Bitcoin Forum
March 01, 2015, 04:40:18 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.10.0 [Torrent] (New!)
 
  Home Help Search Donate Login Register  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 ... 454 »
381  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: List of court cases, complaints, regulatory actions, etc. on: August 20, 2013, 04:35:29 PM
Seizure Warrant - Funds in Dwolla account of Mutum Sigillum, LLC [Mt. Gox]
May 14, 2013
Location: USA

Abstract: The U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security (DHS) has seized funds in the accounts used by Mt. Gox at Dwolla and Wells Fargo.

Update to this ...

When the seizure warrant was executed, $2,915,507.40 was the amount seized from Dwolla:
 - http://www.scribd.com/doc/161492071/Bitcoin-Mt-Gox-Warrant-Executed
382  Bitcoin / Press / Re: 2013-08-20 MT GOX Dwolla Seizure was $2,915,507.40 on: August 20, 2013, 04:32:19 PM

They also had a bank account in Deleware in which funds were seized if I remember correctly.

Update: Wells Fargo, a/c# 7657841313

Quote
On May 9, 2013, the Honorable Stephanie A. Gallagher issued a seizure warrant for the
contents of the Mutum Sigillurn LLC account at Wells Fargo, based on the foregoing
information. Bank records also show that nearly all of the activity in that Wells Fargo account
consists of wires between that account and Dwolla, which represent bitcoin transactions for
customers. The other transactions in this account are not significant in number or amounts.
- http://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Mt-Gox-Dwolla-Warrant-5-14-13.pdf
383  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: High Risk Merchant Accounts on: August 20, 2013, 04:00:45 PM
Relevant article on Coindesk:

Bitcoin could be a boon for porn and other high-risk merchants
 - http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-could-be-a-boon-for-porn-and-other-high-risk-merchants/
384  Bitcoin / Technical Support / Re: Sent money are stuck on: August 19, 2013, 07:04:06 PM
my client says "Seen by 1 node".

What client?

If you are using the Bitcoin-Qt/bitcoind client make sure it is left running and has established connections so that it can re-broadcast the transaction.
385  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Bounty 20 BTC: Wi-Fi Hotspot, enabled by bitcoin on: August 19, 2013, 06:46:17 PM
Keeping an eye on this:

Bitcoin Wifi Hotspot running on Raspberry Pi.
 - http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=277584.0
 - http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1ko3sz
386  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: History of United States Anti-Money Laundering Laws on: August 18, 2013, 09:58:10 PM
Incidentally, the source:

 - http://www.fincen.gov/news_room/aml_history.html
387  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: What is the best site that explain mining? on: August 18, 2013, 04:40:30 PM
Hardly any progammers or miners like my explanation of how mining works using the concept of a "reverse bingo", but a few non-techncial people have claimed that my explanation has helped them understand mining better than any other explanation they've seen:
 - http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/a/3978/153
388  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: using tails OS on usb as a secure hardware wallet? on: August 18, 2013, 02:45:31 AM
can this be used as a safe secure hardware wallet?
for example store the private key along on the tails usb
boot, create a simple new blockchain.info wallet,
add private key sign transactions, sweep private key from blockchain.info wallet that was just created,
eject usb reboot system,

can something other then blockchain.info be used with tails to sign transactions?

Related:

BTCVault
 - http://dswd.github.io/btcvault/security.html
 - http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=163763.0

USB wallet (Puppy Linux):
 - http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=257672.0
389  Bitcoin / Press / Re: 2013-08-17 Coindesk.com - Bitcoin Law: What US businesses need to know on: August 18, 2013, 02:25:23 AM
Basically, everywhere except for the United States.

Speeding is illegal on the roads within the U.S. yet the average speeds often exceed the posted limit.  Marijuana is illegal to possess, per federal law, yet a visitor to a city could likely find a source and acquire some in a matter of minutes.

But few people would go thirty miles over the speed limit without expecting a run-in with the law.

The point is, bitcoin has a future in the U.S. even if exchanges are regulated out of existence.
390  Economy / Marketplace / Re: NEFT Vodka and Bitcoin on: August 17, 2013, 09:16:44 PM
Still anxiously awaiting Neft Vodka's distribution in the U.S.

I'm curious if anyone knows ... is the vodka sold in the White Barrel any different product than that sold in the Black Barrel?
391  Bitcoin / Press / 2013-08-17 Coindesk.com - Bitcoin Law: What US businesses need to know on: August 17, 2013, 03:14:27 PM
Bitcoin Law: What US businesses need to know
by Marco Santori  [Chairman of the Bitcoin Foundationís Regulatory Affairs Committee]

This is a basic primer on the state of US law as it applies to digital currency entrepreneurs.

Quote
If the last few months have taught us anything, it is that there will soon exist a new and evolving body of law: The Law of Digital Currency, or, as some would prefer it: Bitcoin Law.
-
[...] 'virtual currency' is something of a loaded term, and bitcoin may not even be best described as a currency at all.
-
[In addition to regulators FinCEN and the SEC, the] consensus among legal professionals is that two more government agencies might soon have a hand in the market as well: the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).
-
Some have called [FinCEN's issuance of guidance] bitcoinís 'watershed moment' because of its clear, unequivocal positive message: bitcoin is not illegal. The negative consequence, though, was just as obvious: Many bitcoin businesses models are illegal.
-
In effect, the [Bank Secrecy Act (BSA)] deputizes financial institutions, requiring them to act as the governmentís foot soldiers in its war on money laundering.

