Show Posts
Hi,
Why being (so) negative ?
What would be my goal if i was planning to never come back.
Budget is to be discussed, we've identified a partner who can produce the hardware/software - cost/financial needs (even if it's not the only one) is to be discussed.
Around 150 BTC, as start. As explained, i'm more interested in the 'who' than in the 'how much', as funding can be executed in many ways.
For people who are curious about who i am, my background/track-record, i would be pleased to answer.
Thanks for the compliments regarding the design
The idea behind the BUNKER is distruptive (in terms of security & confidentialy) and different than the solutions offered by the market.
The existing cold-wallets are suffering from vulnerabilities (usages, or technical) and had been compromised for some reasons.
Cloud-wallets are not offering an optimum security level.
We're solving this.
It's because we've seen a lot of newbie account popping around claiming they have a good project in hand, very enthusiastic at the very beginning, begging for investors to pour money on their project and then suddenly they disappear and never come back. So we always questions anyone's intention here so don't take personality but consider it as ways to help you next to the next level in this community.
I guess this is the definiton of most of crypto-projects, there's a world between an idea and its execution and this is what i like.
I'm not enthousiastic, i'm more realistic.
The entire cryptocurrency market faces a severe flaw as a new asset class - insecurity of its infrastructure.
In 2017 alone, $530 million worth of NEM was stolen at the cryptocurrency exchange Coincheck and the global events and news continuously remind us the vulnerability and insecurity of safeguarding cryptocurrency.
To improve the security of cryptocurrency infrastructure, it is important that we have a decentralized system for the effective storage of user private keys.
It is simply not secure enough to rely on humans when it comes to information security, as there could always be a possibility of hacking or being stolen when private keys are under direct possession of humans. There is a possibility of storing the private keys on computers either in plain text or in encrypted form but it is still not a safe means as hacking methods have improved with advanced malwares that are capable of stealing the private keys of users.
Hardware wallets have emerged to help cryptocurrency owners to better protect their assets. Each of the available solution in the market have their unique strength and shortcomings. As at now there are solutions such as Trezor, Ledger and Digital BitBox. It has been discovered that each of these solutions have an inherent security flaw arising from the design and implementation of the software and hardware system. Security issues can arise from issues such as implementation of the user interface, hardware implementation, software implementation etc. in an attempt to protect the user, some implementations have the potential of locking out the user due to lack of backup and recovery features. There is need for a solution that solves all the problems associated with the devices that are currently in the market but with more superior capabilities.
