Actually, Craig tried arguing that the intended 'recovery' of 'his' coins from the BitcoincashSV chain would be sufficient for him to prove he has enough assets to cover a potential loss in the COPA case, but that was rejected as the Master Clark pointed out that such an action could only properly be used if he was able to verify ownership of those coins independently of the private keys. Something we know he cannot do because all his "I am Satoshi" supposed proof was exposed as mere fakes and forgeries during the Kleiman case.

Thing is, we know that nChain is in majority control of the BSV network so they could potentially just force it through, but it is good to see that the legal process has already pointed out that it would not be proper for them to do so without there being suitable proof that the person trying to 'recover' said coins actually owns them. This is what is going to fuck Craig up in the coming cases. Where the Kleiman action was a ridiculous sham where neither side contested his "I am Satoshi" claim because it suited their purposes, neither Hodlonaut nor COPA cases are based on that same premise and Craig's claim to be Satoshi has even been raised as a particular reason for why a number of damning pieces of evidence from the Kleiman case were accepted for the COPA case, "In my judgement, these questions are exactly the kind of debate which will need to be had in order to test the defendant’s claim that he is indeed Satoshi Nakamoto.".

So not only does Craig have to come up with a not-insignificant security deposit for the COPA case, he will also have to explain away his forgeries AND proffer up actual proof that he is Satoshi, something he has utterly failed to do and, in fact, something which directly led to him fleeing Australia when he repeatedly failed to do so for the ATO which, had he simply performed a legitimate signing or moved a coin, would have exonerated him over the multi-million-dollar cash rebate fraud he is likely to end up facing extradition over in the next few years.

(And this is ignoring his NSW SC fraudulent cases where he lied in court, filed fake valuations and forged signatures on backdated contracts, made false police reports to the UK police over a hack for which there is no evidence it ever happened and where he lied about ADT UK's data centre having an outage and losing the footage of the 'pineapple' being planted, plus a litany of 'minor' frauds like filing fake backdated company appointments for a dead guy etc.)

All in, Craig Wright is finally going to see his multi-year frauds catch up with him and it will be glorious.

Yeah he's still floating around the internet, no doubt. Sometimes I think he just desperately wants attention, any attention, even ours.

Ask him to tell you about his connection to 55 Clive Road on MI5's Palace Barracks in Belfast. That's the real mystery here, the Razormind scam was just another painfully-obvious cash grab from the outset, but that connection is what piqued my interest.

*Every single 'gotcha' piece of evidence which proves Craig to be a liar and a fraud*

CSW: "I was hacked"

I got one too, are you saying you didn't send this pm?

What makes you think that is even a thing? Given the sketchy nature of the Tether money-printing machine, coupled with near-incessant wash-trading across multiple exchanges, absent any major institutional rush for bitcoin there's little reason to believe its price is being suppressed and every reason to suspect it may be somewhat inflated.


So far the only BTC Craig claims to own are in wallets controlled by other people who have cryptographically called out his bullshit, or contain stolen coins. This is a guy who has supposedly conducted multi-million-dollar business deals through trading in privkeys or letters of assignment to bitcoin which never move.

His whole shtick has been to declare ownership of things he has no proof of ever owning and trying to con the ATO out of millions of dollars in rebates for claimed R&D costs he can't prove he ever actually funded.

My take from the above - he is admitting that only 8 people could be convinced this 'Metanet' platform was both a) Worth registering their PII on and b) Secure

Staggeringly incompetent practice, though, storing customer ID documentation in a publicly-viewable WP folder. Pretty much proves those involved in setting this platform up have no idea what they're doing.

Not only did the 2009 miner wait until the definitive 'Tulip Trust' list of addresses Craig submitted as being his were made public in the court records a few days ago, they signed their 'Craig Steven Wright is a Liar and a Fraud' message on Calvin Ayre's birthday!

Absolute.Fucking.Legend. 

Proof of ammo - priceless

https://medium.com/@paintedfrog/craig-wright-plagiarized-significant-portions-of-his-phd-thesis-and-tried-to-hide-it-80cd8f01459

Bird nests for botnets. Stunningly bad plagiarism. This guy's only talent is in conning the credulous.

Any more excuses from his fanbase is merely staggeringly wilful ignorance and wholly delusional.

All religious faith requires one maintain an intellectually dishonest mindset, so for Craig Wright to also be dishonest in his words and deeds is merely an extension of that position.

