Where is the guys who want to buy more at lower price? Is it ok for you to buy, 1000sat now!  |
|
|
|
|
Where can we ask a refund?
|
|
|
|
|
Open source is huge thing, but I think Qora need to do more things to attract attentions and collect community again.
|
|
|
|
|
So, there is no wallet at all? Dose the dev know how long a few hours means?
Beside, I request to verify the testnet as you said through mail, no reply until now.
Sell your stakes now, no illusions, please.
|
|
|
|
|
I think it's time to show some of your work to investors, isn't it?
|
|
|
|
|
How can the direct investors get refunds?
|
|
|
|
It will arrive. I do not want a fiasco like https://poloniex.com/correspondence.pdfwith any exchange. Since this is a wallet that contains many different types of tokens. I prefer to test, test and test. Like I said, we will have a concrete and final date tomorrow for a wallet, or I could release the testnet... Do you want a release of the testnet version? Regards, ASIC-8Tile ok，always postpone,never arrive.
guys,we will surely see this ugly wallet,but the next year.
can you release the test wallet to some specific community members, to prove that the wallet is truly coming. |
|
|
|
|
Do u have any plan to issue some more sianotes at a reasonable price?
|
|
|
|
|
In final testing, and will be released soon. I know it will be this way, good luck!
|
|
|
|
Hello everyone, we did not expect such a negative response to an incentive that we thought would spark more interest. We can adjust the changes if the community feels strong about it.
There was not much participation after the level dropped below 5000. We wanted to offer an incentive for some people that may have been sitting on the fence. We can cancel the bonus if the existing community that have been with us feels strongly about this.
I could hardly believe that your team can make a huge thing. Because you are changing the rules all the time, unilaterally, not just once or twice. In my opinion, you can just announce this project failed, and refund all the money to us investors. To be frank, we thought that we were giving existing participants and people sitting on a fence a nice last minute gesture to get more coins at a higher bonus level before the first coin sale ended. The amount of btc raised is well below our stated goal. The remaining shortfall will have been sold to "private" investors to make up the difference. This was stated in the beginning of the announcement. We thought this was something the community would like.  Please just ignore me, maybe you are right. I just don't like people changing terms frequently, especially for serous things. Wish you guys succeed. |
|
|
|
So it turns out to be a scam, we got it. If someone still want to believe this project, just let them being fool. Wait a moment, maybe they just want to cheat more people fall for it, in that way, they earn money. |
|
|
|
Hi ownerbest, I am not trying to ignore anyone's questions. I am swamped with PM's, website development, hardware development, and people telling me BitPay is a scam stuff. If you look at an example such as Counterparty, they have taken their time to develop a nice platform (not perfect). It does take more time when involving third-party review for Security/Code. Our intentions for future releases will take into consideration time delays related to third-parties. No one can control this. How many other crypto-tokens have had actual code reviews from Bitcoin Core developers and/or CISSP white hats? Very few on my list. We are in the process of creating a "Standard" with partnerships. I will NOT jeopardize the security and possible loss of crypto-tokens because of pressure from community members. Since this is new code, we have to expect some delays for the better of the community. This is not a fork of another coin. It is an improvement of existing technology. If you want to help develop the DApp, by all means contact me via a PM. Regards, ASIC-8Tile https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=761852.msg9515776#msg9515776Two questions:
1. How about the source check? Any update?
2. Will the wallet be released according to plan?
Anyone can do me a favor, answer the two questions? So the dev just came and past, ignored this? Thanks for your explicit answer, first, I want to clarify that I'm not FUD, and I appreciate your great work! But, combined with the market reaction of these days (Drop down to IPO price), I think the investors need to know more details, that's all. |
|
|
|
Two questions:
1. How about the source check? Any update?
2. Will the wallet be released according to plan?
Anyone can do me a favor, answer the two questions? So the dev just came and past, ignored this? |
|
|
|
Two questions:
1. How about the source check? Any update?
2. Will the wallet be released according to plan?
Anyone can do me a favor, answer the two questions? |
|
|
|
|
Two questions:
1. How about the source check? Any update?
2. Will the wallet be released according to plan?
|
|
|
|
|
David is in the team, but this does not mean your team is clean.
Can u tell the guy who claimed he is in alibaba and has plenty of resource in China?
I may know him, or, u don't dare!
|
|
|
|
So, if someone has evidences that your team come from China, why u deny it?
What matter if they where from China 1/7th the people on the planet are from there? Regardless of where them this team has come out with a pretty cool looking coin concept and will put it into action real soon. It does not matter. So, I ask why they denied. Or, it does matter, I come from China, I know those guys are just good at pumping and dumping games. For coding or developing? LOL, come on. |
|
|
|
|
So, if someone has evidences that your team come from China, why u deny it?
|
|
|
|
|
Where is the download link of 0.7 Ver? And is there enough connections?
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like the wallet is working fine?
So, when will launch?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
