 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
My account was hacked, and someone posting anything, then my old account was banned. They banned my account for political reason - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=552469Just to inform everyone that I am not new here in bitcointalk.org and why this fucking reporter -1 trust to my account. You report without googling it. You idiot. It's nice to hear from the project representative such polite words addressed to the community. Have you really come to the forum to build a good reputation for the project? Bravo! First, in order. Nobody denigrates your project. And if, as you say, you are a longtime forum member, you would have to remember that copy-paste is not going to be a good sign to create your white paper. Moreover, you should know that to prevent any misunderstandings, you just need to add links to sources. And the second thing. If your account was previously banned, then you are also prohibited from appearing here on the forum from your other accounts. Don't be surprised, but the rules are also part of the forum. FYI: I am part of the team, I can do what I want to do by posting the project. |
|
|
|
Can the ARNO team answer about this plagiarism issue? This project is highly technical and needs real expertise in nanotechnology. Why did you resort to copying your content to different resources? How do we know that the team members that you published are really part of this project? Artem, Head of the Project, haven't mentioned ARNO as part of his project in his linkedin account. If he is really part of this, can you ask to add this ARNO project in his portfolio? Also, please add linkedin acct of the DPL of the Engineering project, Serguei V.Shuskov. Thanks for your comment and your questions. We will try to give you a comprehensive answer. Can the ARNO team answer about this plagiarism issue? - answer: In the Russian language there is such a catch phrase - "I did something nasty - this is joy in my heart." We have always strived and will continue to strive to understand other people, even if they set their goal in life simply to denigrate everything and everything for any reason available to them. We are always open to constructive dialogue and are ready to provide our partners and, in general, all interested parties with reliable information about the project, even if it carries a negative connotation. This project is highly technical and needs real expertise in nanotechnology. - answer: This statement is absolutely true. The competence of our team in this area can be confirmed, for example, by numerous publications and obtained patents (our team publishes at least 12 printed works per year and receives 4-5 patents). This information is open and is not hidden from anyone. Why did you resort to copying your content to different resources? - answer: The question is not very clear. When placed on trackers, the information is always validated by the channel without fail. And it is rated. And to provide different channels with different information is not entirely correct, as it seems to us. Or did you mean something else? How do we know that the team members that you published are really part of this project? - answer: Why do many of us believe in the existence of God, for example? Or that the Earth is square (as an option - flat)? Convincing a person of something is not a big deal. But, in our case, the presence of just announced people in our team is quite, again, validated on trackers and is a prerequisite for placement and listing. Artem, Head of the Project, haven't mentioned ARNO as part of his project in his linkedin account. - answer: This statement is absolutely not true. If you suddenly decide to look at Artem's personal pages, you will immediately and completely make sure that belonging to the project with an indication of the space occupied in it is there explicitly. If he is really part of this, can you ask to add this ARNO project in his portfolio? - answer: Again, the essence of the question is not very clear. Nobody requested such a portfolio and it was not provided to anyone as unnecessary. If it is about personal information on LinkedIn, then filling it out is everyone's personal business. And this is more a matter of being overloaded with work and family. Also, please add linkedin acct of the DPL of the Engineering project, Serguei V.Shuskov. - answer: It is a little unclear why you needed such a formality, but every member of the team has Facebook and Linkedin pages. And they are provided at the request of exactly the team member to whom they belong. Initially, all contacts were posted under the personas, but the amount of spam and obscene offers that immediately began to arrive on publicly published pages was so great that now this information is no longer available. |
|
|
|
Again, high technology and cryptocurrency.Why can't you find investors in the real sector for your idea? Why do you need these tokens?This would have worked in 2017,when projects raised funds for any idea.
