Wow, this is actually a good, useful, well thought out survey! Quite a rarity.
The "credible" news stories part is a bit confusing though. What exactly is meant by "credible"? The reporting itself? Or the actions being reported on?
Thanks for that. I must admit (despite a few naysayers but you expect that) an enormous amount of effort has gone into crafting a bunch of stuff into this survey along with a fair amount of coding to get Qualtrics to do.. tricks.
I can't disclose the underlying thinking until the survey closes (that would be silly given what the survey is trying to ascertain) but wrt the credibility of stories part... simply credibility is up to you. Technically credibility is a facet of trust but in practise it means different things to different people BUT seems to end up in the same place. Meaning the more credible (for whatever reason) you deem something to be the more likely you are to trust it.
I'm really hoping to get over 100 full study participants by the end of the month as that will enable some (ironically) credibility with the results in the fields of psychology and sociology as well as my core discipline - cyber-security. Hopefully this study will provide one of the first formal looks into usage along with how and why news might be a price determinant of Bitcoin. Normally this determinant status is merely asserted by statistical correlation between a news story being published and a price movement, here I hope to be able to explain why people respond to those news stories.
Please please do encourage others especially from the Bitcoin community who have remained somewhat bashful in helping out.
Again thanks