Thanks for suggestion.

Team tokens and Comapny tokens will be locked for 3 years, Tokens purchased in token sale will be not locked.

We are advertising on top platforms like CoinMarketCap

you can read the full details here: http://tinyurl.com/y6hm8ldq

We are in talk with some of the top exchanges.

 Bounty tokens will be distributed post Token Sale with locking period of 6 months only.

No verification is required for participation in bounty. You can follow below steps
1. Signup on tokensale.auxledger.org
2. Get you referral code and share for refer and earn
3. Submit you activities with same email id which you used to signup on tokensale.auxledger.org

In this bounty translation is not available, you can participate in other activities like video,news,articles,etc. creation and publication

you can find signature codes at this link: http://tinyurl.com/y6hm8ldq

.

.

.

Creating a whole new scenario of blockchain and assisting those turbulent technologies via several procedures one can have several suspicions on how does it works inherently.  Throughout the history of cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology, we have been acquainted across diverse new processes and terms such as coins, tokens, presale, crowd sale, decentralization, etc. But right now our concern is not what these terms are rather focusing on the terms ICO and IPO. Briefing it on the scale of technicality these two terms might sound similar but keeping a whole different meaning in application and abbreviation. Now industries are looking for how blockchain can benefit their business. While going from the investment panorama, the most impressive regard of the continuing blockchain revolution is assuredly the initial coin offering (ICO), which has attracted the attention of alternative investors and technologist across the globe. Although this new capital raising mechanism is not fully defined by the government indexes; continuing the flow of capital in new projects.
On the other hand, the (IPO) initial public offering refers to the first time a company sells shares of its capital on the open market. Explaining the underwriting as an act of raising investment capital, IPOs are not yet out of the league.  While ICOs render a sole way of growing needed capital, market shareholders and regulators equivalent have called for reasonable management, hence redefining the whole investment industry with the establishment that within a given blockchain, all associates are obedient to the rules set by the whole blockchain algorithms.

In about five years from now, the global blockchain government market will be worth nearly $3.5 billion, claims a new study by B2B research and analysis firm MarketsandMarkets. To put things into perspective, that’s a net growth of about 3,400% compared to where the corresponding figure stood just a year back.

Read more: https://blokt.com/news/world-governments-are-probably-more-enthusiastic-about-blockchain-than-perceived-finds-study

Key Findings
The report underlines the need to ensure data safety and boost operational efficiency as the key reasons driving the growing government interest in the technology. It states that authorities that have incorporated (or are planning to incorporate) blockchain in the government machinery seem convinced that digital ledgers are much less vulnerable to tampering and can help ensure decentralized and transparent governance.

In addition, public sector transactions are also likely to be expedited by the introduction of blockchain in many government departments and agencies.

The researchers segmented the global blockchain government market into five regions, of which North America is likely to be the one with the biggest share of the market. Europe is likely to closely follow at the second spot, with the Asia Pacific, Middle East and Africa, and Latin America at the third, fourth and fifth spots, respectively.

As for businesses that the study expects to take a lead role in the supply side of things, IBM (US), Microsoft (US), Amazon Web Services (AWS), Oracle (US) and Deloitte (US) are likely to emerge as the biggest blockchain government application vendors.

Other key stakeholders might include:

Infosys (India), Auxesis Group (India),

Bitfury (Netherlands), Cegeka (Netherlands),
Guardtime (Estonia), BTL (Canada),
Factom (US), SpinSys (US), ModulTrade (UK),
brainbot technologies (Germany), OTC Exchange Network (US),
Somish (India), Blocko (South Korea), Symbiont (US),
Blockchain Foundary (Singapore), BigchainDB (Germany),
RecordsKeeper (Spain), Intel (US) and Accenture (Ireland).

The concept of centralization is running from the Romanic era while governing a large amount of audience one has to become little inhuman. Therefore the larger the government, the more are the problems dealing with the vast amount of people and diversity of cultures. While going reverse to the stage, decentralizing may protect the rights of this vast amount of audience instead of getting implied by more fundamental rights.

Here centralization may sound like the arms of government around public like armor; armor makes us dependent on government. On the other hand, the idea of decentralization may sound very vague or turbulent but it very much verbalizes future in a responsible way because the smart and judicious nation can work efficiently this way as they can figure out their own comfort zone of whether to keep it mandatory or not.

The unit of the centralized organization functions in-hand for the human resources which are responsible for determining the coveted professional and educational frameworks of new volunteers. In the whole centralization phenomenon, the unit will be having constant statistics about the staffing process throughout the organization, like the total cost of the process and the total number of recruits.

When we come across the gates of decentralizing the centralized system so many things appear to face change in the uniformity of their privacy. The recruitments become faster with its own phases keeping the capital growth in the spotlight, hence corporations now more inclined to this whole concept. This feature is individually difficult because corporate skills rarely provide clarity about the major origins of additional value that underpin the argument for bringing different business activities together in a group.

