Perhaps you question implies other ideas beyond the strictly technical. In which case, they seem to be open to suggestions and initiatives from the community. When and if enough trust on the dev is built into this project, I myself have a couple of potential projects that could make this coin actually usable, in an advantageous way, in the real world. Others, I am sure, will contribute also if, like I say, the commitment and technical development warrants it.

For what I can see, this NiceHash thingy is much, much less productive than what I thought initially. An average computer gets more or less the same amount that one would get on some kind of faucet or similar... much, much less than staking. Not entirely worth it, actually, in my opinion.

Thanks a lot.  Now, with the wallet miner not engaged, I am beginning to see the "Yes!" in green frequently. I guess now it is working properly... Is the payment in BTC or AXIOM?

Quick calculation: This initial period of 5 AXIOM per block was originally supposed to last 3 months... well, at current rate, more likely to increase the pace rather than reducing it, (3 blocks per minute, average), if my calculations are correct will result in less than 30 days more until we reach the second phase of "high POW/POS rewards... which will last no more than 5 days...

Distribution of AXIOM has been significantly accelerated...

About time... it's been a complicated transition so far. Hopefully things will work flawlessly from now on...

The distribution is being accelerated but the cap for the project is around 10 million coins total.

It seems to be working now. Thanks everyone.

Do you have to have the miner engaged in the client or it doesn't matter? I have it engaged at present.

System error messge: The program cant start because MSVCR120.dll is missing. Try to reinstall...."

It doesn't work for me...

I have posted this on their thread but I believe that many people still haven't heard of this project. It is a project that I do NOT endorse yet: As many who know me know perfectly well, my requirements for endorsement are quite normal in my view for unreachable for most of cryptos. I require first and foremost, that the identity of the devs is known. Also that there's no censorship on their BTCT thread. Finally, that I believe in the project (and that means no instamines and a bunch of other murky things). In this case, the devs are anonymous, so that's a no-no. The thread is not censored, so that's 1-1. Which leaves the "murky things" in the unproven territory or, as many put it, the proverbial "fence". I do not know if the project is legit or the devs mined a lot of coins and are going to dump them at a given moment and leave. I guess it is possible, no one would be very surprised  if it comes to happen. But I also know that, even though they ninja-launched it way before it was ready for primetime and, as a consequence, many things that shouldn't have happen, did (most notably that GPUs actually mined it when it was supposed to be CPU-only), AXIOM is not the usual copy-paste hackjob, but one coded from scratch... and that's more than 99% of all other alts already. I also know that even though many people still doesn't know anything about this project, the price in the only market, Bittrex, has continued going up and people seem to be accumulating it, which is a clear proof of support.

Sorry for the preamble. What the title of this thread means is that perhaps that support is caused by the following scenario: In the nest 100 days, assuming the project remains on course, holders of AXIOM, staking, can multiply their holdings by a factor of 8. Here's the rough math: Someone with 20-25k AXIOM staking is going to (considerably) more than double that figure by the time the high staking season starts, in 3 months or less. With bonanza staking time (average of 80 coins per block for 17 days) more than probably tripling or better.

Edit to add: All of that is with regular staking, not considering that now it is possible, for most people to stake DOUBLE what I used for the previous calculation (read about this increase in staking with CPUs, up to 120% above current level), so somebody with 20-25k AXIOM will mine in the next 90 days around 50-60,000 coins (probably many more), for a total, rounding up numbers, of 85,000. Those 85,000 staking the second "high stakes phase" will stake quite a nice number of coins, probably doubling again, so the 20-25,000 staking today, in just over 3 months will become, easily, 160-200,000 coins, up to a x8. In 3 months! Price would have to go to practically to single digits to incur in losses. These calculation have been made on the fly and don't contemplate any compounding stake of the coins mined, so the figures are extraordinarily conservative on purpose.

The character of this thread is just informative, in no way I recommend or endorse investment in this project. I simply point out what, if the project continues its course, will result of an initial investment around 25,000 AXIOM coins.

Finally, it is worth considering that the total number of Axiom coins to be in circulation, ever, will be around 10 million, as per the devs. Even if all the current coins in circulation were to stake the next 100 days, still the number of total coins would not -or barely- reach that figure. Needless to say, many, perhaps the vast majority, wont produce the exemplified results for lack of coinage or simply because they will be traded many times over as the prices fluctuate.

Do your research, by all means, but I believe this project could present a singular opportunity, seldom available in crypto any more.

Yeah, it would be nice if a guide more for less techie people was given. My wallet, for instance, doesn't have a visible config. file so how do I change the configuration? This should be implemented directly in a new wallet version, three (Windows) versions, in fact. It is a copy/paste instant job for the devs while it is a veritable nightmare for some users (me).

