 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 »
|
Why did I ask?
Everywhere it says that BTC addresses begin with 1 and / or 3, but this address is of a completely different structure: it starts with a small letter and if you write this address in the search bar on the "blockchain explorer" site, then there will be no information.
This is Bech32 address format. It's using for native SegWit transactions since 2018. Blockchain.com don't support it. Use other explorers. https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/address/bc1q4unyqwgxhvmxynfj404q903zrfwywygc9rmm8sYes, I especially do not need it! I just accidentally saw this address and wondered - what kind of "beast" is this ?! Thanks for the information. |
|
|
|
|
Why did I ask?
Everywhere it says that BTC addresses begin with 1 and / or 3, but this address is of a completely different structure: it starts with a small letter and if you write this address in the search bar on the "blockchain explorer" site, then there will be no information.
|
|
|
|
Even in the very first place, it's unlikely for China to adopt bitcoin. Rather they're creating their own cryptocurrency. China always want to control over their people. And as far as I know they wanted to lead in the cryptocurrency market which is somehow indirect saying they might compete with bitcoin in the future if they finally released their own digital currency. However, I don't know if they can really compete with bitcoin, although China is a big country. But obviously, they don't want bitcoin
Name at least one country in the world that does not want to have complete control over its people. |
|
|
|
|
And if we assume that everything is much simpler?
If someone (or several people) found a way to open old addresses and now "pours" from old addresses to new ones.
In order not to cause panic and suspicion, it simply “pours” these funds to their new addresses without cashing out?
And when the "right" time comes, then will cash out OR will cash out gradually.
|
|
|
|
these titles were in the wrong range and moved to a safe place 2**169 > 2**170 Bit are all within this range 0x2000000000000000000000000000000000000000000:0x3ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff Transactions from each address were made at different times, for several days but for a small period of time. Therefore, we can assume that these addresses may have one owner or the owners of these addresses communicate with each other and do this together. The reason (as one option) may be the desire to “update the repository” for the next few years. |
|
|
|
Don't use WarpWallet, the manual key management is a nightmare, and it uses uncompressed addresses. Just memorize a random 12 word seed phrase.
Hi ryanc ! Can you send me PM ? |
|
|
|
China owns +95% of all crypto's on earth, so they don't care which one wins, they own them all, this is called a fully covered bet, they cannot lose.
bitcoin will fall below ripple in cap in 2019, the writing is on the wall, just like lotus-123, being first doesn't make you a winner forever, just once at the beginning
Hello btc-room101 ! I would like to speak privately with you. Is it possible? If "YES" - send me PM pls. Are you that serious dude?you really need to bump this thread just to ask that Private conversation when you can just simply send Him Pm?i don’t know if this is funny or irritating lol 😂
Anyway to OP’s thread ,I wanna ask also. How did you know about that 95% of bitcoin ownership of China ?just now that I saw something interesting because while they are banning bitcoin and yet they’re holding this huge amount !? He is denied access to receive PM. I can’t send him anything |
|
|
|
China owns +95% of all crypto's on earth, so they don't care which one wins, they own them all, this is called a fully covered bet, they cannot lose.
bitcoin will fall below ripple in cap in 2019, the writing is on the wall, just like lotus-123, being first doesn't make you a winner forever, just once at the beginning
Hello btc-room101 ! I would like to speak privately with you. Is it possible? If "YES" - send me PM pls. |
|
|
|
I have been trying to solve the puzzle but every time I tried I got an headache. I dont know where to start and I keep on researching until I end up with nothing. I even ask some of my friends who are good with this things but I cannot understand fully their explanation. I guess I will stop doing the challenge and will focus on the signature campaign. Well good luck to you guys in solving the puzzle its hopeless for me.
Just a every day. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=im2VlRprLVcIt is not clear what you are doing there and what result you get? Write me in PM. |
|
|
|
|
netlakes - I made a php script to generate these results
What to do with your script?
What good is it?