Good day. Thanks for your comment and your questions. We will try to give you a comprehensive answer. Despite the fact that the introduction of various types of carbon materials in the production of lead-acid batteries has been carried out since the mid-50s of the last century, real opportunities have emerged only in the last quarter of a century - in connection with the emergence of sanely expensive methods of producing carbon nanomaterials themselves. Attempts have been made to introduce it into real production, but they have caused and are still causing more problems for manufacturers than they bring benefit (a small article about some of the problems is posted on our Media channels, in LinkedIn and on Facebook). We began to solve all the current problems of the manufacturers directly in a complex, having carried out preliminary research before this and received very impressive (as predicted before us in numerous publications) results that were appreciated by the manufacturers - we succeeded in cooperation with the companies MONBAT and Elhim-Iskra to produce test batches of batteries (500 pieces each) made according to our technology and assemble the very final product that we are talking about in our project. We created very successful energy storage devices based on secondary power sources at the beginning of last year, after which they underwent comprehensive checks and tests (and tests of only one new battery model in the current reality can last from 6 months to a year, certification - from a year to one and a half). Based on the results of field tests, the project of our team was singled out in a separate direction. Of course, investors from China and India immediately showed interest in the project. Our reluctance to work in this regard with China and India (as well as Pakistan and Poland) is entirely due to the conditions put forward to us - the creation of only one turnkey production in these countries (then we will copy it ourselves), which is not profitable for us as a team. Negotiations with the largest US corporation Johnson & Johnson (in Europe it is a Varta trademark) have reached a logical deadlock due to the unstable political and trade situation. Investors from the countries of the Persian Gulf, on the eve of a new great Arab war, also peri-oriented towards the United States and prefer not to introduce something new, but to spend money on preparing for the massacre. We are in no way opponents of either Saudi Arabia, Israel, the United States or Europe, as well as China and India, but we believe that the technology we have developed (actually tested and demonstrated in action only last summer) should not be copied , therefore, it was decided to create the entire production and implementation chain ourselves (especially since, according to the roadmap of our project, everything is going according to plan), receiving funding through the release of tokens for the full implementation of the entire project. |
|
|
|
Good day. We thank you for your comment and for the tremendous work of identifying alleged plagiarism in our white paper, which was done so diligently. It is a pity that all your efforts are directed solely and exclusively at denigrating both the idea itself and the project as a whole. I must point out to you that the solution of the problem, which has already been solved for our project, is being dealt with not only by us, and not by us the first. For example, here is just a list of the main research points with dates (for the last quarter of a century). - Nakamura, Shiomi et al. at 1996-97 years have found that introduction of increased amounts of carbon black to the negative paste retards substantially the sulfation of the negative plates on HRPSoC cycling and the number of completed micro-cycles increases to about 5000. - Hollenkamp et al. at 2000-01 have established, within a project of the Advanced LeadAcid Battery Consortium (ALABC) program, that addition of graphite or carbon black to the negative paste improves notably its conductivity and lowers the charge voltage of the cells. - Newnham et al. at 2002 have found that the specific surface area of NAM is an important parameter as it sustains the potential of the negative plates below the hydrogen evolution potential. However, not all carbon forms that increase the specific surface of NAM contribute to improvement of battery cycle life on HRPSoC operation. - Lam et al. at 2002 have pointed out that certain carbon forms (depending on the initial product from which they have been produced) may contain impurities which would lower the over-potential of hydrogen evolution and eventually reduce the efficiency of charge. - Calabek et al. at 2006 have proved that the presence of carbon in NAM reduces its pore radii and thus impedes the continuous growth of PbSO4 crystals, sustaining formation of small crystallites of high solubility and hence efficient charge process. - Moseley at 2006 assumes that carbon acts as an electro-osmotic pump that facilitates acid diffusion in the inner NAM volume at high rate of charge and discharge. - Lam et al. at 2006-07 have created an ultra-battery with a conventional PbO2 positive plate and a negative plate comprising two parts: half of it is a carbon electrode and the other half is a regular negative plate (with sponge lead active material). In the ultrabattery design, carbon is in electrical, but not in physical contact with the negative active material. It has been speculated that only those mechanisms of carbon action which could still operate when the carbon is isolated from the lead active mass can be considered as candidates for providing the major benefit to charge efficiency and impeding negative plate sulfation. - Pavlov et al. at 2010-12 established that carbon additives reduce the mean pore radius of NAM, carbon particles adsorb onto the lead surface, mostly to the edges and apexes of the lead crystals, and at higher carbon concentrations, onto the crystal surface as well. Some of the carbon types have a stable and low-ohmic contact with the lead surface. These carbon additives will guarantee good electrochemical behavior of the (Pb + C) electrode. - Pavlov et al. at 2013-15 identify of the mechanism (s) by which certain forms of carbon, when included in the negative active material of a valve-regulated lead – acid battery exposed to high-rate partial-state-of charge operation, are able to resist sulfation. As you can see, at different times a lot of efforts have been made to positively address the issue of the applicability of carbon nanomaterials in the production of lead-acid