The clarification, we find, is to set a hurdle high enough so that the benefits of centralization will presumably far surpass the deprivations, executing the risks worth taking. Hence the tug of war between these two shifting phases will keep going to enhance what is more beneficial centralization or decentralization.

Today’s EHR (Electronic Health Record), although very essential, is available in an unstructured format, and controlled by various healthcare providers which are stored in a central database of each such providers. Making them more vulnerable for the Hackers. Moreover, it doesn’t have a user-friendly interface which lack interoperability; making it difficult to use.

Talking about the healthcare industries then approximately $80 Billion as a whole crouched in making a demure medical error becoming a 3rd leading cause of patient’s death. This antonym is procreated due to unavailability of the clinical history of a patient, reasonably confronted by the researchers of the Johns Hopkins University.

Proteus (leading health IT security firm) discovered that 5.579 Million patient records have been hacked and the hackers now know a lethal allergy or composition of which the patient is prone to, making it a critically irresolvable problem.

Healthcare domain will see considerable and beneficial impact once blockchain technology based systems are processed across the patient and healthcare provider ecosystem.

1. Issues in current system

1.1.Manual/Paper driven process:
As the complete healthcare system is not digitised we still have complete “patient to prescription” cycle on graphs and papers.

1.2. Siloed and non-interacting systems:
The healthcare providers/hospitals which have IT systems are designed in such a way that they cannot interact with other systems in the same hospital/network or operated with the affiliated labs.

1.3. In-accurate diagnosis/prescription:
If the patient changes his healthcare provider/hospital then the chances of partial/in-accurate diagnosis and prescriptions are in bulk hence, his clinical history is not available easily and if available then it is not interpreted well and in standard format.

1.4. Supply chain leakage:
Pharmacies associated with particular healthcare provider/hospital don’t have accurate and current patient data thus, the system is not able to predict what surgical/pharmaceutical inventory is needed which results in over/ under stock data analysis.

1.5. Fraud prone ecosystem:
Globally the total cost of insurance fraud is estimated at over $40 billion per year. The fraud categories range in the form of fraudulent claims, where subsidised medicines are sold in an open market, patient data theft, counterfeit medicines/drugs.

1.6. Delays/Frauds and lack of audit in Government schemes:
The Public healthcare system is most hampered because of inability to identify the need of a patient and providing them with customised services. Current manual or disconnected system has very inefficient audibility.

EHR System on Blockchain Technology
Blockchain technology by definition is secure/shared auditable ledger system to share digital assets associated with unique blockchain address, this fundamental is a core for the proposed system.

With the proposed new system for patient EHR, we prioritise patient as the most important beneficiary along with building trust and confidence for all the other parties involved and every patient will have a unique identity over blockchain network and his clinical data generated at various stages will be associated with this unique identity as EHR digital asset.

2. Advantages with Proposed system



2.1 Control access and EHR ownership with patient:

Blockchain will contain references to the EHR data, while Smart Contracts will define and enforce access rules to EHR content. This will ensure that only authorized persons/entities access the EHR data. In addition, the blockchain provides an irrevocable record of all events that the data has undergone. All these will enable population health management and research.

2.2 Transparency and auditability in Government healthcare program:
An integrated and synchronized EHR system will put power in Government’s hand to efficiently and accurately involve the needed citizens in state-sponsored schemes. Also, the participation of private players can be very well merged because of a transparent and auditable system.

2.3 Accurate and efficient diagnosis/prescription:
The EHR will be a permission shared asset across the EHR network healthcare providers/hospitals.

2.4 Reduced supply chain leakages:
Real-time and accurate data about patients enables predictions and inventory management with higher efficiency and accuracy.

2.5 Fraud proof system:
Real-time auditability and immutable nature of blockchain datasets will ensure the system is fraud proof and when implemented with operational checkpoints can be secured till the last mile.

2.6 Clinical Trials:
Using blockchain will help make clinical trials reliable at each step by keeping track and time-stamping at each phase of the trial (trial protocol, patient enrolment etc). This can bring life-saving drugs at reduced cost in short span of time to market.

2.7 Preventive healthcare:
Current advanced AI or conventional analytics can be utilized to draw out valuable insights from huge and diverse datasets to help individuals/public institutions focus on preventive healthcare rather than curing the ailment.

3. Advantages of Auxledger over existing blockchain solutions

Sounds Great! So, what’s the problem?

Well, even though this is of course a step in the right direction, things are still far from perfect.

3.1. Interoperability between different Healthcare Organisations
The proposed blockchain solution will isolate the healthcare organizations from each other, not allowing them to interconnect when required.

For example:

To involve needful citizens in the state-sponsored schemes, Government Organisations need data that they can fetch from other healthcare providers which can be achieved with the help of Auxledger as it offers interoperability between different networks.

3.2. Transaction cost independent of market dynamics
Auxledger is a Hybrid Blockchain Network which provides low transaction cost much of a private network, and data reliability of a public network. Moreover, Ethereum/Bitcoin-based transactions cost is dependent on market dynamics whereas the self-regulating economic model of Auxledger proposes simple gas philosophy i.e. “ “no limitations, but pay for what you consume” and doesn’t depend on the market dynamics.

