The people who designed Bitcoin obviously knew that all those who are against central banking would create a ponzi speculation bubble and ignore the facts that the masses don't share their enthusiasm for killing fiat, central banking, theft protection, consumer protections, etc..
So you are talking about a ponzi scheme conspiracy to attack people that "are against central banking"? Like, "make all these "anti-central-banking-bastards" poor by letting them invest into a ponzi and then let the bubble pop"?
Who are these "pro-central-banking-conspirators?
What was the reason for them to start fighting against the "anti-central-banking-anarchos"? Were they aware of an underground community that was about to fight against central banking, so they must react to kind of a revolution?
When they created Bitcoin, they didnt think about, that the early miners and adaptors could most likely be the same people that they are fighting against?
Or is the plan even more advanced: "Let these anti-central banking-idiots first get rich with Bitcoin and THEN we destroy all the other people (late adaptors) that only were into "anti-central-banking" because we gave them the initial idea with our invention (Bitcoin Interception).
Does this really make any sense to you?
What do you think will happen on the very day of its release, when a central bank creates its own open source bitcoin copy (SHA256)? I give you some keywords to inspire: DDOS, PREMINING, INSTAMINING
After release, people will cry about not getting connected to the network, not finding blocks, homepage of the "centralcoin" not working anymore, Bitcointalkforum not working due to infinite refreshing, and after a few hours people will point their ASICS to their favorite BTC Pool writing "I gave up to mine this centralized scam coin". People will see that a few people minted alot of coins and they will turn their back on that coin which will result in a very low market price.