batteries. Moreover, I will tell you - some of the technologies have even been introduced. True, since no one except our team was able to solve in a complex the problem of producing the materials themselves, transporting them and introducing them into existing production chains, the introduction of such technologies did not give any special marketing advantages. The technologies that we use are also developed by us, and they are displayed in the relevant articles (which you did not get to) and already received patents for production technologies (which you also did not get to, which is rather strange, there are links in the white paper). I understand that your task is precisely and directly denigrating our efforts, but we are not going to interfere with you even in this regard - a reasonable investor will always prefer to see everything with his own eyes and touch with his own hands (and we are ready to provide such an opportunity to anyone who wishes) or, at least, watch the video cut on our YouTube channel from our production, its quality, etc. |
|
|
|
I read on the site, "Real business and has existed for several years" It makes me curious, where can I see your achievements so far? I tried looking for the news on https://twitter.com/ArnoToken, but couldn't find anything. In fact, the Twitter account is only a few months old, it was created last December. I also saw an airdrop at 25 december 2020, but the current token holder is still 1. Good day. Thanks for your message and questions. Indeed, the project under consideration in the form of preliminary developments, laboratory research and independent examinations with subsequent patenting of the results has existed for the fourth year. Prior to entering PreICO, it was carried out within the framework of joint work of the Advanced Research and Technology Holding, KACST (King AbdulAziz City for Science and Technology, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia) and the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (Institute of Electrochemistry, Bulgaria). At the moment, since last summer, the project has been separated from the general theme into a separate direction. A real working prototype of 5 kW, already extensively tested and put into continuous operation, you can see either at the test site in Sun Valley, KACST (Kingdom of Saudi Arabia), where it works as a secondary source in the electrical grid, powered by solar panels, or in our laboratory (Minsk, Belarus). As for the individual elements, that is, the actual lead-acid batteries, manufactured according to our new technology, they were manufactured by the Elhim-Iskra enterprise (Bulgaria) and you can both see and touch them in the same place as indicated above. So are the official reports. If you still look at the roadmap of the project, you will surely see that it started last summer. Some delay in appearing on various social networks was due to the need for comprehensive testing of the project page, personal account of partners and payment systems, as well as the initial posting of information about the project on trackers. The airdrop program is also published on the site and we have not yet received complaints that it does not work - charges are made every Wednesday (which, by the way, was reported on Twitter). About Airdrop, the fact that now the token is only in one hands, as etherscan correctly suggested to you, you might notice that so far we have only pre-sales and tokens are credited in personal accounts after registration. They will be transferred to wallets without fail simultaneously with listing on the stock exchange (or stock exchanges, we are currently negotiating with several). As far as I know, this is absolutely normal practice. |
|
|
|
Can the ARNO team answer about this plagiarism issue? This project is highly technical and needs real expertise in nanotechnology. Why did you resort to copying your content to different resources? How do we know that the team members that you published are really part of this project? Artem, Head of the Project, haven't mentioned ARNO as part of his project in his linkedin account. If he is really part of this, can you ask to add this ARNO project in his portfolio? Also, please add linkedin acct of the DPL of the Engineering project, Serguei V.Shuskov. Noted Sir, I will connect with them. |
|
|
|
ARNO Token A Real Nano Technology Project!
ABOUT PROJECTCreation of production of secondary energy sources for industrial and home use based on lead-acid
battery cells using carbon nano materials.The technologies for producing carbon nanomaterials, in particular carbon nanotubes, intercalated graphite and graphene structures, developed and implemented for industrial use by our team over the past few years, allow us to produce additives of various types for various fields of application.
This allows our team of scientists, engineers and technologists to use our proprietary additives to store energy, improve efficiency, increase the capacity and life of our batteries, and more.
Manufacturers of electronic products, hybrid vehicles and power systems are also benefiting from our technical practice, which allows them to create more flexible and high-performance offerings for their end users. For the battery and energy market, carbon nanotubes, intercalated graphite and graphene's serve: - Conductive components of battery electrodes;
- Rheology modifiers for pastes and slurries used in preparation of battery electrodes;
- Structural and porosity modifiers for battery electrodes;
- Capacitors for charge storage.
LIQUIDITY OF PROJECTAny capital investment into cryptocurrency entails the financial risks.
We have no way to guarantee the continuous increase of token, but we will make every effort to make it fluid
at the maximum rate.- Once ARNO token is added to the exchanges, the project team will put up a certain quantity of tokens for auction,
and when the tokens are bought by the participants, the team will stop the cryptocurrency input on the present platform for a year.
The auction is held by the traders not bearing a relation to the developers. - The project token is the main settlement tool of the economic part of the project. The entire economic system of the
project involves the active use of the ARNO token. We will not use even the most popular cryptocurrencies such as BTC or ETH.
Only ARNO will be used inside our project and everything connected with it. - It is also a very important role in the fact that the project is physical and it is already working. The direction is new and in demand.
New energy efficient systems are our future.
