|
nice to see this promising young pool back online...
not so nice to see that it's already mining the wrong fork of TUN.
|
|
|
|
|
i'd love to see native integration with ahashpool as one of the profit switching pools, maybe as a replacement to hashrefinery etc.
since it uses the same yiimp template as zpool, i kind of sort of got it to work by modifying the zpool templates, but it's a pain in the ass to setup and doesn't work for all algos (some don't receive profit info from the pool, while others do just fine etc.).... also the dash doesn't show the current profit of the algo being mined, while clicking on details does show it etc. like i said, it kind of sort of works, but it would be great if it worked natively, just like zpool.
thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
the equihash price on hicehash has just gone into crazy mode  |
|
|
|
miningspeed seems to be hashing...
still can't connect to nova.
just as i submitted this post, my miner connected to nova. |
|
|
|
|
miningspeed seems to be hashing...
still can't connect to nova.
|
|
|
|
|
just want to make sure i understand something correctly.
this is a fork... and as a fork (once we hit the magic block that ends the premine) the first block(s) will be high diff, basically the same diff as the current bitcoin blocks and are probably going to take a while to find.
then the diff should come down as the network adjusts etc..
right ?
|
|
|
|
i've been looking at that same block explorer, and it looks like it's a bit behind, and is still catching up. |
|
|
|
|
how many premine blocks are done already ?
i remember seeing a couple of hours back that something like 2000 out of 8000 was done, so i figure we should be getting pretty close to the 499407 block by now...
|
|
|
|
For some reason they didn't make it clear on the ANN, but theres is a 28% dev fee. Check their official website. signatum.orgTo be totally clear its 20% Dev fee 8% support fee, for exchanges and projects. lets give the new Devs a chance, they have agreed to be transparent with the Dev wallet, I would rather have a pre-mine and trusted Devs than no Pre-mine, FUD over the claim, and speculation on what is happening. Devs need to be paid for their work, they put in the effort. i'm all for the devs having some "skin in the game" and getting paid for their work. but any coin with a 20% pre-allocation to the devs is one that should throw up red flags all over the place. today they're all buddies who are focused on the same goal... tomorrow, for some reason or another, they have a falling out, and suddenly huge chunks of coin supply are in danger of being dumped. |
|
|
|
For some reason they didn't make it clear on the ANN, but theres is a 28% dev fee. Check their official website. signatum.orgi noticed that too, and pointed it out a couple of pages back... surprised it's not getting any attention. |
|
|
|
|
ok, so i read the announcement on the new 2.0 site.
from what i gather so far, this is the same exact coin, using the same exact ticker, but is now taken over by a new team.
also, at some point in the next couple of months this thing will fork at 4:1, cutting everyone's current sigt holdings by a factor of 4 (if you had 10,000 sigt you will now have 2,500 of new and improved, yet somehow the same sigt 2.0).
at some point during the fork the dev team will be allocated 28% of the total coin supply, 20% for devs and 8% for some other fund.
pow may be back in the new fork...
|
|
|
|
Stay mining it, yesterday everyone wanted to go the moon with SIGT and now leaving lol?
why not mine something that is more profitable, and then use the proceeds to buy sigt instead ? this coin doesn't seem to have a problem attracting miners. it has a problem attracting buyers. |
|
|
|
|
the fact that the halving came and went with barely a whimper is not a good sign...
|
|
|
|
that answers it ...
it is a SINGLE sign in that is allowed ...
the moment you log in via different device - it logs you out of the other devices automatically ... this is an inherent security built in to mpos itself - to stop you 'forgetting' a session open on another system that may be accessible to others in the place where you accessed it - as they will have access to your account AND coins ... one login sessions at a time on one system at a time ...
we dont control that - its inherent in mpos itself ...
