Bitcoin Forum
May 05, 2016, 06:46:37 AM *
News: New! Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.12.1 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Donate Login Register  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 [22] 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 ... 457 »
421  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: A progressive Bitcoin futures exchange: 796 Exchange on: August 21, 2013, 01:07:50 AM
796 got some press:
 - http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-08-20/bitcoin-spawns-china-virtual-ipos-as-u-s-scrutiny-grows.html

[Update: This is not an endorsement.  I've never used 796, and know nearly nothing about it.]
422  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Some Open Transaction Questions... on: August 21, 2013, 01:05:17 AM
As far as i understand each type of goods has an issuer. Who is the issuer of Bitcoins in that system? Or would i issue Bitcoins by claiming i have some?

A Bitcoin voting pool is described in the Auditing page on the OT wiki.  As is auditing for physical:
 - https://github.com/FellowTraveler/Open-Transactions/wiki/Auditing
423  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Buying bitcoins in Chile? on: August 21, 2013, 12:45:35 AM
A digital currency exchange service for buying with cash in Chile:

 - http://mibi.cl
 - https://twitter.com/mibilletera/status/369828907307900929
424  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Virtual Currencies Compliance Conference (VC3) hosted by NMTA in New York City on: August 20, 2013, 08:01:18 PM
The VC3 page now has links to the (powerpoint) presentations:
 - http://nmta.us/site/page.php?570
425  Economy / Economics / Re: Bitcoin Adopting Countrys' Ultimate Guide to Taxation on: August 20, 2013, 07:37:13 PM
there is a need for a different taxation system than we currently have.

Cash is a payment method that too can be used anonymously.  The use of cash hasn't caused the current taxation system to be abandoned.
426  Bitcoin / Technical Support / Re: Double-spending vs Double-spending on: August 20, 2013, 05:48:52 PM
Obviously 1. != 2. so I think we should use another word for describing 2.
I've never seen anybody using another word, did you?

A spend with Bitcoin is a "confirmed" transaction.   Most services do not credit a transaction as confirmed until there are six block that have confirmed the transaction.  

So 1 == 2 in that context (with the exception of systemic failure like what happened with the March 2013 hard fork in which even a confirmed transaction got double spent).

I'm not talking about these (which deserve their names) but rather about things like this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=232979.0 or https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=231309.0 (ie rebroadcasting the same tx with more fees for example, nothing malicious)

But the term double spending is never used (as far as I've seen) when referring to "replace by fee" capability:
 - http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=199947.0
427  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: List of court cases, complaints, regulatory actions, etc. on: August 20, 2013, 04:35:29 PM
Seizure Warrant - Funds in Dwolla account of Mutum Sigillum, LLC [Mt. Gox]
May 14, 2013
Location: USA

Abstract: The U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security (DHS) has seized funds in the accounts used by Mt. Gox at Dwolla and Wells Fargo.

Update to this ...

When the seizure warrant was executed, $2,915,507.40 was the amount seized from Dwolla:
 - http://www.scribd.com/doc/161492071/Bitcoin-Mt-Gox-Warrant-Executed
428  Bitcoin / Press / Re: 2013-08-20 MT GOX Dwolla Seizure was $2,915,507.40 on: August 20, 2013, 04:32:19 PM

They also had a bank account in Deleware in which funds were seized if I remember correctly.

Update: Wells Fargo, a/c# 7657841313

Quote
On May 9, 2013, the Honorable Stephanie A. Gallagher issued a seizure warrant for the
contents of the Mutum Sigillurn LLC account at Wells Fargo, based on the foregoing
information. Bank records also show that nearly all of the activity in that Wells Fargo account
consists of wires between that account and Dwolla, which represent bitcoin transactions for
customers. The other transactions in this account are not significant in number or amounts.
- http://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Mt-Gox-Dwolla-Warrant-5-14-13.pdf
429  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: High Risk Merchant Accounts on: August 20, 2013, 04:00:45 PM
Relevant article on Coindesk:

Bitcoin could be a boon for porn and other high-risk merchants
 - http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-could-be-a-boon-for-porn-and-other-high-risk-merchants/
430  Bitcoin / Technical Support / Re: Sent money are stuck on: August 19, 2013, 07:04:06 PM
my client says "Seen by 1 node".

What client?

If you are using the Bitcoin-Qt/bitcoind client make sure it is left running and has established connections so that it can re-broadcast the transaction.
431  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Bounty 20 BTC: Wi-Fi Hotspot, enabled by bitcoin on: August 19, 2013, 06:46:17 PM
Keeping an eye on this:

Bitcoin Wifi Hotspot running on Raspberry Pi.
 - http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=277584.0
 - http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1ko3sz
432  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: History of United States Anti-Money Laundering Laws on: August 18, 2013, 09:58:10 PM
Incidentally, the source:

 - http://www.fincen.gov/news_room/aml_history.html
433  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: What is the best site that explain mining? on: August 18, 2013, 04:40:30 PM
Hardly any progammers or miners like my explanation of how mining works using the concept of a "reverse bingo", but a few non-techncial people have claimed that my explanation has helped them understand mining better than any other explanation they've seen:
 - http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/a/3978/153
434  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: using tails OS on usb as a secure hardware wallet? on: August 18, 2013, 02:45:31 AM
can this be used as a safe secure hardware wallet?
for example store the private key along on the tails usb
boot, create a simple new blockchain.info wallet,
add private key sign transactions, sweep private key from blockchain.info wallet that was just created,
eject usb reboot system,

can something other then blockchain.info be used with tails to sign transactions?

