982
|
Other / Beginners & Help / Re: About the traceability of Bitcoin
|
on: March 31, 2019, 09:30:09 PM
|
Hi all,
Just a very beginer in the Bitcoin world, and I'm trying to understand all implications. So, I'm trying to figure out what happens in the following scenario with my current understanding of Bitcoint technology.
I imagine Bitcoin to behave like a physical banknote, but with unusual face values, for example 0,0135 BTC. Of course, the global Bitcoin network is like the mint that creates such "banknotes" and certifies its value.
So, as an ordinary banknote, it has a "serial number" that can be traceable.
If you take money from an ATM machine, the system will record that you withdraw an amount of money in cash, but certainly I'm not aware of any ATM machine that also records the serial numbers of the banknotes you withdraw.
But I think this is not the case with Bitcoin!
So, if I have a Coinbase account in which I've to be fully identified (like in any other brick-and-mortar Bank) and I buy Bitcoins using my credit card thru the Coinbase platform, I'm fully identified. All right, I understand it.
I also have an Electrum wallet in my PC.
If I send 0.1 BTC from my Coinbase account to an address of my Electrum wallet, the only information available will be that 0.1 BTC has gone from my Coinbase account to someone's else, that could be myself or not if I'm paying for some service, or is a tip or a donation.
But if I now pay something, sending the 0,1 BTC from my Electrum wallet to a Bitcoin address, it can be proved that the very same 0.1 BTC that I sent at first to some unkown recipient, has been also sent afterwards to another recipient, and imagine that this other recipiet is fully known (for example, some shop that accepts payments in BTC).
In this way, it can't be 100% proved that I did the second payment, but certainly it would be highly suspicious, isn't it?
So the question is: Do thing work this way?
Thanks,
You shouldn't link your wallets, one of the best mixers might be altcoins but you never know. When you make a transaction i think you might leave your ip around, so coinbase could link other sites aswell, privacy is very harsh these days even if you take all these measures, could say they are pointless without extreme care. But nothing to do with bitcoin itself as you can mask your ip afaik.
|
|
|
984
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Tokens (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [TWBT] [THE WATCHER BOT TOKEN] [Artificial Intelligence Robot Assistant!]
|
on: March 31, 2019, 08:40:20 PM
|
Would be nice to have some trusted feedback, I will be around . kaptkrunch, if this ends up in a scam your trust rating will be just the same as OPs for supporting it. Edit: Will eventually make a post if no one sees it, so you asking for anything for the use of the bot? any donation address posted prior to this post in name of the bot? and, whats the use of the token. The team that runs the bot asks a small fee to have it join the server. I'm not part of the team but I do employ the bot. The bot made the token. As far as donations or ICO or any pre capital raised it has not happened to my knowledge and I personally will make a post if that happens or I find out about it. Not fully sure what you mean by that question so if i'm mistake please clear it up for me. I believe the token will be used to fund the bots continued updates in the future as it continues to grow and need more powerful hardware. I will find out by asking the bot.. and report what it says to you here. Thanks for all your interest and concern. As a user of the bot I also have reservations but watching it preform day in and day out I'm nothing short of amazed at what it has done for my communities. EDIT the bot has a paterion account ill find out if its ever been used but 100% it has not and will never be posted here! So how does a smart contract IA robot create a token on the very network he resides (if i didnt misunderstood) then uses your account to create its ANN? Also, not editing your last answer proves you farming posts. Hard to prove its a scam but logical tho.
|
|
|
989
|
Economy / Exchanges / Re: KYC and identity theft risk
|
on: March 31, 2019, 05:44:51 PM
|
Hello guys. I'm very very far from making some kind of cash-out, but i was just wondering... How do you handle the thing of being forced to give your personal informations to exchanges to be able to convert your cryptos in fiat and transfer them on bank? For how i see it there it's a very high possibility (if not certainty) that exchanges are selling the informations given by their costumers... and anyway there is alway the risk that they get hacked.
Knowing this, why you handled your ID and documents to exchanges? making some money it's enought to compesate the risks for you? do you use some alternative way to cash out your crypto?
For me, giving bank coordinates should be enough to allow people to cash out... The worst that can happen in that way is having your bank account hacked, but in these cases the banks give some warranties and some kind of protection/indemnity... I don't see the necessity to provide an exchange with photos, ID, bills etc...
What do you think? do you think this system will change in the near future? what alternatives do you have?
Exchange KYC is almost acceptable or even necesary in some cases be it buyer or seller, but shitcoin shittoken shitico things are a completly different deal, you get simple graphic designing for your money and data that it is after sold on a dark market. However some exchanges don't requiere KYC for smaller amounts and there is ways to avoid this, try localbitcoins, it's somewhat better and is user2user through escrow. I personaly try to avoid exchanges that requiere payment for listing.
|
|
|
990
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Service Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Ethex.bet 🏆 FAIR LOTTERY GAME! TRY DEMO or Win 1 of 5 Jackpots!
|
on: March 31, 2019, 05:22:32 PM
|
When are we getting that expected chat? I'm seeing that with a bit more of wagering the JP could even recover from weekly and daily without a problem. If gamblers started using normal transaction fees instead these crazy ones perhaps their BankRoll wouldn't be so affected by larger sesions either, I seen myself that daily and weekly can make a great betback, monthly with a larger user base being a myth.