The markets are giving the dev team the benefit of the doubt... a little bit. For a non-copy-paste hackjob that works, is innovative and has a dev team that seems relatively committed (that weekend off was quite a red flag though), the current price is extremely low. If the markets were confident, this would be by now way above 50K.

That said, no one is selling much, beyond those mined initial coins seemingly while there's a lot of people accumulating to stake and prepare adequately for the future "stake bonanza"  which seems quite wise at this point IF the commitment is legit. Think about it: Someone with 20-25k AXIOM staking is going to (considerably) more than double that figure by the time the high staking season start, in 3 months or less. with bonanza staking time more than probably tripling or better. Even assuming that the price may stagnate at one point or another and that the stagnation will happen between 15-20K (which is extremely conservative, as the projects gains credibility), you have quite a home run by Christmas... with the "protection" implied in the fact that even if the price, for whatever reason, would go to 4-5k, those holders/stakers would still be ahead of the game.

Taking all that into consideration, the only reason why this is not pulling quadruple volume and much higher prices, to me is due to the exceptionally depressive mood of the markets at the moment. Maybe when some of the Ethereum people cash out profits, some of that cash will flow this way, who knows.

Edit to add: All of that is with regular staking, not considering that now it is possible, for most people to stake DOUBLE what I used for calculation, so somebody with 20-25k AXIOM will mine in the next 90 days around 50-60,000 coins, for a total, rounding up numbers, of 85,000. Those 85,000 staking the second "high stakes phase" will stake quite a nice number of coins, probably doubling again, so the 20-25,000 staking today, in just over 3 months will become, easily, 160-200,000 coins, up to a x8. In 3 months! Price would have to go to practically to single digits to incur in losses.

No wonder people is accumulating...

CPU mining in my side of the woods, has drawn to a halt for all intents and purposes. I have notified the dev that whatever they are doing in the background is havig that effect.

I doubt it is just in my case...

Much to learn you have, young padawan...

Thank you but no. I don't. Really I don't. Identifying utter nonsense doesn't require much psychology.

BlackCoin was a gigantic scam and sustained P&D. I wrote hundreds of pages detailing how it was. Now it's just surviving, short of, and there's no money to be made there. But it was a huge scam that I exposed in their unmoderated thread -they closed it because of me only to have to reopen it because the coin was going to the ground- and in a couple of separate, dedicated threads. They are also prominently featured in my WALL OF SHAME. Haven't you heard of THE BLACK HAND? humm, do your homework young padawan...

Seeing how it's raining in your nick of the woods, you still have time to come around other projects? Wow...

Nope. At this points, that's not THE POINT. I have made my mission to alert people because, as you rightfully point out, there are so many of them scams. So I am especially sensitive to that short of thing. There's absolutely no reason whatsoever -although I admit to several red flags, and have admitted to them for days now-, for you or anyone to believe this project is a scam. Much less to treat it as such as a foregone conclusion. And, that being your opinion, the repeated speculative insistence, obviously, makes it look like you have other interests (or manias) way beyond the excuse of "helping newbies"... that's MY SPECIALTY. With the red flags taken into consideration, I repeat, this is, so far a legit project that, if it materializes as such legit endeavor, could go places. Big places. Your "foregone conclusion" that it is the anatomy of a scam, is just manic, unwelcome -because it doesn't add critical thinking to the project- and completely improper from any perspective. You have expressed yyour opinion too many times already. You have warned of your opinion to any newbie that may come in here. Congrats, mission accomplished. Now you are just reaching, not making sense and, frankly, looking quite pathetically ridiculous.

If you decide to stay, for the love of... whatever, at least contribute some funny GIFs, ok? And no BS, please.

And people is intelligent enough to identify and thoroughly ignore those on full retard mode... while the thread continues bumping up. Limits? Why? They all disappear at (your) will just pressing on "ignore"...

THIS is negative. You, engaging someone who for whatever reason, keeps on posting negative -and often irrational- stuff. Even worse, asking him to leave. One of the best things of this projects starts right here, with a free, unmoderated thread where everyone can post, even those sockpuppets that post the otherwise funny GIFs. It's all bringing buzz to the project, which is good.. The negative as well as the positive. You should place yourself way above that and, since you -and everyone else- has already clearly identified those with and without substance, just ignore them altogether and go on about your business.

You will miss on some really funny memes though.

Edit to add: And, besides, the "strong FUD" is actually having a nice impact in both the volume and the price so, why change a good thing?