ARNO Token Full Description:Details:Pre-sales: Oct 06, 2020 - Mar 31, 2021 Public sales: Dec 01, 2021 - Apr 02, 2022 Token supply: 50,000,000 ARNO Total tokens for sale: 4,000,000 ARNO Soft cap: 60,000 USD Hard cap: 7,760,000 USD Token Info:Ticker: ARNO Type: Utility-token Token standard: ERC20 Token price in USD: 1 ARNO = 2 USD Accepted currencies: ETH, BTC, LTC, USDT, XMR, DOGE, BCH, Dash Smart Contract Address: https://etherscan.io/token/0x7Aa885b81cd8bdE980dF6ECaD860336068459895Bonus program:When buying 30 and 299 coins + 10% bonus When buying 300 and 1499 coins + 15% bonus When buying 1500 and more coins + 20% bonus Legal:Blockchain Platform: Ethereum Country limitations: No Registration country: Belarus Office address: Minsk, Tolbuchina str., 2A BONUSESARNO Token - CryptoCurrency ICO/STO/IEO For more information, please find important links below.Official Website | Whitepaper | Private Policy | Disclaimer | Bounty Program
|
|
|
|
Have known V SYSTEMS for long, and the previous name is VEE.
Just in case anyone is cheated, I am going to tell you it is like a scam.
They cheated quite a lot during fund raising, and by this, they raised $160 million.
1. They said they worked for it over 2 years, and in fact they didn't have any code at all!
When they were raising fund during Feb 2018, they said they had worked on it for over 2 years.
In fact, their first code was forked from waves on March 2018.
2. They just played a little code the time they claimed to be listed.
When they raise fund during Feb 2018, they said they would list coin be listed late Apr 2018.
In fact, they just tried waves code a little, and even unfamiliar with it at the time.
They started to submit some useful code after late July 2018.
3. Leasing can't be used at all for now, cause they have no smart contract at all now.
4. Their supernodes were not elected, but selected! Even much more centralised then EOS.
5. They made investors feel like it's hype and should invest ASAP during Feb 2018. And in fact they were still raising money late Sep 2018.
6. They privately promised they will buyback if the exchange price is lower than private price, in fact they failed to do that.
Their scam was revealed little by little when they failed to show code, to be listed, some investors asked to refund, they asked investors to calm down and promised to buyback at private sale price if the price drops lower than private price. In fact they are now hiding and escaping it.
The private price was 1000 Satoshi, around 0.09USD, and
the price is about 800 Satoshi, around 0.028USD now.
6. They are so much familiar to tell lies to cheat your money, KEEP AWAY FROM it.
They earned $160M USD, now they used to get listed on exchange and pay developer, coders and everything. It is expensive to get listed on exchange you know. But I don't know. I invested 10,000 VSYS. |
|
|
|
|
What is the maximum supply? I saw at
Coingecko circulating 1,791,684,434 / 999,999,999,999,999?
coinmarketcap 1,791,932,242 VSYS Total Supply 3,696,790,706 VSYS
Which is correct here?
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
FriendsterIO is different from Friendster the old one and not connected with it, but this social media make you happy, give tip for your posts, give reward to your post and comment and everything, combined twitter & fb platform.
|
|
|
|
|
I like this social media, well done team, all staff supportive. Wish you luck guys.
Best Regards
Okane Satoshi
|
|
|
|
|
Good ALGO, I can run my CPU to mine this Veco Coin. Thank you team.
|
|
|
|
|
What is Bitcoin X?
Bitcoin X is an asset running on Stellar platform that aims to accomplish the Satoshi's vision under a scalable way on the 10th anniversary of Bitcoin itself.
Why choose Stellar over Ethereum?
There are also numerous issues regarding scalability on Ethereum's blockchain. We choose Stellar because its growing acceptance around the crypto community in the development of smart contracts SSC. We also want to bring to the community of eBTC and the one who believe Satoshi's peer-to-peer cash system a true scalable payment method but with transparency and real development behind.
Great concept.
|
|
|
|
|
Market Cap
$6,489,664 USD
1,620 BTC
57,367 ETH
Volume (24h)
$95,467 USD
23.82 BTC
843.89 ETH
Circulating Supply
32,318,000,613 HUM
Total Supply
125,000,000,000 HUM
The unsold token must be burn.
|
|
|
|
What is the really point of your project? too much supply.  |
|
|
|
So how does it works? How to ship my items using BITNAUTIC?  |
|
|
|
|
STELLAR:
Summary
Stellar(XLM) is an open-source, distributed, blockchain-based payment platform. The native currency of Stellar are Lumens (XLM) which facilitates multi-currency and asset transactions on the network. Stellar is built on a system of decentralised servers that updates the Stellar ledger every 2 to 5 seconds. The consensus mechanism of the Stellar network differs from Bitcoin, instead of Proof-of-Work it utilises a Federated Byzantine Agreement (FBA) algorithm which enables faster confirmation times because the protocol does not require the entire miner network to approve each transaction.
|
|
|
|
|
