Bitcoin Forum
October 07, 2026, 09:39:37 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 31.1 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 ... 413
1  Local / Deutsch (German) / 1miau ist wieder Online on: May 05, 2026, 10:26:19 AM
Hallo zusammen und ich wollte nur noch kurz einmal bestätigen, dass ich der originale Besitzer des 1miau Accounts bin. Ein bisschen weniger toxisch hätte ich das willkommen zurück schon erwartet und irgendwie kann ich die Skepsis auch verstehen, um Betrug zu vermeiden.
Viele Grüße also an alle und gute Beiträge werde ich auch mit Merit versehen, sofern der Beitrag kein Denglisch enthält.  Wink
2  Economy / Reputation / Re: Bitcointalk Defensive Alliance on: May 01, 2026, 03:20:22 PM

Verified. Now do you mind explaining why you declared yourself dead "to protect the person behind 1miau", only to come back half a year later?
After getting some sort of burnout, I've decided to withdraw permanently from Bitcointalk but now it felt better, so I've decided to come back. But now we are at it again, I've already spent more time online right now than I should be.
I might withdraw again if it continue at this pace.
3  Economy / Reputation / Re: Bitcointalk Defensive Alliance on: May 01, 2026, 03:04:42 PM
New attempt should only work on Electrum since Electrum has a different way of displaying things:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Today's date 01.05.2026 and I'm still the original 1miau:
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1miau7e4tFSAGR4TkAJ8n32UMm2yLB9EH
G1qg1x/O/7skWIoJ+ZnjiA5P6u9HlOo4BJahppNDCEMfJK2eyOx7Rxc4JM8sBJCzFS2MGi8uuyTB/SS9aLcDo/8=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

4  Economy / Reputation / Re: Bitcointalk Defensive Alliance on: May 01, 2026, 01:47:41 PM
I'm aware you are a bit confused and hereby I'm ready to provide a staked message.

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I'm still the original owner, here is a signed message:
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1miau7e4tFSAGR4TkAJ8n32UMm2yLB9EH
HCGwHdEc+8A8DsuIZRKxTPHcfajDZY2ldaEY2/W37lblIQUoU9nCSlkXl+O40FU6f46MX6DaoEZRDJBqTO3nW7U=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

No need for speculation, you can remove your negative trust now.
5  Economy / Reputation / Re: Bitcointalk Defensive Alliance and 1miau. Convenient timing or coincidence? on: May 01, 2026, 01:46:51 PM
I'm aware you are a bit confused and hereby I'm ready to provide a staked message.

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I'm still the original owner, here is a signed message:
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1miau7e4tFSAGR4TkAJ8n32UMm2yLB9EH
HCGwHdEc+8A8DsuIZRKxTPHcfajDZY2ldaEY2/W37lblIQUoU9nCSlkXl+O40FU6f46MX6DaoEZRDJBqTO3nW7U=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

No need for speculation, you can remove your negative trust now.
6  Other / Meta / Re: I believe a new rule should be implemented regarding negative trust on: April 27, 2026, 07:48:31 PM
In my opinion, a clear evidence should be linked when making use of negative Trust. Negative Trust is a strong and powerful Tool which should be used with caution. 
If in doubt, go with neutral Trust where you link evidence as well.
7  Economy / Reputation / Re: Bitcointalk Defensive Alliance on: April 26, 2026, 03:24:50 PM
Any chance of making this the first case. Holy bumped a guy with 10 merits and 47 posts so that rollinsweet’s trust against me moved from untrusted to trusted.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5581376.new
I've distrusted him for now.
8  Economy / Reputation / Re: Bitcointalk Defensive Alliance on: April 24, 2026, 04:12:02 PM
Bitcointalk Account name: SuperBitMan
Reson why you are eligible to joine here: I’m one of those members that don’t support unjustified negative trust and cyber bullying in this forum, I believe everyone should be treated equally and always given the right for Fair hearing.

You are very welcome in our alliance.