That the religious proclaim their piety to be evidence of their integrity is what is truly laughable and insulting. Never heard of 'lying for Jesus'? Hell, the Christian Taliban in the US have turned the falsification of America's history into an entire industry, as detailed in the excellent book by Chris Rodda: Liars for Jesus.

Back on topic, I think his ultimate aim at this point is to fudge his way through this court case, relying on perjury, forgery and the simple fact that he knows full well that none of the lawyers, on either side, want to kill this cash cow by pursuing the evidence through to the actual truth, that he is not Satoshi Nakamoto. The best result he could get is that he loses the case but the court accepts whatever excuse he's going to inevitably roll out for why he will never be able to access the 'Satoshi Stash' and ultimately awards Ira an affordable amount, low enough for Calvin to comfortably write it off, allowing for Craig and Calvin to claim the outcome proves that Craig is Satoshi.

Agreed. Flag raised here.

Just to put a few more nails in the coffin of these scammers, they also have hijacked Tim Cullen's details for these two scammy sites, too:

coindesk-mining.com and fox-launcher.com both show pretty much the same layout and have reference to Mr Cullen:

Yes, OP, they are a scam website.

Repost from the other promineruk.com thread:

Bullshit. I mean, sure, a Tim Cullen is listed as being the Director and Shareholder of Crypto Asset Mining Limited, but I'm pretty sure you're not him.

You see, Timothy Paul Cullen has a history of being appointed to quite a few companies as an accountant providing officer services to those companies:

But when it comes to Crypto Asset Mining Limited, a company which is about to be struck off the register, there are some additional disturbing facts:

Not only is this company purporting to be trading as 'promineruk', it is also behind the scammy 'investment' mining website 'crypto2mining'

DO NOT VISIT THE WEBSITE OF CRYPTO2MINING - it is infected with a malware downloader:


My theory is that Timothy Cullen has no idea about the scammy activities of the actual people behind this operation, he may not even be aware that he is appointed in the first place as there are a couple of clues which suggest his registration as the Director and Shareholder are not set up quite right (I won't divulge as it is a frequent mistake that scammers are inclined to make when doing this).

In any event, OP, I believe you are correct, promineruk.com is a scam and I have tagged their account and raised a flag accordingly.

Voted? You're lying, there was no vote, this is, as usual, just another paid marketing piece. The author's profile proves as much:

https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1156138774864306176
Just to clarify.

PSA WARNING !!!

This project has been

proven to be fraudulent

DO NOT PROMOTE OR YOU

WILL BE MARKED WITH NEGATIVE

TRUST FOR PROMOTING A SCAM



Details of scam can be found in this thread.

There is every reason to believe that, while BTC-e may not have been your brainchild, you were very much connected to it on multiple levels. Whereas your puerile attempt to dismiss such by way of false equivalence lacks both evidence and reasoning.

1. Your mining pool's launch and BTC-e's launch occur within a couple of weeks of each other, along with your mining pool being an official partner of BTC-e
2. You already admitted that you provided technical consultanting to BTC-e
3. You asserted in this article that the founder of BTC-e, Alexey, was your friend
4. You were a moderator at BTC-e
5. You launched your own PoW/PoS coin, heavily instamined it and had it listed at BTC-e within days on an exchange which was known to be particularly difficult to get coins listed on

I'm always willing to review historic trust ratings, albeit in this instance I would clarify that I did not accuse Balthazar of fraud, I asserted that his connection to BTC-e rendered him untrustworthy in my opinion. Frankly, given the points I raised in dm with Veleor, even if I were to revisit this rating as it stands I would likely only modify the BTC-e relationship text to that below as well as raising the issue of the sketchy nature of Balthazar's Novacoin launch and listing on BTC-e:

So which part of the following 'Hashlet' bullshit makes Homero, or you, innocent?



^^^ None of these things were actual physical miners, they were literally just png's with clicky 'boost' options with rocket icons on the web interface for them that did nothing but make the customer believe they were mining crypto instead of being, as was the truth, merely the false front-end of a multi-million-dollar ponzi.

But you knew that.

PSA WARNING !!!

This project has been

proven to be fraudulent

DO NOT PROMOTE OR YOU

WILL BE MARKED WITH NEGATIVE

TRUST FOR PROMOTING A SCAM



Details of scam can be found in this thread.