#crysx
That is my point, if I am sitting at only 1 computer (device) and not signing in from somewhere else, it takes 30-60 minutes before I am signed out of that computer. For example when I wrote my previous post I was signed in. I took the dog out for a walk like 30 minutes and then grabbed something to eat for 15 minutes. When returned to the same computer again, I was logged out and had to log in again. Without touching any other devices... Anyway it's not very important, it's just kind of annoying. --ypsi i've stayed logged in for like days now. i think the trick is to keep the dashboard page up when you want to stay logged in. if you move to statistics or any other portion of the site, and leave your browser there - it will log you out at some point. but as long as you're on the dashboard, it just seems to keep you logged in. well, at least it keeps me logged in |
|
|
|
my miner seems to be working fine but on my dashboard, the worker is not active. therefore my hashrate is 0  but i still getting my coins. is it a bug? yep cant access dashboard, but am still receiving shares this is a dumb question but yor are cheking your coin dashboard? because there is a loot of coins on the pool, make sure you are on the rigth coin it happensd to me xD nope, pretty sure im in the right pool. sometimes the worker is there, sometimes its not whenever i check. and the hashrate is not same with what my miner says. im using gtx 1070 for denarius mining and my miner always show around 53mh hashrate, the dashboard randomly range from 27 to 130, or 0 when the worker went inactive. lol I thought u're talking about sigt pool im mining sigt too. same things are occurring.  well for me is the same, the hasrate is not stable your hashrate in the miner and the pool will always vary a bit, that's not abnormal. it's much more pronounced with this miner/pool combo, though. the pool tends to jack up worker diff way too high, and this makes smaller rigs choke up. for example, as i'm typing this, all of my rigs are shown to be set at 248 diff by the pool. my x6gpu rig has zero issues handling it, and is humming right along. however, my x2 and x1 rigs are struggling to submit work consistently. and that's what you're seeing at the pool - inconsistency. smaller rigs just don't get the time they need to submit shares at this high difficulty. you can easily see that when you look at the miner window for smaller rigs - if you see a lot of "mean netdiff" and not a lot of "share", then your card is choking and is not submitting shares consistently. this is why you're seeing wild fluctuations in hashrate with smaller rigs at the pool. they are working at a very high worker diff, so when blocks are fast they simply do not have the time they need to finish their calculations and submit a share before a block is found. this is why you will occasionally see them appear to drop off from the pool. they didn't really drop off, they just didn't submit any shares in the x amount of time the pool uses to calculate your hashrate. so let's say it takes 60 seconds for the pool to update your worker hashrate, and in that minute your rig didn't submit any shares - it will appear to drop off from the pool. reverse that for when the blocks are slow - smaller rigs get enough time to breathe and start submitting shares. because of the high worker diff, they are submitting large shares. when that happens you will see your hashrate go up wildly. for example, it's not unusual for me to see one of my x1 1070 rigs appear to drop off the pool, and then reappear with the hashrate of 90-120mh (3x4 it's normal sigt speed) a minute later. like i said, all my rigs right now are set by the pool to mine at worker diff of 248. x6 rig has plenty of power to consistently submit shares, and its hashrate at the pool is consistent. it does fluctuate a bit here and there, but it's close to what it's supposed to be. my x2gpu rig has a harder time keeping up with this diff and is wild. my x1's are just all over the place, sometimes disappearing from pool for long stretches (didn't submit any shares) and then reappearing at 3 to 4x their hashrate. this isn't a new thing, and has been brought in this thread - so the devs are aware that this is happening. not sure if there is a fix coming, or they plan to leave it this way, but since i started mining here this has been my one and only problem with this miner/pool combo - i am literally happy with everything, except this hmm... i dont quite get it. so basically is it 'just the outer cover' and i am still earning the same in the end? should i re-add --lodiff into my config? fyi i removed --lodiff because, from what i understood, if i only mine from low diff blocks and the pool got a lot of hi diff blocks then my miner work less, causing me to earn less. i'm pretty sure that unless you run something that is resembling a farm you're supposed to be on the lodiff port. the op of this thread says CWI-Pool Signatum Mining Stratum is split into two ports. The first is the Low Difficulty Port for those miners that have small to medium sized hashrates (estimated up to approximately 25 x 1080ti cards), and the second being the High Difficulty Port for those miners that have medium to high hashrates (estimated at approximately 25 x 1080ti cards to GPU Farms).i am kind of sort of sure that it doesn't matter if you mine on hidiff or lodiff when it comes to block rewards. same pool, the rewards get split based on the amount of shares you submit, not on the which port you mine. i am completely unsure of whether you earn less or more when the worker hash the pool is seeing/reporting is wild. i'm guessing that sometimes it will be more and sometimes less, and sometimes it will even out. i don't know. i checked against my own setup just now using whattomine's calculator. whattomine says that under ideal conditions, with 100% luck, i should've mined just over 45 sigt per 1070gpu (running at 29.5mh) during the course of the last 24 hours. i have 10 of these pointed at the pool, 6 in one rig, and the other 4 spread among smaller rigs that seem to be choking on high worker diff. pool reports that i earned just over 428 sigt, or 42.8 sigt per gpu for the same time frame. pool also reports luck of 109%. so, i'm at 42.8 sigt with pool being at 9% less then perfect luck vs 45 sigt under ideal conditions. seems ok, and seems like the wild hashrate is not affecting what i should be earning in the pool. |
|
|
|
Correct me if I'm wrong, but orphans still give 1250 coins per block. So I don't see the big deal.
the way i understood orphans is that the pool forfeits the earnings for that block. orphans are blocks that the pool solves, submits to the network, the network initially appears to accept them but then for some reason on another it decides to reject them - usually because some other pool solved the same block a millisecond faster, but the blockchain didn't catch up and register it in time etc. so, not supposed to get paid for them. ddos cause them sometimes, or it's possible that a huge pool is ravaging a small network by overwhelming it etc, etc... so, orphans happen, especially in a smaller pool. but when there's barely any for weeks and then you see a lot of them on the same day, usually something is misfiring somewhere between the network and the pool. |
|
|
|
|
on a completely unrelated topic from my post above.....
something is up with orphans.