Related:

BTCVault
 - http://dswd.github.io/btcvault/security.html
 - http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=163763.0

USB wallet (Puppy Linux):
 - http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=257672.0
435  Bitcoin / Press / Re: 2013-08-17 Coindesk.com - Bitcoin Law: What US businesses need to know on: August 18, 2013, 02:25:23 AM
Basically, everywhere except for the United States.

Speeding is illegal on the roads within the U.S. yet the average speeds often exceed the posted limit.  Marijuana is illegal to possess, per federal law, yet a visitor to a city could likely find a source and acquire some in a matter of minutes.

But few people would go thirty miles over the speed limit without expecting a run-in with the law.

The point is, bitcoin has a future in the U.S. even if exchanges are regulated out of existence.
436  Economy / Goods / Re: NEFT Vodka and Bitcoin on: August 17, 2013, 09:16:44 PM
Still anxiously awaiting Neft Vodka's distribution in the U.S.

I'm curious if anyone knows ... is the vodka sold in the White Barrel any different product than that sold in the Black Barrel?
437  Bitcoin / Press / 2013-08-17 Coindesk.com - Bitcoin Law: What US businesses need to know on: August 17, 2013, 03:14:27 PM
Bitcoin Law: What US businesses need to know
by Marco Santori  [Chairman of the Bitcoin Foundationís Regulatory Affairs Committee]

This is a basic primer on the state of US law as it applies to digital currency entrepreneurs.

Quote
If the last few months have taught us anything, it is that there will soon exist a new and evolving body of law: The Law of Digital Currency, or, as some would prefer it: Bitcoin Law.
-
[...] 'virtual currency' is something of a loaded term, and bitcoin may not even be best described as a currency at all.
-
[In addition to regulators FinCEN and the SEC, the] consensus among legal professionals is that two more government agencies might soon have a hand in the market as well: the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).
-
Some have called [FinCEN's issuance of guidance] bitcoinís 'watershed moment' because of its clear, unequivocal positive message: bitcoin is not illegal. The negative consequence, though, was just as obvious: Many bitcoin businesses models are illegal.
-
In effect, the [Bank Secrecy Act (BSA)] deputizes financial institutions, requiring them to act as the governmentís foot soldiers in its war on money laundering.

 - http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-law-what-us-businesses-need-to-know
438  Bitcoin / Press / Re: 2013-08-13 Senate panel kicks off broad look at Bitcoin on: August 17, 2013, 06:31:33 AM
Here's a link to an PDF of the actual letter sent by committee chair Thomas Carper and member Tom Coburn:

 - http://www.hsgac.senate.gov/download/letter-to-secretary-napolitano-on-virtual-currencies
439  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: List of court cases, complaints, regulatory actions, etc. on: August 17, 2013, 06:28:13 AM
Inquiry into Virtual Currencies by U.S. Congress (Committee On Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs)
August 12, 2013
Location: Washington, DC, USA

Abstract: A U.S. Senate Committee has started an inquiry into Bitcoin and other virtual currencies, asking a range of regulators to list what safeguards are in place to prevent criminal activity.

 - http://www.hsgac.senate.gov/download/letter-to-secretary-napolitano-on-virtual-currencies
 - http://bit.ly/1bFGgXf (Browser-friendly / PDF viewer)
 - http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/13/usa-senate-bitcoin-idUSL2N0GE10K20130813
440  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Does bitcoin really has no central authority? on: August 16, 2013, 08:44:30 AM
Also, according to Bitcoin Foundation's websites, it could standardize Bitcoin by changing codes. What if one day they start to play evil?

There are many Bitcoin clients. Any change that implements a change that "breaks" the Bitcoin protocol will not be accepted by older clients.  This is called a hard fork.  So unless people upgrade to a client that understands the change, that change made will have no impact.

There is the argument that the power to accept changes comes from those who hold bitcoins and those who will buy the mined coins.  These people are referred to as the "economic majority":
 - http://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Economic_majority

The economic majority's power is what played out this way with the accidental hard fork in March.  There was a change to the v0.8 client that those using v0.7.2 and prior didn't use.   Even though there were more v0.8 clients running at the time, the "economic majority" were using v0.7 and thus that's the side of the fork that mining capacity jumped to once it became obvious coins mined on v0.8 were going to become worthless.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 [22] 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 ... 457 »
Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!