It is interesting to see so many opinions of people that never red actually Darwin's work or any other scientific work supporting the theory. Make informed opinions, read, evaluate, my critical to everything before jumping into conclusions.
Most of Darwin's writings regarding evolution show that he was not very sure of himself. He was simply pointing out another path that looked viable at the time. Since then science has proven him wrong in may ways.
The most interesting point about all Darwin evolution is that Darwin, himself, doesn't clearly take on the immense problem that cause and effect - as shown to exist by Newton's 3rd Law - makes for his idea of survival of the fittest. Of course, they didn't use the word "programming" back then... at least not as frequently as we do today. But that is essentially what C&E is. Programming leaves no room for selection in the sense of natural selection. Intelligent design is all that is shown by all-pervading C&E.
In other words, Darwinian evolution was a total misnomer and miscalculation right from the start. It was science fiction right from the start. And all kinds of weak thinkers from the time of Darwin right down to the present have been overcome, mentally, by the dazzle of the Darwinian science fiction of evolution.
Evolution is a hoax.
Dear BADecker,
I totally agree with you that the Evolution Theory proved to be wrong. I know that. Period.First, when I read your comment I was surprised, but then I got the idea: you love the word 'hoax.' Well, good for you!
I love this word, too, by the way.
HOWEVER,
my point wasn't whether the Evolution Theory is a mistake or not. My point was that
the word 'hoax' by no means matches the context. That's it.
I hate to disappoint you here, but if you claim to be so scientifically-minded, you must know the connotation of the word 'hoax,' don't you? It has a
negative connotation.
hoax:
1. An act intended to
deceive or
trick.
2. Something that has been established or accepted by
fraudulent means.
/American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fifth Edition. Copyright © 2016 by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. All rights reserved./
Thus,
a hoax implies
an intention to deceive or trick and establishing or accepting something by
fraudulent means.
Which of these applies to Charles Darwin and/or his theory? (deceive,trick)
Did Darwin intend to
deceive or trick anybody by his theory?
Was his theory established or accepted
by fraudulent means?
Where's
the proof that Darwin
intended to deceive or trick people by his theory?
Don't answer. These are rhetorical questions.
Let's go on.
Now, in the given context we can discuss either a
'theory' or a
'hypothesis' vs. a
'fact.' (
Remember, "scientific hypotheses are not facts?")
First, a scientist puts forward /
formulates a theory in order
to explain some facts or phenomena either to prove them or find some better evidence to explain his or her observations.
Look up 'theory' and you'll see: "...An
assumption based on limited information or knowledge; a
conjecture."
Unlike situation with '
hoax,' implying
an intention to deceive, the key word here is '
assumption.'
So, 'theory' doesn't mean 'fact' or 'truth,' it's just an assumption.
In the end, if a theory proves to be correct, it becomes a 'fact' or 'knowledge,' but should it be wrong, it'll remain a 'theory' and become history.
It can become anything, but a 'hoax,' unless a person behind it intended to deceive or trick people, of course, which is very unlikely
A bunch of definitions (just in case)
theory:
1. A set of statements or principles devised to explain a group of facts or phenomena, especially one that has been repeatedly tested or is widely accepted and can be used to make predictions about natural phenomena.
2. The branch of a science or art consisting of its explanatory statements, accepted principles, and methods of analysis, as opposed to practice: a fine musician who had never studied theory.
3. A set of theorems that constitute a systematic view of a branch of mathematics.
4. Abstract reasoning; speculation: a decision based on experience rather than theory.
5. A belief or principle that guides action or assists comprehension or judgment: staked out the house on the theory that criminals usually return to the scene of the crime.
6. An assumption based on limited information or knowledge; a conjecture.
Some definitions of the 'fact'
fact:
1. Knowledge or information based on real occurrences: an account based on fact; a blur of fact and fancy.
2.
a. Something demonstrated to exist or known to have existed:
Genetic engineering is now a fact. That Chaucer was a real person is an undisputed fact.b. A real occurrence; an event:
had to prove the facts of the case.c. Something believed to be true or real:
a document laced with mistaken facts.
3. A thing that has been done, especially a crime:
an accessory before the fact.
4.
Law A conclusion drawn by a judge or jury from the evidence in a case:
a finding of fact.
a concept whose truth can be proved; Example: "scientific hypotheses are not facts."
Thanks for the discussion!
Nothing personal
Show Posts
