Aside from the current state of the market, you have to look at the project, read the whitepaper, check the MVP, induce yourself into the ideology behind the project to recognize the real value of the project and its potential.

The project is already ahead of the roadmap, testnet is up. Even before the ICO, a team has been working around the clock on the prototype of the DigiSafeGuard in secrecy.

The launch timing might not be great looking at the sudden unexpected shift, but again if you look at the project and its potential, you will realize if you get on the boat early, you will not only support a solid project but you will reap the benefits when the market recovers.

There are thousands of ICO's pulling goodhearted investors with a half-baked 1 page PDf with no solid team, no actual use for their tokens and some of them even are on reputable exchanges which makes you scratch your head... 

Securypto project has a solid concept, backed with a actual working tangible prototype and  a dedicated team. The whole concept is in line with the whole reason behind the blockchain revolution, taking control of your finances, taking control of your privacy, taking control of your content, taking control of your life.

so....

The next person who comes to me with some random ICO "proposol" that they want to "blockchain the refrigerator" and "revolutionize" the cooling system of the world will get smacked by a giant cucumber pulled from the same "blockchained" refrigerator 

This project serves a purpose, it serves the freedom lovers, the privacy geeks and thin foiled hat people(myself included) and anyone basically who thinks how they live their is non of anyone else darn business. (I'm looking at you uncle sam  )

To stay on topic as a general rule with regards to any form of information or skepticism.... "fact" is something an majority have agreed upon and hence from that day they call it an fact.... we call the grass green because we reached an consensus on the usage and interpretation of both the words "grass" and the word "green". Coming back to your question of  "why"... it's simple.... It's harder to defend than to attack facts in general and especially on global warming where the data is interpretable in many ways to the highest bidder for a mouthpiece P.H.D. degree for both organisations/goverments/companies etc at both sides whether it's a bio-hippy or the oil-junky. Long story short....It's a fight between who is better in convincing and the "facts" are secondary as long the objective is reached...which is convince you of the existence or myth of global warming.

You did not just put your own message from another thread as a reliable source did you?....I think you just tried to do that.....It's like asking why is this pen blue, and you give me a piece of paper written on it "This pen is blue because I said so". Your source of information and the building argument for it is flawed on so many levels that I am not even sure where to start... you are way into deep to be pulled out .....I wish you well 

Dear lord never thought my first message here would be about this , so basically humanity is created/designed in the image of the creator but ignore the motion of how the creator came to be in the first place and it's existence is accepted by you as a starting point.