3.3 No need to compromise privacy
According to the proposed blockchain solution, for giving access to your ledger to the other nodes, you will have to strike down your wall of privacy.

Whereas, Hawk Model of Auxledger used for privacy let the user decide about the parties to which it will disclose information.

Introduced by a new system for patient’s EHR, we prioritise patient as the most important motive with building trust and confidence for all the other parties involved. Auxledger based EHR will assist healthcare providers as well as government organisations, keeping their platform patient-centric. Hence EHR will be fully efficient and reliable.

Well, this news was posted by ET NOW on their official page.

Read more at:
//economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/64569000.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

Crypto-currency followers, here’s a piece of good news for you.

A panel formed by the government to look into crypto-currency does not seem to be in favour of banning it. Instead, it may suggest allowing crypto-currency with riders, ETNow reported quoting Cogencis.

On April 6, RBI through its notice titled ‘Prohibition on dealing in virtual currencies’, mandated banks, e-wallets and payment gateway providers to withdraw support for crypto-currency exchanges and other businesses dealing with virtual currencies (VCs) in India.

Banks, in turn, forced exchanges and traders to stop using their accounts for trading in VCs. This led them to approach the Supreme Court against the regulator’s move. The case is scheduled for hearing on July 20.
Lack of proper stakeholder consultation and absence of reasonable grounds to restrict any business are the primary provisions under which the RBI notice has been challenged in the SC.

Popular crypto-currency bitcoin fell to a two-month low on Tuesday, sliding in three of last four sessions on nagging regulatory and security concerns after the weekend hacking of South Korean crypto-currency exchange Coinrail.
The original virtual currency is nearing its lowest level of the year at just under $6,000 on the Bitstamp platform. It fell to a low of $6,500 and last traded 4.7 per cent lower at $6,551.48.

So far in 2018, bitcoin is down nearly 53 per cent, after soaring more than 1,300 per cent last year.


Read more at:
//economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/64569000.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

According to a new market research report “FinTech Blockchain Market by Provider, Application (Payments, Clearing, and Settlement, Exchanges and Remittance, Smart Contract, Identity Management, and Compliance Management/KYC), Organization Size, Vertical, and Region – Global Forecast to 2023”, published by Markets and Markets™, the market size is expected to grow from USD 370.3 Million in 2018 to USD 6,228.2 Million by 2023, at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 75.9% during the forecast period.

The key factors driving the FinTech Blockchain Market include its high compatibility with the financial industry ecosystem, faster transactions, reduced total cost of ownership, and the rising cryptocurrency market cap and Initial Coin Offering (ICO).

The payment, clearing, and settlement segment is estimated to account for the largest market size in the FinTech Blockchain Market in 2018.

The payment, clearing, and settlement segment is expected to dominate the overall FinTech Blockchain Market in terms of share. This domination by the segment is attributed to the blockchain technology applications, which are predominantly finding use in the payment industry to reduce risks and improve the efficiency and transparency in payment systems across different verticals. Additionally, the shift from the centralized technical infrastructure to the distributed, ecosystem-enabling platform is laying the foundation for new business models in the payment industry.

The application and solution providers segment is expected to grow at the highest CAGR in the global FinTech Blockchain Market during the forecast period.

The FinTech Blockchain Market has been segmented on the basis of providers into 3 categories: application and solution providers, middleware providers, and infrastructure and protocols provider. These providers offer infrastructure to develop in the blockchain-based platforms. Among these types, the application and solution providers segment is the fastest-growing segment in the overall FinTech Blockchain Market. The introduction of technologically advanced blockchain solutions has witnessed a certain level of adoption in commercial banks, investment banks, and insurance companies, thereby fueling the overall market growth.

North America is expected to account for the largest market size in the FinTech Blockchain Market during the forecast period.

North America is expected to account for the largest share of the overall market in 2018. This region is considered the most advanced with regard to technology adoption and infrastructure. The wide presence of the key industry players of blockchain technology solutions in this region is the major driving factor responsible for the growth of the FinTech Blockchain Market. All the major financial institutions in this region are moving toward the adoption of the blockchain technology to develop business applications, due to the recognition of the blockchain technology’s potential for safer transactions and low infrastructure cost.

The major FinTech blockchain technology vendors include AWS (US), IBM (US), Microsoft (US), Ripple (US), Chain (US), Earthport (UK), Bitfury (US), BTL Group (Canada), Oracle (US), Digital Asset Holdings (US), Circle (Ireland), Factom (US), AlphaPoint (US), Coinbase (US), Abra (US), Auxesis Group (India), BitPay (US), BlockCypher (US), Applied Blockchain (UK), RecordesKeeper (Spain), Symbiont (US), Guardtime (Estonia), Cambridge Blockchain (US), Tradle (US), and Blockchain Advisory Mauritius Foundation (Mauritius).

https://www.globalbankingandfinance.com/fintech-blockchain-market-worth-6228-2-million-usd-by-2023/