 - http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-law-what-us-businesses-need-to-know
392  Bitcoin / Press / Re: 2013-08-13 Senate panel kicks off broad look at Bitcoin on: August 17, 2013, 06:31:33 AM
Here's a link to an PDF of the actual letter sent by committee chair Thomas Carper and member Tom Coburn:

 - http://www.hsgac.senate.gov/download/letter-to-secretary-napolitano-on-virtual-currencies
393  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: List of court cases, complaints, regulatory actions, etc. on: August 17, 2013, 06:28:13 AM
Inquiry into Virtual Currencies by U.S. Congress (Committee On Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs)
August 12, 2013
Location: Washington, DC, USA

Abstract: A U.S. Senate Committee has started an inquiry into Bitcoin and other virtual currencies, asking a range of regulators to list what safeguards are in place to prevent criminal activity.

 - http://www.hsgac.senate.gov/download/letter-to-secretary-napolitano-on-virtual-currencies
 - http://bit.ly/1bFGgXf (Browser-friendly / PDF viewer)
 - http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/13/usa-senate-bitcoin-idUSL2N0GE10K20130813
394  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Does bitcoin really has no central authority? on: August 16, 2013, 08:44:30 AM
Also, according to Bitcoin Foundation's websites, it could standardize Bitcoin by changing codes. What if one day they start to play evil?

There are many Bitcoin clients. Any change that implements a change that "breaks" the Bitcoin protocol will not be accepted by older clients.  This is called a hard fork.  So unless people upgrade to a client that understands the change, that change made will have no impact.

There is the argument that the power to accept changes comes from those who hold bitcoins and those who will buy the mined coins.  These people are referred to as the "economic majority":
 - http://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Economic_majority

The economic majority's power is what played out this way with the accidental hard fork in March.  There was a change to the v0.8 client that those using v0.7.2 and prior didn't use.   Even though there were more v0.8 clients running at the time, the "economic majority" were using v0.7 and thus that's the side of the fork that mining capacity jumped to once it became obvious coins mined on v0.8 were going to become worthless.
395  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: bitl bill Counterfeit money on: August 15, 2013, 06:25:11 PM
Thank you for answers. It seems the lack of study still

Creating a counterfeit of most any paper item is trivial unless expensive anti-counterfeit measures are taken.  Here's an example of the challenge to making paper hard to replicate:
 - http://rt.com/usa/100-dollar-bills-misprinted-496

This is such a challenge that even community/local currency issuers such as Brixton Pound have gone to using electronic (mobile/SMS) ledgers:
 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qa9Bqrs9yAQ

Even tactics like putting a hologram sticker to protect the private key (as is employed with the Casascius physical coin has) been discovered to be vulnerable:
 - http://codinginmysleep.com/casascius-physical-bitcoins-cracked-at-defcon

The problem comes with intending the item (paper, coin, whatever) to circulate.  

What does work well are single-use vouchers.  When buying a MoneyPak at a convenience store, that piece of paper that is issued contains a code that can be redeemed online.   This same approach where a one-time code is issued is how ticket-in/ticket-out (TITO) equipment at casinos work.   Other e-gift cards and other vouchers/coupons work with the same concept.   The code is revealed to the customer but the intention is that the code will be redeemed instead of the paper with the code being transferred to someone else as an exchange of value.

The single-use e-code/voucher approach used by MoneyPak/UKash/CashU/etc. all are regulated financial products (as there is an issuer of the code) and issuing a private currency would bring the regulators:
 - http://www.the-star.co.ke/news/article-128667/cbk-investigates-bangla-pesa

So even if one wanted to go that route, there are hurdles beyond the technological.
396  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: raspberry pie + thermal printer + ? = bitcoin printer on: August 15, 2013, 05:50:59 PM
Additional threads on the topic:

Offline Paper Wallet Creator - Raspberry Pi?
 - http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=74615.msg868578#msg868578

Piper - A hardware-based paper wallet printer and so much more
 - http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=194635.0

Bitfrore - Bitcoin Cold Paper Wallet Printer Crowdfunding Campaign
 - http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=261080.0

and not quite the same as a paper wallet s a

Tamper-proof paper wallet design
 - http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=169836.0
397  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Firmcoins - A new kind of Bitcoin physical bill ready for off-line transactions on: August 15, 2013, 05:41:59 PM
What is the purpose of the hologram sticker?
398  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: List of court cases, complaints, regulatory actions, etc. on: August 15, 2013, 04:50:15 PM
Iacono et al v. Bitinstant, L.L.C.
August 8, 2013
New York, USA (NY Southern District Court)
Case: 1:2013cv04674

Abstract: Class action complaint against BitInstant. The assertion is that BitInstant made false claims about the speed of its service and the refund of fees.

 - http://www.scribd.com/doc/160464240/BitInstant-Class-Action-Lawsuit
 - http://www.coindesk.com/bitinstant-gets-hit-with-a-class-action-lawsuit-by-frustrated-customers
399  Bitcoin / Press / Re: 2013-08-12 Politico: Congress starts looking into Bitcoin on: August 15, 2013, 12:41:07 AM
Their best bet would be to try to corner the market before someone else does and with a 1.5 billion $ market they have the funds (or can print the funds) to gain a substantial share.

Though the value of bitcoin at the current exchange rate multiplied by the ~11.3 million BTC issued to-day equals some number a little over $1 billion, that is not what the cost would be to acquire "a substantial share".  Nobody knows where the exchange rate would end up if another round of heavy buying were to be attempted.

But what benefit do you see they would gain from buying lots of coins?
400  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: How to use 2-factor auth on mtgox, even without a smartphone on: August 15, 2013, 12:19:47 AM
does this work for BTC-e ?

In June, BTC-E added two-factor authentication:
 - https://btc-e.com/profile#security/2fa

So yes, any TOTP client such as this browser-based one will work with BTC-E's two-factor auth.

List of exchanges with two-factor authentciation:
 - http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/4113
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 ... 454 »
Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!