I need clarity on this;
  • Will the alliance have a strong public/private rules, stating conditions under which a member of the alliance will not be protected by its members. This rules will keep every member checked, such that no member will go attract unnecessary fights hoping the Brotherhood to fight for them.
  • Will every trust decision made by a member be his personal decision or will it always represent the decision of the alliance. If the later will be the case, does it therefore mean that the alliance will have a coordinated strong voice in any trust issues even if it doesn't directly affect their members.
  • Don't we think there will be trust system disruption. I mean, if user A distrusts a member of the alliance, they might be tempted to distrust all other members of the alliance. And the alliance will be tempted to retaliate.
I have a feeling that such an alliance might be secretly existing among BTT members, which is how it fits best. The difference is that you came out clean, which will call for much debate, scrutiny and exclusion of the members. I would like you to address a few of my concerns, such that I'll be sure that a coordinated loyalty mechanism will not replace an evidence-based trust system.
Many thanks for your feedback.
The alliance will be decentralized where every unique feedback according to DT standards comes into play.

The are no rules exept the guide from LoyceV about how to leave trust.
The alliance is rather meant a defensive one, which should protect against unjustified feedbacks simply to make it unattractive to unfairly accuses and unjustified negative trust.
9  Economy / Reputation / Bitcointalk Defensive Alliance on: April 23, 2026, 11:51:07 PM
I'm hereby starting Bitcointalk defensive Alliance, where we are founding a strong defensive Organisation on Bitcointalk.
It is meant to protect its members against unjustified negative Trust and other cyberbullying.


An attack against one Member is seen as an attack on the whole alliance. If an attack occurs, it is crucial for all members to be defended against any accusation. The alliance will be a fair share to protect its members against attacks.


Founding members


1miau

Applications

Our Defensive alliance is only as good as joined members are caring to protect each other. As a Member based alliance, we are relient on good support and Membership.
You can apply here right away but we need to have at least one sentence why you should be eligible to join our alliance.


Bitcointalk Account name:
Reason why you are eligible to join here:



Alliance members:

SuperBitMan
rat03gopoh
KingsDen
MaxMueller
Tungbulu
Kazkaz27
10  Economy / Reputation / Dead men tell no tales on: April 23, 2026, 11:38:38 PM
Despite dead men tell no tales, I'm here again to discuss what we all like so much: Bitcoin.
After a few months offline my new focus will be to strengthen my relationship with Bitcointalks community and other things surrounding Bitcoin and Altcoins.

And dead men (or cats) tell no tales  Smiley
11  Economy / Reputation / Re: 1miau has died on: November 06, 2025, 02:41:33 PM
It's true, I'm leaving the forum on my terms to protect the person behind 1miau. I won't be able to be active in discussions and I can't read your PMs to me. Don't be sorry, Bitcointalk has to offer so much even without 1miau.  Smiley

I'll lock this topic now.
12  Local / Deutsch (German) / Re: Gewinnspiel gesponsort von 🐳 Whale.io | Bitcoinpreis Ende 2025? on: November 06, 2025, 02:05:17 PM
Aufgrund des Todes von 1miau wird dieses Gewinnspiel von einer Drittpartei beendet werden
13  Economy / Reputation / 1miau has died on: November 06, 2025, 02:01:46 PM
Unfortunately, I have to announce 1miau is dead.  It already died few days ago but don't be sorry. 1miau had a good time here on the Forum and Bitcointalk will stay to be relevant even without 1miau.  Smiley
14  Local / Anfänger und Hilfe / Re: Welche Bitcoin-Begriffe werden im Deutschen üblicherweise übersetzt? on: August 29, 2025, 05:00:19 PM
Ich würde es wie folgt übersetzen:

Wallet    Wallet
Hardware Wallet    Hardware Wallet
Software Wallet    Software Wallet
Private Key    Privater Schlüssel
Public Key    Öffentlicher Schlüssel
Seed Phrase    Seed Phrase
"Not your keys, not your coins?"    "Nicht deine Schlüssel, nicht deine Münzen"
"Don't trust, verify"    "Vertraue nicht, verifiziere"
"Tick Tock, Next Block"    "Tick Tock, nächster Block"
"Fix the money, fix the world"    "Repariert das Geld, repariert die Welt"
Mempool    Mempool
Watch Only wallet    Wallet nur zum Ansehen
Transaction    Transaktion
Passphrase    Passphrase
Script Type    Script Typ
Blockchain     Blockchain
Derivation Path    Ableitungspfad
Bitcoin Address    Bitcoin Adresse

