Mu 1-2 Liv
15''
Bitcoin Miner
|
|
|
Developers is important thing but the most important is investor, you can make shitty project look very good if investor have a lot of money and also he can hire good developer and hacker to solve some problem. Good project is about idea not developer. My big brother is a programer he is working as system engineer. But he syill does not enter this crypto world.
It's hard to say that your point is right. It's like the story " Chicken comes first or the egg comes first?". But in my opinion, if that project is not good enough, whether investors will want to invest on it? Anyway, every aspect all has its reason and I respect your opinion.
|
|
|
What I give analyse below are basing on tweet of @Fiskantes and I hope will give you a insight about Developers in this market. When we come with this market, almost we just concern about the price and products how they are used and what they solve. But first of all, Blockchain needs developers (devs) to creat products. 1. The importance of Devs- Devs are the first users and creators for the system. Because of this, Devs become the most important factor, who decide to succeed of any blockchain network. - If you pay attention that the core reason make the later platforms are less attractive with devs and usually lead to failure because the platform is increasingly devoid of devs. - According to the report of Electric Capital, the amount of Devs take part in developing in the Crypto segment for the first time has increased continuously for more than 3 months since the peak of 2017 and has increased by more than 15% since the beginning of 2020 (Source: Electric Capital)However, among them, almost devs focus on top 200 networks. This thing make a closed cycle: More devs--> More good products--> More users--> More devs. And as a result, the top networks grow more and the weaker networks have more difficulties. (Source: Electric Capital)The networks don't focus on devs almost be removed, underdeveloped, and can't be attracted to users and investments 2. The factors that be attracted devs - The friendly working enviroment
- Tool for devs
- Money
- Let's look at some good networks now, we can see they all have 3 above factors such as Ethereum with Ethereum Foundation and the programming language Solidity, or Polkadot with Web3 Foundation and the Substrate tool...Beside that, some promised names who attracted more and more devs come to their networks like Solana, Near, Flow, Avalanche. -->So, for the final, understanding the importance of Devs may be the best key for developing of any project.
|
|
|
Currently NEO has upgraded to NEO3, yes, even though it is running a testnet, I have to admit that NEO after 2018 many projects on the NEO platform died, so this resulted in reduced users in the NEO ecosystem, yes NEO is indeed one of the best smart contract projects other than Ethereum and TRON, but if they don't provide convenience to the projects that are on it then NEO will disappear from the radar.
I also waiting how Neo 3.0 perform and they can creat a more convience in their ecosystem and the connection between other ecosystems or not. If they do it well, the growth of price is unbelievable in 2021 and further because the price gap to reach its old ATH is very big.
|
|
|
As you know, Neo is a quite big platform with smart economy which initially known as Antshares, this project was believed to be China’s first-ever public blockchain when it was launched in February 2014. The open-source platform subsequently rebranded to Neo three years later. Neo had an impressive increasement time when from 20 USD at the end of 2017 to 198 USD in January 2018. But now, its price is diving at the bottom with around 17 USD if compare with other famous platforms which was at the same time with it such as ETH (got back 50% price compare to the old ATH). What is the reason? 1.The ecosystem didn't have much development for long time - dApps run on it almost be died or had left . Aphelion (APH) : died . Senno (SENNO) : died . Alphacat (ACAT) : almost died . Effect.AI (EFX) : had left . Travala.com (AVA): had left . And more... Neo platform is hard to code on it because NEO and GAS aren't native tokens and there is not many utilities to support for developers. 2. The cost to creat a new Token on Neo is very expensive --> This is the very big issue for new dApps who wants to choice Neo's platform-->The amount of dApps are running is too littleAs I know, we must to cost 5000 GAS (at the price of GAS now is 1.56 USD--> 7800 USD for total, and when the GAS was highest is 91 USD, the cost would be 455.000 USD). And if compare with ETH, we just need to cost 0.3 ETH, equivalent to 195 USD now and 420 USD when ETH was in the highest price --> too cheap compared to Neo Look at this picture, you are easy to realize that the amount of dApps are running is too little compared with the rest. It is even worse than Steem (A project is out of money to develope and the team is scrambling and much unstable). Beside that,definitely active users and transactions can't compare. (Source: https://www.dapp.com/article/dapp-com-2019-annual-dapp-market-report) In another way, any hopes for Neo in 2021 and further?There are 3 important elements I think that maybe help Neo find their position again are: Neo 3.0, Neo Blockchain Toolkit (code the Toolkit for Dotnet programmer), EcoBoost. Let's wait and see how the result comes out. I hope here are some interesting synthetic about Neo and be able to help you to have a visual view before investing on Neo.
|
|
|
All US bills need 2/3 Senate majority approval to pass, assuming the lawmakers even make their bill progress to that stage. I don't think it stands a chance at getting to the voting part though - stablecoin companies will lobby against this bill since it would give USD PAX/USDC and even Tether (at least for some time) headaches.
