Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 »
|
2
|
Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Open Letter to Mark Karpeles: Voluntary Reorganization Best Option for Us All
|
on: February 27, 2014, 08:51:19 PM
|
Existing bearer bonds and shares are not illegal but it is no longer legal to issue new bearer shares and bonds in virtually all countries. Maybe somolia allows it but even many offshore locations revised their statutes in the last couple decades. There are a lot of outstanding US treasury bearer bonds. They no longer pay interest but they are normally used as a "reallllly" big cash note so they probably will never be redeemed. BTW: Nevada prohibited the issuance of bearer shares in 2007. http://law.justia.com/codes/nevada/2010/title7/chapter78/nrs78-235.htmledit: is it possible to create a blockchain based registry of ownership and not have them be bearer shares? Sure if the blockchain can verify the identity of all shareholders, collect and store required information, ensure shareholders are accredited before issuing shares, enforce restrictions on transfers for private placements as required by securities laws, and file all necessary documents with regulators in a timely manner. DeathAndTaxes: What if a settlement was done where gox account users take a haircut, for the haircut they get a corporation in the Marshall Island which owns MtGox or a large percentage of it. That corporation could do bearer shares. I have no idea for numbers of value, but surely that would be more valuable then trying to extract cash via bankruptcy + overhead of lawyers.
|
|
|
3
|
Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Support a Bailout for (MT)Gox.com
|
on: February 27, 2014, 07:57:07 AM
|
Bailouts, even in the form you're suggesting, are counter to what decentralized networks are all about. Decentralized networks are superior because you don't have to bail out, or save any one entity.
And yet, and yet..... Mark Kapeles of mtgox bailed out another exchange back in 2011, using 17,000 BTC of his own to make sure the customers of that exchange didn't lose money - and I'm sure they were glad. Why did he do it? Because it's not in the long term interests of the community to allow large numbers of people to lose money. It wasn't then and it isn't now. Decentralized networks don't mean "you don't have to bail out or save any one entity" - it just means that there is no govt to organize the bailout and the community does it instead. Think very hard before you advocate the "selfish at all costs" model which is quite different from a decentralized model. If these types of incidents start to happen very frequently, one of two things will happen a) bitcoin will die as people will shudder at a non-regulatory environment that practically says to crooks, come and steal there is no comeback and no compensation for the victims or b) regulation will happen because the victims become so numerous, they eventually make up the majority of the community. I think a bailout is a good idea. Perhaps Mtgox can issue bailout bonds that we can buy for 1BTC each and which pay a % of the profits. That way he raises capital to pay the victims, they clean up mtgox - put in new management, and when it's running properly again, those of us who have participated in the bailout get a small return for our altruism. customer ownership? http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1yyrvf/open_letter_to_mark_karpeles_voluntary/
|
|
|
4
|
Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Open Letter to Mark Karpeles: Voluntary Reorganization Best Option for Us All
|
on: February 27, 2014, 07:40:17 AM
|
Existing bearer bonds and shares are not illegal but it is no longer legal to issue new bearer shares and bonds in virtually all countries. Maybe somolia allows it but even many offshore locations revised their statutes in the last couple decades. There are a lot of outstanding US treasury bearer bonds. They no longer pay interest but they are normally used as a "reallllly" big cash note so they probably will never be redeemed. BTW: Nevada prohibited the issuance of bearer shares in 2007. http://law.justia.com/codes/nevada/2010/title7/chapter78/nrs78-235.htmledit: is it possible to create a blockchain based registry of ownership and not have them be bearer shares? Sure if the blockchain can verify the identity of all shareholders, collect and store required information, ensure shareholders are accredited before issuing shares, enforce restrictions on transfers for private placements as required by securities laws, and file all necessary documents with regulators in a timely manner. What about using the existing AML database from Gox and identity verified? Issue the shares and have them accredited/assured/restrictions ensured via ethereum? Certainly up for someone smarter than me! It says you can use blockchain for a datastore, GOX be the issuer and be the match for allowed public keys.. the ethereum share then is programmed to only be able to be traded between the primary list of registered holders that were certified by box on the blockchain. If you want to change to a new key you need to register that key with gox and for a fee they will add a new allowed public key to the published allowed list to participate in ownership... I'm just brainstorming here. Perhaps it is possible?? It would be a very interesting showcase of blockchain technology
|
|
|
5
|
Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Open Letter to Mark Karpeles: Voluntary Reorganization Best Option for Us All
|
on: February 27, 2014, 07:03:22 AM
|
Launch the equity as GOX traded colored coins (or other blockchain based overlay for stock ownership), which when/if profit is made BTC will be distributed to shareholders.
