 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
Hi everybody. I found AGORA on a website that publishes ratings from popular experts: https://topexperts.io/ico/agoraThere is a common 5.09/10 score from 9 experts |
|
|
|
Hi everybody. I found RChain on a website that publishes ratings from popular experts: https://topexperts.io/ico/rchainThere is a common 6.24/10 score from 12 experts |
|
|
|
Hi everybody. I am a programmer with great experience and since 2017 I have been learning the blockchain. I am interested in investing in ICO projects, but I don't have an economic background to assess the potential of the project. I can study the code on github, but this is clearly not enough for successful investments. What to do in this situation, maybe pass some courses of traders?
Not all projects possessing a working product have a fair value. For example, I know several projects that are constantly developing, updating github, but they have no marketing at all, no one knows about their product and therefore it has fallen greatly from the ICO price. In any project, apart from the product, you also need marketing and a strong community of supporters! There must be hyip and interest of so many people to the project. Thanks, you are right. The problem is that I don't understand anything in economic, marketing and so on If you can really appreciate a good code, then it is easier to look for reports on this project. Professional analysts make reports from an economic point of view. There are websites, spreadsheets, youtube bloggers, analyst aggregators, listings of ico-projects. If you look at aggregator sites, such as http://topexperts.io you can compare the scores of one project from different analysts. So you can conclude - if the project's scores are low everywhere, and on one website are high - most likely they are paid for. And vice versa. |
|
|
|
On the ICO websites we can see ratings from various trackers, all with high scores. I checked on the sites, the score is really that. But can it be trusted?
Well, icobench and icoholder seem to be normally rate. But who knows, maybe scam ICOs can buy a good rating there. It's unrealistic to buy ratings on all listings, there are more than 100 of them. And popular projects are analyzed by almost all top experts. It is enough to see one negative report to understand everything. And where to get such a list of experts? You can use the sites where project scores are collected from all experts. At cryptodiffer, for example, about 20 experts are immediately visible. There is also http://topexperts.io there are more of them, and the functionality there is better. |
|
|
|
How do you differ scam projects? Recently, for every second project, someone writes a "scam". At the same time, a bunch of popular projects like Savedroid collect millions and disappear.
There are a lot of criteria by which you can check scam projects. These are economic factors, the team, code, and more. If you are new to this, you can hardly figure it out right away. You can choose the project, analyze it, and then compare with reports of famous experts. |
|
|
|
I chose several promising ICOs on NEO. I read various reports, but they contradict each other. What experts do you trust?
Usually I trust only analysts who write or shoot video on their own, e. g. Oh Hey Matty or Ian Balina. I watched them. But they do a review of a small number of projects, apparently taking the most popular ones. They don’t have most of my chosen projects. As an option, you can read the theme of the project here on bitcointalk. There are also enough paid reviews and fake accounts here. If it's hard to you to figure out, then you can use aggregators, where you can find scores for all analysts. E. g. http://topexperts.io |
|
|
|
Guys, I chose several promising ICOs. I read various reports, but they contradict each other. What experts do you trust?
Usually I trust only analysts who write or shoot video on their own, e. g. Oh Hey Matty or Ian Balina. I watched them. But they do a review of a small number of projects, apparently taking the most popular ones. They don’t have most of my chosen projects. As an option you can read the theme of the project here on bitcointalk. There are also enough paid reviews and fake accounts here. If it's hard to you to figure out, then you can use aggregators, where you can find scores for all analysts. E. g. http://topexperts.io |
|
|
|
|
I chose several promising ICOs. I read various reports, but they contradict each other. What experts do you trust?
|
|
|
|
Guys, how do you differ scam projects?
There are a lot of criteria by which you can check scam projects. These are the team, hardcap, code, and more. If you are new to this, you can hardly figure it out right away. You can choose the project, analyze it, and then compare with reports of famous experts. There are no guarantees that the report was not made for money. So you should look at reports from different experts and compare their opinions and yours. You can have a table where you will virtually “invest” in projects and then watch roi. In the future, with success, you can start a real investment. Every normal expert usually has a spreadsheet, where they indicate their investments and final achievements on a separate tab. So you can determine whether to trust a particular analyst. You can also see the statistics of project scores for all top experts. For example, it's quite conveniently on http://topexperts.io. If the individual estimates fall out - it's a reason to think. |
|
|
|
Well, icobench and icoholder seem to be normally rate. But who knows, maybe scam ICOs can buy a good rating there. Of course, ratings are sold, and on that they earn It's unrealistic to buy ratings on all listings, there are more than 100 of them. And popular projects are analyzed by almost all top experts. It is enough to see one negative report to understand everything. And where to get such a list of experts? Alternatively, you can use the sites where project scores are collected from all experts. At cryptodiffer, for example, about 20 experts are immediately visible. There is also http://topexperts.io, there are more of them, and the functionality there is better. |
|
|
|
Guys, how do you differ scam projects?
There are a lot of criteria by which you can check scam projects. These are the team, hardcap, code, and more. If you are new to this, you can hardly figure it out right away. You can choose the project, analyze it, and then compare with reports of famous experts. |
|
|
|
Hi guys! How do you differ scam projects? Recently, for every second project, someone writes a "scam". At the same time, a bunch of popular projects like Savedroid collect millions and disappear.
You can make a checklist for yourself and check the project on it. E. g.; Team (their linkedin, facebook profiles) Economic model Hardcap Website Github code MVP and so on Or just check experts' reviews Unfortunately, I don't have enough knowledge to evaluate all of this. What experts can you recommend? There are no guarantees that the reports were not made for money, so you should look at reports from different experts and compare their opinions and yours. You can have a table where you will virtually “invest” in projects and then watch roi. In the future with success you can start a real investment. Every normal expert usually has a spreadsheet, where they indicate their investments and final achievements on a separate tab. So you can determine whether to trust a particular analyst. |
|
|
|
Well, icobench and icoholder seem to be normally rate. But who knows, maybe scam ICOs can buy a good rating there. Of course, ratings are sold, and on that they earn It's unrealistic to buy ratings on all listings, there are more than 100 of them. And popular projects are analyzed by almost all top experts. It is enough to see one negative report to understand everything. |
|
|
|
|