Das wären für mich die gängigsten Übersetzungen zu den genannten Begriffen.  Smiley
15  Local / Deutsch (German) / Re: [Neue Auswertungen] Wir deutschsprachigen und die Merits ... on: August 28, 2025, 04:59:46 PM
Der August sollte tatsächlich besser werden als der Juli. Was mir auffällt, ist leider immer noch, dass ich mein sMerit nicht komplett los werde, weil es tatsächlich an guten Beiträgen mangelt.
Sehr gut sieht man das am aktuellen Kursverlauf, wo es ziemlich wenig Aktivität gibt und wenn es dann mal mehr Beiträge sind, sind es generische Zweizeiler, die schwerlich als Qualitätsbeiträge zu werten wären.
16  Other / Meta / Re: [Request] Application for a moderator on the beginners and help board. on: August 12, 2025, 03:20:26 PM
I can support Mia Chloe as a Moderator of Beginners and Help as well.
She is a nice and helpful Member and I can imagine these advantages are necessary for a good Beginners and Help Moderator.
In my opinion, Mia Chloe is perfectly suited for a Beginners and Help Moderator.  Smiley
17  Local / Deutsch (German) / Re: [Neue Auswertungen] Wir deutschsprachigen und die Merits ... on: August 06, 2025, 07:42:59 PM
Naja, wenn diese Nutzer nur eine Frage haben und sich nur dafür anmelden und dann nie wieder kommen ist es halt doch besser als wenn sie gar nicht ins Forum kommen und unwissend bleiben.
Da würde ich diesen Nutzern keinen Vorwurf machen.
18  Local / Deutsch (German) / Re: [Neue Auswertungen] Wir deutschsprachigen und die Merits ... on: August 06, 2025, 04:22:50 PM
Das stimmt leider.
Die meisten Nutzer stellen nur eine Frage und dann hört man nie wieder etwas von ihnen.
Nun ja, soll jeder das Forum nutzen, wie er will, hier gibt es keine Regeln dafür. Wäre aber trotzdem schön, wenn danach noch weitere Beiträge von diesen Nutzern folgen würden.  Smiley
19  Local / Deutsch (German) / Re: [Neue Auswertungen] Wir deutschsprachigen und die Merits ... on: August 01, 2025, 02:44:11 PM
Na 1603 verteilte Merits sind doch ein formidables Ergebnis, bei dem ich mich nicht beschweren würde. Ich würde eher dazu tendieren, dass der Juli insgesamt schwächer wird und wir dann einen Einbruch verzeichnen müssen.
Aber alles halb so schlimm, so lange wir in den Top 3 liegen ist doch alles in Butter.  Smiley
20  Local / Deutsch (German) / Re: Beiträge übersehen - fordere hier Merit nach on: August 01, 2025, 02:39:12 PM
Bitcointalk Nutzername: Joperh sartchex

Beitragslink: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5552081.msg65637613#msg65637613
Begründung, warum Merit verteilt werden soll: Gute Frage und Klarstellung.

Beitragslink: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5199920.msg65637535#msg65637535
                   https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5199920.msg65637889#msg65637889
                   https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5549555.msg65637549#msg65637549
Begründung, warum Merit verteilt werden soll: "Interessante Antworten, die zum Thema passen."

Hallo Joperh sartchex,

vielen Dank zunächst für deine Einreichung. Ich bitte jedoch darum, noch einmal die Regeln zu lesen, denn es ist pro Nutzer nur ein Beitrag pro Monat erlaubt.
Zudem sind deine verlinkten Beiträge doch sehr generisch und ich habe nur deshalb Merit verteilt, weil du noch so neu bist. Da erwarte ich in Zukunft also mehr Substanz in deinen Beiträgen.  Smiley
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 ... 413
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!