|
382
|
Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
|
on: December 19, 2013, 11:15:49 PM
|
|
Dick swinging contest aside, nobody in here knows anything about what is actually happening at ACTM/VMC, so yammering on and on ad nauseum is pointless.
Given my observations of a lot of players in the bitcoin sphere, a deep and warm "concern for the community" is hardly a priority…
If you're on here posting negative, you're intentions are dubious.
|
|
|
|
|
383
|
Economy / Speculation / Re: I AM HODLING
|
on: December 19, 2013, 02:00:52 PM
|
Tee hee this thread. I'm proud to be part of a community like this <3
Dude you ruled it! thanks for spawning this, I'm glad you didn't hodl your tongue when writing it. Couldn't think of a better way to end 2013 bitcoin mayhem. |
|
|
|
|
384
|
Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
|
on: December 19, 2013, 04:45:45 AM
|
Weekly Update 12/18/13
Crypto-Trade:
I have all of the legal issues worked out, and I am programming them into the verification site.
VMC:
We are working with eASIC and our engineers to get our chip and boards in full production.
We have stock piled all the hardware to build the miners and we are per-assembling the miners.
Ken, you are soooo good lookin… thx for the update. |
|
|
|
|
389
|
Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
|
on: December 12, 2013, 06:34:20 PM
|
so weird I was just getting ready to post a speculation about that very address… are you implying that this address is connected to ACTM or eASIC in anyway? I'm very curious as to what others think as I really have no idea. I guess I am implying that I hope it is connected. what's interesting is that BTC8,000 at around September 9 would equal to just about $1million… things that make you go hmmmm. |
|
|
|
|
392
|
Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
|
on: December 09, 2013, 04:31:31 AM
|
Entropy, you have been away for a long time and now you are back.
It's obvious the reason for that is you want back in. So don't be a twat about it and just buy your shares for the best price you can. There's no need for these shenanigans as you are so transparent about your intent.
Most probably entropy's order on CT: Price/AMC Amount AMC Total BTC 0.0000001 10000000 BTC1 |
|
|
|
|
394
|
Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
|
on: December 09, 2013, 04:09:34 AM
|
2. The pirateat40 path: The SEC prosecutes Ken for securities fraud and siezes all assets. I see Ken has already acknowledged that the SEC is investigating him, so it might not be long before this one comes into play.
Woh woh woh, where does one reach this conclusion? 1. Ken was issuing illegal securites via BTCT and Bitfunder. 2. BTCT and Bitfunder shut down due to their potential legal liabilities 3. Ken acknowledges that Ukyo informed him that the SEC had specifically inquired regarding AMC 4. Bitfunder's assets are suddenly unavailable 4 a) the only explanation that doesn't involve a ripoff is that those assets have been seized by a legal authority It's hardly a wild leap to conclude that there is a significant chance that the SEC investigation into Ken will lead to charges and asset seizure. Who the fuck are you? We need new troll FUD? Go away. Who the hell are you? I'm hardly new. I've been warning people not to lose money on this mess from the original IPO. You should have listened. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=245713.0;allNo no really, just go ahead and fuck right back off into the hole you climbed out of you unscrupulous manipulative little worm. |
|
|
|
|
396
|
Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
|
on: December 09, 2013, 03:51:43 AM
|
2. The pirateat40 path: The SEC prosecutes Ken for securities fraud and siezes all assets. I see Ken has already acknowledged that the SEC is investigating him, so it might not be long before this one comes into play.
Woh woh woh, where does one reach this conclusion? 1. Ken was issuing illegal securites via BTCT and Bitfunder. 2. BTCT and Bitfunder shut down due to their potential legal liabilities 3. Ken acknowledges that Ukyo informed him that the SEC had specifically inquired regarding AMC 4. Bitfunder's assets are suddenly unavailable 4 a) the only explanation that doesn't involve a ripoff is that those assets have been seized by a legal authority It's hardly a wild leap to conclude that there is a significant chance that the SEC investigation into Ken will lead to charges and asset seizure. Who the fuck are you? We need new troll FUD? Go away. |
|
|
|
|
398
|
Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
|
on: December 07, 2013, 02:39:43 PM
|
Oops I guess I didn't get the memo from the lemming commitee.
Thanks, you're so helpful. Whilst we are working to help our futures you sit back and call names. No name calling here, unless your consider a small woodland creature a bad word... But seriously, Ken doesn't seem to want to or have the power to divulge any of this information that we've all been asking for umpteen times ad infinitum. |
|
|
|
|
400
|
Economy / Securities / Re: [BitFunder] Moving Forward/Resolution Process
|
on: December 07, 2013, 02:05:32 PM
|
Yeah for you, and a small number of tech heads who get how to secure their coins, it's all good. Admittedly, securely storing coins is not trivial for non-nerds today, but thats being worked on. Check out trezor and similar hardware wallets. There are quite good reasons why bitcoin hasnt taken over the world yet, the ecosystem just isnt ready for it yet. If you arent able to handle its rough edges (or price volatility), you should just wait. Not everyone can be an early adopter. Bitcoin may not be broken per se... What is broken is human integrity. And if this tiny community can't prove to the rest of the world what a great thing bitcoin can potentially be without robbing each other blind at evey opportunity, then what's the point? You mean like gold and cash are broken or pointless because you cant rely on them not being stolen if you dont secure them ? Its not like paypal and credit cards are fraud free either. anyway /OT Trust me dude, I've been in this awhile so I've heard and argued for everything that your saying over and over since '11. Since then it's been one heist after another. You can defend it all you want but all I'm saying is when it comes down to it, human greed fucks up the money everytime. And if it's in this format, already hard for the layman to "get it," and all they see is this kinda bs happening within the "ecosystem," then why would they want to trust the bitcoin or it's network at all. Just stay with the old system. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
