81
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Safety revision after the Hacks going around these days
|
on: March 05, 2014, 01:19:54 AM
|
If you have a lot of funds, just buy a laptop for trading only. Put a ton of security software, enable or possible security features on everything and you're good to go.
Or buy a laptop exclusively for cold storage only. This except with a tablet/net book that could be kept in a bank vault or home safe.
|
|
|
88
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: [PROPOSAL] - lock the apparent Mt. Gox coins for now
|
on: March 05, 2014, 12:35:25 AM
|
QFT You do understand you will never convince miners to erase 3,000 blocks of the blockchain however if you did, then Bitcoin is done. Remember over those 3,000 blocks, newly mined coins have been involved in transactions and this action would double spend all of those. The coins originally minted would never exist and thus the coins spent wouldn't. Merchants, other users, exchanges would all see the downstream transactions (which have 6 ro 3,000+ confirmations) suddenly go unconfirmed and invalid.
While this in theory could be done at any time it is generally accepted to be impossible. If miners by decree can double spend transaction not 1 or 2 confirmations into the blockchain but 3,000 blocks deep then no receiver can ever be sure that the transaction is irreversible. There is a certain level of faith in all currencies that create the perception of value, and Bitcoin is no exception. Among those faiths, Bitcoin users believe that while it is possible in theory to 51% the network and undo transactions thousands of blocks deep, that it would have such an economic cost that it infeasible. All users accept this faith or they wouldn't be using bitcoin (or would require 10,000+ confirmations before concluding the transaction). Your proposed action (although I think it has no chance) if successful would break that faith. Without faith in the irreversibility of transactions, there is no value or utility to Bitcoin. Bitcoin would be dead. I am not talking the exchange rate goes down a bit and recovers, I mean completely abandoned as a worthless experiment and development moves on to future systems which don't have the vulnerability (likely some floating checkpoint system which acts as a check to the proof of work).
How do you use a currency that at any time could simply be "undone" and erased from your wallet by the actions of a third party? Would you use that currency? I know I wouldn't. I genuinely feel sorry for those who lost significant amounts of money by misplacing their trust in MtGox but this is a situation where the cure is worse than the disease.
This
|
|
|
90
|
Economy / Gambling / Re: BTC multi level earning system
|
on: March 05, 2014, 12:24:55 AM
|
If it really worked you wouldn't be here trying to scam people for .01 BTC. Quit trying to scam for a few bucks so you can go lose it all yourself like you obviously already did.
/end thread
|
|
|
93
|
Economy / Goods / Re: [For Sale]BAWLS Energy Drinks
|
on: March 03, 2014, 02:46:53 AM
|
I haven't had one of these for years!! The original are soooooo damn good! Only energy drink that actually tastes good. I might have to get some!
|
|
|
|