Hello! We are working to roll out the next release, it will include some new features and the chat as well. It will be rolled out next week and we will post an announcement here. Ethex suggests the comission, that warrants the bet being processed in one of the nearest upcoming blocks. You can always change the comission, if you are ready to wait a bit. That would be great, if you’ll share with us your bet placing experience using different fees. Thank you for your interest and cooperation. Hey, very glad to hear from you, and even happier to hear the site is going towards a 2.0 version . When i gamble in a rush I generaly don't have time to change the fees, but usualy the game doesn't pend on the confirmation itself, uncertain on what, but even well feed fees can take time. I'd say that the times that the bets don't run smooth is not because of a specific transaction and huge fees don't help much. When I'm winning I do love to spoil the miners a bit tho and shouldn't do any harm from time to time. Btw, the empty pool betting war for tickets is pretty funny, even if one can get his funds drained by someone else before winning or losing completly. Edit: What I cannot understand is why confirmed transactions can take a lot time to process. I sometimes have the feeling some transactions never play or only play if you send a bet or two after.
|
|
|
993
|
Economy / Collectibles / Re: [WTS] Nastyfans Minted Seat Silver Set - 8 Coins - 36oz Total
|
on: March 31, 2019, 03:21:49 AM
|
so? How does one go about seeing how much has been "donated" to the coins? Or am I wrong about how I understand how this works? You get a cut in the mining operation made from the buys of the coin, its a pretty funny income that I actually wanted to ask how much btc each coin made or atleast how old are the coins which is kinda the same.
|
|
|
996
|
Other / Meta / Re: Being able to comment on the merit given.
|
on: March 30, 2019, 12:27:13 AM
|
So in addition to reading a whole bunch of posts, looking for some to give a merit or two, the OP wants us to write a justification as well? Like the trust comments?
You all got that right. Nor would I really care to read the inevitable comments that would accompany most merits: "Good post", "+1", and the like--and that's if anyone even bothered to comment. And assuming you had to write something in, you'd probably get mostly incoherent nonsense written by members who just have to fill in a field. At the very worst it might turn people off the merit system altogether. Bad idea. if you think you need to "justify" why you merited a certain post, then you better not merit it in the first place. and sense there is no rules on what exactly should you merit someone for, there is no point of knowing what did someone merit a post for, as long as they are not sending the merit to their ALT. but that's my sentence So in addition to reading a whole bunch of posts, looking for some posts to give a merit or two, the OP wants us to write a justification as well? Like the trust comments? You read because you read if you deem proper you can merit. I am a merit source. I try to do a good job by distributing all of my source merit to as many posts as possible. Currently that involves giving merit to 200+ posts per month. If I had to also leave a comment on each merit that I gave out, I either wouldn't have a life or would have to just give more merit to fewer posts. I'm trying to spread my source merit around as much as possible. I never said a comment is a must. I just cannot believe I answered 3 posts with 4 real words. Edit: Updated op.
|
|
|
997
|
Other / Meta / Re: Being able to comment on the merit given.
|
on: March 30, 2019, 12:04:47 AM
|
I think there is enough drama already. But feel free to PM the person and explain why you sent them merits.
I mean the merit system is so one doesn't use the trust system to "merit" post reliability, perhaps you not meriting the quality of the post just what it speaks, or perhaps a clarification would be made since you meriting someone for something they do not that specifical post. These are cases that I feel needed by own forum use. You mean you would like to leave a comment when you drop someone some merit? Might be a neat idea for those inclined to so so
If you want it so people justify why they merit someone, I don't see it's value. Other than completely obvious merit abuse on a decent scale it isn't moderated. I also don't see the majority of people bothering to leave merit feedback.
The first line you said, as comment and clarification. I'm pretty happy, I were really worried about the way trust sys used to work back in the day. I don't always bother but I like to do so when proper. So in addition to reading a whole bunch of posts, looking for some posts to give a merit or two, the OP wants us to write a justification as well? Like the trust comments? You read because you read if you deem proper you can merit. Yall can shittalk on fb tryna be on a sirius forum here.
|
|
|
998
|
Other / Meta / Being able to comment on the merit given.
|
on: March 29, 2019, 11:43:50 PM
|
So, my wish/idea is basicaly being able to see and explain why that person has been merited most specificaly.
Edit: Pehaps being able to merit an user directly instead of his posts?.
|
|
|
1000
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: A new look to KYC, from a customer's perspective.
|
on: March 29, 2019, 04:13:35 PM
|
Often them team is just a profile picture purchased from photostock linked to a made up linkedIn profile. A formal verification system needs to be done on the CEO and senior members of the team to ensure that they are real, this would safeguard the investors from scammers
I agree and this method is I often do when I participate on an ICO. I literally trying to make in contact with them through video call to see if they are the people on the website link and unfortunately only few agree to do it. So Im surprise that many projects are scam. They saying they are busy with stuff, what is a 2min video talk. If you're a legit project then you dont need to be scare on people verifying you on method like this. This should be done as collective not as a single user, if we demanded it from the beginning and done it all we wouldnt have any hassle getting the data, verifying and perhaps meeting part of the team atleast.
|
|
|
|