How can he help us to find new keys?
|
|
|
|
I apologize for the late response. Here is the result from that script
$bitcoin$96$3ce2900d6c2df58a1cfa9ea1755a1599e0b60001fcd29d730c298de7538e3a0709e4fdb738d8ac61b5b03c582d724214$16$d07e66c2606ae4fc$80062$96$0d19a16dcbaa53570214fbeea16c65721f5dc28513053de870c7f8437222e3620be2ee0c92b4e3fdd1ef61ef7f20ae96$130$04fec0d307bdda75bc9cd4861a519d92814ef934cae6bddfac84ccf79356d93bc6399d1ca0e6f25dd6b3bb6b5db7d2d505e985e99c6cec46c8604ec203ce7f487e
let me know if you need anything else. like i said earlier, i doubt that any of the passwords i put on the first page are related to this wallet password, and i cant remember any more, so i can't really help you anymore on that front. Best bet is to just bruteforce it.
I will split half of the entire wallet balance (~3.11 BTC amongst two addresses--1.5 BTC/$6300 reward!!!) to whoever solves it. I think that $6k is a big enough bounty for people to throw real power at it. If you manage to find the password, I'm happy to use a middleman to mediate the transfer. At this point any bitcoin is better than none. Good luck all, i can't think of anything else that could be helpful
Good day. I've sent you a personal message but it didn't go through cause Newbie is not allowed to send you a message. if you can kindly contact me at Telegram I'd like to talk to you regarding this offer. Best Regards, Morarity Hello Morarity ! You can request me at PM ? |
|
|
|
Hey guys, newbie here glad I found this thread. I'm not a programmer or know how to brute force these bitcoin wallets. Iv'e been working on a new way to store your private keys privately and securely out in the open. Essentially if somebody can have access to your private key, They will be unable to unlock the wallet. In this image I put a private key that is missing 13 characters. If you can guess the password, you can have access to decrypting the characters needed to unlock the private key. If anyone can crack this private key, they can have access to some Bitcoin I sent to it. Good luck guys. Freddy.  You want, that for 0.00136069 BTC (it is less than $ 12 on a today's rate) someone seriously has engaged in your riddle? |
|
|
|
I have a GPU brainflayer, 1 billion hashes /sec on 8 x RX570
You can send me PM if interested
bartekjagoda How to send you PM if you have "closed"? I have opened my box for newbies I usually get 160-220Mkeys per second depending on the size of addresses to check. Has been doing 100lists [/quote] I send PM to you |
|
|
|
Probably at I have very weak laptop there is no large difference on speed from change of parameters - t - p (in clBitCrack.exe)
The quantity Generating starting points depends on parameters - t - p
Than meanings of parameters - t - p by that more will be more generated Generating starting points
I think, probably, than will be more generated Generating starting points - the better?
Who knows precisely - explain.
Hi, read the link https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5166284.msg52255756#msg52255756I so have understood, that cuBitCrack and CUDA for processors Intel witch a video cards NVIDA Mine laptop - AMD A6-3420M APU with AMD Radeon HD 6520G Therefore I use OpenCL and clBitCrack Unless cuBitCrack and CUDA will work with such configuration? |
|
|
|
|
Probably at I have very weak laptop there is no large difference on speed from change of parameters - t - p (in clBitCrack.exe)
The quantity Generating starting points depends on parameters - t - p
Than meanings of parameters - t - p by that more will be more generated Generating starting points
I think, probably, than will be more generated Generating starting points - the better?
Who knows precisely - explain.
|
|
|
|
Hi!! Is it easier to break an address with the public key? could you explain to me which method? I need public key for non find number .. 64, 66 etc  nobody help my? Of course, it's easier. You know the points x and y. You need to find the multiplier (the desired private key) from the generator point, that is, from key 1. Is there any software for this? Yes it is a Pollard Kangaroo Python script. Does it work only under INTEL i5-2540 and higher? Will it not work under AMD? Perhaps there is a compiled software in exe option - Such as clBitCrack.exe ? |
|
|
|
Hi!! Is it easier to break an address with the public key? could you explain to me which method? I need public key for non find number .. 64, 66 etc nobody help my? Of course, it's easier. You know the points x and y. You need to find the multiplier (the desired private key) from the generator point, that is, from key 1. Is there any software for this? |
|
|
|
I need public key for non find number .. 64, 66 etc nobody help my? And if for some other address? |
|
|
|
|
