuring out what else it may be
.
-Dave
 This is my main computer. But I also tried it with a current Mac Book Pro, the behavior was the same there. I have already exchanged the USB cables, but I will try to clean them again. This is my main computer. But I also tried it with a current Mac Book Pro, the behavior was the same there. I have already exchanged the USB cables, but I will try to clean them again. When I bought the Ledger back then, I thought I had made a good choice. But now I don't have a good feeling about it anymore. Unfortunately, what is on the ledger is not exactly small. Should I rather get another hardware wallet and try to get my inventory over there? |
|
|
|
|