Exactly, but OP also made one good point here that this thing is always coming up whenever btc is touching the skies. Look at the current rate of up surge and how people gaining money by selling their bitcoins into stablecoin. This is bad for the whales who would want the price to go even further the current barrier of 20K. This time it would be historical event if we cross this barrier and to make it happen, people who had FOMO reactions and conversions into stable coin needs to get out of it and again buy the BTC. It's like mutual global pump if this news spreads on serious note. This time everyone will have fear of USDT or few known stable coins getting illegality issues. Just imaging, everyone will start selling them for BTC. That's a badass savage play indeed. That's the reason I am worrying but I also realize that the situation now is quite different to 2017 when at that time USDT is almost a dominate stable coin and almost people can only sell their BTC to USDT to take profit, and I remembered that the exchanges in that time hadn't have the service to exchange directly BTC to USD or the currency of their country as now.
|
|
|
All US bills need 2/3 Senate majority approval to pass, assuming the lawmakers even make their bill progress to that stage. I don't think it stands a chance at getting to the voting part though - stablecoin companies will lobby against this bill since it would give USD PAX/USDC and even Tether (at least for some time) headaches.
Actually, to a completely bill is approved and release offically, it must a lot of time and it's also not easy, because USDT will not sit tight and the influence of USDT to the cryptocurrency market now is too much. I mean news like this maybe cause confusions for investors about stable coins and they will continue to hold Bitcoin instead of transfering to stable coins when they want to take profit.
|
|
|
Today, I read a new in Decrypt.co about USA proposed bill would make it illegal to issue stablecoins in the US if not federal approval. It was proposed by 3 lawmakers: Rashida Tlaib, Rep. Jesús “Chuy” García and Rep. Stephen Lynch to manage the stable coin market. And it is aiming Tether (USDT) because as you know, USDT can't prove that behind 1 USDT is guaranteed by 1 real USD. And this news is released when Bitcoin is on a strong growth and want to break its old peak, this is quite similar to 2017 when Bitcoin reached 20k and after that , there were many bad news about Tethers at that time. And there is a speculation that it is a shark strick to other investors be fear and not dare to sell their Bitcoin at that time. Am I too suspicious? Hope to receive opinions from you guys!
|
|
|
Yeah great performance from Chelsea especially Giroud. Both the team have already qualified for next stage but Sevilla benched lot of players for the match yesterday since to me it seems like they are much more focused on their LaLiga game against Real Madrid.
Yep, I agree with you about that. This is also the reason Sevilla lost so easy like that. Lack of deternimation and fire in them.
|
|
|
To be honest I never thought Chelsea can win big and Sevilla has a bad performance on the home stadium like that. Sevilla again shown they are only the King in Europa League.
In fact, Lampard and his students did good performance with the counter attack when must play in the home stadium of Sevilla. Especially, Giroud had extremely impressive performance with Poker. I see when he switched to play for Chelsea, his playstyle is much softer than before. He was not only play well with head but also he uses his legs very well. Congratulate the first position for Chelsea. Giroud 8', 54', 74', 83' (p)
|
|
|
I really hope that van Dijk will play again, since the back is no longer in defense, it has become a mess at Liverpool and it really needs to get better. It is total chaos. I still want to see it against Ajax. Can they just run into another defeat? I believe they can.
I agree with you about lack of Van Dijk is heavily affected with the gameplay of Liverpool, he is also the morale leader of whole team and give a strong defense to Liverpool. Beside that, the Thiago Alcântara’s injury also make Liverpool face with some of difficulities with the central midfielder . Head to head history is quite balance, so I guess there will be a draw match.
|
|
|
Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=219636Current amount of Posts (Including this one): 426 SegWit BTC address for payouts: bc1qqct2sqfskkgnscxjgg4zk6p6x3r9jpj7ctxkvx EARNED merit in the last 120 days: 0 I hope this time I will be accepted by you!
|
|
|
Pretty clear favourites for both Liverpool and Man City though, City don't look in a great place league wise!
Let's look at the match between Liverpool and Brighton. I think this is a good bet for today if basing on statistics of both teams and Odds The Fulltime Handicap is 0.5-1 and the rate is 0.81 for Liverpool is quite good to choose
|
|
|
I am sure that there will be a massive pump that will happen during this time to push the bitcoin price to jump to the high price in a short time.
I believe this thing will happen soon because if compare with 2017, when Bicoin reach 20k USD, everyone all talk about Bitcoin, search about Bitcoin and be very interested in it. If we look at the amount of people who search Bitcoin according the data of Google Trends, you can see that the amount of those people now are lower than 2017 so much. That thing prove that small investors doesn't still really come back yet. And maybe we can see the really massive pump to entire these people back into the market, and after that , one correction will happen. (Source: https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=today%205-y&q=Bitcoin)
|
|
|
Liverpool are again aggressive after being questioned that many players are absent and that makes them weak especially in defense but still their performance at home will not fade and this is still more attacking than Leceister. Firmino and Jota are key players and I see enough strikers up front complete along with Sadio Mane playing on the left wing.
Though the absence of Sala on the attack but their power still outperformed with three outstanding players: Mane, Firmino, and especially Diego Jota (player with extremely wise gameplay). Maybe this year will be a two-horse race between Liverpool vs Tottenham.
|
|
|
|