4 in the last 24 hours seems high when the total for the last week is 7, and "lifetime" (yes i know the pool is young) is 10.
that means that 40 percent of orphans came in the last 24 hours, which seems abnormal.
edit:
just checked suprnova, and they're showing 1 orphan in the last 24 hours and 6 in the last week. they also found a tenfold or so more blocks in that period, so they technically should have many more orphans, not less.
so yeah, something is up with the orphans.
|
|
|
|
my miner seems to be working fine but on my dashboard, the worker is not active. therefore my hashrate is 0 but i still getting my coins. is it a bug? yep cant access dashboard, but am still receiving shares this is a dumb question but yor are cheking your coin dashboard? because there is a loot of coins on the pool, make sure you are on the rigth coin it happensd to me xD nope, pretty sure im in the right pool. sometimes the worker is there, sometimes its not whenever i check. and the hashrate is not same with what my miner says. im using gtx 1070 for denarius mining and my miner always show around 53mh hashrate, the dashboard randomly range from 27 to 130, or 0 when the worker went inactive. lol I thought u're talking about sigt pool im mining sigt too. same things are occurring. well for me is the same, the hasrate is not stable your hashrate in the miner and the pool will always vary a bit, that's not abnormal. it's much more pronounced with this miner/pool combo, though. the pool tends to jack up worker diff way too high, and this makes smaller rigs choke up. for example, as i'm typing this, all of my rigs are shown to be set at 248 diff by the pool. my x6gpu rig has zero issues handling it, and is humming right along. however, my x2 and x1 rigs are struggling to submit work consistently. and that's what you're seeing at the pool - inconsistency. smaller rigs just don't get the time they need to submit shares at this high difficulty. you can easily see that when you look at the miner window for smaller rigs - if you see a lot of "mean netdiff" and not a lot of "share", then your card is choking and is not submitting shares consistently. this is why you're seeing wild fluctuations in hashrate with smaller rigs at the pool. they are working at a very high worker diff, so when blocks are fast they simply do not have the time they need to finish their calculations and submit a share before a block is found. this is why you will occasionally see them appear to drop off from the pool. they didn't really drop off, they just didn't submit any shares in the x amount of time the pool uses to calculate your hashrate. so let's say it takes 60 seconds for the pool to update your worker hashrate, and in that minute your rig didn't submit any shares - it will appear to drop off from the pool. reverse that for when the blocks are slow - smaller rigs get enough time to breathe and start submitting shares. because of the high worker diff, they are submitting large shares. when that happens you will see your hashrate go up wildly. for example, it's not unusual for me to see one of my x1 1070 rigs appear to drop off the pool, and then reappear with the hashrate of 90-120mh (3x4 it's normal sigt speed) a minute later. like i said, all my rigs right now are set by the pool to mine at worker diff of 248. x6 rig has plenty of power to consistently submit shares, and its hashrate at the pool is consistent. it does fluctuate a bit here and there, but it's close to what it's supposed to be. my x2gpu rig has a harder time keeping up with this diff and is wild. my x1's are just all over the place, sometimes disappearing from pool for long stretches (didn't submit any shares) and then reappearing at 3 to 4x their hashrate. this isn't a new thing, and has been brought in this thread - so the devs are aware that this is happening. not sure if there is a fix coming, or they plan to leave it this way, but since i started mining here this has been my one and only problem with this miner/pool combo - i am literally happy with everything, except this |
|
|
|
yo mama.... there, i "contributed" to the "discussion: |
|
|
|
Is there any new version aside 0.98?
Should have been released yesterday but still wasn't. All are waiting. SP has just released spmod7 - a little bit faster than previous on 1060/1070 - so its time for CWI to beat it, as far as they claimed having better miner for internal use. no ... you are talking about CWIgm-0.9.9 ... and no - we are NOT in competition with a greedy man like rune ... we are not in competition with ANYONE ... we ARE on the path to making a better miner than our previous one on the two initial goals we set from the beginning ... stability and ease of use ... we ARE succeeding in that - and have no intention to align ourselves with a decidedly greed riddled charlatan ( http://www.dictionary.com/browse/charlatan ) like rune ( sp ) ... we focus on what have in our sights - and goals ONLY - and to make sure that all fixes and growth will come in good time ... in saying that tho - there are a number of advancements in the next test version - and we are squashing some bugs that seem to be difficult to hold down at the moment ... we are also preparing for the testing of the redevlopment of our coins also ... new algo should be ready very soon ... #crysx i'm with you... take your time, do it right. just keep in mind that sigt will be halving again in a couple of weeks or so, and be mined out completely in less then 2 months. so you know - hurry up |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
