Funny question, because technically I check this site more than 3x per hour!  Although many say there are other similar better sites coinmarketcap is still easier to remember and classic. It would be interesting they have reduced the amount of volume needed to appear on winners and losers for hours and days. Because because the current feature let's say we privilege the exchanges with volume! Most people access this site, it's something like google that people complain and suggest duckduckgo, but no use! |
|
|
|
Depends on whether you are own (old) Vite ERC20 tokens or (new) native Vite tokens. If you have ERC20 tokens then you can trade. If you have native Vite tokens then not because the network is still in test net. If you are confused about I'll try to explain briefly. Vite tokens were originally issued on the Ethereum platform as ERC20 tokens. Later, after release of testnet, native Vite token was released. Everyone who owns ERC20 tokens need to convert to native tokens.
I think I got some VITE from the testenet and was looking to figure out the date of the conversion possibility! There is also a need to motivate people to use VITE! Why have opted for Q3 the launch of the mainnet, many things can happen. |
|
|
|
So, always welcome new shared masternodes platforms which provide more confidence! I think Blockshare is that kind of novelty and depending on the demand for projects because they want to be on that platform. The value of each BLS will be substantially driven to good highs and stability, Precisely because of the need to have those coins to pay the fees in the voting, causing good demand. The key to success here could also be a good relationship with the community and enable people to use Blockshare directly. And up to the present moment, there is no doubt of that either.  |
|
|
|
Q3 2019 according to the roadmap
I own some VITE, so I will not be able to trade them in exchanges, yet? |
|
|
|
|
I'll wait until tomorrow for some response! The bounty campaign was finalized a few days ago, but you disappeared, manager!
I need to remove the signature.
|
|
|
|
|
Will mainnet VITEs be available next week or next week?
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, I remember that in the middle of last year they commented on IoT.
Are we finally getting closer to this interaction?
It is an industry totally unexplored and with this allows numerous possibilities.
This image is exciting and makes us believe that nothing is lost yet.
Probably there are countless projects already underway and we are unaware of its beginning and current state.
|
|
|
|
I voted in the basics and traditional: ETH! I'm usually not conservative. I find WAN, NEO and NANO interesting too But in this related list you have demonstrated the intention of which may bring a greater adoption and not future. If ETH develops a larger creation, there is no doubt that it will always be at the top, NEO is a real threat. ETH brought the simplicity of the relationship with the blockchain, no other project will do another identical magic, maybe do another magic! |
|
|
|
|
The number of responses in this thread probably should have explained all possible reasons why ICOs fail.
But I will complement some more details, for example
In my opinion the main reason for the ICOs to fail is precisely this rounding of funds.
I want to say that many times, the team itself has minimal resources for project survival!
Because if this team is not able to afford some sites to host blockexplorer and its information,
there is definitely no one who will value your project, since it does not even do it!
|
|
|
|
|
I've never had a problem using Yobit, in fact, there was only one time that the deposit was delayed.
But countless people complain about this exchange at any time.
I've never traded suspicious coins or projects that could be fraudulent.
Maybe that's why I did not have problems, at least for now.
Either way, it will always be important not to trust any exchange or rely on exchanges until they prove to be reliable.
|
|
|
|
|
After so many ICO projects launched in recent years and most of them are failing,
Why not think about a development that can recover the bottom of these lost ICOs and improve these projects?
It would be interesting to worry about investigating and enforcing these ICOs!
It is no longer healthy to inject money into most new ICOs, there is an exception, but it is time to look at what already exists.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I agree with your sense of difficulty in speculating prices at the moment.
In fact, if it is very simple to believe that prices could further decrease precisely because of the bear market sentiment.
When it's the bull market, that sentiment is likely to be the opposite.
The big move right now is finding solid designs and ignoring prices!
It's interesting to try to think about values, which is difficult.
|
|
|
|
|
How innocent because there is still no project capable of getting attention without the appreciation of the BTC! Incidentally.
I'm wrong because maybe XRP and DOGE are the only ones apparently,
maybe LTC too or even ETH! The others need to evolve in many ways!
It is possible that GRIN, FIL and XTZ can follow this path of independence in which it is currently a great challenge.
I did not want to mention the tickers of any project, but I had to be emphatic in what I was writing.
Either way, I mean that if the BTC breaks, it will take months or years for the surviving altcoins to get value.
|
|
|
|
|
This market is totally saturated and uncompromising with people in the sense that the most important thing is to design a whitepaper
And so take them to some famous exchanges and everything will be finalized.
Unfortunately most of these projects have forgotten the commitment that is the education, guidance and use of these projects in real life.
There are exceptions but the big challenge at the moment is to justify the existence of these projects!
I hope it's possible for good things to be delivered by the end of this year when many ICOs will complete two years of existence!
The future market for ICOs will slightly decline in performance from these past projects.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, when you lamented and tried to warn people the price of the BTC was slightly higher than now.
In my opinion despite this old thread, it's no time for despair.
But now is not the time to buy as much as you can, unless you accept the challenge!
The challenge is this market depressed and totally unknown and discredited by most people.
This collective feeling has been in the air for a long time, but if that happens and who made good purchases,
It'll basically guarantee your life, your children and whoever else.
|
|
|
|
|
But waiting for what exactly?
This moment is not speculation or anything, because you will be subject to irreparable losses.
Also, I believe that anyone still in cryptocurrency is because they believe in its diffusion and utility.
This utility is still very questionable, but there are jobs to dispel them.
The only thing at the moment we have to do is actually wait, if the interest is financial.
|
|
|
|
I don't have tokens without liquidity and by the way! You complained about being a bagholders but did not explain in detail what you want to improve your situation. Well, not that it's important for people to know, but at least it would be nice of you to recognize that you will not have where push these tokens! These tokens don't represent any value or even possibilities. It's sad the truth.  Be realistic with yourself. |
|
|
|
Well, it is difficult to apply all possible definitions of dead for all projects. But some characteristics such as volume, media and people's interest for some purpose on this project! I think that CMC is not being honest in recent times and are giving away important coins to make people forget. However, the truth always prevails and will soon prevail. Many projects have false volumes and are already dead! |
|
|
|
|
Regarding your second item this is a condition to be remembered when you choose some ICO and in choosing this in fact!
much analysis is required to support the period.
So, your first item is already very clear when mentioning that if they have the resources to keep and develop something, then ICO is not necessary.
In fact if they want to raise something, that leaves the community to judge, many projects must be tokens.
But another part is tokens just to get people's money and nothing to do, could simply be coins, allow mining and let the market judge the right price.
If the project is good, good things will happen, simple as that.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