and be immediately shutdown and seized by Japanese regulators for securities violations. I don't know the lawful method in Japan. Another way then? I do like the idea of a blockchain based ownership system. The same reason you like it, is the same reason just about every nation on earth has banned bearer shares a couple decades ago. Most off shore locations no longer allow bearer shares. Securities laws are generally speaking insanely complex, but they (almost?) never allow unregistered securities to be sold to the public or publicly traded. They really are illegal? According to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_Equity_and_Fiscal_Responsibility_Act_of_1982 and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bearer_bond it seems that they made it so the interest can never be tax deductible for the issuer. Does that mean they are still illegal? Or just fiscally not desireable for the issuer. I'm not trying to argue or anything with you.. I truly don't know and would like to understand it better and the history of how this happened. edit: reading further, these are bearer bonds, not bearer shares... I need to read further Okay reading further, they are banned in all US states except for wyoming and Nevada... fascinating source: http://www.quickmba.com/law/corporation/nevada/edit: is it possible to create a blockchain based registry of ownership and not have them be bearer shares?
|
|
|
8
|
Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Open Letter to Mark Karpeles: Voluntary Reorganization Best Option for Us All
|
on: February 27, 2014, 06:33:37 AM
|
I think it will either be a bankruptcy fight or a debt-for-equity and fix gox.
I think more value is in a voluntary debt-for-equity of gox, run a re-branding/management and relaunch with better audits and controls.
Launch the equity as GOX traded colored coins (or other blockchain based overlay for stock ownership), which when/if profit is made BTC will be distributed to shareholders.
|
|
|
9
|
Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s
|
on: December 24, 2013, 09:35:16 PM
|
I just want my full BTC refund if they don't ship before Dec 31 2013, I'm not asking for 1200USD per BTC refund and please stop with this "they will only refund in USD"
same, but it may be too much to Ask; can't squeeze blood from a turnip. They probably don't have USD or BTC!
|
|
|
10
|
Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s
|
on: December 24, 2013, 04:17:41 PM
|
Josh is probably taking a % of HF profits due to it's suggestions to john. So there is really no point in asking him it's opinion on HF. I will always remember how sure he was that KNC was gonna be late when we meet, it must have been because he knew that KNC was legit.
And I was right... KNC was late. They promised summer delivery and didn't deliver until, what... October? You are incorrect, sir. They said all of batch 1 will be in-hand by 15 Oct. They went approx 2 weeks over that mark. 2 weeks lost me about $1,000, but it could have been worse. I had 2 orders between 10 and 20; UPS shipping notice came on October 2nd ended up delivering October 7th. I still have not mined more BTC then I paid. Such is life. Unfortunately I bought into hashfast that they were fully funded ahead of time and would refund in BTC if they didn't deliver... and hashfast was going to deliver mid October. Seems that they may have converted to $'s so if they don't deliver I'm taking a large unpleasant bath if they attempt to refund BTC based on the $ equivalent paid at the time.
|
|
|
13
|
Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [9 TH] Bitparking Pool, DGM 0%,vardiff,stratum,Merge Mining
|
on: December 07, 2013, 12:30:06 AM
|
With the next block:
Current Difficulty DGM Estimate Current Block Shares Duration CDF 707408283.0514985 8.49823019 97,030,022 07:37:19 12.82%
Estimated payout of 8.49 for the entire pool? Out of a 25 coin payout... I'm going to be switching off of this pool. Maybe I just don't understand DGM very well.... but based on those predictions I don't like it.
With that last block:
Id Block Time Duration Block Reward DGM Payment Shares State 452 273428 2013-12-06 17:43 183:13:36 25.10242339 28.76415763 2,325,697,441 valid
Other blocks paid an extra 3 BTC due to the bad variance... I guess at this point the variance is way too high for me.
|
|
|
16
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com
|
on: October 07, 2013, 09:18:20 AM
|
Had my Saturn shipped Thursday. got stuck in cologne by "customs" . there is no customs check on internal EU packages. Pkg delay-add'l security check by Gov't or other agency- beyond UPS control. I did a search on the above message and with the millions of UPS packages sent daily, I got 4 hits. 2 were driver errors (left the package at the wrong gate) 1 was the driver pulled over for speeding and cops checked the whole van. 4th was a train derailment . I wonder what caused mine. Its due today but I have lost 4 days:( Almost forgot. I rang UPS and demanded to know exactly where my package was now (Friday). Guy says Germany. where in Germany ? At the harbour. I didn't realise express shipping went by SHIP I had mine ship 10/2/2013; my shipping number was between 10-20; not supposed to arrive until this Wednesday 10/9/2013. So.. it could be worse!
|
|
|
|